Is the Physical Being Taken out of Physical Education? On the Possible Effects of High-Stakes Testing on an Embattled Profession’s Curriculum Goals

References

• Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). High-stakes testing & student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10, 18. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/viewFile/297/423
   Google Scholar
• Airasian, P. W. (1988a). Measurement driven instruction: A closer look. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 7, 6–11. doi:10.1111/emip.1988.7.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Airasian, P. W. (1988b). Symbolic validation: The case of state-mandated, high-stakes testing. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 10, 301–313. doi:10.3102/01623737010004301
   Google Scholar
• Airasian, P. W. (1993). Policy-driven assessment or assessment-driven policy? Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development (American Counseling Association), 26(1), 22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258–267. doi:10.3102/0013189X07306523
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. D., Oluwole, J. O., & Green, P. C. (2013). The legal consequences of mandating high stakes decisions based on low quality information: Teacher evaluation in the Race-to-the-Top era. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(0), 5. doi:10.14507/epaa.v21n5.2013
   Google Scholar
• Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L., & Shepard, L. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers (EPI Briefing Paper # 278). Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.epi.org/publication/bp278
   Google Scholar
• Berg, K. (2010). Justifying physical education based on neuroscience evidence. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 81(3), 24–46. doi:10.1080/07303084.2010.10598445
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41, 287–302. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (n.d.). Overweight and obesity. Retrieved September 20, 2012, from http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html
   Google Scholar
• Cook, G. (2005). Cut to fit. American School Board Journal, 192(8), 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, S. P. (2010). Can teachers be evaluated by their students’ test scores? Should they be? The use of value-added measures of teacher effectiveness in policy and practice. education policy for action series. Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University (NJ1). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522163
   Google Scholar
• Daugherty, R., Black, P., Ecclestone, K., James, M., & Newton, P. (2008). Alternative perspectives on learning outcomes: Challenges for assessment. Curriculum Journal, 19, 243–254. doi:10.1080/09585170802509831
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, C. D. (2011). Physical education curriculum priorities: Evidence for education and skillfulness. Quest, 63(1), 5–18. doi:10.1080/00336297.2011.10483659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, C. D. (2014). The role of students and content in teacher effectiveness. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(1), 6–13. doi:10.1080/02701367.2014.872979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feingold, R. S. (2013). Vision in an age of accountability. Quest, 65(4), 385–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.834832
   Google Scholar
• Filburn, A. D., & Fletcher, J. S. (2008). NCLB: The next step in the diminishment of physical education and health. Illinois Journal for Health, Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 61, 58–60.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, M. J. 2015. Measurement as politics by other means: The case of test-based teacher evaluation. In K. E. O’Hare (Ed.), Teacher evaluation: The charge and the challenges (pp. 39–58). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J., & Wilburn, D. (2013). The mismeasure of education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. L., & Bearak, J. M. (2014). “Teaching to the test” in the NCLB era: How test predictability affects our understanding of student performance. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 381–389. doi:10.3102/0013189X14554449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. M. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labaree, D. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81. doi:10.3102/00028312034001039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbery, M. A. F., & McKenzie, T. L. (2015). Physically literate and physically educated: A rose by any other name? Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4, 139–144. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, J., & Tannehill, D. (2010). Standards-based physical education curriculum development. (Second Edition). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
   Google Scholar
• Madaus, G. F., Russell, M. K., & Higgins, J. (2009). The paradoxes of high stakes testing: How they affect students, their parents, teachers, principals, schools, and society. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. (2012). An increased role for the Department of Education in addressing federalism concerns. Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal, 2012, (1), 79–110.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, T. L., & Lounsbery, M. A. F. (2009). School physical education: The pill not taken. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 3, 219–225. doi:10.1177/1559827609331562
   Google Scholar
• Metzler, M. W. (2014). Teacher effectiveness research in physical education: The future isn’t what it used to be. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(1), 14–19. doi:10.1080/02701367.2014.872932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New York State. (n.d.). Governor Cuomo announces highlights from the passage of the 2015–16 state budget. Retrieved from https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-cuomo-announces-highlights-passage-2015-16-state-budget
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, C. (2013). Education in the age of biocapitalism: Optimizing educational life for a flat world. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ratey, J. J. (2008). Spark: The revolutionary new science of exercise and the brain (1st ed.). New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Rink, J. E. (2013). Measuring teacher effectiveness in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84(4), 407–418. doi:10.1080/02701367.2013.844018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabo, D. (2009). The gender gap in youth sports: Too many urban girls are being left behind. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 80(8), 35–40. doi:10.1080/07303084.2009.10598374
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, C. M. & Garrison, M. J. (2015). Under Review.
   Google Scholar
• SHAPE America (2014). National standards & grade-level outcomes for K-12 physical education Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Society of Health and Physical Educators (SHAPE) America. (2015). The essential components of physical education. Reston, VA. Retrieved May 19, 2015, from http://www.shapeamerica.org/upload/TheEssentialComponentsOfPhysicalEducation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. J., & Lounsbery, M. (2009). Promoting physical education: The link to academic achievement. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 80(1), 39–43. doi:10.1080/07303084.2009.10598266
   Google Scholar
• Trost, S. G., & Van Der Mars, H. (2009). Why we should not cut P.E. Educational Leadership, 67(4), 60–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar