Entrepreneurship in a Hub-and-Spoke Industrial District: Firm Survey Evidence from Seattle's Technology Industry

REFERENCES

• Aldrich H. and Martinez M. A. (2001) Many are called, but few are chosen: an evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 25(4), 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Amazon.com (2011) Annual Report. Amazon.com, Seattle, WA (available at: http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9MTc5ODc3fENoaWxkSUQ9LTF8VHlwZT0z&t=1)..
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. and Lehmann E. (2005) Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions?, Research Policy 34, 1191–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhide A. (2000) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma R. and Frenken K. (2011) Technological relatedness and regional branching, in Bathelt H., Feldman M. and Kogler D. (Eds) Beyond Territory. Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and Innovation, pp. 64–81 Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma R. and Iammarino S. (2009) Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy, Economic Geography 85(3), 289–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma R. and Wenting R. (2007) The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: does location matter?, Industrial and Corporate Change 16(2), 213–238. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtm004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass D. (2010) Microsoft's creative destruction, New York Times 4 February, A27 (available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/opinion/04brass.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0)..
   Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T., Gambardella A. and Saxenian A. (2001) ‘Old economy’ inputs for ‘new economy’ outcomes: cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys, Industrial and Corporate Change 10(4), 835–860. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.835
   Google Scholar
• Buenstorf G. and Klepper S. (2009) Heritage and agglomeration: the Akron tyre cluster revisited, Economic Journal 119(April), 705–733. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02216.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton D., Sorensen J. and Beckman C. (2002) Coming from good stock: career histories and new venture formation, Social Structure and Organizations Revisited 2009(19), 229–262. doi: 10.1016/S0733-558X(02)19007-0
   Google Scholar
• Chan S. P. (2009) Latest round of Microsoft layoffs may not be last, Seattle Times 6 May (available at: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoft/2009180671_microsoft06.html)..
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H. (2002) Graceful exits and missed opportunities: Xerox's management of its technology spin-off organizations, Business History Review 76(4), 803–837. doi: 10.2307/4127710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H. (2003) The era of open innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review 44(3), 35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook J. (1999) ‘Baby Bills’ off to the Internet gold rush. Microsoft is seeing an exodus of managerial talent, Seattle Post-Intelligencer 20 July (available at: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-64104298.html)..
   Google Scholar
• Cusumano M. (1998) Software Business Entrepreneurship: Lessons from Bill Gates and Microsoft. Sloan School of Management Working Paper Number WP 4046-98 (available at: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/2736) (accessed on 24 January 2013)..
   Google Scholar
• Cusumano M. and Selby R. W. (1995) Microsoft Secrets: How the World's Most Powerful Software Company Creates Technology, Shapes Markets, and Manages People. Touchstone, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl M. S., Ostergaard C. R. and Dalun B. (2010) Emergence of regional clusters: the role of spinoffs in the early growth process, in Boschma R. and Martin R. (Eds) The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, pp. 205–220 Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Commerce (2009) Fostering Washington's Innovation Economy: SB 6015 Report. Report to the Governor and Washington State Legislature (available at: http://www.commerce.wa.gov/uploads/agencyresource/sb6015report.pdf) (accessed on 26 January 2010)..
   Google Scholar
• Feldman M. (2003) The locational dynamics of the US biotech industry: knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis, Industry and Innovation 10(3), 311–328. doi: 10.1080/1366271032000141661
   Google Scholar
• Ferriani S., Garnsey E. and Lorenzoni G. (2012) Continuity and change in a spin-off venture: the process of reimprinting, Industrial and Corporate Change 21(4), 1011–1048. doi: 10.1093/icc/dts001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida R. and Kenney M. (1990) High-Technology restructuring in the USA and Japan, Environment and Planning A 22, 233–252. doi: 10.1068/a220233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken K., van Oort F. and Verburg T. (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth, Regional Studies 41(5), 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasmeier A. (1988) Factors governing the development of high tech industry agglomerations: a tale of three cities, Regional Studies 22(4), 287–301. doi: 10.1080/00343408812331344980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray M., Golob E. and Markusen A. (1996) Big firms, long arms, wide shoulders: the ‘hub-and-spoke’ industrial district in the Seattle region, Regional Studies 30(7), 651. doi: 10.1080/00343409612331349948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray M., Golob E. and Markusen A. (1999) Seattle: a classic hub-and-spoke region, in Markusen A., Lee Y.-S. and DiGiovanna S. (Eds) Second Tier Cities: Rapid Growth Beyond the Metropolis, pp. 267–289 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison B. (1992) Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles?, Regional Studies 26(5), 469–483. doi: 10.1080/00343409212331347121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug P.The location decisions and operations of high technology organizations in Washington State, Regional Studies1991a25(6), 525–541. doi: 10.1080/00343409112331346697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug P.Regional formation of high-technology service industries: the software industry in Washington State, Environment and Planning A1991b23, 859–884. doi: 10.1068/a230869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker D. (2005) High-technology employment: a NAICS-based update, Monthly Labor Review 128(July), 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Heebels B. and Boschma R. (2011) Performing in Dutch book publishing 1880–2008: the importance of entrepreneurial experience and the Amsterdam cluster, Journal of Economic Geography 11, 1007–1029. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbq048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs J. (1969) The Economy of Cities. Penguin, London.
   Google Scholar
• Klepper S. (1996) Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle, American Economic Review 86(3), 562–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper S.Employee startups in high-tech industries, Industrial and Corporate Change2001a10(3), 639–673. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.3.639
   Google Scholar
• Klepper S. (2001b) The evolution of the U.S. automobile industry and Detroit as its capital (available at: http://www.druid.dk/conferences/winter2002/gallery/klepper.pdf) (accessed on 11 November 2008)..
   Google Scholar
• Klepper S. (2002) The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry, Industrial and Corporate Change 11(4), 645–666. doi: 10.1093/icc/11.4.645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper S. (2009) Silicon Valley, a chip of the old Detroit bloc, in Acs Z., Audretsch D. B. and Strom R. J. (Eds) Entrepreneurship, Growth, and Public Policy, pp. 79–116 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Klepper S. and Sleeper S. (2005) Entry by spinoffs, Management Science 51(8), 1291–1306. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manes S. and Andrews P. (1993) Gates: How Microsoft's Mogul Reinvented an Industry – And Made Himself the Richest Man in America. Touchstone, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen A. (1994) Studying regions by studying firms, Professional Geographer 46(4), 477–490. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00477.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen A. (1996) Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts, Economic Geography 72(3), 293–214. doi: 10.2307/144402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen A. and McCurdy K. (1989) Chicago's defense-based high technology: a case study of the ‘seedbeds of innovation’ hypothesis, Economic Development Quarterly 3(1), 15–31. doi: 10.1177/089124248900300103
   Google Scholar
• Martin R. (2010) Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography: Rethinking regional path dependence: beyond lock-in to evolution, Economic Geography 86(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez A. (2011) Amazon.com on a hiring spree, Seattle Times 5 March (available at: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2014412815_amazon06.html)..
   Google Scholar
• Mayer H. (2011) Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Second Tier Regions. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Neck H., Meyer D. G., Cohen B. and Corbett A. (2004) An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation, Journal of Small Business Management 42(2), 190–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke F., Henning M. and Boschma R. (2011) How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions, Economic Geography 87(3), 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian A. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Shane S. (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual–Opportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers P. and Carlson D.The New Economy in Metropolitan Seattle: High Tech Firm Location Decisions Within the Metropolitan Landscape. University of Washington, Seattle, WA2000a.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers P. and Carlson D. (2000b) Ten Steps to a High Tech Future: The New Economy in Metropolitan Seattle (available at: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/reports/2000/12labormarkets_sommers/sommersreport.pdf)..
   Google Scholar
• Sommers P. and Heg D. (2003) Spreading the Wealth: Building a Tech Economy in Small and Medium-Sized Regions (available at: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/reports/2003/10labormarkets_sommers/200310_Sommers.pdf) (accessed on 8 February 2009)..
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson O. and Audia P. G. (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989, American Journal of Sociology 106(2), 424–461. doi: 10.1086/316962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staber U. (2005) Entrepreneurship as a source of path dependency, in Fuchs G. and Shapira P. (Eds) Rethinking Regional Innovation and Change: Path Dependency or Regional Breakthrough, pp. 107–126 Springer, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Storper M. (1989) The transition to flexible specialisation in the US film industry: external economies, the division of labor, and the crossing of industrial divides, Cambridge Journal of Economics 13, 273–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stross R. E. (1996) The Microsoft Way: The Real Story of How the Company Outsmarts Its Competition. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Tappi D. (2005) Clusters, adaption and extroversion: a cognitive and entrepreneurial analysis of the Marche music cluster, European Urban and Regional Studies 12(3), 289–307. doi: 10.1177/0969776405056591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar