Spatial Concentration of Industries and New Firm Exits: Does this Relationship Differ between Exits by Closure and by M&A?

REFERENCES

• Allison, P.D. (1982) Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology , 13, 61–98. doi: 10.2307/270718
   Google Scholar
• Buehler, S. , Kaiser, C. and Jaeger, F. (2006) Merge or fail? The determinants of mergers and bankruptcies in Switzerland, 1995–2000. Economics Letters , 90(1), 88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2005.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caroll, G.R. and Hannan, M.T. (1989) Density dependence in the evolution of populations of newspaper organizations. American Sociological Review , 54(4), 524–541. doi: 10.2307/2095875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cefis, E. and Marsili, O. (2012) Going, going, gone. Exit forms and the innovative capabilities of firms. Research Policy , 41(5), 795–807. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coff, R.W. (1999) How buyers cope with uncertainty when acquiring firms in knowledge-intensive industries. caveat emptor, Organization Science , 10(2), 144–161. doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.2.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, M. , Porter, M.E. and Stern, S. (2010) Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography , 10(4), 1–24. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbq010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detienne, D. (2010) Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: theoretical development. Journal of Business Venturing , 25, 203–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falck, O. (2007) Survival chances of new businesses: do regional conditions matter?. Applied Economics , 39(16), 2039–2048. doi: 10.1080/00036840600749615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folta, T.B. , Cooper, A.C. and Baik, Y. (2006) Geographic cluster size and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing , 21, 217–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, R. and Nesta, L. (2009) Product innovation and survival in a high-tech industry. Review of Industrial Organization , 34, 287–306. doi: 10.1007/s11151-009-9210-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. , Caroll, G.R. and Hannan, M.T. (1983) The liability of newness: age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review , 48, 692–710. doi: 10.2307/2094928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. , Brixy, U. and Falck, O. (2006) The effect of industry, region and time on new business survival: a multi-dimensional analysis. Review of Industrial Organization , 28, 285–306. doi: 10.1007/s11151-006-0018-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski, P.A. , Mata, J. and Portugal, P. (2010) Founding conditions and the survival of new firms. Strategic Management Journal , 31(5), 510–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graebner, M.K. , Eisenhardt, M. and Roundy, P.T. (2010) Success and failure in technology acquisitions: lessons for buyers and sellers. Academy of Management Perspectives , 24(3), 73–92. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2010.52842952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, D.J. (2009) Identifying urbanization and localization externalities in manufacturing and service industries. Papers in Regional Science , 88(1), 63–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. and Freeman, J. (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review , 49, 149–164. doi: 10.2307/2095567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada, N. (2007) Which firms exit and why? An analysis of small firm exits in Japan. Small Business Economics , 29(4), 401–414. doi: 10.1007/s11187-006-9001-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headd, B. (2003) Redefining business success: distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics , 21(1), 51–61. doi: 10.1023/A:1024433630958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. and Lieberman, M.B. (2002) The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change , 11(4), 725–760. doi: 10.1093/icc/11.4.725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S.P. (1995) Easy estimation methods for discrete-time duration models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics , 57(1), 129–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1995.tb00031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S.P. (2005) Survival analysis. Unpublished manuscript. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester (available at: http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/teaching/degree/stephenj/ec968/pdfs/ec968lnotesv6.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. (2010) The origin and growth of industry clusters: the making of Silicon Valley and Detroit. Journal of Urban Economics , 67, 15–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koeke, J. (2002) Determinants of acquisition and failure: evidence from corporate Germany. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics , 13(4), 457–484. doi: 10.1016/S0954-349X(02)00024-3
   Google Scholar
• McCann, B.T. and Folta, T.B. (2008) Location matters: where we have been and where we might go in agglomeration research. Journal of Management , 34(3), 532–565. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, E. and Doloreux, D. (2007) The Key Dimensions of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) Analysis: A Decade of Evolution , Working Papers on Firms and Regions Number U1/2007. Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe
   Google Scholar
• Ranft, A.L. and Lord, M.D. (2002) Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: a grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science , 13(4), 420–441. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.4.420.2952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schary, M.A. (1991) The probability of exit. RAND Journal of Economics , 22(3), 339–353. doi: 10.2307/2601051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, H. (2007) The merger paradox, in C. Wankel (Ed.), 21st Century Management. A Reference Handbook , Vol. I, pp. 345–354. Sage, Los Angeles, CA
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, J.M. and Flyer, F. (2000) Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the Unites States. Strategic Management Journal , 21(12), 1175–1193. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200012)21:12<1175::AID-SMJ139>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, O. and Audia, P.G. (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology , 106(2), 424–462. doi: 10.1086/316962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staber, U. (2001) Spatial proximity and firm survival in a declining industrial district: the case of knitwear firms in Baden-Wurttemberg. Regional Studies , 35(4), 329–341. doi: 10.1080/00343400125106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, M.R. and Jones, B.S. (2002) Modelling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science , 46(1), 218–237. doi: 10.2307/3088424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A.L. J. and Boschma, R.A. (2010) Co-evolution of firms, industries and network in space. Regional Studies , 45(7), 191–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oort, F.G. (2004) Urban Growth and Innovation: Spatially Bounded Externalities in the Netherlands , Ashgate, Aldershot .
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, S. and Cockburn, I. (2010) Patents and the survival of Internet-related IPOs. Research Policy , 39, 214–228. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennberg, K. and Lindqvist, G. (2010) The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms. Small Business Economics , 34(3), 221–241. doi: 10.1007/s11187-008-9123-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennberg, K. , Wiklund, J. , Detienne, D.R. and Cardon, M.S. (2010) Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing , 25, 361–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L.G. (1989) Combining institutional theory and population ecology: no legitimacy, no history. American Sociological Review , 54(4), 542–545. doi: 10.2307/2095876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar