Identifying European Economic Integration and Globalization: A Review of Concepts and Measures

REFERENCES

• A. T. Kearney, Inc. (2006) The Globalisation Index, Foreign Policy (available at: http://www.atkearney.com/main.taf?p=5,4,1,127,1).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson J. E. and van Wincoop E. (2004) Trade costs, Journal of Economic Literature 42(3), 691–751. doi: 10.1257/0022051042177649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baier S. L. and Bergstrand J. H. (2007) Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?, Journal of International Economics 71, 72–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balassa B. (1961) The Theory of Economic Integration. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin R., Forslid R., Martin P., Ottaviano G. I. P. and Robert-Nicoud F. (2003) Economic Geography and Public Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagwati J. (2004) In Defense of Globalization. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Bosker M. and Garretsen H. (2010) Trade costs in empirical New Economic Geography, Papers in Regional Science 89(3), 485–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00314.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brakman S., Garretsen H. and Schramm M. (2006) Putting New Economic Geography to the test: freeness of trade and agglomeration in the EU regions, Regional Science and Urban Economics 36(5), 613–635. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brakman S., Garretsen H. and van Marrewijk C. (2009) The New Introduction to Geographical Economics, 2nd Edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Bun M. and Klaassen F. (2007) The euro effect on trade is not as large as commonly thought, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 69(4), 473–496. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairncross F. (1997) The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Will Change Our Lives. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Chen N. and Novy D. (2012) On the measurement of trade costs: direct vs. indirect approaches to quantifying standards and technical regulations, World Trade Review 11, 401–414. doi: 10.1017/S1474745612000183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combes P.-P. and Lafourcade M. (2005) Transport costs: measures, determinants and regional policy implications for France, Journal of Economic Geography 5, 319–349. doi: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combes P.-P., Mayer T. and Thisse J.-P. (2008) Economic Geography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Dorrucci E. (2005) An Institutional Index of Regional Integration for the European Union and Mercosur. Mimeo. European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Dorrucci E., Firpo S., Fratzscher M. and Monelli F. P. (2002) European Integration: What Lessons for Other Regions? The Case of Latin America. ECB Working Paper Number 185. European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher A. (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Empirical evidence from a new index, Applied Economics 38(10), 1091–1110. doi: 10.1080/00036840500392078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher A., Gaston N. and Martens P. (2008) Measuring Globalization – Gauging its Consequence. Springer, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards T. H. (2007) How globalized really is European trade?, Spatial Economic Analysis 2(3), 259–280. doi: 10.1080/17421770701550363
   Google Scholar
• Egger P., Larch M., Staub K. E. and Winkelmann R. (2011) The trade effects of endogenous preferential trade agreements, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3(3), 113–143. doi: 10.1257/pol.3.3.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger P. and Pfaffermayr M. (Forthcoming 2012) The pure effects of European integration on intra-EU trade, The World Economy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel J. A. (1997) Regional Trading Blocs. The Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita M., Krugman P. and Venables A. J. (1999) The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser E. L. and Kohlhase J. E. (2005) Cities, regions and the decline of transport costs, Papers in Regional Science 83(1), 197–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick R. and Rose A. K. (2002) Does a currency union affect trade? The time-series evidence, European Economic Review 46(6), 1125–1151. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00202-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwartney J., Hall J. and Lawson R. (2011) Economic Freedom of the World: 2011 Annual Report. Economic Freedom Network, Vancouver, BC (data available at: http://www.freetheworld.com).
   Google Scholar
• Hanson G. (2005) Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration, Journal of International Economics 67, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson G. and Xiang C. (2004) The home-market effect and bilateral trade patterns, American Economic Review 94(4), 1108–1129. doi: 10.1257/0002828042002688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head K. and Ries J. (2001) Increasing returns versus national product differentiation as an explanation for the pattern of U.S.–Canada trade, American Economic Review 91(4), 858–876. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.4.858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilberry R. and Hummels D. (2003) Intranational home bias: some explanations, Review of Economics and Statistics 85(4), 1089–1092. doi: 10.1162/003465303772815970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller S. and Kruse R. (2010) Milestones of European Integration: Which Matters Most for Export Openness? CREATES Research Paper Number 2010-27. Aarhus University, Aarhus.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann D., Kraay A. and Mastruzzi M. (2010) The Worldwide Governance Indicators: A Summary of Methodology, Data and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Number 5430 (available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1682130).
   Google Scholar
• Laaser C.-F. (1997) Ordnungspolitik und Strukturwandel im Integrationsprozeß: das Beispiel Griechenlands, Portugals und Spaniens. Kieler Studie Number 287. Mohr, Tübingen.
   Google Scholar
• Limão N. and Venables A. (2001) Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, and transport costs, and trade, World Bank Economic Review 15(3), 451–479. doi: 10.1093/wber/15.3.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood B. and Redoano M. (2005) The CSGR Globalisation Index: An Introductory Guide. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation Working Paper Number 155/04 (available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/index/).
   Google Scholar
• McCallum J. (1995) National borders matter: Canada–US regional trade patterns, American Economic Review 85, 615–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller T., Holmes K. R. and Feulner E. J. (2012) 2012 Index of Economic Freedom. Promoting Economic Opportunity and Prosperity. The Heritage Foundation, New York, NY (available at: http://www.heritage.org/index/download).
   Google Scholar
• Mongelli F. P., Dorrucci E. and Agur I. (2005) What Does European Institutional Integration Tell Us About Trade Integration? ECB Occasional Paper Series Number 40. European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Oman, Ch. (1996) The Policy Challenges of Globalisation and Regionalisation. OECD Policy Brief Number 11. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005) Measuring Globalisation: OECD Economic Globalisation Indicators. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (various years) Economic Surveys [various countries]. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Preston C. (1997) Enlargement and Integration in the European Union. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Redding S. and Venables A. J. (2004) Economic geography and international inequality, Journal of International Economics 56, 97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik D. (1999) Globalisation and labour, or: if globalisation is a bowl of cherries, why are there so many glum faces around the table?, in Baldwin R., Cohen D., Sapir A. and Venables A. (Eds) Market Integration, Regionalism and the Global Economy, pp. 117–150. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Schrader K. and Laaser C.-F. (1994) Die baltischen Staaten auf dem Weg nach Europa: Lehren aus der Süderweiterung der EG. Kieler Studie Number 264. Mohr, Tübingen.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze G. G. and Ursprung H. W. (1999) Globalisation of the economy and the nation state, World Economy 22(3), 295–352. doi: 10.1111/1467-9701.00205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schürmann C. and Talaat A. (2000) Towards a European Peripherality Index. Final Report. Report Number 53. Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung, Dortmund.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab K. and Sala-i-Martin X. (Eds) (2012) World Competitiveness Report 2012–2013. World Economic Forum (available at: http://www.weforum.org/gcr).
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter M. J. (2001) Trade liberalization and per capita income convergence: a difference-in-differences analysis, Journal of International Economics 55, 203–228 [comment by Ben-David D., 229–234]. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00087-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traistaru I., Nijkamp P. and Longhi S. (2002) Regional Specialization and Concentration of Industrial Activity in Accession Countries. ZEI Policy Paper B; 16/2002. ZEI, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Van Liemt G. (1998) Labour in the global economy: challenges, adjustment and policy responses in the EU, in Memedovic O., Kuyvenhoven A. and Molle W. (Eds) Globalisation of Labour Markets. Challenges, Adjustment and Policy Responses in the EU. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Vanthoor W. F. V. (2002) A Chronological History of the EU 1946–2001. Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf H. (2000) Intranational home bias in trade, Review of Economics and Statistics 82(4), 555–563. doi: 10.1162/003465300559046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar