Do Interstate Visits Matter? Political-Geographic Analysis of Slovak Economic Diplomacy

Literature Cited

• Bayne, N., and S. Woolcock. 2018. The new economic diplomacy: Decision-making and negotiation in international economic relations. London and New York: Routledge Revivals.
   Google Scholar
• Beneš, V. 2012. Mají středoevropské státy společné geopolitické priority? Srovnání zahraničních cest prezidentů v letech 2004 až 2010 [Do Central European countries have common geopolitical priorities? Comparison of foreign trips of presidents from 2004 to 2010]. Politologický časopis: Czech Journal of Political Science 19:3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeijk, P. A. G. 2009. Economic diplomacy and the geography of international trade. Edward Elgar. doi: 10.4337/9781781007778.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeijk, P. A. G., and S. J. V. Moons, eds. 2018. Research handbook on economic diplomacy. Edward Elgar. doi: 10.4337/9781784710842.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeijk, P. A. G., M. Yakop, and L. F. Groot. 2011. The economic effectiveness of diplomatic representation: An economic analysis of its contribution to bilateral trade. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 6 (1–2):101–20. doi: 10.1163/187119111X566751.
   Google Scholar
• Boháč, R. 2017. Návrhy na zlepšenie fungovania slovenskej ekonomickej diplomacie [Proposals for improving the functioning of Slovak economic diplomacy]. University of Economics in Bratislava, Faculty of International Relations, Bratislava, Slovakia.
   Google Scholar
• Bojang, A. S. 2018. The study of foreign policy in international relations. Journal of Political Sciences & Public 6 (4):1–9. doi: 10.4172/2332-0761.1000337.
   Google Scholar
• Brocková, I. 2019. Modern economic diplomacy of small states. Politické Vedy 22 (2):12–25. doi: 10.24040/politickevedy.2019.22.2.12-25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassey, A. J. 2016. The destinations of state trade missions. CESifo Economic Studies 62 (3):547–71. doi: 10.1093/cesifo/ifv026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavari, A., and M. Ables. 2019. Going global: Assessing presidential foreign travel. Congress & the Presidency 46 (2):306–29. doi: 10.1080/07343469.2018.1536173.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. 2013. Geography and international relations theorizing: Their implications for China. Eurasian Geography and Economics 54 (4):363–85. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2013.861749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compernolle, P., and M. Vancauteren. 2018. Embassies matter for trade, but diplomats matter most: Evaluation of Dutch economic diplomacy in Latin America. In Research handbook on economic diplomacy, ed. P. A. G. van Bergeijk and S. J. V. Moons, 144–64. Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781784710842.
   Google Scholar
• Creusen, H., and A. Lejour. 2013. Market entry and economic diplomacy. Applied Economics Letters 20 (5):504–07. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2012.714066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disdier, A., and K. Head. 2008. The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade. Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (1):37–48. doi: 10.1162/rest.90.1.37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. 2017. Diplomatic material: Affect, assemblage, and foreign policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
   Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. 2019. Foreign policy sans MFA. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (1–2):155–64. doi: 10.1163/1871191X-15101087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekmekci, F., and A. Yildirim. 2013. The political economy of Turkey’s Eastern turn: An empirical analysis of Erdogan’s state visits (2003–2010). Romanian Journal of Political Science 3 (1):52–75.
   Google Scholar
• Essex, J., L. Stokes, and I. Yusibov. 2019. Geographies of diplomatic labor: Institutional culture, state work, and Canada’s foreign services. Political Geography 72:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fard, R. 2021. Towards a new concept of constructivist geopolitics: Bridging classical and critical geopolitics. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies 15 (1):26–57. doi: 10.51870/CEJISS.A150102.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S., and R. Forslid. 2019. Sizing up the impact of embassies on exports. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 121 (1):278–97. doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flissak, K., and T. Drakokhrust. 2021. Modern paradigm of national interests promoting in foreign economic activity of Slovakia. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 7 (2):224–32. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-2-224-232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgia. 2021. Ekonomická informácia o teritóriu [Economic information about the territory]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic. Accessed July 5, 2023. https://www.mzv.sk/documents/10182/11440220/Gruz%C3%ADnsko%20-%20ekonomick%C3%A1%20inform%C3%A1cia%20o%20terit%C3%B3riu%202022.pdf/193f6b6a-0d46-adfb-e229-c85c6f2a277b.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, E. 2008. The politics of the state visit. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 3 (2):153–78. doi: 10.1163/187119108X323646.
