120
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Critical Surveys Edited by Stephen Roper

&
Pages 939-954 | Published online: 18 Aug 2010

References

  • ADSHEAD , M. and QUINN , B. 1998 . The move from government to governance: Irish development policy's paradigm shift . Policy and Politics , 26 : 209 – 225 .
  • BAUMGARTNER , F. R. and JONES , B. D. 1993 . Agendas and Instability in American Politics , Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press .
  • BENZ , A. and EBERLEIN , B. 1999 . The Europeanization of regional policies: patterns of multi‐level governance . Journal of European Public Policy , 6 : 329 – 348 .
  • Boix , C. 1998 . Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • BRAUN , D. 1993 . Who governs intermediary agencies? Principal‐agent relations in research policy‐making . Journal of Public Policy , 13 : 135 – 162 .
  • BROOKS , C. 1999 . Values and views of government? Analysing the ideological sources of public policy preferences . Social Science Research , 28 : 137 – 161 .
  • BULMER , S. and PADGETT , S. 2005 . Policy transfer in the European Union: an institutionalist perspective . British Journal of Political Science , 35 : 103 – 126 .
  • COOKE , P . 2004a . The role of research in regional innovation systems: new models meeting knowledge economy demands . International Journal of Technology Management , 28 : 507 – 533 .
  • COOKE , P. 2004b . Life sciences clusters and regional science policy . Urban Studies , 41 : 1113 – 1131 .
  • COOKE , P. , BOEKHOLT , P. and TODLING , F. 2001 . The Governance of Innovation in Europe: Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness , London : Continuum International .
  • COOKE , P. , GOMEZ‐URANGA , M. and ETXEBARRIA , G. 1997 . Regional innovation systems: institutional and organizational dimensions . Research Policy , 26 : 475 – 491 .
  • COZZENS , S. E. and MELKERS , J. E. 1997 . Use and usefulness of performance measurement in state science and technology programs . Policy Studies Journal , 25 : 425 – 435 .
  • COZZENS , S. E. and WOODHOUSE , E. J. 1995 . “ Science, government, and the politics of knowledge ” . In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , Edited by: jASANOFF , S. , MARKLE , G. E. , PETERSEN , J. C. and PINCH , T. 533 – 553 . London : Sage .
  • CRUZ‐CASTRO , L. and SANZ‐MENENDEZ , L. 2005 . Politics and institutions: European parliamentary technology assessment . Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 72 : 429 – 448 .
  • CRUZ‐CASTRO , L. , FERNANDEZ , M. and SANZ‐MENENDEZ , L. 2003 . La importancia de los intereses academicos en la política científica y tecnológica catalana, Papers . Revista de Sociología , 70 : 75 – 105 .
  • DICKSON , D. 1984/88 . The New Politics of Science, , 2nd Edn , Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press .
  • DOHSE , D. 2000 . Technology policy and the regions ‐ the case of the Bioregio contest . Research Policy , 29 : 1111 – 1133 .
  • DOLOWITZ , D. P. and MARSH , D. 2000 . Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy‐making . Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration , 13 : 5 – 24 .
  • DRUCKMAN , J. N. and LUPIA , A. 2000 . Preference formation . Annual Review of Political Science , 3 : 1 – 24 .
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION . 1993 . White Paper on ‘Growth, Competitiveness and Employment and Ways Forward into the 21st Century’ , Brussels : EC . COM (93) 700 (final)
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION . 1995 . Green Paper on Innovation , Brussels : EC . COM (95) 688 (final)
  • EDLER , J. , KUHLMANN , S. and BEHRENS , M. , eds. 2003 . Changing Governance of Research and Technology Policy. The European Research Area , Cheltenham : Edward Elgar .
  • EWERS , H.‐J. and WETTMANN , R. W. 1980 . Innovation oriented regional policy . Regional Studies , 14 : 161 – 179 .
  • FELLER , I. 1992 . American state governments as models for national science policy . Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 11 : 288 – 309 .
  • FERNANDEZ , M. , SANZ‐MENENDEZ , L. and CRUZ‐CASTRO , L. 2003 . Diseno institutional y preferencias politicas: o como equilibrar los intereses académicos en la política de ciencia, tecnología e innovación gallega . Inguarak, Revista Vasca de Sociología y Ciencia Política , 35 : 33 – 68 .
  • GRANDE , E. 1996 . The state and interest groups in a framework of multi‐level decision‐making: the case of the European Union . Journal of European Public Policy , 3 : 318 – 338 .
