539
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Revisiting the Tactical-Decision Learning Model

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Bouthier, D. (1984). Sports collectifs: Contribution à l’analyse de l’activité et éléments pour une formation tactique essentielle. L’exemple du rugby [Team sports: Contribution to the analysis of activity and elements for an essential tactical education] (Unpublished Master’s thesis). INSEP, Paris (France).
  • Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18(1), 5–8.
  • Butz, J. V. (2018). Applications for constructivist teaching in physical education. Strategies, 31(4), 12–18. doi:10.1080/08924562.2018.1465868
  • Chandler, T. (1996). Teaching games for understanding—Reflections and further questions. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(4), 49–51. doi:10.1080/07303084.1996.10607375
  • Chang, C.-W. (2009). Langage, pensée et action: approche sémio-constructiviste des apprentissages du jeu en basket-ball chez l’élève de CM2 (5ième grade) [Language, thought and action: Semio-constructivist approach to basketball game-play learning with 5th grade pupils] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Franche-Comté, Besançon (France).
  • Chow, J. Y. (2013). Nonlinear learning underpinning pedagogy: Evidence, challenges, and implications. Quest, 65(4), 469–484. doi:10.1080/00336297.2013.807746
  • Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araujo, D. (2007). The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 251–278. doi:10.3102/003465430305615
  • Davids, K., Button, C., Araujo, D., Renshaw, I., & Hristovski, R. (2006). Movement models from sports provide representative task constraints for studying adaptive behavior in human movement systems. Adaptive Behavior, 14(1), 75–95. doi:10.1177/105971230601400103
  • Davids, K., Chow, J.-Y., & Shuttleworth, R. (2005). A constraints-led framework for nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, New Zealand, 38(1), 17–29.
  • Davids, K., Kingsbury, D., Bennet, S. J., & Handford, C. (2001). Information-movement coupling: Implications for the organization of research and practice during acquisition of self-paced extrinsic timing skills. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(2), 117–127. doi:10.1080/026404101300036316
  • Deriaz, D., Poussin, B., & Gréhaigne, J.-F. (1998). Le débat d’idées [The debate of ideas]. Éducation Physique et Sport, n273, 80–82.
  • Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391–409. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6
  • Ennis, C. D. (2007). Curricular coherence: A key to effective physical activity programs. In P. Heikinaro-Johansson, R. Telama, & E. McEvoy (Eds.), AIESEP World Congress 2006 proceedings: The role of physical education in promoting physical activity and health (pp. 10–25). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyvaskyla, Department of Sport Sciences Research Report No. 4.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  • Godbout, P., & Desrosiers, P. (2005). Students’ participation to the assessment process in physical education. In F. Carreiro da Costa, M. Cloes, & M. Gonzalez Valeiro (Eds.), The art and science of teaching in physical education and sport (pp. 227–248). Lisbon, Portugal: Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
  • Goodyear, V., & Dudley, D. (2015). “I’m a facilitator of learning!” Understanding what teachers and students do within student-centered physical education models. Quest, 67(3), 274–289. doi:10.1080/00336297.2015.1051236
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., Billard, M., & Laroche, J. Y. (1999). L’enseignement des jeux sportifs collectifs à l’école. Conception, construction, évaluation [The teaching of team sports at school. Conception, construction, assessment]. Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck. (Collection Sciences et Pratiques du Sport).
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., Caty, D., & Godbout, P. (2010). Modelling ball circulation in invasion team sports: A way to promote learning games through understanding. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(3), 257–270. doi:10.1080/17408980903273139
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., Caty, D., & Marle, P. (2007). Étude systématique de différentes configurations du jeu dans les jeux réduits [Systematic study of various configurations of play in small-sided games]. In J.-F. Gréhaigne (Ed.), Configuration du jeu. Débats d’idées & apprentissage du football et des sports collectifs [Configuration of play. Debate of ideas & soccer and team-sports learning] (pp. 43–60). Besançon, France: Presses de l’Université de Franche-Comté.
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., & Godbout, P. (1995). Tactical knowledge in team sports from a constructivist and cognitivist perspective. Quest, 47(4), 490–505. doi:10.1080/00336297.1995.10484171
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., & Godbout, P. (1998a). Formative assessment in a tactical approach context. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(1), 46–51. doi:10.1080/07303084.1998.10605048
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., & Godbout, P. (1998b). Observation, critical thinking and transformation: Three key elements for a constructivist perspective of the learning process in team sports. In R. Feingold, R. Rees, G. Barrette, L. Fiorentino, S. Virgilio, & E. Kowalski (Eds.), Education for life (pp. 109–118). New-York, NY: Adelphi University.
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., & Godbout, P. (2014). Dynamic systems theory and team sport coaching. Quest, 66(1), 96–116. doi:10.1080/00336297.2013.814577
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier, D. (1997). Performance assessment in team sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16(4), 500–516. doi:10.1123/jtpe.16.4.500
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier, D. (1999). The foundations of tactics and strategy in team sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18(2), 159–174. doi:10.1123/jtpe.18.2.159
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier, D. (2001). The teaching and learning of decision making in team sports. Quest, 53(1), 59–76. doi:10.1080/00336297.2001.10491730
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., & Nadeau, L. (2015). L’enseignement et l’apprentissage de la tactique en sports collectifs: Des précurseurs oubliés aux perspectives actuelles [The teaching and learning of tactics in team sports: From forgotten precursors to current perspectives]. eJournal de la Recherche sur l’Intervention en Éducation Physique et Sport, n35, 106–140. doi:10.4000/ejrieps.1660
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., Richard, J.-F., & Griffin, L. (2005). Teaching and learning team sports and games. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
  • Gréhaigne, J.-F., Wallian, N., & Godbout, P. (2005). Tactical-decision learning model and students’ practices. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(3), 255–269. doi:10.1080/17408980500340869
  • Griffin, L. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Oslin, J. L. (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2017). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 83–106). London, UK: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Harvey, S., Cope, E., & Jones, R. (2016). Developing questioning in game-centered approaches. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 87(3), 28–35. doi:10.1080/07303084.2015.1131212
  • Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). Exploring socially shared regulation in the context of collaboration. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 267–286. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.12.3.267
  • Kinnerk, P., Harvey, S., MacDonncha, C., & Lyons, M. (2018). A review of the game-based approaches to coaching literature in competitive team sport settings. Quest, 70(4), 401–418. doi:10.1080/00336297.2018.1439390
  • Light, R. (2004). Coaches’ experiences of Game Sense: Opportunities and challenges. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 9(2), 115–132. doi:10.1080/1740898042000294949
  • Marsenach, J., & Druenne, F. (1974). Volley-ball. Mémento CPS FSGT. Paris, France: Armand Colin-Bourrelier.
  • Nachon, M., & Chang, C.-W. (2004). Interactions verbales entre les élèves et projet d’action en Basket-ball en classe de troisième [Student verbal interactions and action project in Basket-ball with high school students]. eJournal de la Recherche sur l’Intervention en Éducation Physique et Sport, n5, 15–36.
  • Nadeau, L., Gréhaigne, J.-F., & Godbout, P. (2017). Developing tactical knowledge with the help of support players: An illustration in ice hockey. International Journal of Physical Education, 54(1), 22–33.
  • Nadeau, L., Richard, J.-F., & Godbout, P. (2008). The validity and reliability of a performance assessment procedure in ice hockey. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13(1), 65–83. doi:10.1080/17408980701444718
  • National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools: Better thinking and learning for every child. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Piaget, J. (1936). La genèse des principes de conservation dans la physique de l’enfant [Genesis of the child conservation-principle]. Annuaire de l’Instruction Publique en Suisse, n27, 31–44.
  • Piaget, J. (1969). Psychologie et pédagogie [Psychology and pedagogy]. Paris, France: Denoël.
  • Renshaw, I., & Chow, J.-Y. (2019a). A constraint-led approach to sport and physical education pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 103–116. doi:10.1080/17408989.2018.1552676
  • Renshaw, I., & Chow, J.-Y. ( Guest Eds.). (2019b). Research in constraints special issue. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2).
  • Richard, J.-F., Godbout, P., & Gréhaigne, J.-F. (2000). Students’ precision and inter-observer reliability of performance assessment in team sports. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71(1), 85–91. doi:10.1080/02701367.2000.10608885
  • Richard, J.-F., Godbout, P., Tousignant, M., & Gréhaigne, J.-F. (1999). The try-out of a team sport performance assessment procedure in elementary and junior high school physical education classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18(3), 336–356. doi:10.1123/jtpe.18.3.336
  • Richland, L. E., & Begolli, K. N. (2016). Analogy and higher order thinking: Learning mathematics as an example. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 160–168. doi:10.1177/2372732216629795
  • Richland, L. E., & Simms, N. (2015). Analogy, higher order thinking, and education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 6(2), 177–192. doi:10.1002/wcs.1336
  • Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. doi:10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
  • Tan, C. (2017). Teaching critical thinking: Cultural challenges and strategies in Singapore. British Educational Research Journal, 43(5), 988–1002. doi:10.1002/berj.3295
  • Tan, C. W. K., Chow, J. Y., & Davids, K. (2012). ‘How does TGfU work?’: Examining the relationship between learning design in TGfU and a nonlinear pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(4), 331–348. doi:10.1080/17408989.2011.582486
  • Vygotski, L. S. (1934). Pensée et langage (traduction de Françoise Sève et avant-propos de Lucien Sève), suivi de “Commentaires sur les remarques critiques de Vygotski” de Jean Piaget [Thought and language (translation by Françoise Sève and foreword by Lucien Sève), followed with Comments on Vygotski’s critical remarks by Jean Piaget]. Collection “Terrains”, Paris, France: Éditions Sociales, 1985; Réédition, Paris, France: La Dispute, 1997.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of the higher psychological processes. (Originally published 1930, New York: Oxford University Press.). Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press.
  • Wallian, N., & Gréhaigne, J.-F. (2004). Vers une approche sémio-constructiviste des apprentissages moteurs [Toward a semio-constructivist approach to motor learning]. In G. Carlier (Ed.), Si l’on parlait du plaisir d’enseigner l’éducation physique [If we talked about the fun of teaching physical education] (pp. 167–179). Montpellier, France: AFRAPS.
  • Welch, P., Young, L., Johnson, P., & Lindsay, D. (2018). Metacognitive awareness and the link with undergraduate examination performance and clinical reasoning. MedEdPublish, 7(2): article No 32. Retrieved from doi:10.15694/mep.2018.0000100.1
  • Woods, A. M., & Book, C. (1995). Critical thinking in middle school physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 66(6), 39–43. doi:10.1080/07303084.1995.10607096
  • Zerai, Z., Gréhaigne, J.-F., & Godbout, P. (2013). Configurations of play in invasion team sports and learning by analogy. International Journal of Physical Education, 50(1), 18–28.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.