   Google Scholar
• Grác, R., and V. Slavík. 2010. Priestorové aspekty formovania siete zastupiteľských úradov v kontexte zahraničnej politiky Slovenskej republiky [Spatial aspects of forming a network of embassies in the context of the foreign policy of the Slovak Republic]. Geografický Časopis 62:237–58. https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/03101343Grac,%20Slavik.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, C. 2011. State visits as a tool of economic diplomacy: Bandwagon or business sense? African Perspectives, Global Insights. Occasional Paper No. 87, South African Institute of International Affairs. Accessed April 20, 2023. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/146008/saia_sop_87_grant_20110728.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., and J. Clark. 2015. Mundane diplomacies for the practice of European geopolitics. Geoforum 62:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, H., and J. Ries. 2010. Do trade missions increase trade? Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'économique 43 (3):754–75. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40800715. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01593.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koliev, F., and M. Lundgren. 2021. Visiting the hegemon: Explaining diplomatic visits to the United States. Research & Politics 8 (4):205316802110667. doi: 10.1177/20531680211066767journals.sagepub.com/home/rap.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolosov, V., and R. Turovskij. 2000. Геополитическое положение России на пороге XXI века: реалии и перспективы [The geopolitical position of Russia on the threshold of the 21st century: Realities and prospects]. Polis, Political Research 3:40–50. https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/359617220.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2016a. Political economies of transnational fields: Harmonization and differentiation. European Diplomacy, Territory, Politics, Governance 6 (2):222–39. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2016.1266960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2016b. “To understand the place”: geographical knowledge and diplomatic practice. The Professional Geographer 68 (4):546–53. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2015.1099450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2017. Critical geopolitics. International Studies. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.137.
   Google Scholar
• Kužmová, L. 2012. Inštitucionálne modely hospodárskej diplomacie—príklad Nemecka, Rakúska, Švajčiarska a Slovenska [Institutional models of economic diplomacy—The example of Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Slovakia]. Medzinárodné Vzťahy 10 (4):153–69.
   Google Scholar
• Lebovic, H. J., N. Elizabeth, and N. E. Saunders. 2016. The diplomatic core: The determinants of high-level US diplomatic visits 1946–2010. International Studies Quarterly 60 (1):107–23. doi: 10.1093/isq/sqv008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, F., W. Yan, and X. Wang. 2017. The impact of Africa-China’s diplomatic visits on bilateral trade. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 64 (3):310–26. doi: 10.1111/sjpe.12128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. 2019. Rethinking the geographies of diplomacy. Diplomatica 1 (1):46–55. doi: 10.1163/25891774-00101008.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs (MFEA SR). 2012. Tlačový brífing Roberta Fica a Miroslava Lajčáka po porade vedúcich zastupiteľských úradov [Press briefing of Robert Fico and Miroslav Lajčák after the meeting of the heads of representative offices]. Accessed March 5, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emMSPXTJT7I.
   Google Scholar
• Moons, S. J. V., and P. A. G. Bergeijk. 2017. Does economic diplomacy work? A meta-analysis of its impact on trade and investment. The World Economy 40 (2):336–68. doi: 10.1111/twec.12392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. 2005. To be a diplomat. International Studies Perspectives 6 (1):72–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00194.x.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. 2012. At home with the diplomats: Ethnography of a European foreign ministry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. 2008. Distance, power and ideology: Diplomatic representation in a world of nation-states. Area 40 (2):228–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00804.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E., and L. Spess. 2005. Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries? World Development 33 (10):1567–85. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsch, V. 2005. State visits and international trade. Cesifo Working Paper No. 1582. Accessed January 17, 2022. https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp1582.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsch, V. 2007. State visits and international trade. The World Economy 30 (12):1797–1816. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01062.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsch, V. 2018. Trips and trade. Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics, 230, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Department of Law and Economics, Darmstadt, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Government of the Slovak Republic. 2020. Resolutions of the Government of the Slovak Republic. Accessed December 9, 2020. https://rokovania.gov.sk/RVL/Resolution.
