Evaluation of European Union Cohesion policy: Research questions and policy challenges

References

• Allen , D. 1996 . “ Cohesion and structural adjustment ” . In Policy-Making in the European Union, , 3rd Edn , Edited by: Wallace , H. and Wallace , W. 209 – 233 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler , J. 2001 . “ The evaluation of regional policy ” . In Quod erat demonstradum? , Edited by: Eckey , H.-F. , Hecht , D. , Junkernheinrich , M. , Karl , H. , Werbeck , N. and WINK , R. 3 – 20 . Stuttgart : Lucius & Lucius . Ordnungspolitik als konstruktive Antwort auf wirtschaftspolitische Herausforderungen
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler , J. , Gross , T. and McMaster , I. Delivering the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas . Background Paper for the UK Presidency Conference ‘Regional and Rural Development Programmes (2007–2013): Delivering the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas’ . 7–8 November 2005 , Newcastle-Gateshead, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler , J. and Michie , R. 1995 . A new era in EU regional policy evaluation? The appraisal of the Structural Funds . Regional Studies , 29 : 745 – 752 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler , J. and Taylor , S. 2003 . “ IQ-Net Report ” . In The Added Value of the Structural Funds: A Regional Perspective , Glasgow : European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde .
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler , J. and Turok , I. 1997 . “ Conclusions: An agenda for reform ” . In The Coherence of EU Regional Policy: Contrasting Perspectives on the Structural Funds , Edited by: Bachtler , J. and Turok , I. 346 – 372 . London : Jessica Kingsley .
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler , J. and Wishlade , F. 2004 . Searching for Consensus: The Debate on Reforming EU Cohesion Policy , Glasgow : European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde . European Policy Research Papers No. 55
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler , J. and Wishlade , F. 2005 . From Building Blocks to Negotiating Boxes: The Reform of EU Cohesion Policy , Glasgow : European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde . European Policy Research Papers No. 57
   Google Scholar
• Barbier , J.-C. 2003 . Devising and Using Evaluation Standards, The French Paradox , Noisy Le-Grand : CNRS/Centre d'études de l'emploi . Document de travail No. 23
   Google Scholar
• Beutel , J. 1997 . “ Report to the Directorate-General for Regional Policies (Commission of the European Communities) ” . In Evaluation of the Macroeconomic Impact of the Structural Policies in the Cohesion Countries (Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain) 1989–1999 , Constance : University of Constance .
   Google Scholar
• Beutel , J. 2002 . “ Final Report to the Directorate-General for Regional Policies (Commission of the European Communities) ” . In The Economic Impact of Objective 1 Interventions for the Period 2000–2006 , Constance : University of Constance .
   Google Scholar
• Blaas , E. W. 1991 . Evaluation of Alternative Methodological Approaches for Assessing the Regional Macro-Economic Effects of the Community's Regional Action: The PARADISE-Model , Economic and Social Institute, Free University Amsterdam .
   Google Scholar
• Boldrin , M. and Canova , F. 2001 . Europe's regions: income disparities and regional policies . Economic Policy , 32 : 207 – 253 .
   Google Scholar
• Bougas , A. 2001 . Progress and challenges in the evaluation of European structural policies . Informationen zur Raumentwicklung , 6/7 : 311 – 314 .
   Google Scholar
• Bradley , J. and Morgenroth , E. 2004 . A Study of the Macroeconomic Impact of the Reform of EU Cohesion Policy , Dublin : Economic and Social Research Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Casavola , P. and Tagle , L. Building capacity for evaluation: lessons from Italy . 5th European Conference on Evaluation of the Structural Funds, ‘Challenges for Evaluation in an Enlarged Europe’ . June . pp. 26 – 27 . Budapest Paper presented to the
   Google Scholar
• Court of Auditors . 1998 . Special Report No. 15/98 on the assessment of Structural Fund intervention for the 1989–1993 and 1994–1999 periods together with the Commission's replies . Official Journal of the European Communities , C 347/1 16.11.98
   Google Scholar
• CSES . 2003 . “ Synthesis Report to the Directorate-General for Regional Policies (Commission of the European Communities) ” . In Ex Post Evaluation of 1994–1999 Objective 2 Programmes , 1994 Sevenoaks : Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services .
   Google Scholar
• ECOTEC . 2003 . “ Final Report to the Department of Trade and Industry and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister ” . In Evaluation of the Added Value and Costs of the European Structural Funds in the UK , London : ECOTEC Research and Consulting Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Ederveen , S. , De Groot , H. L. F. and Nahuis , R. August 2002 2002 . Fertile Soil for the Structural Funds? A Panel Data Analysis of the Conditional Effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy , August 2002 , The Hague : CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis . Discussion Paper No. 10
   Google Scholar
• EPRC and Fraser Associates . 2002 . “ Final Report to the Department of Trade and Industry ” . In A Feasibility Study of an Evaluation of the Impact and Added Value of the EU Structural Funds in the UK , Glasgow, and Fraser Associates : European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde .
   Google Scholar
• EPRC and Fraser of Allander . 2000 . “ Final Report to the Scottish Executive ” . In Methodologies Used in the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of European Structural Funds: A Comparative Assessment , Glasgow : European Policies Research Centre and the Fraser of Allander Institute, University of Strathclyde .
   Google Scholar
• Ernst and Young . 1997 . “ Evaluation and Documents Series No. 4. Directorate-General for Regional Policies ” . In Ex-Post Evaluation of the 1989–1993 Objective 2 Programmes , Brussels : Commission of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• ESRI . 2002 . “ Final Report to the Directorate-General for Regional Policies (Commission of the European Communities) ” . In An Examination of the Ex-post Macro-economic Impacts of CSF 1994–1999 on Objective 1 Countries and Regions , Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin, with Gesellschaft für Finanz- und Regionalanalysen (GEFRA) .
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 1990 . Annual Report on the Implementation of the Reform of the Structural Funds , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 18.3.92 1992 . Community Structural Policies: Assessment and Outlook , 18.3.92 , Brussels : Commission of the European Communities . COM(92) 84 final
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 1993 . Third Annual Report on the Implementation of the Reform of the Structural Funds , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 1996 . First Report on Economic and Social Cohesion , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 1999 . The MEANS Collection: Evaluating Socio-Economic Programmes , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 2001 . Unity, Solidarity, Diversity for Europe, its People and its Territory, Second Report on Economic and Social Cohesion , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 2002 . “ Working Paper. DG Regional Policy ” . In Community Added Value: Definition and Evaluation Criteria , Brussels : Commission of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 2004 . A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation, Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• European Council . 1988 . Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments . Official Journal of the European Communities , L185 15.7.88
   Google Scholar
• European Council . 1993 . Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2081/93 of 20 July 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No. 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments . Official Journal of the European Communities , L193 21.7.93
   Google Scholar
• European Council . 1999 . Council Regulation (EC) No. 1260/1999 of 12 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds . Official Journal of the European Communities , L161 26.6.99
   Google Scholar
• European Council . 17 December 2005 2005 . Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council, 15–16 December 2005 , 17 December 2005 , Brussels : Council of the European Union . CONCL 3
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine , C. and Monnier , E. 2002 . “ Evaluation in France ” . In International Atlas of Evaluation , Edited by: Furubo , J.-E. , Rist , R. C. and Sandahl , R. 63 – 76 . New Brunswick, NJ : Transaction .
   Google Scholar
• Furubo , J.-E. , Rist , R. C. and Sandahl , R. 2002 . International Atlas of Evaluation , Edited by: Furubo , J.-E. , Rist , R. C. and Sandahl , R. New Brunswick, NJ : Transaction .
   Google Scholar
• HMT, DTI and ODPM . 2003 . A Modern Regional Policy for the United Kingdom , London : H. M. Treasury, the Department of Trade and Industry and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, HMSO .
   Google Scholar
• Hummelbrunner , R. , Huber , W. and Arbter , R. 2005 . Process Monitoring of Impacts: Towards a New Approach to Monitor the Implementation of Structural Funds Programmes , Mimeo : ÖAR-Regionalberatung and Austrian Federal Chancellery .
   Google Scholar
• Lang , J. 2001 . Improving structural policy under conditions of hybrid governance: multi-actor constellations, integrated feedback instruments and the use of evaluation results . Evaluation , 7 : 7 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• MAP . November 2004 . Final Report by the Commission for the Study and Creation of a State Agency for the Evaluation of the Quality of Public Services and Policies , November , Madrid : Ministerio de Administraciones Públicas .
   Google Scholar
• Marks , G. 1992 . “ Structural policy in the European Community ” . In Europolitics, Institutions and Policymaking in the new European Community , Edited by: Sbragia , A. 191 – 224 . Washington, DC : Brookings Institution .
   Google Scholar
• MEANS . 1993 . Methods to Give Meaning to the Evaluation Obligation: The Conclusions of the MEANS Programme , Lyon : CEPOS . MEANS/93/12/EN
   Google Scholar
• Michie , R. and Fitzgerald , R. 1997 . “ The evolution of the Structural Funds ” . In The Coherence of EU Regional Policy: Contrasting Perspectives on the Structural Funds , Edited by: Bachtler , J. and Turok , I. 14 – 28 . London : Jessica Kingsley .
   Google Scholar
• Midelfart-Knarvik , K. H. and Overman , H. G. 2002 . Delocation and European integration: is structural spending justified? . Economic Policy , 17 ( 35 ) : 323 – 359 .
   Google Scholar
• Osuna , J. L. and Márquez , C. 2000 . Guía para la evaluación de políticas públicas , Seville : Instituto de Desarollo Regional, Fundación Universitaria .
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Research, Eurofutures and Umeå University . June 2004 . Effektutvärdering av de geografiske målprogrammen inom EG:s strukturfonder June , ITPS A2004:009
   Google Scholar
• Pollack , M. 1995 . “ Regional actors in an intergovernmental play: the making and implementation of EC structural policy ” . In The State of the European Union , Edited by: Rhodes , C. and Mazey , S. Vol. 3 , 361 – 390 . Harlow : Longman .
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt , C. 1998 . Evaluation in Europe: boom or bubble? . Evaluation , 4 : 214 – 224 .
   Google Scholar
• Röger , W. Macroeconomic evaluation of the effects of CSF with Quest II . European Conference on Evaluation Methods for Structural Funds Intervention . 2–3 December 1996 , Berlin, Germany. Paper presented at the
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson , I. 2000 . Evaluation in complex policy systems . Evaluation , 6 : 433 – 454 .
   Google Scholar
• Sapir , A. , Aghion , P. , Bertola , G. , Hellwig , M. , Pisani-Ferry , J. , Rosati , D. , Viñals , J. , Wallace , H. , Buit , M. , Nava , M. and Smith , P. M. 2004 . An Agenda for a Growing Europe: The Sapir Report , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Scheffel , K. 2001 . Evaluierung – Chance oder Last? Eine Betrachtung aus Bundessicht . Informationen zur Raumentwicklung , 6/7 : 315 – 316 .
   Google Scholar
• Tarschys , D. 2003 . Reinventing Cohesion: The Future of European Structural Policy , Stockholm : Swedish Institute for Growth Studies . SIEPS Report No. 17
   Google Scholar
• Tavistock Institute with GHK and IRS . 2003 . The Evaluation of Socio-Economic Development: The Guide , London : Tavistock Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , S. , Bachtler , J. and Polverari , L. 2001 . Structural Fund evaluation as a programme management tool: comparative assessment and reflections on Germany . Informationen zur Raumentwicklung , 6/7 : 341 – 357 .
   Google Scholar
• Toepel , K. 2000 . Evaluation in der Regionalpolitik . Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung , 69 : 395 – 405 .
   Google Scholar
• Toulemonde , J. 2000 . Evaluation culture(s) in Europe: differences and convergence between national practices . Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung , 69(Heft 3/2000) : 350 – 357 .
   Google Scholar
• Wadley , D. 1986 . Restructuring the Regions: Analysis, Policy Model and Prognosis , Paris : Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development .
   Google Scholar