98
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Focus

Social Enterprises in Postcolonial Economies: Articulating Neoliberalism in Practice for a Public Economic Geography

Received 16 Mar 2023, Accepted 23 Feb 2024, Published online: 08 Apr 2024

Literature Cited

  • Alexander, N. 2010. South Africa: An unfinished revolution? The 4th Strini Moodley annual lecture, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 13 May 2010. Accessed December 21, 2023. https://marxists.architexturez.net/archive/alexander/2010-unfinished-revolution.pdf
  • Alexander, N. 2013. Thoughts on the new South Africa. Auckland Park, South Africa: Jacana Media.
  • Amin, A., and L. R. Cirolia. 2018. Politics/matter: Governing Cape Town’s informal settlements. Urban Studies 55 (2):274–95. doi: 10.1177/0042098017694133.
  • Berndt, C., and M. Wirth. 2019. Struggling for the moral market: Economic knowledge, diverse markets, and market borders. Economic Geography 95 (3):288–309. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2018.1521699.
  • Bond, P. 2007. Introduction: Two economies—Or one system of superexploitation. Africanus 37 (2):1–21.
  • Bradnock, B., and G. Williams. 2014. South Asia in a globalising world: A reconstructed regional geography. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Chopra, V. 2023. Actually existing neoliberalism and enterprise formation in the informal economy: Interrogating the role of mediating social enterprises in India and South Africa. Economic Geography 99 (4):390–410. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2023.2196003.
  • Clarno, A., and S. Vally. 2023. The context of struggle: Racial capitalism and political praxis in South Africa. Ethnic and Racial Studies 46 (16):3425–47. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2022.2143239.
  • Davies, W., and N. Gane. 2021. Post-neoliberalism? An introduction. Theory, Culture & Society 38 (6):3–28. doi: 10.1177/02632764211036722.
  • Daya, S. 2014. Beyond exploitation/empowerment: Re-imagining Southern producers in commodity stories. Social & Cultural Geography 15 (7):812–33. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2014.929728.
  • Dey, P. 2014. Governing the social through “social entrepreneurship”: A Foucauldian view of “the art of governing” in advanced liberalism. In Social entrepreneurship and enterprise: Concepts in context, ed. H. Douglas and S. Grant, 55–72. Prahan, Australia: Tilde University Press.
  • Ferguson, J. 2009. The uses of neoliberalism. Antipode 41 (Suppl. 1):166–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00721.x.
  • Finn, B. M. 2023. The structure of informality: The Zambian Copperbelt and the informal/formal dialectic. Dialogues in Human Geography 2023:204382062311688. doi: 10.1177/20438206231168883.
  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. 1997. The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Capital & Class 21 (2):186–88. doi: 10.1177/030981689706200111.
  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2014. Rethinking the economy with thick description and weak theory. Current Anthropology 55 (Suppl. 9):S147–S153. doi: 10.1086/676646.
  • Gidwani, V., and J. Wainwright. 2014. On capital, not-capital, and development: After Kalyan Sanyal. Economic and Political Weekly 49 (34):40–47.
  • Gooptu, N., ed. 2013. Enterprise culture in neoliberal India: Studies in youth, class, work and media. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
  • Hart, G. 2002. Development/s beyond neoliberalism? Power, culture, political economy. Progress in Human Geography 26 (6):812–22. doi: 10.1191/0309132502ph405pr.
  • Hart, G. 2009. D/developments after the meltdown. Antipode 41 (Suppl. 1):117–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00719.x.
  • Jenkins, K. 2011. Depoliticisation and the changing trajectories of grassroots women’s leadership in Peru: From empowerment to service delivery? Journal of Latin American Studies 43 (2):299–326. doi: 10.1017/S0022216X11000046.
  • Kamat, S. 2014. The limits of post-politics: Rethinking radical social enterprise. In The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticisation, spectres of radical politics, ed. J. Wilson and E. Swyngedouw, 189–207. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. doi: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748682973.003.0016.
  • Larner, W. 2014. The limits of post-politics: Rethinking radical social enterprise. In The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticisation, spectres of radical politics, ed. J. Wilson and E. Swyngedouw, 189–207. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. doi: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748682973.003.0016.
  • Martin, T. L. 2019. Believing is seeing: The “lens”: Metaphor in critical theory. Literary Imagination 21 (3):289–95. doi: 10.1093/litimag/imz030.
  • Naidoo, P., and A. Veriava. 2004. People before profits? A review of development and social change. Development Update 4 (4):1–22.
  • Narayan, P., and E. Rosenman. 2022. From crisis to the everyday: Shouldn’t we all be writing economies? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 54 (2):392–404. doi: 10.1177/0308518X211068048.
  • Nchito, W. S. 2023. Deconstructing informality: Will the informal/formal dialectic ever end? Dialogues in Human Geography. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/20438206231220725.
  • Nicholls, A. 2010. The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34 (4):611–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x.
  • Nilsen, A. G., and S. Roy. 2015. New subaltern politics: Reconceptualizing hegemony and resistance in contemporary India. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Peck, J., N. Brenner, and N. Theodore. 2018. Actually existing neoliberalism. In The Sage handbook of neoliberalism, ed. D. Cahill, M. Cooper, M. Konings, and D. Primrose, 3–15. London: Sage.
  • Pollard, J., C. McEwan, and A. Hughes, eds. 2011. Postcolonial economies. London: Zed Books.
  • Raghuram, P., and C. Madge. 2006. Towards a method for postcolonial development geography? Possibilities and challenges. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 27 (3):270–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00262.x.
  • Rankin, K. N. 2002. Social capital, microfinance, and the politics of development. Feminist Economics 8 (1):1–24. doi: 10.1080/13545700210125167.
  • Rankin, K. N. 2013. A critical geography of poverty finance. Third World Quarterly 34 (4):547–68. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.786282.
  • Rose, N. 1999. The powers of freedom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosenman, E., and P. Narayan. 2023. Economic geography for and by whom? Rethinking expertise and accountability. Dialogues in Human Geography. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/20438206231178818.
  • Roy, S. 2015. The Indian women’s movement: Within and beyond NGOization. Journal of South Asian Development 10 (1):96–117. doi: 10.1177/0973174114567368.
  • Santos, L., and S. Banerjee. 2019. Social enterprise: Is it possible to decolonise this concept? In Theory of social enterprise and pluralism: Social movements, solidarity economy and the Global South, ed. P. Eynaud, 2–16. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Sanyal, K. 2007. Rethinking capitalist development: Primitive accumulation, governmentality, and post-colonial capitalism. Delhi, India: Routledge India.
  • Satgar, V. 2012. Beyond Marikana: The post-apartheid South African state. Africa Spectrum 47 (2–3):33–62. doi: 10.1177/000203971204702-303.
  • Sen, D. 2018. Everyday sustainability: Gender justice and fair trade tea in Darjeeling. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Spicer, J., T. Kay, and M. Ganz. 2019. Social entrepreneurship as field encroachment: How a neoliberal social movement constructed a new field. Socio-Economic Review 17 (1):195–227. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwz014.
  • Teasdale, S., and P. Dey. 2019. Neoliberal governing through social enterprise: Exploring the neglected roles of deviance and ignorance in public value creation. Public Administration 97 (2):325–38. doi: 10.1111/padm.12588.
  • Tuck, E., and K. W. Yang. 2012. Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1 (1):1–40.
  • Veriava, A. 2019. The two economies, primitive accumulation, and the government of the state: Or reflecting on the politics of the governed from South Africa. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 39 (1):24–36. doi: 10.1215/1089201X-7493744.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.