  • GUSTON , D. 1999 . Between Politics and Science , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • HAAS , P. M. 1992 . Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination . International Organization , 46 : 1 – 35 .
  • HALL , P. A. 1986 . Governing the Economy. The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France , Cambridge : Polity .
  • HALL , P. A. 1989 . “ Conclusion; the politics of Keynesian ideas ” . In The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Keynesianism Across Nations , Edited by: HALL , P. A. 361 – 391 . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
  • HALL , P. A. 1993 . Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state . Comparative Politics , 25 : 275 – 296 .
  • HASSINK , R. 1993 . Regional innovation policies compared . Urban Studies , 30 : 1009 – 1024 .
  • HECLO , H. 1974 . Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden , New Haven, CT : Yale University Press .
  • HIBBS , D. A. 1977 . Political parties and macroeconomic policy . American Political Science Review , 71 : 1467 – 1487 .
  • HOOGHE , L. and MARKS , G. 2001 . Multi‐level Governance and European Integration , Lanham, MD : Rowman & Littlefield .
  • KAISER , R. 2003 . The multi‐level science policy and regional innovation: the case of them Munich cluster for pharmaceutical biotechnology . European Planning Studies , 11 : 841 – 857 .
  • KAISER , R. and PRANGE , H. 2004a . The reconfiguration of national innovation systems ‐ the example of German biotechnology . Research Policy , 33 : 395 – 408 .
  • KAISER , R. and PRANGE , H. 2004b . Managing diversity in a system of multi‐level governance: the open method of coordination in innovation policy . Journal of European Public Policy , 11 : 249 – 266 .
  • KEATING , M. 2002 . “ Devolution and public policy in the United Kingdom. Divergence or convergence? ” . In Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences within the UK , Edited by: ADAMS , J. and ROBINSON , P. London : Institute for Public Policy .
  • KINGDON , J. W. 1984/95 . Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, , 2nd Edn , London : HarperCollins .
  • KOSCHATZKY , K. 2000 . The Regionalisation of the Innovation Policy in Germany ‐Theoretical Foundations and Recent Experience , Working Paper 1/2000 Fraunhofer Institut System ‐und Innovationsforschungs (FhG‐ISI) .
  • KUITUNEN , S. 2002 . What is the role of the EU Structural Funds in promoting RTDI? Review of some empirical findings . Research Evaluation , 11 : 49 – 58 .
  • LAMBRIGHT , H. and TEICH , A. 1989 . Science, technology and state economic development . Policy Studies Journal , 18 : 135 – 147 .
  • LANDABASO , M. 1995 . Promoción de la innovación en la política regional comunitaria , Bilbao : Universidad del País Vasco . Dissertation
  • LAREDO , P. 2003 . Six major challenges facing public intervention in higher education, science, technology and innovation . Science and Public Policy , 30 : 4 – 12 .
  • LASSWELL , H. 1936 . “ Politics: who gets what, when and how ” . In The Political Writings of Harold D. Lasswell , Edited by: LASSWELL , H. 295 – 461 . Glencoe : Free Press . 1951
  • LONG , W and FELLER , I. 1972 . State support of R&D: an uncertain path to economic growth . Land Economics , 48 : 220 – 227 .
  • LOUGHLIN , J. 1996 . ‘Europe of the regions’ and the federalisation of Europe . Publius ‐ The Journal of Federalism , 26 : 141 – 162 .
  • Lowi , T. J. 1972 . Four systems of policy, politics and choice . Public Administration , 32 : 298 – 310 .
  • LYALL , C. and TAIT , J. 2004 . Foresight in a multi‐level governance structure: policy integration and communication . Science and Public Policy , 31 : 27 – 37 .
  • MAJONE , G. 1991 . Cross‐national sources of regulatory policymaking in Europe and the United States . Journal of Public Policy , 11 : 79 – 106 .
  • MARCH , J. G. and OLSEN , J. P. 1984 . The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life . American Political Science Review , 78 : 734 – 749 .
  • MARKS , G. 1992 . “ Structural policy and 1992 ” . In Euro‐Politics. Institutions and Policy Making in the ‘New? European Community , Edited by: SBRAGIA , A. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution .
  • MARKS , G. , HOOGHE , L. and BLANK , K. 1996 . European Integration from the 1980s: state‐centric v. multi‐level governance . Journal of Common Market Studies , 34 : 343 – 378 .
  • MARTIN , S. 1998 . EU programmes and the evolution of the local economic governance in the UK . European Urban and Regional Studies , 5 : 237 – 248 .
  • METCALFE , S. E. and GEORGHIOU , L. 1998 . Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy . STI Science, Technology and Industry Review , 22 : 75 – 100 .
  • MOE , T. M. 1980 . The Organization of Interests , Chicago, IL : Chicago University Press .
  • MORENO , L. 2002 . Decentralization in Spain . Regional Studies , 36 : 399 – 408 .
  • Moso , M. 2000 . “ Origen y evolución de las políticas científicas y tecnológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de País Vasco (1980–1998) ” . Bilbao : Basque Country University Press . Dissertation
  • Moso , M. and OLAZARAN , M. 2002 . Regional Technology Policy and the emergence of an R&D System in the Basque Country . Journal of Technology Transfer , 27 : 61 – 75 .
  • MYTELKA , L. K. and SMITH , K. 2002 . Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co‐evolving process . Research Policy , 31 : 1467 – 1479 .
  • OECD . 2004 . Science and Innovation Policy. Key Challenges and Opportunities , Paris : OECD .
  • PAVITT , K. 1991 . What makes basic research economically useful . Research Policy , 20 : 109 – 119 .
  • PAVITT , K. 2000 . Why European Union funding of academic research should be increased: a radical proposal . Science and Public Policy , 27 : 455 – 460 .
  • RICHARDSON , J. J. and JORDAN , A. G. 1979 . Governing Under Pressure. The Policy Process in a Post‐Parliamentary Democracy , Oxford : Martin Robertson .
  • ROMERO , M. , CRUZ‐CASTRO , L. and SANZ‐MENENDEZ , L. 2003 . Estabilidad y cambio en las políticas andaluzas de ciencia, tecnología e innovación . Revista Internacional de Sociología , 35 : 7 – 52 .
  • SABATIER , P. A. 1988 . An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy‐oriented learning therein . Policy Sciences , 21 : 129 – 168 .
  • SABATIER , P. A. 1998 . The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe . Journal of European Public Policy , 5 : 98 – 130 .
  • SALTER , A. J. and MARTIN , B. 2001 . The economic benefits of publicly funding basic research: a critical review . Research Policy , 30 : 509 – 532 .
  • SANZ‐MENENDEZ , L. 1995 . Policy choices, institutional constraints and policy learning: the Spanish science and technology policy in the eighties . International Journal of Technology Management , 10 : 255 – 274 .
  • SANZ‐MENENDEZ , L. 1997 . Estado, ciencia y tecnología en España: 1939–1997 , Madrid : Alianza Universidad .
  • SANZ‐MENENDEZ , L. , CRUZ‐CASTRO , L. and ROMERO , M. 2001 . “ Recursos, intereses y difusión de modelos para la política regional de IòD: la Comunidad de Madrid ” . In Sistemas regionales de Innovación , Edited by: OLAZARAN , M. and GOMEZ‐URANGA , M. 375 – 403 . Bilbao : Basque Country University Press .
  • SANZ‐MENENDEZ , L. , MUNOZ , E. and GARCIA , C. E. 1993 . The vicissitudes of Spanish science and technology policy . Science and Public Policy , 20 : 370 – 380 .
  • SCHERZINGER , A. 1998 . Die Technologiepolitik der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland ‐ein Überblick , Discussion Paper No. 164 Berlin : DIW .
  • SCHON , D A. and REIN , M. 1994 . Frame Reflection. Towards the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies , New York : Basic .
  • SKOCPOL , T. and FINEGOLD , K. 1982 . State capacity and economic intervention in the early New Deal . Political Science Quarterly , 97 : 255 – 278 .
  • SMITH , A. 1997 . Studying multi‐level governance. Examples from French translations of the structural funds . Public Administration , 75 : 711 – 729 .
  • SOETE , L. and ARUNDEL , A. , eds. 1993 . An Integrated Approach to European Innovation and Technology Diffusion Policy, A Maastricht Memorandum , Brussels : CE .
  • STEINMO , S. , THELEN , K. and LONGSTRETH , F. , eds. 1992 . Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • STURN , D. 2000 . Decentralized industrial policies in practice: the case of Austria and Styria . European Planning Studies , 8 : 169 – 182 .
  • WALKER , J. L. Jr . 1991 . Mobilizing Interest Groups in America , Ann Arbor, MI : University of Michigan Press .
  • WEIR , M. 1992 . “ Ideas and the politics of bounded innovation ” . In Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis , Edited by: STEINMO , S. , THELEN , K. and LONGSTRETH , F. 188 – 216 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • WILSON , D and SOUITARIS , V. 2002 . Do Germany's federal and land governments (still) co‐ordinate their innovation policies? . Research Policy , 31 : 1123 – 1140 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.