Review of Literature and Overview of Study

References

• Adams, J., & DeFleur, M. H. (2010). The acceptability of a doctoral degree earned online as a credential for obtaining a faculty position. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 71–85. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_2
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, B. A. (2012). Redefining the EdD: Seeking a separate identity. Quest, 64(1), 24–33. doi:10.1080/00336297.2012.653260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, B. A., Lund, J., & O’Neil, K. (2015). PETE doctoral institutions: Programs, faculty and doctoral students. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 86, 311–318. doi:10.1080/02701367.2015.1041634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, B. A., Lund, J., & O’Neil, K. (2016). The impact of supply and demand on D-PETE: The future of the profession. Quest, 68, 337–347. doi:10.1080/00336297.2016.1182563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, B. A., & Rikard, G. L. (2008). A comparison of supply and demand for PETE faculty: The changing landscape. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 540–545. doi:10.1080/02701367.2008.10599521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, B. A., & Rikard, G. L. (2011a). Characteristics of PETE doctoral level institutions: Descriptions of programs, faculty and doctoral students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 103–115. doi:10.1123/jtpe.30.2.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, B. A., & Rikard, G. L. (2011b). A comparison of supply and demand for PETE professionals in higher education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 116–128. doi:10.1123/jtpe.30.2.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle, S., & Arends, R. I. (2003). Faculty supply and demand. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 112–126. doi:10.1177/0022487102250285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Sinclair, M. D., & Clark, J. R. (1993). Effects of questionnaire length, respondent- friendly design, and difficult question on response rates for occupant-addressed census mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(3), 289–304. doi:10.1086/269376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. L., & Beck, S. W. (1999, April). Education should consider alternative formats for the dissertation. Educational Researcher, 23(1), 29–32; 42.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: A report prepared by the Pew Charitable Trusts.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics (2017). Degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by control and classification and state or jurisdiction 2015–16. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_317.20.asp
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M., Sutherland, S., Sinclair, C., & Ward, P. (2011). Not surprised, but concerned: The professoriate’s reaction to PETE doctoral education in the United States. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 157–177. doi:10.1123/jtpe.30.2.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikard, G. L., & Boyce, B. A. ( Guest Eds.). (2011). A multifaceted examination of the status of PETE doctoral education in the U.S. [Special Thematic Issue]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 1–208. doi:10.1123/jtpe.30.2.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Mars, H. (2011). Reflecting on the state of U.S. doctoral programs… Houston we have a problem. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 189–208. doi:10.1123/jtpe.30.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Mars, H. (2018). 37th Dudley Allen Sargent lecture: Policy development in physical education … The last best chance? Quest. doi:10.1080/00336297.2018.1439391
   Google Scholar
• Ward, P., Parker, M., Sutherland, S., & Sinclair, C. (2011). A critical examination of the curriculum of physical education teacher education doctoral programs. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 145–156. doi:10.1123/jtpe.30.2.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, M. L., Goc Karp, G., & Feltz, D. (2003). Positions in kinesiology and physical education at the college or university level. Quest, 55, 30–50. doi:10.1080/00336297.2003.10491787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar