Revisiting the Narrative about Least Restrictive Environment in Physical Education

References

• Arnold, J. B., & Dodge, H. W. (1994). Room for all. The American School Board Journal, 181, 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Aufsesser, P. M. (1981). Adapted physical education: A look back, a look ahead. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 52(6), 28–31. doi:10.1080/07303084.1981.10629196
   Google Scholar
• Block, M. E. (1994). Why all students with disabilities should be included in regular physical education. Palaestra, 10(3), 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Block, M. E. (1996). When can I remove a child with disabilities from regular physical education? Palaestra, 12(2), 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Block, M. E. (1999a). Part 1: Did we jump on the wrong bandwagon? Problems with inclusion in physical education. Palaestra, 15(3), 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Block, M. E. (1999b). Part 2: Did we jump on the wrong bandwagon? Making general physical education work. Palaestra, 15(4), 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Block, M. E. (2016). A teacher’s guide to including students with disabilities in general physical education (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Block, M. E., & Krebs, P. L. (1992). An alternative to least restrictive environments: A continuum of support to regular physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 97–113. doi:10.1123/apaq.9.2.97
   Google Scholar
• Block, M. E., & Obrusnikova, I. (2007). Inclusion in physical education: A review of literature from 1995–2005. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 24(1), 103–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredahl, A. M. (2013). Sitting and watching the others being active: The experienced difficulties in physical education when having a disability. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 30(1), 40–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhead, G. D. (1985). Placement of mildly handicapped children in mainstream physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2, 307–313. doi:10.1123/apaq.2.4.307
   Google Scholar
• Broadhead, G. D. (1986). Adapted physical education research trends: 1970–1990. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 3, 104–111. doi:10.1123/apaq.3.2.104
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, S. (1991). Physical education and sport for the deaf: Rethinking the least restrictive environment. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 8, 95–102. doi:10.1123/apaq.8.2.95
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, S. (1993). Least restrictive environment: A response to Decker. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 10, 8–9. doi:10.1123/apaq.10.1.8
   Google Scholar
• Casebolt, K., & Hodge, S. (2010). High school physical education teachers’ beliefs about teaching students with mild to severe disabilities. The Physical Educator, 67(3), 140–155.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, J. (2011). Physically fit or physically literate? How children with special educational needs understand physical education. European Physical Education Review, 17(2), 167–181. doi:10.1177/1356336X11413183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, J., & Vickerman, P. (2008). Let the children have their say: Children with special educational needs and their experiences of physical education--A review. Support for Learning, 23, 168–175. doi:10.1111/sufl.2008.23.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Columna, L., Davis, T., Lieberman, L., & Lytle, R. (2010). Determining the most appropriate physical education placement for students with disabilities. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 81(7), 30–37. doi:10.1080/07303084.2010.10598506
   Google Scholar
• Decker, J. (1993). Least restrictive environment programming for individuals with hearing impairments: A response to Butterfield. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 10, 1–7. doi:10.1123/apaq.10.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Decker, J., & Jansma, P. (1991). Identifying least restrictive environment options in physical education. The Physical Educator, 48(4), 192–200.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, J., & Jansma, P. (1995). Physical education least restrictive environment continua used in the United States. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 124–138. doi:10.1123/apaq.12.2.124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, E. (1970). Special education as a development capital. Exceptional Children, 37, 229–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaepe, J. (1984). Mainstreaming malpractice. The Physical Educator, 41, 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• DePauw, K. P., & Doll-Tepper, G. (2000). Toward progressive inclusion and acceptance: Myth or reality? The inclusion debate and bandwagon discourse. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 135–143. doi:10.1123/apaq.17.2.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J., & Craft, D. (1985). Mainstreaming theory and practice. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2, 273–276. doi:10.1123/apaq.2.4.273
   Google Scholar
• Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. PL 94-142, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401 et seq., 89 Stat. 773-796.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, H. (2005). Still feeling like a spare piece of luggage? Embodied experiences of (dis)ability in physical education and school sport. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 10(2), 41–59. doi:10.1080/1740898042000334908
   Google Scholar
• Gent, P. J., & Mulhauser, M. B. (1988). Public integration of students with handicaps: Where it’s been, where it’s going, and how it’s getting there. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 188–196. doi:10.1177/154079698801300309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenier, M. (2011). Coteaching in physical education: A strategy for inclusive practice. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 28(2), 95–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosse, S. (1991). Is the mainstream always a better place to be? Palaestra, 7(2), 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Haegele, J. A., Hersman, B. L., Hodge, S. R., Lee, J., Samalot-Rivera, A., Saito, M., … Silva, A. (2017). Students with disabilities in Brazil, Japan, South Korea and the United States: Implications for inclusion and social justice in physical education. In A. Morin, C. Maiano, C. Lonsdale, & R. Craven (Eds.), Inclusive physical activities: International perspectives (Vol. X, pp. 287–308). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haegele, J. A., Lee, J., & Porretta, D. L. (2015). Research trends in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly from 2004 to 2013. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 32(3), 187–205. doi:10.1123/APAQ.2014-0232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegele, J. A., & Sutherland, S. (2015). Perspectives of students with disabilities toward physical education: A qualitative inquiry review. Quest, 67(3), 255–273. doi:10.1080/00336297.2015.1050118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegele, J. A., & Zhu, X. (2017). Experiences of individuals with visual impairments in integrated physical education: A retrospective study. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 88(4), 425–435. doi:10.1080/02701367.2017.1346781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardman, M. L., Drew, C. L., Egan, M. W., & Wolf, B. (1993). Human exceptionality: Society, school, and family (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, S., Msetfi, R., & Gallagher, S. (2013). ‘Happy and a bit nervous’: The experiences of children with autism in physical education. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 222–228. doi:10.1111/bld.12053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, S., Lieberman, L., & Murata, N. (2012). Essentials of teaching adapted physical education. Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, S., Sato, T., Mukoyama, T., & Kozub, F. (2013). Development of the physical educators’ judgments about inclusion instrument for Japanese physical education majors and an analysis of their judgements. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 60, 332–346. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2013.846468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004. Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647, codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1487 (West Supp. 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Jansma, P., & Decker, J. (1990). Project LRE/PE: Least restrictive environment usage in physical education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jansma, P., & Decker, J. (1992). An analysis of least restrictive environment placement variables in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 63(2), 171–178. doi:10.1080/02701367.1992.10607577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, A., Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1996). Rationale for inclusive schooling. In S. Stainback & W. Stainback (Eds.), Inclusion: A guide for educators (pp. 3–16). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Karper, W. B., & Martinek, T. J. (1985). The integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children in elementary physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2, 314–319. doi:10.1123/apaq.2.4.314
   Google Scholar
• LaMaster, K., Gall, K., Kinchin, G., & Siedentop, D. (1998). Inclusion practices of effective elementary specialists. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 64–81. doi:10.1123/apaq.15.1.64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavay, B., & DaPaepe, J. (1987). The harbinger helper: Why mainstreaming in physical education doesn’t always work. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 58(7), 98–103. doi:10.1080/07303084.1987.10609614
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, L., & Houston-Wilson, C. (2018). Strategies for inclusion (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, L. J., Cavanaugh, L., Haegele, J. A., Aiello, R., & Wilson, W. J. (2017). The modified physical education class: An option for the least restrictive environment. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 88(7), 10–16. doi:10.1080/07303084.2017.1340203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loovis, E. (1986). Placement of handicapped students: The perpetual dilemma. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 3, 193–198. doi:10.1123/apaq.3.3.193
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, A. P., & Hardman, M. L. (1989). The desegregation of America’s special schools: Strategies for change. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 68–74. doi:10.1177/154079698901400108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia, 348 F. Supp. 966 (D.D.C 1972).
   Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, U.S. District Court, 343 F. Supp. 279 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Place, K., & Hodge, S. R. (2001). Social inclusion of students with physical disabilities in general physical education: A behavioral analysis. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 389–404. doi:10.1123/apaq.18.4.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, T., & Miyahara, M. (2017). Inclusion of students with disability in physical education: A qualitative meta-analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education. doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1412508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, J., & Ha, S. (2012). Inclusion in physical education: A review of literature. International Journal of Disability, Development, & Education, 59(3), 257–281. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2012.697737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rarick, G. L., & Beuter, A. C. (1985). The effects of mainstreaming on the motor performance of mentally retarded and nonhandicapped students. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2, 277–282. doi:10.1123/apaq.2.4.277
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. (1962). A framework for considering some issues in special education. Exceptional Children, 28, 367–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrill, C. (1994). Least restrictive environments and total inclusion philosophies: Critical analysis. Palaestra, 10(3), 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, M. E., & Eichner, S. J. (1989). Integration for students with profound disabilities. In F. Brown & D. H. Lehr (Eds.), Persons with profound disabilities: Issues and practices (pp. 109–138). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Stainback, S. B., & Stainback, W. C. (1992). School as inclusive communities. In W. Stainback & S. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (pp. 29–43). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Stainback, W. C., & Stainback, S. B. (1990). Support networks for inclusive schooling: Interdependent integrated education. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (1988). Caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of the principle of the least restrictive environment. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13(1), 41–53. doi:10.1177/154079698801300105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2018). The condition of education 2018: Children and youth with disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1977, August 23). Education of handicapped children: Implementation of Part B of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Federal Register, Part II, 42(163), 42474–42518.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler, E. W., van der Mars, H., Darst, P., & Cusimano, B. (1990). Relationship of presage, context, and process variables to ALT-PE of elementary level mainstreamed students. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 7, 298–313. doi:10.1123/apaq.7.4.298
   Google Scholar
• Will, M. (1984, August). Education for the handicapped law report. Report presented at the Topical Conference on LRE Technical Assistance Parent Programs, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Yell, M. L. (1995). Least restrictive environment, inclusion, and students with disabilities: A legal analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 28(4), 389–404. doi:10.1177/002246699502800401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar