A Post-Mortem of Regional Innovation Policy Failure: Scotland's Intermediate Technology Initiative (ITI)

References

• Acs Z., Autio E. and Szerb L. (2014) National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications, Research Policy 43, 476–494. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs Z. and Varga A. (2005) Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change, Small Business Economics 24, 323–334. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-1998-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold E. (2004) Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations, Research Evaluation 13, 3–17. doi:10.3152/147154404781776509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim B. and Coenen L. (2005) Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: comparing Nordic clusters, Research Policy 34, 1173–1190. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim B., Lawton-Smith H. and Oughton C. (2011) Regional innovation systems: theory, empirics and policy, Regional Studies 45, 875–891. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.596701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. and Feldman M. (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, American Economic Review 86, 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autio E. (1998) Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation, European Planning Studies 6, 131–140. doi:10.1080/09654319808720451
   Google Scholar
• Berchicci L. (2013) Towards and open R&D system: internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance, Research Policy 42, 117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek A., Jacobsson S., Lindmark S. and Rickne A. (2008) Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis, Research Policy 37, 407–429. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best M. (1990) The New Competition: Institutions of Industrial Restructuring. Polity, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Borras S. and Edquist C. (2013) The choice of innovation policy instruments, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80, 1513–1522. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman B. (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory, Research Policy 29, 627–655. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown R., Anyadike-Danes M., Hart M., Mason C. and Richmond K. (2012) The growth dynamics of technology-based firms in Scotland, Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary 36, 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Brown R. and Mason C. (2012) The evolution of enterprise policy in Scotland, in Blackburn R. and Schaper M. (Eds) Government, SMEs and Entrepreneurship Development: Policy, Practice and Challenges, pp. 17–30. Gower, Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Brown R. and Mason C. (2014) Inside the high-tech black box: a critique of technology entrepreneurship policy, Technovation 34, 773–784. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown R., Mason C. and Mawson S. (2014) Increasing ‘the Vital 6%’: Designing Effective Public Policy to Support High Growth Firms. Working Paper No. 14/01. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA), London (available at: http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/working_paper_-_increasing_the_vital_6_percent.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson B., Jacobsson S., Holemen M. and Rickne A. (2002) Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues, Research Policy 31, 233–245. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen W. and Leveinthal D. (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152. doi:10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke P. (2004) Integrating global knowledge flows for generative growth in Scotland: life sciences as a knowledge economy exemplar, in Global Knowledge Flows and Economic Development, pp. 73–96. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke P. (2005) Devolution and innovation: the financing of economic development in the UK's devolved administrations, Scottish Affairs 50, 39–50. doi: 10.3366/scot.2005.0004
   Google Scholar
• Cooke P., Boekholt P., and Toedtling F. (2000) The Governance of Innovation in Europe. Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke P., Uranga M. and Etxebarria G. (1997) Regional Innovation systems: Iinstitutional and Organisational organisational dimensions, Research Policy 26, 475–491. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox D. and Rigby D. (2013) Innovation Policy Challenges for the 21st Century. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Crespi F. and Quatraro F. (2013) Systemic technology policies: issues and instruments, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80, 1447–1449. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez M. (2001) The evaluation of regional innovation and cluster policies: towards a participatory approach, European Planning Studies 9, 907–923. doi:10.1080/09654310120079832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodgson M., Hughes A., Foster J. and Metcalfe S. (2011) Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: the case of Australia, Research Policy 40, 1145–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith M., Thorpe R. and Lowe A. (2002) Management Research: An Introduction. Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar J. (2009) Intermediary technology institutes: their role in promoting innovation and economic development in Scotland. Paper presented at the 7th Triple Helix International Conference, Glasgow, UK, 17–19 June 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist C. (2004) Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges, in Fagerberg J., Mowery D. and Nelson R. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist C. (2011) Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failures), Industrial and Corporate Change 20, 1725–1753. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz H. (2006) The new visible hand: an assisted linear model of science and innovation policy, Science and Public Policy 33, 310–320. doi:10.3152/147154306781778911
   Google Scholar
