From Professional Geography to Public Geography, from Representational Certainty to Not Knowing the Answer

Literature Cited

• Agnew, J. 2006. Open to surprise? Progress in Human Geography 30 (1):1–4. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph587xx.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., and C. McFarlane. 2011. Assemblage and geography. Area 43 (2):124–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01004.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J. 2020. Flat ontology and geography. Dialogues in Human Geography 10 (3):345–61. doi: 10.1177/2043820620940052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. 1996. Logics of dislocation: Models, metaphors, and meanings of economic space. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T., and E. Sheppard. 2010. “Nothing includes everything”: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 34 (2):193–214. doi: 10.1177/0309132509343728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. 2021. The entanglements of uncertainty. Journal of Planning Education and Research 41 (2):217–25. doi: 10.1177/0739456X18783038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, M., and R. Geoghegan. 2010. The art of proof: Basic training for deeper mathematics. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. 1971. Praxis and action. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. 1992. The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. 2010. The pragmatic turn. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. 2021. Foreword. In Pragmatism as anti-authoritarianism, ed. R. Rorty, ii–xxvi. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. 2022. Pragmatism and idealism: Rorty and Hegel on reason and representation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, C. 2007. Well positioned? Locating participation in theory and practice. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39 (12):2861–65. doi: 10.1068/a39348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dijn, H. 2015. Professors or professionals? Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 7 (2):40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1920] 2008. Reconstruction in philosophy. In John Dewey, the middle works, 1899–1924, vol. 12, ed. J. Boydston, 77–201. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1925] 1988. Experience and nature. In John Dewey, the later works, 1925–1953, vol. 1, ed. J. Boydston, 3–326. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1927] 2008. The public and its problems. In John Dewey, the later works, 1925–1953, vol. 2, ed. J. Boydston, 235–372. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1929] 1988. The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. In John Dewey, the later works, 1925–1953, vol. 4, ed. J. Boydston, 1–150. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1938] 2008a. The determination of ultimate values or aims through antecedent or a priori speculation or through pragmatic or empirical inquiry. In John Dewey, the later works, 1925–1953, vol. 13, ed. J. Boydston, 255–70. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1938] 2008b. Logic: The theory of inquiry. In John Dewey, the later works, 1925–1953, vol. 12, ed. J. Boydston, 1–527. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, G. 2019. The crisis of expertise. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farias, I. 2011. The politics of urban assemblages. City 15 (3–4):365–74. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2011.595110.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, S. 2019. Wayward lives, beautiful experiments: Intimate stories of riotous black girls, troublesome women, and queer radicals. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Immerwahr, D. 2015. Thinking small: The United States and the lure of community development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. P., K. Woodward, and S. Marston. 2007. Situating flatness. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (2):264–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00254.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. 2013. How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, R. W. 1993. Challenge assumptions! Urban Geography 14 (3):221–23. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.14.3.221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, R. W. 2014. Methods and moral inquiry. Urban Geography 35 (5):657–68. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2014.920220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, R. W. 2016. Justice as subject and object of planning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (6):1205–20. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, R. W. 2017. On poetry, pragmatism, and the urban possibility of creative democracy. Urban Geography 38 (4):479–94. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1272195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, R. W. 2020. The quest for uncertainty: Pragmatism between rationalism and sentimentality. In The power of pragmatism: Knowledge production and social inquiry, ed. J. Wills and R. W. Lake, 267–74. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, R. W. 2021. Conversational gambits: Talking points to a better future. Urban Geography 42 (10):1415–17. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2021.1940714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, R. W. 2023a. On seagulls, hedgehogs, and foxes: Representation, reconstruction, and the challenge of getting from here to there. Dialogues in Urban Research 1 (1):42–46. doi: 10.1177/27541258231156431.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, R. W. 2023b. Value magic. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space2023:0308518X2311542. doi: 10.1177/0308518X231154254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, R. W., and A. Zitcer. 2012. Who says? Authority, voice, and authorship in narratives of planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 32 (4):389–99. doi: 10.1177/0739456X12455666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2007. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, G. 1993. Realism and representation: Essays on the problem of realism in relation to science, literature, and culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. [1927] 1993. The phantom public. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2005. Issues spark a public into being: A key but forgotten point of the Lippmann-Dewey debate. In Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy, ed. B. Latour and P. Weibel, 208–17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2020. As ANT is getting undone, can pragmatism help us re-do it? In Routledge companion to actor-network theory, ed. A. Blok, I. Farias, and C. Roberts, 112–20. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2015. Politics of affect. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, C. 2011. Learning the city: Knowledge and translocal assemblage. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 2002. Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, P., and E. Rosenman. 2022. From crisis to the everyday: Shouldn’t we all be writing economies? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 54 (2):392–404. doi: 10.1177/0308518X211068048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. 2017. Tough enough: Arbus, Arendt, Didion, McCarthy, Sontag, Weil. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, K., and J. DeFilippis. 2021. A radical belief in all of us: An invitation to collective moral inquiry as democratic conversation. Urban Geography 42 (10):1389–93. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2021.1940713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pain, R., and S. Kindon. 2007. Participatory geographies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39 (12):2807–12. doi: 10.1068/a39347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 1998. Pragmatism and realism. In The revival of pragmatism: New essays on social thought, law, and culture, ed. M. Dickstein, 37–53. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1982. Consequences of pragmatism (Essays, 1972–80). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1999. Philosophy and social hope. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2021. Pragmatism as anti-authoritarianism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2022. What can we hope for? Essays on politics, ed. W. Malecki and C. Voparil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenman, E., J. Loomis, and K. Kay. 2020. Diversity, representation, and the limits of engaged pluralism in (economic) geography. Progress in Human Geography 44 (3):510–33. doi: 10.1177/0309132519833453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savransky, M. 2021. Around the day in eighty worlds: Politics of the pluriverse. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 1992. Method in social science: A realist approach, 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stillwell, J. 2004. Mathematics and its history. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2008. Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2015. The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vattimo, G. 2014. A farewell to truth. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, J., and R. W. Lake, eds. 2020. The power of pragmatism: Knowledge production and social inquiry. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zitcer, A., and R. W. Lake. 2012. Love as a planning method. Planning Theory and Practice 13 (4):606–609.
   Google Scholar