Compatibility and Complementarity of Classroom Ecology and Didactique Research Perspectives in Physical Education

References

• Alexander, K. (1982). Behavior analysis of tasks and accountability in physical education ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Allal, L. (2011). Pedagogy, didactics and the co-regulation of learning: A perspective from the French-language world of educational research. Research Papers in Education, 26, 329–336. doi:10.1080/02671522.2011.595542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. (1998). Apport des recherches didactiques à l’analyse de l’enseignement. Une étude de cas: Le contrat didactique. In C. Amade-Escot, J. Barrué, J. Bos, F. Dufor, M. Dugrand, & A. Terrisse (Eds.), Recherches en éducation physique et sportive: Bilan et perspectives (pp. 253–266). Paris, France: Édition Revue EPS.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. (2000, April). How students manage the didactic contract? Contribution of the didactic perspective to research in physical education classroom. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational research association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED442786)
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. (2006). Student learning within the didactique tradition. In D. Kirk, M. O’Sullivan, & D. Macdonald (Eds.), Handbook of research in physical education (pp. 347–365). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. (2007). Le didactique. Paris, France: Revue EPS.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. (2010, May). L’articulation des cadres théoriques dans l’analyse de l’enseignement en éducation physique et sportive (Ecologie de la classe et théorie de l’action conjointe en didactique): Esquisse épistémologique. Paper presented at the VIème Biennale de l’ARIS, Université de Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C., Elandoulsi, S., & Verscheure, I. (2015). Physical education in Tunisia: Teachers’ practical epistemology, students’ positioning and gender issues. Sport, Education and Society, 20, 656–675. doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.997694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C., Garnier, A., & Monnier, N. (2007). La dynamique contractuelle du processus didactique. In A. Amade-Escot (Ed.), Le didactique (pp. 31–48). Paris, France: Editions EPS.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C., & Marsenach, J. (1995). Didactique de l’éducation physique et sportive. Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C., & O’Sullivan, M. (Eds.). (2007). Co-construction of PE content: Contemporary research approaches. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy [Special issue], 12(3).
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C., & Venturini, P. (2009a, May). Ecological and “Didactique” perspectives: How knowledge co-construction is grasped through the concepts of “learning environment” and “didactic milieu” which throw light on “students’ productive disciplinary engagement”. Paper presented at the AIESEP International Seminar Situated Learning, Reflective Practice and Knowledge Construction in Physical Education, Besançon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C., & Venturini, P. (2009b). Le milieu didactique: D’une étude empirique en contexte difficile à une réflexion sur le concept. Education et Didactique, 3(1), 7–43. doi:10.4000/educationdidactique.407
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C., & Venturini, P. (2015). Joint action in didactics and classroom ecology: Comparing theories using a case study in physical education. Interchange [S pecial issue on comparative didactics], 46, 413–437. doi:10.1007/s10780-015-9263-5
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C., Verscheure, I., & Devos, O. (2002). Milieu didactique et régulations comme outils d’analyse de l’activité en éducation physique. Les Dossiers des Sciences De l’Education, 8, 87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barkow, J. (Ed.). (2006). Missing the revolution: Darwinsim for social scientists. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennour, N. (2014). L’engagement disciplinaire productif des élèves dans l’action didactique conjointe en gymnastique. Etudes de cas dans deux établissements contrastés en Tunisie ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Toulouse–Le-Mirail, France.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Perspective and method. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brok, P. J., Fisher, D., Rickards, T., & Bull, E. (2006). Californian science students’ perceptions of their classroom learning environments. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 3–25. doi:10.1080/13803610500392053
   Google Scholar
• Bronckart, J. P. (2005). Une introduction aux théories de l’action. Genève, Switzerland: Faculté de psychologie et des sciences de l’éducation, Carnet des sciences de l’éducation.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. (1981). Le cas de Gaël. Bordeaux, France: IREM de Bordeaux.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. (1986). Fondements et méthodes de la didactique des mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(2), 33–115.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. [Collected papers], N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warlfield (Eds.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. (2003). Glossaire de quelques concepts de la théorie des situations didactiques en mathématiques. Retrieved from http://pagesperso-orange.fr/daest/guy-brousseau/textes/Glossaire_Brousseau.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brunelle, J., Drouin, D., Godbout, P., & Tousignant, M. (1988). La supervision de l’intervention en activité physique. Montréal, QC, Canada: Gaëtan Morin.
   Google Scholar
• Caillot, M. (2007). The building of a new academic field: The case of French didactiques. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 125–130. doi:10.2304/eerj
   Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y. (1992). Fundamentals concepts in didactics: Perspectives provided by an anthropological approach. In R. Douady & A. Mercier (Eds.), Research in didactique of mathematics: Selected papers (pp. 131–167). Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
   Google Scholar
• Desbiens, J.-F. (2002). L’évaluation et la responsabilisation des élèves: ébauche d’une problématique sur le thème de la supervision active en enseignement de l’éducation physique. Brock Education, 12(1), 36–48.
   Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, J.-P. (1991). Recherche qualitative. Guide pratique. Montréal, QC, Canada: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1977). Learning the classroom environment: An ecological analysis. Journal of Teacher Education, 28(6), 51–55. doi:10.1177/002248717702800616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1979). Classroom effects. Theory Into Practice, 18(3), 138–144. doi:10.1080/00405847909542823
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1981). Research on classroom contexts. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(6), 3–6. doi:10.1177/002248718103200602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53(2), 159–199. doi:10.3102/00346543053002159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1985). Learning to teach: An emerging direction in research on preservice teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(1), 31–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 392–431). New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dugal, J.-P., & Amade-Escot, C. (2004). Formation au conseil et développement professionnel des conseillers pédagogiques. Recherche coopérative et savoirs didactiques. Recherche et Formation, 46, 97–116.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, B.-P., Rhodes Linehan, N., & Hastie, P. (2010). The ecology of cooperative learning in elementary physical education classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29(2), 113–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. (1986). Classroom environment. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, J. P., Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. (2005). Applying educational research: A practical guide (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. (1979). Cultural materialism: The struggle for a science of culture. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, P.-A., & Siedentop, D. (1999). An ecological perspective on physical education. European Physical Education Review, 5(1), 9–30. doi:10.1177/1356336X990051002
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, P.-A., & Siedentop, D. (2006). The classroom ecology paradigm. In D. Kirk, D. Mac Donald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 214–225). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, P. A., Sinelnikov, O. A., Brock, S. J., Sharpe, T. L., Eiler, K., & Mowling, C. (2007). Kounin revisited: Tentative postulates for an expanded examination of classroom ecologies. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26, 298–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennings, J., Wallhead, T. L., & Byra, M. (2010). A didactic analysis of student content learning during the reciprocal style of teaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 227–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A., & Collier, D. (2011). An ecological examination of an urban sixth grade physical education class. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 16, 279–293. doi:10.1080/17408989.2010.535203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A., Griffin, L. L., & Dodds, P. (2008). The relationship between instructional alignment and the ecology of physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 308–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johsua, S., & Félix, C. (2002). Le travail des élèves à la maison: Une analyse didactique en termes de milieu pour l’étude: Vers une didactique comparée. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 141, 89–97. doi:10.3406/rfp.2002.3074
   Google Scholar
• Jonnaert, P., & Vander Borght, C. (1999). Créer des conditions d’apprentissage: Un cadre de référence socioconstructiviste pour une formation didactique des enseignants. Bruxelles, Belgium: De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., MacDonald, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2006). The handbook of physical education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75–95. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenoir, Y. (2002). Les réformes actuelles de la formation à l’enseignement en France et aux États-Unis: Éléments de mise en perspective socio-historique à partir du concept d’éducation. Revue Suisse des Sciences de l’Education, 24(1), 91–127.
   Google Scholar
• Leriche, J. (2010). Analyse didactico-écologique des pratiques d’accompagnement de stagiaires en éducation physique au Québec et en France à partir de deux études de cas (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. Retrieved from: http://savoirs.usherbrooke.ca/handle/11143/958
   Google Scholar
• Leriche, J., Amade-Escot, C., Desbiens, J. F., & Dugal, J. P. (2009, May). Quelle prépondérance accorde-t-on aux savoirs en éducation physique dans les entretiens maître de stage/stagiaire au Québec et en France? Paper presented at the AIESEP, Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Leriche, J., Desbiens, J.-F., Dugal, J.-P., & Amade-Escot, C. (2010a). Analyse de l’accompagnement du stage en responsabilité au Québec et en France: Un regard sur les entretiens post-leçons à l’aide de l’écologie de la classe. Ejrieps, 19(1), 71–99.
   Google Scholar
• Leriche, J., Desbiens, J. F., Dugal, J. P., & Amade-Escot, C. (2010b, May 27–29). Analyse écologico-didactique de l’accompagnement des stagiaires au Québec et en France. Paper presented at the 6e Biennale de l’ARIS (Association pour la recherche en intervention en sport), Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ligozat, F. (2011, September). The development of comparative didactics & joint action theory in the context of the French-speaking subject didactiques. Paper presented at the European Congress for Educational Research (ECER), in the symposium “Fachdidaktik,” Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ligozat, F., & Schubauer-Leoni, M. L. (2010). The joint action theory in didactics: Why do we need it in the case of teaching and learning mathematics? In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), (pp. 1615–1624). Lyon, France: INRP. Retrieved from http://fractus.uson.mx/Papers/CERME6/wg9-09-ligozat.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Loquet, M., Garnier, A., & Amade-Escot, C. (2002). Transmission des savoirs en activités physiques, sportives et artistiques dans des institutions différentes: Enseignement scolaire, entraînement sportif, transmission chorégraphique. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 141, 99–109. doi:10.3406/rfp.2002.2918
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M.-C., & Hersh, S.-B. (1990, April). Student negotiation of tasks in physical education and special education settings. Paper presented at the American educational research association annual meeting, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Marsenach, J. (1989). Les pratiques des enseignants d’éducation physique et sportive dans les collèges. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 89, 7–10. doi:10.3406/rfp.1989.1399
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A., & Loomis, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 241–272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCaughtry, N., Tischler, A., & Flory, S.-B. (2008). The ecology of the gym: Reconceptualized and extended. Quest, 60, 268–289. doi:10.1080/00336297.2008.10483581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, A., Schubauer-Leoni, M. L., & Sensevy, G. (2002). Vers une didactique comparée. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 141, 5–16. doi:10.3406/rfp.2002.2910
   Google Scholar
• Metzler, M. (2011). Instructional models for physical education (3rd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionary. (2014). Online dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/
   Google Scholar
• Rink, J.-E. (1994). Task presentation in pedagogy. Quest, 46, 270–280. doi:10.1080/00336297.1994.10484126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roustan, C., & Amade-Escot, C. (2003). Une analyse didactique en terme de milieu pour l’étude: Approche spécifique à l’EPS et dialectique de la co-construction. Revue Suisse des Sciences de l’Education, 25, 481–504.
   Google Scholar
• Schneuwly, B. (2011). Subject didactics—an academic field related to the teacher profession and teacher education. In B. Hudson & M. A. Meyer (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe (pp. 275–286). Opladen & Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., & Leutenegger, F. (2005). Une relecture des phénomènes transpositifs à la lumière de la didactique comparée. Revue Suisse des Sciences de l’Education, 27, 407–429.
   Google Scholar
• Sensevy, G. (2007). Des catégories pour décrire et comprendre l’action didactique. In G. Sensevy & A. Mercier (Eds.), Agir ensemble. L’action didactique conjointe du professeur et des élèves (pp. 13–49). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires.
   Google Scholar
• Sensevy, G. (2009, January). Outline of a joint action theory in didactics. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of European Research in Mathematics Education, Lyon, France (pp. 113–122).
   Google Scholar
• Sensevy, G. (2011). Overcoming fragmentation: Towards a joint action theory in didactics. In B. Hudson & M. Meyer (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe (pp. 60–76). Opladen, Germany and Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Sensevy, G., & Forest, D. (2012). Semiosis process in instructional practice. In Proceedings of the ICLS 2011 Conference (pp. 16–24). The 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Sydney. Retrieved from http://fr.scribd.com/doc/109869021/ICLS2012-Proceedings-Vol-1-2012
   Google Scholar
• Sensevy, G., Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., Mercier, A., Ligozat, F., & Perrot, G. (2005). An attempt to model the teacher’s action in the mathematics class. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59, 153–181. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-5887-1
   Google Scholar
• Siedentop, D. (1988). An ecological model for understanding teaching/learning in physical education. In New horizons of human movements: Proceedings of the 1988 Seoul Olympic scientific congress. Seoul, Korea: SOSCOC.
   Google Scholar
• Siedentop, D. (1991). Developing teaching skills in physical education. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
   Google Scholar
• Siedentop, D. (1994). Apprendre à enseigner l’éducation physique. Montréal, QC, Canada: Gaëtan Morin.
   Google Scholar
• Siedentop, D. (1998). New times in (and for) physical education. Key-lecture presented at the International AIESEP World Congress “Education for Life”. In R. S. Fengold et al. (Eds.), Proceedings (pp. 210–212). New York: Adelphi University.
   Google Scholar
• Siedentop, D. (2002). Content knowledge for physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 368–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siedentop, D., & Tannehill, D. (2000). Developing teaching skills in physical education (4th ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
   Google Scholar
• Thepaut, A., & Léziart, Y. (2007). De la nécessité de la prise en compte de la notion de “milieu didactique” pour l’étude des phénomènes de transmission et d’appropriation des savoirs: Un exemple à propos de l’apprentissage de la passe en basket-ball. Science et Motricité, 61, 57–71. doi:10.3917/sm.061.0057
   Google Scholar
• Tinning, R. (2002). Engaging siedentopian perspectives on content knowledge for physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 378–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinning, R. (2006). Theoretical orientations in physical education teacher education. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Handbook of physical education (pp. 367–385). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tinning, R. (2015). Commentary on research into learning in physical education: Towards a mature field of knowledge. Sport, Education & Society, 20, 676–690. doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.994491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinning, R., MacDonald, D., Wright, J., & Hickey, C. (2001). Becoming a physical education teacher. Contemporary and enduring issues. Frenchs Forest, N.S.W., Australia: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tinning, R., & Siedentop, D. (1985). The characteristics of tasks and accountability in student teaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 4, 286–299.
   Google Scholar
• Tousignant, M. (1982). Analysis of the task structures in secondary physical education classes ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Tousignant, M., & Siedentop, D. (1983). A qualitative analysis of task structures in required secondary physical education classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 3(1), 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Venturini, P., & Amade-Escot, C. (2014). Analysis of conditions leading to a productive disciplinary engagement during a physics lesson in a disadvantaged area school. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 170–183. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verscheure, I., & Amade-Escot, C. (2007). The gendered construction of physical education content as the result of the differentiated didactic contract. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 12, 245–272. doi:10.1080/17408980701610185
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language, A. Kozulin (Ed., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ( Original work published 1934)
   Google Scholar
• Wallhead, T. L. (2004). A didactic analysis of student content development during the peer-assisted learning tasks of a unit of sport education ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Wallhead, T. L., & O’Sullivan, M. (2007). A didactic analysis of content development during the peer teaching tasks of a sport education season. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 12, 225–243. doi:10.1080/17408980701610177
   Google Scholar