• Feldman M. and Kelley M. (2006) The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior, Research Policy 35, 1509–1521. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer E. and Reuber A. (2003) Support for rapid-growth firms: a comparison of the views of founders, government policymakers, and private sector resource providers, Journal of Small Business Management 41, 346–365. doi: 10.1111/1540-627X.00087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan K., Uyarra E. and Laranja M. (2011) Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation, Research Policy 40, 702–713. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (2013) Annual Report 2012: Research for Greater Efficiency. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, Munich (available at: http://www.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/zv/en/Publications/Annual-Report/Fraunhofer-Annual-Report_2012.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman C. (1995) The ‘national system of innovation’ in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics 19, 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler M. (2010) Rules of the game: the place of institutions in regional economic change, Regional Studies 44, 1–15. doi:10.1080/00343400903389979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graebner M., Martin J. and Roundy P. (2012) Qualitative data: cooking without a recipe, Strategic Organization 10, 276–284. doi:10.1177/1476127012452821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene F. and Storey D. (2007) Issues in evaluation: the case of shell livewire, in Audretsch D., Grilo I. and Thurik R. (Eds) Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison R. and Leitch C. (2010) Voodoo institution or entrepreneurial university? Spin-off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK, Regional Studies 44, 1241–1262. doi: 10.1080/00343400903167912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris R., Li Q. and Moffat J. (2013) The impact of higher education institution-firm knowledge links on establishment-level productivity in British regions, Manchester School 81, 143–162. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.2011.02276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt-Dundas N. and Roper S. (2011) Creating advantage in peripheral regions: the role of publicly-funded R&D centres, Research Policy 40, 832–841. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells J. (1999) Regional systems of innovation?, in Archibugi D., Howells J. and Michie J. (Eds) Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons (2013) Bridging the Valley of Death: Improving the Commercialisation of Research. Science and Technology Committee, House of Commons, London (available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmsctech/348/348.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Huggins R. and Kitagawa F. (2012) Regional policy and university knowledge transfer: perspectives from devolved regions in the UK, Regional Studies 46, 817–832. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.583913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino S., Piva M., Vivarelli M. and Von Tunzelmann N. (2012) Technological capabilities and patterns of innovative cooperation of firms in the UK regions, Regional Studies 46, 1283–1301. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.679259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intellectual Property Office (2012) Facts and Figures 2010 and 2011 Calendar Years. Intellectual Property Office, Newport (available at: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/about-facts1011.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• ITI Scotland (2008) Origins of Programmes (Life Science, Techmedia and Energy). ITI Scotland, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Keating M. (2005) Policy convergence and divergence in Scotland under devolution, Regional Studies 39, 453–463. doi:10.1080/00343400500128481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall B. (1992) Introduction, in Lundvall B. (Ed.) National Systems of Innovation – Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, pp. 1–19. Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall B. A. (2007) National innovation systems – analytical concept and development tool, Industry and Innovation 14, 95–119. doi: 10.1080/13662710601130863
   Google Scholar
• Luthje C., Herstatt C. and Von Hippel E. (2005) User-innovations and ‘local’ information: the case of mountain biking, Research Policy 34, 951–965. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall C. (2005) Scotland's science strategy: an exercise in concurrent power?, Scottish Affairs 52, 51–70. doi: 10.3366/scot.2005.0038
   Google Scholar
• Lyall C. (2007) Changing boundaries: the role of policy networks in the multi-level governance of science and innovation in Scotland, Science and Public Policy 34, 3–14. doi:10.3152/030234207X190568
   Google Scholar
• Malerba F. (2002) Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy 31, 247–264. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann R. and Sager T. (2007) Patents, venture capital and software startups, Research Policy 36, 193–208. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen A. (2000) Can technology policy serve as industrial policy?, in Howes C. and Singh A. (Eds) Competitiveness Matters: Industry and Economic Performance in the US, pp. 127–144. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Mason C. and Brown R. C. (2012) Technology-Based Firms in Scotland. Scottish Enterprise, Glasgow (available at: http://www.scottish-enterprise.com/~/media/SE/Resources/Documents/STUV/Technology-Based-Firms-in-Scotland.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Mason C. and Brown R. (2014) Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth-Oriented Entrepreneurship. Background Paper for the LEED Programme. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris (available at: http://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Mason C. and Pierrakis Y. (2013) Venture capital, the regions, and public policy: the United Kingdom since the post-2000 technology crash, Regional Studies 47, 1156–1171. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.588203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato M. (2013) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Anthem, London.
   Google Scholar
• Melancon Y. and Doloreux D. (2013) Developing a knowledge infrastructure to foster regional innovation in the periphery: a study from Quebec's coastal region in Canada, Regional Studies 47, 1555–1572. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.626400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe S. (1997) Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework, in Archibugi D. and Michie J. (Eds) Technology, Globalisation and Economic Performance, pp. 268–296. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Molina A. and Gregson G. (2002) Real-time evaluation methodology as a learning instrument in high technology SME support networks, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 2, 69–99. doi:10.1504/IJEIM.2002.000476
   Google Scholar
• Morgan K. (1997) The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal, Regional Studies 31, 491–503. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson R. and Winter S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Oakey R. (2003) Technical entrepreneurship in high technology small firms: some observations on the implications for management, Technovation 23, 679–688. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00045-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakey R. (2012) Open innovation and its relevance to industrial research and development: the case of high-technology small firms, International Small Business Journal 31, 319–336. doi:10.1177/0266242612458942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2004) Global Knowledge Flows and Economic Development, LEED Programme. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010) The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting A Head Start on Tomorrow. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Oughton C., Landabaso M. and Morgan K. (2002) The regional innovation paradox: innovation policy and industrial policy, Journal of Technology Transfer 27, 97–110. doi:10.1023/A:1013104805703
   Google Scholar
• Parida J., Westerberg M. and Frishammer J. (2012) Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMEs: the impact on innovation performance, Journal of Small Business Management 50, 283–309. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosevic S. and Yoruk E. (2013) Entrepreneurial propensity of innovation systems: theory, methodology and evidence, Research Policy 42, 1015–1038. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper S., Love J. and Cooke P. (2006) The Scottish Innovation System: Actors, Roles and Actions. Report for the Scottish Government, Edinburgh (available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/89713/0021562.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Rosa P. (1999) The prevalence of multiple owners and directors in the SME sector: implications for our understanding of start-up and growth, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 11, 21–37. doi:10.1080/089856299283272
   Google Scholar
• Salter A. and Martin B. (2001) The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review, Research Policy 30, 509–532. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive (2004) A Smart, Successful Scotland. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh (available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/26800/0027981.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (2013) Business Enterprise Research and Development Scotland. Scottish Government, Glasgow (available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0044/00447162.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Sharif N. (2006) Emergence and development of the national innovation systems concept, Research Policy 35, 745–766. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits R. and Kuhlmann S. (2004) The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1, 4–32. doi: 10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004621
   Google Scholar
• Targeting Technology (2008) Scottish University Spin-Off Study. Targeting Innovation, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• The Herald (2010) SE writes off £32 m investment as it ‘abandons’ technology scheme, The Herald 21 November.
   Google Scholar
• The Herald (2013) Ten years and £231 m invested in the ITIs – but just 600,000 royalties to show for it, The Herald 17 March.
   Google Scholar
• Toedtling F. and Trippl M. (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach, Research Policy 34, 1203–1219. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turok I. (1991) Policy evaluation as science: a critical assessment, Applied Economics 23, 1543–1550. doi:10.1080/00036849100000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra E. (2010) What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20, 115–137. doi:10.1007/s00191-009-0135-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra E. and Flanagan K. (2010) From regional systems of innovation to regions as innovation policy spaces, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28, 681–695. doi: 10.1068/c0961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Stel A. and Storey D. (2004) The link between firm births and job creation: Iis there a upas tree effect?, Regional Studies 38, 893–909. doi:10.1080/0034340042000280929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E. (2009) Democratizing Innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation, International Journal of Innovation Science 1, 29–40. doi:10.1260/175722209787951224
   Google Scholar
• Warwick K. (2013) Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Publ., Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek A. and Hekkert M. (2012) Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars, Science and Public Policy 39, 74–87. doi:10.1093/scipol/scr008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young B., Hewitt-Dundas, N. and Roper S. (2008) Intellectual property management in publically funded R&D centres: a comparison of university-based and company-based research centres, Technovation 28, 473–484. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar