The Sopranos Redux: The Empirical Economics of Waste Crime

REFERENCES

• Alberini A. and Austin D. H. (1999) Strict liability as a deterrent in toxic waste management: empirical evidence from accident and spill data, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38(1), 20–48. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1999.1074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almer C. and Goeschl T. (2010) Environmental crime and punishment: empirical evidence from the German penal code, Land Economics 86(4), 707–726. doi: 10.3368/le.86.4.707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano M. and Bond S. (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, Review of Economic Studies 58(2), 277–297. doi: 10.2307/2297968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano M. and Bover O. (1995) Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models, Journal of Econometrics 68, 29–52. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltagi B. (2006) Estimating an economic model of crime using panel data from North Carolina, Journal of Applied Econometrics 21, 543–547. doi: 10.1002/jae.861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker G. (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach, Journal of Political Economy 76(2), 169–217. doi: 10.1086/259394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell R. and Bond S. (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models, Journal of Econometrics 87, 115–143. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge I., Klingemann H.-D., Volkens A., Bara J. and Tanenbaum E. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry T. (1999) Unobserved heterogeneity bias when estimating the economic model of crime, Applied Economics Letters 6, 753–757. doi: 10.1080/135048599352349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry T. and List J. (2002) Aggregation bias in the economic model of crime, Economic Letters 75, 81–86. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00597-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe C. and Fraser I. (1999) An economic analysis of household waste management, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38(2), 234–246. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1998.1079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen M. (1999) Monitoring and enforcement of environmental policy, in Tietenberg T. and Folmer H. (Eds) International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 1999, pp. 44–106. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Corman H. and Mocan N. (2000) A time series analysis of crime deterrence and drug abuse in NYC, American Economic Review 90(3), 584–604. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.3.584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell C. and Trumbull W. (1994) Estimating the economic model of crime with panel data, Review of Economics and Statistics 76(2), 360–366. doi: 10.2307/2109893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dills A. K., Miron J. A. and Summers G. (2008) What Do Economists Know About Crime? NBER Working Paper Number 13759. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Earnhart D. (1997) Enforcement of environmental protection laws under communism and democracy, Journal of Law and Economics 40(2), 377–402. doi: 10.1086/467377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earnhart D. (2000) Environmental crime and punishment in the Czech Republic: penalties against firms and employees, Journal of Comparative Economics 28, 379–399. doi: 10.1006/jcec.2000.1652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earnhart D. (2004) The effects of community characteristics on polluter compliance levels, Land Economics 80(3), 408–432. doi: 10.2307/3654729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert H. (2004) Inspections, warnings and compliance: the case of petroleum storage regulation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47, 232–259. doi: 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00079-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich I. (1973) Participation in illegitimate activities: a theoretical and empirical investigation, Journal of Political Economy 81(3), 521–565. doi: 10.1086/260058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajnzylber P., Lederman D. and Loayza N. (2002) What causes violent crime?, European Economic Review 46, 1223–1357. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00096-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullerton D. and Kinnaman T. (1995) Garbage, recycling, and illicit burning or dumping, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29(1), 78–91. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1995.1032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glicksman R. and Earnhart D. (2007) Depiction of the regulator-regulated entity relationship in the chemical industry: deterrence-based v. cooperative enforcement, William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 31(3), 603–660.
   Google Scholar
• Gray W. B. and Shadbegian R. J. (2004) ‘Optimal’ pollution abatement – whose benefits matter, and how much?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47(3), 510–534. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2003.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray W. B. and Shimshack J. P. (2011) The effectiveness of environmental monitoring and enforcement: a review of the empirical evidence, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5(1), 3–24. doi: 10.1093/reep/req017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstone M. (2002) The impacts of environmental regulations on industrial activity: evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act amendments and the Census of Manufactures, Journal of Political Economy 110(6), 1175–1219. doi: 10.1086/342808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grepperud S. (2002) Voluntary environmental agreements: bargaining over more than emissions, European Journal of Political Economy 18, 545–559. doi: 10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00105-2
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton J. T. (1996) Going by the (informal) book: the EPA's use of informal rules in enforcing hazardous waste laws, Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth 7, 109–155.
   Google Scholar
• Helland E. (1998) The revealed preferences of state EPAs: stringency, enforcement, and substitution, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 35, 242–261. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1998.1028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch H. (1994) Die Rechtswirklichkeit des Umweltstrafrechts aus der Sicht von Umweltverwaltung und Strafverfolgung. Empirische Untersuchungen zur Implementation strafbewehrter Vorschriften im Bereich des Umweltschutzes. Eigenverlag Max-Planck- Institut fuer Auslaendisches und Internationales Strafrecht, Freiburg.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob B., Lefgren L. and Moretti E. (2007) The dynamics of criminal behavior: evidence from weather shocks, Journal of Human Resources 42(3), 489–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan R. A., Gunningham N. A. and Thornton D. (2003) Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan D. M. and Posner E. A. (1999) Shaming white-collar criminals: a proposal for reform of the federal sentencing guidelines, Journal of Law and Economics 42(1), 365–391. doi: 10.1086/467429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpoff J., Lott J. and Wehlry E. (2005) The reputational penalties for environmental violations: empirical evidence, Journal of Law and Economics 48(2), 653–676. doi: 10.1086/430806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann H.-D., Volkens A., Bara J. and Budge I. (2007) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt S. (1998) The relationship between crime reporting and police: implications for the use of uniform crime reports, Journal of Quantitative Criminology 14(1), 61–81. doi: 10.1023/A:1023096425367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt S. D. and Miles T. J. (2007) Empirical study of criminal punishment, in Polinsky A. M. and Shavell S. (Eds) Handbook of Law and Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 455–495. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald Z. (2001) Revisiting the dark figure: a microeconometric analysis of the under-reporting of property crime and its implications, British Journal of Criminology 41, 127–149. doi: 10.1093/bjc/41.1.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald Z. (2002) Official crime statistics: their use and interpretation, Economic Journal 112, 85–106. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKitrick R. (2006) The politics of pollution: party regimes and air quality in Canada, Canadian Journal of Economics 39(2), 604–620. doi: 10.1111/j.0008-4085.2006.00362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustard D. (2003) Reexamining criminal behavior: the importance of omitted variable bias, Review of Economics and Statistics 82(1), 205–211. doi: 10.1162/rest.2003.85.1.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickell S. (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects, Econometrica 49(6), 1417–1426. doi: 10.2307/1911408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickman N. and Witt R. (2007) The determinants of employee crime in the UK, Economica 74, 161–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00530.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau S. (2009) Empirical analysis of sanctions for environmental violations, International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 3(3), 161–194. doi: 10.1561/101.00000024
   Google Scholar
• Shimshack J. and Ward M. (2005) Regulator reputation, enforcement, and environmental compliance, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50, 519–540. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2005.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigman H. A. (1998) Midnight dumping: public policies and illegal disposal of used oil, Rand Journal of Economics 29(1), 157–168. doi: 10.2307/2555820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigman H. A. (2010) Environmental liability and redevelopment of old industrial land, Journal of Law and Economics 53, 289–306. doi: 10.1086/649803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigman H. A. and Stafford S. (2011) Management of hazardous waste and contaminated land, Annual Review of Resource Economics 3, 255–275. doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-083110-120011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford S. (2002) The effect of punishment on firm compliance with hazardous waste regulations, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44(2), 290–308. doi: 10.1006/jeem.2001.1204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford S. (2006) State adoption of environmental audit initiatives, Contemporary Economic Policy 24, 172–187. doi: 10.1093/cep/byj010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan T. P. (2001) Environmental Law Handbook, 16th Edn. Government Institutes, Rockville, MD.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1999) Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report. Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2002) Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report. Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2006) Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report. Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Witzke H. P. and Urfei G. (2001) Willingness to pay for environmental protection: coping with the regional dimension, Regional Studies 35, 207–214. doi: 10.1080/713693807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar