The Spatial–Racial Patterns of U.S. Dam Removals Since 2010

Literature Cited

• American Rivers. 2019. American Rivers dam removal database. Accessed February 22, 2019. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5234068.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, J., J. N. Blignaut, S. J. Milton, D. Le Maitre, K. J. Esler, A. Limouzin, C. Fontaine, M. P. de Wit, W. Mugido, P. Prinsloo, et al. 2010. Are socioeconomic benefits of restoration adequately quantified? A meta-analysis of recent papers (2000–2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 other scientific journals. Restoration Ecology 18 (2):143–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00638.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, H. S., ed. 2012. The political economy of environmental justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, H. S., L. Ma, and C. Timmins. 2019. Environmental justice: The economics of race, place, and pollution. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (1):185–208. doi: 10.1257/jep.33.1.185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellmore, R. J., J. J. Duda, L. S. Craig, S. L. Greene, C. E. Torgersen, M. J. Collins, and K. Vittum. 2017. Status and trends of dam removal research in the United States. WIREs: Water 4:E1164.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. S., M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, et al. 2005. Synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science 308 (5722):636–37. doi: 10.1126/science.1109769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. S., E. B. Sudduth, M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, J. L. Meyer, G. Alexander, J. Follastad‐Shah, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, R. Lave, et al. 2007. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: Results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restoration Ecology 15 (3):482–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00244.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, S. M., K. D. Genskow, T. L. Filbert, N. Hernandez-Mora, M. L. Keefer, and K. A. White. 1998. Socioeconomic and institutional dimensions of dam removals: The Wisconsin experience. Environmental Management 22 (3):359–70. doi: 10.1007/s002679900111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullard, R. D. 2000. Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. 3rd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffin, B. C., and H. Gosnell. 2017. Beyond mandatory fishways: Federal hydropower relicensing as a window of opportunity for dam removal and adaptive governance of riverine landscapes in the United States. Water Alternatives 10 (3):819–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, R. A., G. Yamazaki, T. Linnansaari, W. Monk, K. M. Samways, R. Dolson, K. R. Munkittrick, and A. Bielecki. 2020. Large dam renewals and removalsPart 1: Building a science framework to support a decision‐making process. River Research and Applications 36 (8):1460–71. doi: 10.1002/rra.3680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniela, T. C., A. Muhar, A. Arnberger, O. Aznar, J. W. Boyd, K. M. A. Chan, R. Costanza, T. Elmqvist, C. G. Flint, P. H. Gobster, et al. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (23):8812–19. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dascher, E. D., and K. Meitzen. 2020. Dams are coming down, but not always by choice: The geography of Texas dams, dam failures, and dam removals. Texas Water Journal 11 (1):89–129. doi: 10.21423/twj.v11i1.7092.
   Google Scholar
• Diessner, N. L., C. M. Ashcraft, K. H. Gardner, and L. C. Hamilton. 2020. I’ll be dammed! Public preferences regarding dam removal in New Hampshire. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 8:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., J. Harbor, and E. Stanley. 2003. Toward policies and decision-making for dam removal. Environmental Management 31 (4):453–65. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2819-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., E. H. Stanley, J. M. Harbor, and G. S. Grant. 2003. Dam removal in the United States: Emerging needs for science and policy. Eos: Transactions American Geophysical Union 84 (4):29–33. doi: 10.1029/2003EO040001.
   Google Scholar
• Drapier, L., M. Germaine, L. Lespez, F. J. Magilligan, and C. Sneddon. 2021. Networks, coaltions, and the contestation of dam removal across political and institutional scales in France and New England (USA). Geographical Review 113 (2):246–67. doi: 10.1080/00167428.2021.1953382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duda, J. J., S. Jumani, D. J. Wieferich, D. Tullos, S. K. McKay, T. J. Randle, A. Jansen, S. Bailey, B. L. Jensen, R. C. Johnson, et al. 2023. Patterns, drivers, and a predictive model of dam removal cost in the United States. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 11:471. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1215471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duda, J. J., E. J. Wagner, D. J. Wieferich, R. C. Johnson, and J. R. Bellmore. 2018. USGS dam removal science database v4.0. (June 2021). Accessed November 5, 2021. doi: 10.5066/P9IGEC9G.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, M. M., J. R. Bellmore, J. E. O’Connor, J. J. Duda, A. E. East, G. E. Grant, C. W. Anderson, J. A. Bountry, M. J. Collins, P. J. Connolly, et al. 2017. Dam removal: Listening in. Water Resources Research 53 (7):5229–46. doi: 10.1002/2017WR020457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, M., F. J. Magilligan, C. E. Torgersen, J. J. Major, C. W. Anderson, P. J. Connolly, D. Wieferich, P. B. Shafroth, J. E. Evans, D. Infante, et al. 2017. Landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the United States. PLoS ONE 12 (7):e0180107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C. A., F. J. Magilligan, and C. S. Sneddon. 2016. “You kill the dam, you are killing a part of me”: Dam removal and the environmental politics of river restoration. Geoforum 70:93–104. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C. A., N. J. Reo, B. Fessell, and F. Dituri. 2022. Native American tribes and dam removal: Restoring the Ottaway, Penobscot and Elwha Rivers. Water Alternatives 15 (1):13–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., and E. C. Kelly. 2010. Peace on the river? Social-ecological restoration and large dam removal in the Klamath basin, USA. Water Alternatives 3:361–83.
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, Z. J., H. Chang, and E. F. Granek. 2018. Fracturing dams, fractured data: Empirical trends and characteristics of existing and removed dams in the United States. River Research and Applications 34 (6):526–37. doi: 10.1002/rra.3283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowski, Z. J., A. Denton, M. A. Rozance, M. Matsler, and S. Kidd. 2017. Removing dams, constructing science: Coproduction of undammed riverscapes by politics, finance, environment, society and technology. Water Alternatives 3 (3):769.
   Google Scholar
• Guetz, K., T. Joyal, B. Dickson, and D. Perry. 2022. Prioritizing dams for removal to advance restoration and conservation efforts in the Western United States. Restoration Ecology 30 (5):e13583. doi: 10.1111/rec.13583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holifield, R., and N. Schuelke. 2015. The place and time of the political in urban political ecology: Contested imaginations of a river’s future. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2):294–303. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2014.988102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. E., and B. E. Graber. 2002. Enlisting the social sciences in decisions about dam removal: The application of social science concepts and principles to public decision-making about whether to keep or remove dams may help achieve outcomes leading to sustainable ecosystems and other goals in the public interest. BioScience 52 (8):731–38. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0731:ETSSID]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondolf, G. M., S. Anderson, R. Lave, L. Pagano, A. Merenlender, and E. S. Bernhardt. 2007. Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn? Restoration Ecology 15 (3):516–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00247.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leisher, C., S. Hess, K. Dempsey, K. M. L. Payne-Wynne, and J. Royte. 2022. Measuring the social changes from river restoration and dam removal. Restoration Ecology 30 (1):e1350.1–8. doi: 10.1111/rec.13500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, L., C. Bohlen, and S. Wilson. 2008. Dams, dam removal, and river restoration: A hedonic property value analysis. Contemporary Economic Policy 26 (2):175–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00100.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magilligan, F. J., C. S. Sneddon, and C. A. Fox. 2017. The social, historical, and institutional contingencies of dam removal. Environmental Management 59 (6):982–94. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0835-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauer, K. W. 2021. Unsettling resilience: Colonial ecological violence, indigenous futurisms, and the restoration of the Elwha River. Rural Sociology 86 (3):611–34. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCool, D. 2012. River republic: The fall and rise of America’s rivers. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohai, P., D. Pellow, and J. T. Roberts. 2009. Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34 (1):405–30. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, S. 2010. Cities, creeks, and erasure: Stream restoration and environmental justice. Environmental Justice 3 (2):61–69. doi: 10.1089/env.2009.0036.
   Google Scholar
• Morandi, B., M. Cottet, and H. Piegay, eds. 2022. River restoration: Political, social, and economic perspectives. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Neeson, T. M., A. T. Moody, J. R. O’Hanley, M. Diebel, P. J. Doran, M. C. Ferris, T. Colling, and P. B. McIntyre. 2018. Aging infrastructure creates opportunities for cost‐efficient restoration of aquatic ecosystem connectivity. Ecological Applications 28 (6):1494–1502. doi: 10.1002/eap.1750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J. E., J. J. Duda, and G. E. Grant. 2015. 1000 dams down and counting: Dam removals are reconnecting rivers in the United States. Science 348 (6234):496–97. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhardt, J. D. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. M. Dahm, J. Follstad Shah, et al. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42 (2):208–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N. L., and D. D. Hart. 2002. How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal: An ecological classification of dams is needed to characterize how the tremendous variation in the size, operational mode, age, and number of dams in a river basin influences the potential for restoring regulated Rivers via dam removal. BioScience 52 (8):659–68. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0659:HDVAWI]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, M. M. 2002. Bringing down our dams: Trends in American dam removal rationales. JAWRA: Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38 (6):1511–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04361.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provencher, B., H. Sarakinos, and T. Meyer. 2008. Does small dam removal affect local property values? Contemporary Economic Policy 26 (2):187–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00107.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, S. G., E. Uchida, S. P. de Souza, B. Blachly, E. Fox, K. Gardner, A. J. Gold, J. Jansujwicz, S. Klein, B. McGreavy, et al. 2018. A multiscale approach to balance trade-offs among dam infrastructure, river restoration, and cost. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115 (47):12069–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807437115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, B., E. Zavaleta, and A. Millard-Ball. 2018. Where and why does restoration happen? Ecological and sociopolitical influences on stream restoration in coastal California. Biological Conservation 221:219–27. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneddon, C., R. Barraud, and M.-A. Germaine. 2017. Dam removals and river restoration in international perspective. Water Alternatives 10 (3):648–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneddon, C., F. Magilligan, and C. Fox. 2017. Science of the dammed: Expertise and knowledge claims in contested dam removals. Water Alternatives 10 (3):677–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullos, D. D., M. J. Collins, J. R. Bellmore, J. A. Bountry, P. J. Connolly, P. B. Shafroth, and A. C. Wilcox. 2016. Synthesis of common management concerns associated with dam removal. JAWRA: Journal of the American Water Resources Association 52 (5):1179–1206. doi: 10.1111/1752-1688.12450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2018. National inventory of all dams. Accessed April 10, 2019. https://nid.sec.usace.army.mil/ords/f?p=105:1.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2019. 2010 census of population and housing. Accessed April 10, 2019. https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2010DP1/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey. 2021. National river restoration science synthesis. Accessed November 5, 2021. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication.
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, E., P. L. Angermeier, B. Bledsoe, G. M. Kondolf, L. MacDonnell, D. M. Merritt, M. A. Palmer, N. L. Poff, and D. Tarboton. 2005. River restoration. Water Resources Research 41 (10):1–12. doi: 10.1029/2005WR003985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl, E., S. N. Lane, and S. C. Wilcox. 2015. The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resources Research 51 (8):5974–97. doi: 10.1002/2014WR016874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar