A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Inter-municipal Cooperation on the Environment

REFERENCES

• Archibugi D., Chomsky N., Falk R., Held D., Iglesias F., Levi L., Marramao G., Monbiot G., Patomäki H., Kaldor M., Sassen S., Sennet R., Shiva V. and Strauss A. (2012) Manifesto for a Global Democracy. 27 June (available at: http://www.federalunion.org.uk/manifesto-for-a-global-democracy-27-june-2012/) (accessed on 10 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Beder S. (2006) Environmental Principles and Policies. An Interdisciplinary Introduction. Earthscan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bel G. and Mur M. (2009) Intermunicipal cooperation, privatization and waste management costs: evidence from rural municipalities, Waste Management 29, 2772–2778. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz A. (2011) The European Union as a loosely coupled multi-level system, in Enderlein H., Walti S. and Zurn M. (Eds) Handbook on Multi-Level Governance, pp. 214–226. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Benz A. and Fürst, D. (2002) Policy learning in regional networks, European Urban and Regional Studies 9, 21–35. doi:10.1177/096977640200900102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsill M. and Bulkeley H. (2007) Looking back and thinking ahead: a decade of cities and climate change research, Local Environment 12, 447–456. doi:10.1080/13549830701659683
   Google Scholar
• Bos J. J., Brown R. R. and Farelly M. A. (2013) A design framework for creating social learning situations, Global Environmental Change 23, 398–412. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley H. (2005) Reconfiguring environmental governance: towards a politics of scales and networks, Political Geography 24, 875–902. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley H. and Betsill M. M. (2013) Revisiting the urban politics of climate change, Environmental Politics 22, 136–154. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni R., Capello R. and Nijkamp P. (1998) Towards sustainable city policy: an economy–environment–technology nexus, Ecological Economics 24, 103–118. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00032-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement K. (2000) Economic Development and Environmental Gain. European Environmental Integration and Regional Competitiveness. Earthscan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Coase R. H. (1960) The problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1–44. doi:10.1086/466560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotugno A. and Seltzer E. (2011) Towards a metropolitan consciousness in Portland Oregon Metropolitan Area, International Planning Studies 16, 289–304. doi:10.1080/13563475.2011.591147
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi S. and Brooks E. (2012) Environmental Justice and the City: Full Report. Study commissioned by Newcastle City Council (available at: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/socialrenewal/fairnesscommission/documents/) (accessed on 19 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Docherty I., Gulliver S. and Drake P. (2004) Exploring the potential benefits of city collaboration, Regional Studies 38, 445–456. doi:10.1080/03434002000213950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans B., Joas M., Sundback S. and Theobald K. (2006) Governing local sustainability, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 49, 849–867. doi:10.1080/09640560600946875
   Google Scholar
• Ewringmann D. and Hansmeyer K. H. (1980) The institutional setting of regional environmental policy, in Siebert H., Walter I. and Zimmermann K. (Eds) Regional Environmental Policy. The Economic Issues, pp. 152–166. Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock R. C. (2007) Rational choice and regional governance, Journal of Urban Affairs 29, 47–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida R. (2006) The Rise of the Creative Class. Reprint. Basic Books, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs D., Jonas A. and While A. (2003) Multi-scalar governance and sectoral policy integration in the United Kingdom, in Lafferty W. M. and Narodoslawsky M. (Eds) Regional Sustainable Development in Europe. The Challenge of Multi-Level Co-operative Governance, pp. 155–180. ProSus, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood D. (2012) The challenge of policy coordination for sustainable sociotechnical transitions: the case of the zero-carbon homes agenda in England, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30, 162–179. doi:10.1068/c1146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson E., Elander I. and Lundmark M. (2009) Multilevel governance, networking cities, and the geography of climate-change mitigation: two Swedish examples, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27, 59–74. doi:10.1068/c07109j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall P. A. and Taylor R. C. R. (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms, Political Studies 44, 936–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrschel T. (2013) Competitiveness AND sustainability – can ‘smart city regionalism’ square the circle?, Urban Studies 50, 2332–2348. doi:10.1177/0042098013478240.
   Google Scholar
• Hulst R. and van Montfort A. (2007a) Comparative analysis and conclusion, in Hulst R. and van Montfort A. (Eds) Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe, pp. 211–238. Springer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Hulst R. and van Montfort A. (2007b) Inter-municipal cooperation: a widespread phenomenon, in Hulst R. and van Montfort A. (Eds) Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe, pp. 1–21. Springer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham C. (2003) Theorizing collaboration practice, Public Management Review 5, 401–423. doi:10.1080/1471903032000146964
   Google Scholar
• International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007, Synthesis Report (available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_synthesis_report.htm) (accessed on 18 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Irvine K. N., Fuller R. A., Devine-Wright P., Tratalos J., Payne S. R., Warren P. H., Lomas K. J. and Gaston K.J. (2010) Ecological and psychological value of urban green space, in Jenks M. and Jones C. (Eds) Dimensions of the Sustainable City, pp. 215–237. Springer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke M. (2002) The political system's capacity for environmental policy: the framework for comparison, in Weidner H. and Jänicke M. (Eds) Capacity Building in National Environmental Policy. A Comparative Study of 17 Countries, pp. 1–18. Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan A. J. and Lenschow A. (Eds) (2008) Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating the Environment for Sustainability. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Kern K. and Bulkeley H. (2009) Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: governing climate change through transnational municipal networks, Journal of Common Market Studies 47, 309–332. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.00806.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau E. and Mouffe C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty W. M. and Narodoslawsky M. (Eds) (2003) Regional Sustainable Development in Europe. The Challenge of Multi-Level Co-operative Governance. ProSus, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Lax D. A. and Sebenius J. K. (1986) The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. Free Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Leibenath M., Blum A. and Stutzriemer S. (2010) Transboundary cooperation in establishing ecological networks: the case of Germany's external borders, Landscape and Urban Planning 94, 84–93. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis J. D. and Weigert A. (1985) Trust as a social reality, Social Force 63, 967–985. doi:10.1093/sf/63.4.967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintz G. (1994) Vom Verursacherprinzip zum Aufteilungsprinzip. Ein Plädoyer für eine differenzierte Betrachtung der umweltpolitischen Kostenzurechnungsprinzipien, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht 17, 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Lintz G. (1997) Grundlagen der Koordination von Umweltpolitik, regionaler Wirtschaftspolitik und Raumplanung. IÖR, Dresden.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes S. (2005) Power. A Radical View. Original text with two major new chapters. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Mayntz R. and Scharpf F. W. (1995) Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus, in Mayntz R. and Scharpf F. W. (Eds) Steuerung und Selbstorganisation in staatsnahen Sektoren, pp. 39–72. Campus, Frankfurt/Main.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M. (2005) Learning, frames, and environmental policy integration: the case of the Swedish energy policy, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23, 207–226. doi:10.1068/c0405j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M. and Persson, A. (2003) Framework for analysing environmental policy integration, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 5, 333–359. doi:10.1080/1523908032000171648
   Google Scholar
• Olson M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. (2010) Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change, Global Environmental Change 20, 550–557. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raagmaa G. (2002) Regional identity in regional development and planning, European Planning Studies 10, 55–76. doi:10.1080/09654310120099263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rader Olsson A. and Cars G. (2011) Polycentric spatial development: institutional challenges to intermunicipal cooperation, Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 31, 155–171. doi:10.1007/s10037-011-0054-x
   Google Scholar
• Rowell A. (2010) Communities, Councils and a Low-Carbon Future: What We Can Do If Governments Won't. Green Books, Totnes.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin Y. (2007a) Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory, Planning Theory 6, 52–68. doi:10.1177/1473095207075161
   Google Scholar
• Rydin Y. (2007b) Sustainable cities and local sustainability, in Atkinson G., Dietz S. and Neumayer E. (Eds) Handbook of Sustainable Development, pp. 347–361. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin Y. (2010) Governing for Sustainable Urban Development. Earthscan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Saretzki T. (2007) The policy turn in German political science, in Fischer F., Miller G. J. and Sidney M. S. (Eds) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. Theory, Politics, and Methods, pp. 587–602. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer M. (2000) Gesellschaftliche Steuerung durch Elitenintegration? Leske & Budrich, Opladen.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf F. W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centred Institutionalism in Policy Research. Westview, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Schimank U. (2007) Neoinstitutionalismus, in Benz A., Lütz S., Schimank U. and Simonis G. (Eds) Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder, pp. 161–175. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt V. (2008) Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse, Annual Review of Political Science 11, 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Thomé K. and Mäntysalo R. (2014) Interplay of power and learning in planning processes: a dynamic view, Planning Theory 13, 115–135. doi:10.1177/1473095213490302.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert H. (2010) Economics of the Environment. Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen E. and Torfing J. (2008) Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.
   Google Scholar
• Späth P. and Rohracher H. (2010) ‘Energy regions’: the transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures, Research Policy 39, 449–458. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan H., Williams P. and Jeffares S. (2012) Leadership for collaboration. Situated agency in practice, Public Management Review 14, 41–66. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.589617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tress G., Tress B., Harms B., Smeets P. and van der Valk A. (2004) Planning Metropolitan Landscapes – Concepts, Demands, Approaches. DELTA Series No. 4. Wageningen, Alterra.
   Google Scholar
• Truffer B. and Coenen L. (2012) Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies, Regional Studies 46, 1–21. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.646164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wende W., Huelsmann W., Marty M., Penn-Bressel G. and Bobylev N. (2010) Climate protection and compact urban structures in spatial planning and local construction plans in Germany, Land Use Policy 27, 864–868. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler St. (2009) Regions, megaregions, and sustainability, Regional Studies 43, 863–876. doi:10.1080/00343400701861344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M. (2007) Spaces of Sustainability. Geographical Perspectives on the Sustainable Society. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Young O. R. (2002) The Institutional Dimension of Environmental Change. Fit, Interplay and Scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Zuindeau B. (2006) Spatial approach to sustainable development: challenges of equity and efficacy, Regional Studies 40, 459–470. doi:10.1080/00343400600757437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar