Firm performance in the periphery: on the relation between firm-internal knowledge and local knowledge spillovers

REFERENCES

• Alcácer, J. (2006). Location choices across the value chain: How activity and capability influence collocation. Management Science, 52, 1457–1471. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcácer, J., & Chung, W. (2007). Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science, 53, 760–776. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsleben, C. (2005). The downside of knowledge spillovers: An explanation for the dispersion of high-tech industries. Journal of Economics, 84, 217–248. doi:10.1007/s00712-005-0111-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, M., & Ejermo, O. (2005). How does accessibility to knowledge sources affect the innovativeness of corporations? – Evidence from Sweden. Annals of Regional Science, 39, 741–765. doi:10.1007/s00168-005-0025-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeli, F., Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2013). Directions and paths of knowledge flows through labour mobility: A social capital perspective. Regional Studies, 48, 1896–1917. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.756579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C., Patrucco, P. P., & Quatraro, F. (2011). Productivity growth and pecuniary knowledge externalities: An empirical analysis of agglomeration economies in European regions. Economic Geography, 87, 23–50. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01104.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 77–86. doi:10.1023/A:1013100704794
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Dohse, D. (2007). Location: A neglected determinant of firm growth. Review of World Economics, 143, 79–107. doi:10.1007/s10290-007-0099-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 31–56. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belussi, F., & Sedita, S. R. (2010). Industrial districts as open learning systems: Combining emergent and deliberate knowledge structures. Regional Studies, 46, 165–184. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.497133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., & Hospers, G.-J. (2007). The new economic geography of old industrial regions: Universities as global–local pipelines. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 779–802. doi:10.1068/c0620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Eriksson, R. H., & Lindgren, U. (2014). Labour market externalities and regional growth in Sweden: The importance of labour mobility between skill-related industries. Regional Studies, 48, 1669–1690. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.867429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lenzi, C. (2013). Local buzz versus global pipelines and the inventive productivity of US cities. In T. Scherngell (Ed.), The geography of networks and R&D collaborations (pp. 299–315). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge ‘tacitness’ reconsidered. Papers in Regional Science, 80, 255–273. doi:10.1007/PL00013627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 439–468. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–52. doi:10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combes, P.-P., & Duranton, G. (2006). Labour pooling labour poaching, and spatial clustering. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 1–28. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2005.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 5–15. doi:10.1007/s10961-005-5009-3
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2012). Collaboration information and the geography of innovation in knowledge intensive business services. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 79–105. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbr003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, T., & Schnellenbach, J. (2006). What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth? A survey of the literature. Regional Studies, 40, 375–395. doi:10.1080/00343400600632739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, R., & Lindgren, U. (2009). Localized mobility clusters: Impacts of labour market externalities on firm performance. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 33–53. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, R. H. (2011). Localized spillovers and knowledge flows: How does proximity influence the performance of plants? Economic Geography, 87, 127–152. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment and Planning A, 43, 1248–1267. doi:10.1068/a43516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frishammar, J., Ericsson, K., & Patel, P. C. (2015). The dark side of knowledge transfer: Exploring knowledge leakage in joint R&D projects. Technovation, 41–42, 75–88. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 75–99. doi:10.1093/jeg/3.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? Annals of Regional Science, 54, 299–321. doi:10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 73–76. doi:10.1080/01944365908978307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., & Klaerding, C. (2012). The end of the learning region as we knew it; towards learning in space. Regional Studies, 46, 1055–1066. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.705823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, A., & Morgan, K. (2012). Spaces of innovation: Learning, proximity and the ecological turn. Regional Studies, 46, 1041–1053. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.672725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, F. (2012). Do clusters really matter for innovation practices in information technology? Questioning the significance of technological knowledge spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 107–126. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. (2009). Innovation dynamics of global competitive regional clusters: The case of the Norwegian centres of expertise. Regional Studies, 43, 1155–1166. doi:10.1080/00343400802094969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. (2015). Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 585–600. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Saether, B. (2015). Innovation in small regions. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 69, 65–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E., & Lorentzen, T. (2015). Between bonding and bridging: Regional differences in innovative collaboration in Norway. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 69, 80–89. doi:10.1080/00291951.2015.1016550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoben, J., Arikan, A., Van Oort, F., & Raspe, O. (2016). Agglomeration and firm performance: One firm’s medicine is another firm’s poison. Environment and Planning A, 48(1), 132–153. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15602898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1, 23–42. doi:10.1080/13662719400000002
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A, 34, 429–449. doi:10.1068/a3457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2006). Localized learning revisited. Growth and Change, 37, 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Power, D. (2005). (How) do (firms in) clusters create knowledge? Industry and Innovation, 12, 409–431. doi:10.1080/13662710500381583
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, S., Piscitello, L., & Elia, S. (2010). Spatial agglomeration of multinational enterprises: The role of information externalities and knowledge spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4), 519–538. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbq011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P. (2001). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 921–943. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.921
   Google Scholar
• McCann, B. T., & Folta, T. B. (2008). Location matters: Where we have been and where we might go in agglomeration research. Journal of Management, 34, 532–565. doi:10.1177/0149206308316057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., & Mattes, J. (2015). The spatiality of trust: Factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts. European Management Journal, 33, 230–244. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paci, R., Marrocu, E., & Usai, S. (2014). The complementary effects of proximity dimensions on knowledge spillovers. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9, 9–30. doi:10.1080/17421772.2013.856518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D. L., & Brown, W. M. (2015). Who benefits from agglomeration? Regional Studies, 49, 28–43. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.753141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammarra, A., & Biggiero, L. (2008). Heterogeneity and specificity of inter-firm knowledge flows in innovation networks. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 800–829. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00770.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, J. M., & Flyer, F. (2000). Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1175–1193. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200012)21:12<1175::AID-SMJ139>3.3.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. (2012). Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation. Cities, 29(Suppl. 2), S9–S18. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srholec, M., & Verspagen, B. (2012). The voyage of the beagle into innovation: Explorations on heterogeneity, selection, and sectors. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21, 1221–1253. doi:10.1093/icc/dts026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stata. (2013). Stata longitudinal-data/panel-data reference manual, release 13. College Station: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 351–370. doi:10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L. J., & Boschma, R. (2011). Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies, 45, 919–933. doi:10.1080/00343400802662658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., & Otto, A. (2009). How to turn the fate of old industrial areas: A comparison of cluster-based renewal processes in Styria and the Saarland. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1217–1233. doi:10.1068/a4129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203–1219. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar