351
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
The Thirty-Fifth Dudley Allen Sargent Commemorative Lecture 2016

Mentoring Excellence in the Kinesiology Academy

National Association of Kinesiology in Higher Education 35th Dudley Allen Sargent Commemorative Lecture 2016

References

  • Adler, R., Ewing, J., & Taylor, P. (2009). Citation statistics. Statistical Science, 24, 1–14. doi:10.1214/09-STS285
  • Amonnette, W. E., English, K. L., & Ottenbacher, K. J. (2010). Nulllis in Verba: A call for the incorporation of evidence-based practice into the discipline of exercise science. Sports Medicine, 40, 449–457. doi:10.2165/11531970-000000000-00000
  • Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press
  • Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbott, D. S., Morse, J. J., Deardorff, D. L., Allain, R. J…. Risley, J. S. (2007). The student-centered activities for large enrollment programs (SCALE-UP) project. Reviews in Physics Education Research, 1, 1. Retrieved from http://www.per-central.org/per_reviews/volume1.cfm#V1I1A4
  • Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64, 45–80. doi:10.1108/00220410810844150
  • Boyce, A. (2008). The next generation: Our legacy, their future. Quest, 60, 186–199. doi:10.1080/00336297.2008.10483576
  • Brumback, R. A. (2008). Worshiping false idols: The impact factor dilemma. Journal of Child Neurology, 23, 365–367. doi:10.1177/08830738315170
  • Brumback, R. A. (2012). “3 … 2 … 1 … impact [factor]: Target [academic career] destroyed!”: Just another statistical casualty. Journal of Child Neurology, 27, 1565–1576. doi:10.1177/0883073812465014
  • Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2015). Impacted science: Impact is not importance. Mbio, 6(5), e01593–15. doi:10.1128/mBio.01593-15
  • Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. (2014). Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Retrieved from http://www.cebm.net/
  • Clark, J. E. (2003). The changing role of mentoring the future professoriate with special attention to being a low-consensus discipline. Quest, 55, 51–61. doi:10.1080/00336297.2003.10491788
  • Coleman, A. (2007). Assess the value of a journal beyond the impact factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1148–1161. doi:10.1002/asi.20599
  • Declaration on Research Assessment. (2015). Declaration on research assessment. Retrieved from http://www.ascb.org/dora/
  • Guyat, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schinemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength recommendations. British Medical Journal, 336, 924–926. doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
  • Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74.
  • Halloun, I. A., & Henestes, D. (1985). The initial state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1043–1055. doi:10.1119/1.14030
  • Hamill, J. (2007). Biomechanics curriculum: Its content and relevance to movement sciences. Quest, 59, 25–33. doi:10.1080/00336297.2007.10483533
  • Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2009). Impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics in the United States. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 5, 020109. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020107
  • Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429–431. doi:10.1038/520429a
  • Hochberg, M. E., Chase, J. M., Gotelli, N. J., Hastings, A., & Naeem, S. (2009). The tragedy of the reviewer commons. Ecology Letters, 12, 2–4. doi:10.111/j.1461-0248.2008.01276.x
  • Hsieh, C., & Knudson, D. (2008). Student factors related to learning in biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics, 7, 398–402. doi:10.1080/14763140802233207
  • Hsieh, C., Smith, J., Bohne, M., & Knudson, D. (2012). Factors related to students’ learning of biomechanics concepts. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 83–89.
  • Key, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 7426–7431. doi:10.1073/pnas.1424329112
  • Knudson, D. (2005a). Evidence-based practice in kinesiology: The theory to practice gap revisited. The Physical Educator, 62, 212–221.
  • Knudson, D. (2005b). Statistical and reporting errors in applied biomechanics research. In Q. Wang (Ed.), Proceedings of XXIII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports: Volume 2 (pp. 811–814). Beijing, China: China Institute of Sport Science.
  • Knudson, D. (2009). Significant and meaningful effects in sports biomechanics research. Sports Biomechanics, 8, 96–104. doi:10.1080/14763140802629966
  • Knudson, D. (2010). What have we learned from teaching conferences and research on learning in biomechanics? In R. Jensen, W. Ebben, E. Petushek, C. Richter, & K. Roemer (Eds.), Scientific proceedings of the 28thConference of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (pp. 678–681). Marquette: Northern Michigan University.
  • Knudson, D. (2011). Authorship and sampling practice in selected biomechanics and sports science journals. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 112, 838–844. doi:10.2466/17.PMS.112.3.838-844
  • Knudson, D. (2013a). Impact and prestige of kinesiology-related journals. Comprehensive Psychology, 2, 13. doi:10.2466/50.17.CP.2.13
  • Knudson, D. (2013b). Physics and biomechanics education research: Improving learning of biomechanical concepts. In T.-Y. Shiang, W.-H. Ho, C. F. Huang, & G. L. Tsai (Eds.), eProceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (pp. 72–76). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University. Chinese Journal of Sports Biomechanics, 5(S1), 72–76.
  • Knudson, D. (2015). Evidence of citation bias in kinesiology-related journals. Chronicle of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 26(1), 5–12.
  • Knudson, D., Elliott, B., & Ackland, T. (2012). Citation of evidence for research and application in kinesiology. Kinesiology Review, 1, 129–136.
  • Knudson, D., Elliott, B., & Hamill, J. (2014). Proposing application of results in sport and exercise research reports. Sports Biomechanics, 13, 195–203. doi:10.1080/14763141.2014.959551
  • Knudson, D., Morrow, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). Advancing kinesiology through improved peer review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85, 127–135. doi:10.1080/02701367.2014.898117
  • Knudson, D., Noffal, G., Bauer, J., McGinnis, P., Bird, M., Chow, J., … Abendroth-Smith, J. (2003). Development and evaluation of a biomechanics concept inventory. Sports Biomechanics, 2, 267–277. doi:10.1080/14763140308522823
  • Krahenbuhl, G. S. (2003). Are we preparing institutional “difference makers”? Quest, 55, 25–29. doi:1080/003362976.2003.10491786
  • Lawson, H. A. (2014). Investing in leaders and leadership to secure a desirable future. Quest, 66, 263–287. doi:10.1080/00336297.2014.918892
  • Lawson, H. A. (2016). Stewarding the discipline with cross-boundary leadership. Quest, 68, 91–115.
  • MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40, 342–349. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571
  • McDermott, L. C. (1991). Millikan lecture1990: What we teach and what is learned—closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59, 301–315. doi:10.1119/1.16539
  • Morrow Jr., J.R., Bray, M. S., Fulton, J. E., & Thomas, J. R. (1992). Interrater reliability of 1987–1991 Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 200–204. doi:10.1080/02701367.1992.10607582
  • Napper-Owen, G. (2012). Raising the next generation. Quest, 64, 131–140. doi:10.1080/00336297.2012.704777
  • National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE). (2003). Guidelines for undergraduate biomechanics [Guidance document]. Reston, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.shapeamerica.org/publications/resources/teachingtools/qualitype/loader.cfm?csModule=security/getfile&pageid=5334
  • Neale, A. V., Dailey, R. K., & Abrams, J. (2010). Analysis of citations to biomedical articles affected by scientific misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16, 251–261. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9151-4
  • Reddick, R. J. (2015). Of feral faculty and magisterial mowglis: The domestication of junior faculty. New Directions for Higher Education, 171, 43–51. doi:10.1002/he.20141
  • Redish, E. F., & Steinberg, R. N. (1999). Teaching physics: Figuring out what works. Physics Today, 52, 24–30.
  • Riskowski, J. L. (2015). Teaching undergraduate biomechanics with just-in-time teaching. Sports Biomechanics, 14, 168–179. doi:10.1080/14763141.2015.1030686
  • Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2007). Show me the data. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 204, 3052–3053. doi:10.1084/jem.20072544
  • Rowlands, I. (2007). Electronic journals and user behavior: A review of recent research. Library and Information Science Research, 29, 369–396. doi:10.1016/j.list2007.03.005
  • Ruscio, J., Seaman, F., D’Oriano, D., Stremlo, E., & Mahalchik, K. (2012). Measuring scholarly impact using modern citation-based metrics. Measurement, 10, 123–146. doi:10.1080/15633367.2012.711147
  • Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314, 497–502. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497
  • Silverman, S. (2003). The role of teaching in preparing future faculty. Quest, 55, 72–81. doi:10.1080/0336297.2003.10491790
  • van Noorden, R. (2010). A profusion of measures. Nature, 465, 864–866. doi:10.1038/465864a
  • Vanclay, J. K. (2009). Bias in the journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 78, 3–12. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-1778-4
  • West, R. E., & Rich, P. J. (2012). Rigor, impact, and prestige: A proposed framework for evaluating scholarly publications. Innovative Higher Education, 37, 359–371. doi:10.1007/s10755-012-9214-3
  • Willingham-McLain, L. (2015). Using a scholarship of teaching and learning approach to award faculty who innovate. International Journal of Academic Development, 20, 58–75. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2014.995661

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.