The Importance of Localized Related Variety for International Diversification of Corporate Technology

References

• Alcacer J. and Chung W. (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers, Management Science 53, 760–776. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison P. (2009) Fixed Effects Regression Models. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida P. and Kogut B. (1997) The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation, Small Business Economics 9, 21–31. doi:10.1023/A:1007995512597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim B. and Gertler M. (2005) Regional innovation systems and the geographical foundations of innovation, in Fagerberg J., Mowery D. C. and Nelson R. R. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 291–317. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B. and Feldman M. P. (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, American Economic Review 86, 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B. and Stephan P. E. (1996) How localized are networks in biotechnology?, American Economic Review 86, 641–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrios S., Görg H. and Strobl E. (2006) Multinationals' location choice, agglomeration economies, and public incentives, International Regional Science Review 29, 81–107. doi:10.1177/0160017605281516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile R., Benfratello L. and Castellani D. (2012) Geoadditive models for regional count data: an application to industrial location. Paper presented at the European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Conference, 2012. Paper No. 2012-89.
   Google Scholar
• Basile R., Castellani D. and Zanfei A. (2008) Location choices of multinational firms in Europe: the role of EU Cohesion Policy, Journal of International Economics 74, 328–340. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk S. and Mudambi R. (2013) MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: the role of discontinuities in geographic space, Journal of International Business Studies, 44(Suppl.), 413–426. doi:10.1057/jibs.2013.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma R. (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies 39, 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma R. and Frenken K. (2006) Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography 6, 273–302. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbi022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma R. and Frenken K. (2011) The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography 11, 295–307. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi S. (2000) The geography of innovation: a cross-sector analysis, Regional Studies 34, 213–229. doi:10.1080/00343400050015069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi S., Lissoni F. and Malerba F. (2003) Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification, Research Policy 32, 69–87. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantner U. and Graf H. (2006) The network of innovators in Jena: an application of social network analysis, Research Policy 35, 463–480. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantner U. and Meder A. (2009) Regional Effects on Cooperative Innovation Activities and the Related Variety of Regional Knowledge Bases. Jena Economic Research Papers No. 2009-064.
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. (1989) Technological Innovations in Multinational Corporations. Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. (1995) The globalization of technology: what remains of the product cycle model?, Cambridge Journal of Economics 19, 155–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. (2000) Multinational corporations and the location of technological innovation in the UK regions, Regional Studies 34, 317–332. doi:10.1080/00343400050078105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. (2009) Location and the multinational enterprise, Journal of International Business Studies 40, 35–41. doi:10.1057/jibs.2008.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. and Iammarino S. (1998) MNCs, technological innovation and regional systems in the EU: some evidence in the Italian case, International Journal of the Economics of Business 5, 383–408. doi:10.1080/13571519884459
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. and Iammarino S. (2000) Multinational corporations and the location of technological innovation in the UK regions, Regional Studies 34, 317–322. doi:10.1080/00343400050078105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. and Iammarino S. (2001) EU regions and multinational corporations: change, stability and the strengthening of technological comparative advantages, Industrial and Corporate Change 10, 1007–1037. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.1007
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. and Iammarino S. (2003) Multinational Corporations and European Regional Systems of Innovation. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. and Noonan C. (2002) The regional distribution of technological development: evidence from FDI in Germany, in Feldman M. N. and Massard N. (Eds) Knowledge Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation, pp. 199–233. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. and Piscitello L. (2000) Accumulating technological competence: its changing impact of corporate diversification and internationalization, Industrial and Corporate Change 9, 21–51. doi:10.1093/icc/9.1.21
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. and Piscitello L. (2002) The location of technological activities of MNCs in European regions: the role of spillovers and local competencies, Journal of International Management 8, 69–96. doi:10.1016/S1075-4253(01)00056-4
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. and Piscitello L. (2005) The recent location of foreign-owned R&D activities by large multinational corporations in European region: the role of spillovers and externalities, Regional Studies 39, 1–16. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. and Piscitello L. (2007) Attraction and deterrence in the location of foreign-owned R&D activities: the role of positive and negative spillovers, International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 1, 87–111. doi:10.1504/IJTLID.2007.015020
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. and Piscitello L. (2014) Historical changes in the determinants of the composition of innovative activity in MNC subunits, Industrial and Corporate Change 23, 633–660. doi:10.1093/icc/dtt047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. A. and Santangelo G. D. (2002) The new geography of corporate research in information and communications technology (ICT), Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12, 163–197. doi:10.1007/s00191-002-0109-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells M. and Hall P. (1994) Technopoles of the World: The Making of the 21st Century Industrial Complexes. Routledge, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D. (1990) Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D., Hagström P. and Sölvell Ö. (1998) The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organizations and Regions. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke P. (1992) Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the New Europe, Geoforum 23, 365–382. doi:10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan R., David P. A. and Foray D. (2000) The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness, Industrial and Corporate Change 9, 211–253. doi:10.1093/icc/9.2.211
   Google Scholar
• Crozet M., Mayer T. and Mucchielli J. L. (2004) How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France, Regional Science and Urban Economics 34, 27–54. doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(03)00010-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dachs B. and Pyka A. (2010) What drives the internationalisation of innovation? Evidence from European patent data, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 19, 71–86. doi:10.1080/10438590903016476
   Google Scholar
• Devereux M., Griffith R. and Simpson H. (2007) Firm location decisions, regional grants and agglomeration externalities, Journal of Public Economics 91, 413–435. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckey H.-F., Kosfeld R. and Türck M. (2006) Räumliche Ökonometrie, Wirtschaftswissen-schaftliches Studium 35, 548–554. doi:10.15358/0340-1650-2006-10-548
   Google Scholar
• Edquist C. (2005) Systems of innovation. Perspectives and challenges, in Fagerberg J., Mowery D. C. and Nelson R. R. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 181–208. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Erken H. and Kleijn M. (2010) Location factors of international R&D activities: an econometric approach, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 19, 203–232. doi:10.1080/10438590802469578
   Google Scholar
• Feldman M. P. (1994) The Geography of Innovation. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken K., Van Oort F. G. and Verburg T. (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth, Regional Studies 41, 685–697. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frietsch R., Schmoch U., Neuhäusler P. and Rothengatter O. (2010) Transnational Patents – Structures, Trends and Recent Developments. Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI), Studien zum Deutschen Innovationssystem No. 9/2010. EFI, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch M. and Slavtchev V. (2007) Universities and innovation in space, Industry and Innovation 14, 201–218. doi:10.1080/13662710701253466
   Google Scholar
• Gauselmann A. and Marek P. (2012) Regional determinants of MNE's location choice in post-transition economies, Empirica 39, 487–511. doi:10.1007/s10663-012-9200-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser E. L., Kallal H. D., Scheinkman J. A. and Shleifer A. (1992) Growth in cities, Journal of Political Economy 100, 1126–1152. doi:10.1086/261856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görg H. and Strobl E. (2003) Footloose multinationals?, Manchester School 71, 1–19. doi:10.1111/1467-9957.00331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granstrand O., Patel P. and Pavitt K. (1997) Multi-technology corporations: why they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive’ core competencies, California Management Review 39, 8–25. doi:10.2307/41165908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granstrand O. and Sjölander S. (1992) Internationalisation and diversification of multi-technology corporations, in Granstrand O., Hakanson L. and Sjölander S. (Eds) Technology Management and International Business: Internationalisation of R&D and Technology, pp. 181–207. Wiley, London.
   Google Scholar
• Guellec D. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. (2001) The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data, Research Policy 30, 1253–1266. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00149-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guellec D. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. (2004) Measuring the internationalisation of the generation of knowledge. An approach based on patent data, in Moed H. F., Glänzel W. and Schmoch U. (Eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies on S&T Systems, pp. 645–662. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Hall B. H. (2011) The Internationalization of R&D. UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series No. 49. UNU-MERIT, Maastricht.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzichronoglou T. (1997) Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers No. 1997/2. OECD Publ., Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Howells J. (1990) The location and organization of research and development: new horizons, Research Policy 19, 133–146. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(90)90043-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IWH, DIW, LMU and WU (2013) Internationale FuE-Standorte. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem No. 11/2013. Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI), Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs J. (1969) The Economy of Cities. Vintage, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. and Trajtenberg M. (1996) Flows of Knowledge from Universities and Federal Labs: Modelling the Flow of Patent Citations Over Time and across Institutional and Geographic Boundaries. NBER Working Paper No. 5712. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. and Henderson R. (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics 58, 577–598. doi:10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson D. (2002) The OECD Technology Concordance (OTC): Patents by Industry of Manufacture and Sector of Use. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers No. 2002/05. OECD Publ., Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Kline S. J. and Rosenberg N. (1986) An overview of innovation, in Landau R. and Rosenberg N. (Eds) The Positive Sum Strategy, pp. 275–306. National Academy Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Kogut B. and Chang S. (1991) Technological capabilities and Japanese FDI in the United States, Review of Economics and Statistics 73, 401–413. doi:10.2307/2109564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortum S. and Putnam J. (1997) Assigning patents to industries: tests of the Yale technology concordance, Economic Systems Research 9, 161–176. doi:10.1080/09535319700000011
   Google Scholar
• Lybbert T. J. and Zolas N. J. (2014) Getting patents and economic data to speak to each other: an ‘algorithmic links with probabilities’ approach for joint analyses of patenting and economic activity, Research Policy 43, 530–542. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki J. (1985) Industrial location and corporate organization in high technology industries, Economic Geography 61, 345–369. doi:10.2307/144054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marek P. (2012) Agglomeration and FDI in East German knowledge-intensive business services, Economia Politica 29, 343–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti S., Piscitello L. and Elia S. (2010) Spatial agglomeration of multinational enterprises: the role of information externalities and knowledge spillovers, Journal of Economic Geography 10, 519–538. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall A. (1920) Principles of Economics. An Introductory Volume, 8th Edn. Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• McCann P. (2011) International business and economic geography: knowledge, time and transactions costs, Journal of Economic Geography 11, 309–317. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann P. and Mudambi R. (2005) Analytical differences in the economics of geography: the case of the multinational firm, Environment and Planning A 37, 1857–1876. doi:10.1068/a37311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. and Rosenberg N. (1998) Science, technological advance and economic growth, in Chandler A. D., Hagström P. and Sölvell Ö. (Eds) The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions, pp. 45–59. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom B. (2000) Learning and Innovation in Organisations and Economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009) OECD Patent Statistics Manual. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Patel P. and Pavitt K. (1991) Large firms in the production of the worlds' technology: an important case of ‘non-globalisation', Journal of International Business Studies 22, 1–21. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel P. and Pavitt K. (1997) The technological competencies in the world's largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety, Research Policy 26, 141–156. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel P. and Pavitt K. (1998) The wide (and increasing) spread of competences in the world's largest firms: a challenge to conventional wisdom, in Chandler A. D., Hagström P. and Sölvell Ö. (Eds) The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organizations and Regions, pp. 192–213. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Piscitello L. (2000) Relatedness and coherence in technological and product diversification of the world's largest firms, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 11, 295–315. doi:10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00019-9
   Google Scholar
• Piscitello L. (2004) Corporate diversification, coherence and economic performance, Industrial and Corporate Change 13, 757–787. doi:10.1093/icc/dth030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Anchor, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson G. B. (1972) The organization of industry, Economics Journal 82, 883–896. doi:10.2307/2230256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N. and Nelson R. R. (1996) The roles of universities in the advance of industrial technology, in Rosenbloom R. S. and Spencer W. J. (Eds) Engines of Innovation: US Industrial Research at the End of an Era, pp. 87–110. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelt R. P. (1974) Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian A. (1994) Regional Advantage – Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Schmoch U., Laville F., Patel P. and Frietsch R. (2003) Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research (available at: http://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/indicators/docs/ind_report_isi_ost_spru.pdf) (accessed January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Soete L. (1987) The impact of technological innovation on international trade patterns: the evidence reconsidered, Research Policy 16, 101–130. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(87)90026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. and Pisano G. (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change 3, 537–555. doi:10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a
   Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Rumelt R., Dosi G. and Winter S. G. (1994) Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23, 1–30. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(94)90094-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verspagen B., Moergastel and Slabbers M. (1994) MERIT Concordance Tables: IPC-ISIC (Rev. 2). MERIT Research Memorandum No. 2/94–004. Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT), Maastricht.
   Google Scholar
• Verspagen B. and Schoenmakers W. (2004) The spatial dimension of patenting by multinational firms in Europe, Journal of Economic Geography 4, 23–42. doi:10.1093/jeg/4.1.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E. (1994) ‘Sticky information’ and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation, Management Science 40, 429–439. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkelmann R. and Boes S. (2006) Analysis of Microdata. Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. (1988) On Coase, competence and the corporation, Journal of Law Economics and Organization 4, 163–180.
   Google Scholar