   Google Scholar
• Pajtinka, E. 2007. Hospodárska diplomacia: Hľadanie efektívneho modelu riadenia, alebo boj o obchodných atašé? [Economic diplomacy: Searching for an effective management model, or a fight for business attachés?] International Politics 10:17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pajtinka, E. 2013. Ekonomická diplomacia Slovenskej republiky: Orgány, inštitúcie a modely riadenia [Economic diplomacy of the Slovak Republic: Bodies, institutions and management models]. Economic Diplomacy—Role, Importance, Problems and Their Solutions, College of International and Public Relations. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263660421_Ekonomicka_diplomacia_Slovenskej_republiky_Organy_institucie_a_modely_riadenia/citations.
   Google Scholar
• Peternel, I., and M. Grešš. 2021. Economic diplomacy: Concept for economic prosperity in Croatia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 34 (1):109–21. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1774788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybyla, V. 2019. Vpliv vybraných demografických charakteristik na volební chování na Slovensku v medziválečném období [The influence of selected demographic characteristics on electoral behaviour in Slovakia in the interwar period]. Geografický Časopis 71:181–99. https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/06271018Przybyla.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, A. 2005. The foreign service and foreign trade: Embassies as export promotion. Berkeley: Haas School of Business, University of California. http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/arose/revbureauc.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ružeková, V., S. Zábojník, J. Hrinko, L. Parízek, and J. Hrabina. 2020. Krehká realita slovenského export: Analýza vývoja slovenského exportu s dôrazom na výsledky zahraničného obchodu SR v rokoch 2019 a 2020 [The fragile reality of Slovak exports: Analysis of the development of Slovak exports with an emphasis on the results of Slovakia's foreign trade in 2019 and 2020]. Council of Slovak Exporters, University of Economics in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic. https://www.exporteri.sk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/RSE_Krehk%C3%A1%20realita%20slovensk%C3%A9ho%20exportu.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Šandor, F., and D. Gurňák. 2020. Two decades of diplomatic representation of the Slovak Republic in the world—Political-geographic perspective. Geographia Cassoviensis 14 (2):212–27. doi: 10.33542/GC2020-2-06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šandor, F., R. Najdený, and D. Gurňák. 2020. Aplikácia GIS v kontexte priestorovej analýzy zahraničnej politiky SR [Application of GIS in the context of spatial analysis of the Slovak foreign policy]. Geografické Informácie 24 (1):22–32. https://www.kggrr.fpvai.ukf.sk/en/images/Geographical%20Information_1_2020.pdf. doi: 10.17846/GI.2020.24.1.22-32.
   Google Scholar
• Šimalčík, M. 2019. Slovak relations with East Asia: A lost decade? In Yearbook of Slovakia’s foreign policy 2019, ed. P. Brezáni, 109–24. Bratislava, Slovak Republic: Research Centre of the Slovak Foreign Policy Association. https://www.sfpa.sk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Rocenka_2019_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Šumberová, M. 2010. Diplomatická reprezentace jako indikátor Geopolitických preference [Diplomatic representation as an indicator of geopolitical preferences]. In Geography for Life in the 21st Century: Proceedings of the XXII Congress of the Czech Geographical Society, ed. M. Šumberová, 872–75. Ostrava, Czech Republic: University of Ostrava. https://konference.osu.cz/cgsostrava2010/dok/Sbornik_CGS/Politicka_a_kuturni_geografie/Sumberova_Diplomaticka_reprezentace.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, B. 2000. The role of small states in the European Union. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46 (1):234–40. doi: 10.2307/143141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ukraine. 2020. Ekonomická informácia o teritóriu [Economic information about the territory]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic. Accessed December 11, 2020. https://www.mzv.sk/documents/10182/620840/Ukrajina+-+ekonomick%C3%A9+inform%C3%A1cie+o+terit%C3%B3riu + 2020.
   Google Scholar
• United Arab Emirates (UAE). 2020. Ekonomická informácia o teritóriu [Economic information about the territory]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic. Accessed December 11, 2020. https://www.mzv.sk/documents/10182/620840/Spojen%C3%A9+arabsk%C3%A9+emir%C3%A1ty+-+ekonomick%C3%A9+inform%C3%A1cie+o+terit%C3%B3riu + 2020.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2020. Slovak Republic trade (% of GDP). Accessed November 5, 2021. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS?end=2020&locations=SK&start=1990&view=chart.
   Google Scholar
• Yasar, M., D. Lisner, and M. R. Rejesus. 2012. Bilateral trade impacts of temporary foreign visitor policy. Review of World Economics 148 (3):501–21. doi: 10.1080/10168737.2013.825305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar