RHOMOLO: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Modelling Approach to the Evaluation of the European Union's R&D Policies

REFERENCES

• Brandsma A., Kancs D. and Ciaian P. (2013) The role of additionality in the EU cohesion policies: an example of firm-level investment support, European Planning Studies 21, 838–853. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma A., Kancs D., Monfort P. and Rillaers A. (2015) RHOMOLO: a dynamic spatial general equilibrium model for assessing the impact of Cohesion Policy, Papers in Regional Science 94. doi:10.1111/pirs.12162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma A., Kancs D. and Persyn D. (2014) Modelling migration and regional labour markets: an application of the new economic geography model RHOMOLO, Journal of Economic Integration 29, 249–271. doi:10.11130/jei.2014.29.2.372
   Google Scholar
• Broecker J., Kancs D., Schuermann C. and Wegener M. (2001) Methodology for the Assessment of Spatial Economic Impacts of Transport Projects and Policies. Integrated Appraisal of Spatial Economic and Network Effects of Transport Investments and Policies. Final Report. European Commission, DG for Energy and Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Broecker J. and Korzhenevych A. (2013) Forward looking dynamics in spatial CGE modelling, Economic Modelling 31, 389–400. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.11.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Comite F. and Kancs D. (2014) Modelling of Agglomeration and Dispersion in RHOMOLO. IPTS Working Papers No. JRC81349. European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Di Comite F. and Kancs D. (2015) Macro-Economic Models for R&D and Innovation Policies: A Comparison of QUEST, RHOMOLO, GEM-E3 and NEMESIS. IPTS Working Papers No. JRC94323. European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Di Comite F., Kancs D. and Torfs W. (2015) Macroeconomic Modelling of R&D and Innovation Policies: An Application of RHOMOLO and QUEST. IPTS Working Papers No. JRC89558. European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit A. and Stiglitz J. (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, American Economic Review 67, 297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009) Traffic Flow: Scenario, Traffic Forecast and Analysis of Traffic on the TEN-T, Taking into Consideration the External Dimension of the Union. TENconnect: Final Report. European Commission, DG for Mobility and Transport.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011a) Identifying and Aggregating Elasticities for Spill-over Effects due to Linkages and Externalities in the Main Sectors of Investment Co-financed by the EU Cohesion Policy. Spill-over Elasticities: Final Report. European Commission, DG for Regional and Urban Policy.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011b) Supplementary Model Calculations Supporting TEN-T Network Planning and Impact Assessment. TENconnect 2: Final Report. European Commission, DG for Mobility and Transport.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014) Investment for Jobs and Growth. Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion 6. European Commission, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Francois J., Manchin M. and Pelkmans-Balaoing A. (2009) Regional integration in Asia: the role of infrastructure, in Francois J. F., Wignaraja G. and Rana P. (Eds) Pan-Asian Integration, pp. 439–486. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. (2000) R&D, Education and Productivity: A Retrospective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kancs D. (2013) Model-Based Support to EU Policymaking: Experience of the RHOMOLO Model. Financing and Assessing Large Infrastructure Scale Projects STOA. European Parliament, Science and Technology Options Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Kancs D. and Siliverstovs B. (Forthcoming 2015) R&D and non-linear productivity growth, Research Policy 44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman P. (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy 99, 483–499. doi:10.1086/261763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairesse J. and Mohnen P. (2001) To Be Or Not To Be Innovative: An Exercise in Measurement. NBER Working Papers No. 8644. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Mairesse J. and Sassenou M. (1991) R&D and productivity: a survey of econometric studies at the firm level, Science, Technology Industry Review 8, 9–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin P. and Rogers C. (1995) Industrial location and public infrastructure, Journal of International Economics 39, 335–351. doi:10.1016/0022-1996(95)01376-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMorrow K. and Roger W. (2009) R&D Capital and Economic Growth: The Empirical Evidence. EIB Papers No. 2009/04. European Investment Bank (EIB), Economics Department.
   Google Scholar
• Okagawa A. and Ban K. (2008) Estimation of Substitution Elasticities for CGE Models. Discussion Papers in Economics and Business No. 2008/16. Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Persyn D., Torfs W. and Kancs D. (2014) Modelling regional labour market dynamics: participation, employment and migration decisions in a spatial CGE model for the EU, Investigaciones Regionales 29, 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Potters L., Conte A., Kancs D. and Thissen M. (2013) Data Needs for Regional Modelling. IPTS Working Papers No. JRC80845. European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen M., Di Comite F., Kancs D. and Potters L. (2014) Modelling Inter-Regional Trade Flows: Data and Methodological Issues in RHOMOLO. REGIO Working Papers No. 02/2014. European Commission, DG for Regional and Urban Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen M., Diodato D. and van Oort F. G. (2013) Integrated Regional Europe: European Regional Trade Flows in 2000. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Varga A. (Forthcoming 2015) Place-based, spatially blind or both? Challenges in estimating the impacts of modern development policies: the case of the GMR policy impact modeling approach, International Regional Science Review 38.
   Google Scholar
• Varga J. and in't Veld J. (2010) The Potential Impact of EU Cohesion Policy Spending in the 2007–13 Programming Period: A Model-Based Analysis. European Economy Economic Papers No. 422, European Commission, DG for Economic and Monetary Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Venables A. (1996) Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries, International Economic Review 37, 341–359. doi:10.2307/2527327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar