Stewarding the Discipline With Cross-Boundary Leadership

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen-Scott, L. K., Hatfield, J. M., & McIntyre, L. (2014). A scoping review of unintended harm associated with public health interventions: Towards a typology and an understanding of underlying factors. International Journal of Public Health, 59(1), 1–12. doi:10.1007/s00038-013-0526-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. London, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. M., Gadlin, H., & Levine-Finley, S. (2010). Collaboration and team science: A field guide. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/download/attachments/47284665/TeamScience_FieldGuide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Block, B. A., & Estes, S. (2011). Supercomplexity in higher education Kinesiology. Quest, 63, 179–196. doi:10.1080/00336297.2011.10483675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, B. A., Tietjen-Smith, T., & Estes, S. (2015). Thinking pluralistically: Dynamic decision- making in Kinesiology. Quest, 67, 93–105. doi:10.1080/00336297.2014.984732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1969). Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds.), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences (pp. 328–348). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, M. M., & Dabars, W. B. (2015). Designing the new American university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damrosch, D. (1995). We scholars: Changing the culture of the university. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M. (2006). Preparing stewards of the discipline. In C. Golde, G. Walker, & Associates (Eds.), Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline (pp. 3–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Halley, A. (1997). Applications of boundary theory to the concept of service integration in the human services. Administration in Social Work, 21(3/4), 145–168. doi:10.1300/J147v21n03_08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, F. (1975). The dialectical uses of ideal-types. Theory and Society, 2(1), 531–561. doi:10.1007/BF00212751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heifetz, R., Linsky, M., & Grashow, A. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, J. (2002). Knowledge is power. Francis Bacon and the method of science. Cambridge, England: Icon.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kretchmar, R. S. (2008). The utility of silos and bunkers in the evolution of Kinesiology. Quest, 60(1), 3–12. doi:10.1080/00336297.2008.10483564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretchmar, R.S. (2014). Complementary kinesiology: Why it is not wise to choose sides or work along. Quest, 66(3), 249–262. doi:10.1080/00336297.2014.918893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. K. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, H. (1991). Specialization and fragmentation among faculty as endemic features of academic life. Quest, 43, 280–295. doi:10.1080/00336297.1991.10484031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, H. (2009). Paradigms, exemplars, and social change. Sport, Education, and Society, 14(1), 97–119. doi:10.1080/13573320802615247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, H. (2014). Investing in leaders and leadership to secure a desirable future. Quest, 66, 263–287. doi:10.1080/00336297.2014.918892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, H. A. (1998). Here today, gone tomorrow: A framework for analyzing the invention, development, transformation and disappearance of helping fields. Quest, 50, 225–237. doi:10.1080/00336297.1998.10484282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, H. A. (1999). Education for social responsibility: Preconditions in retrospect and prospect. Quest, 51, 116–149. doi:10.1080/00336297.1999.10491673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, H. A. (2008, January). Crossing borders and changing boundaries to develop innovations that improve outcomes. The Cagigal Lecture, AIESEP World Congress, Sapporo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, H. A. (2012). Realizing the promise to young people: Kinesiology and new institutional designs for school and community programs. Kinesiology Review, 1(1), 76–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. D. Cartwright (Ed.). New York, USA: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Riesman, D., Glazer, N., & Denney, R. (1950). The lonely crowd: A study of the changing American character. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2012). Collaboration in public policy and practice: Perspectives on boundary spanners. Chicago, IL: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zerhouni, E. A. (2005). Translational and clinical science: Time for a new vision. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 1621–1623. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb053723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar