The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions

REFERENCES

• Aiello, F., & Pupo, V. (2012). Structural Funds and the economic divide in Italy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(3), 403–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. (2000). Changing patterns of urbanized countryside of Western Europe. Landscape Ecology, 15, 257–270. doi: 10.1023/A:1008151109252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. (2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67, 9–26. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodriguez Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x.
   Google Scholar
• Baslé, M. (2006). Strengths and weaknesses of European Union policy evaluation methods: Ex-post evaluation of Objective 2, 1994–99. Regional Studies, 40(2), 225–235. doi: 10.1080/00343400600600595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & von Ehrlich, M. (2010). Going NUTS: The effect of EU Structural Funds on regional performance. Journal of Public Economics, 94(1–2), 578–590. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & von Ehrlich, M. (2011). Absorptive capacity and the growth effects of regional transfers: A regression discontinuity design with heterogeneous treatment effects. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 8474. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
   Google Scholar
• Bernini, C., & Pellegrini, G. (2011). How are growth and productivity in private firms affected by public subsidy? Evidence from a regional policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(3), 253–265. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldrin, M., & Canova, F. (2001). Inequality and convergence: Reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy, 32, 207–253.
   Google Scholar
• Boldrin, M., & Canova, F. (2003). Regional policies and EU enlargement. In B. Funck & L. Pizzati (Eds.), Labour, employment and social policy in the EU enlargement process. Changing perspectives and policy options. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, A., Castellacci, F., Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2003). The impact of EU regional support on growth and convergence in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, 621–644. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’Erba, S., & Le Gallo, J. (2008). Regional convergence and the impact of European Structural Funds 1989–1999: A spatial econometric analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 87(2), 219–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00184.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., Garcilazo, E., & McCann, P. (2013). The economic performance of European cities and city regions: Myths and realities. European Planning Studies, 21(3), 334–354. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.716245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., Garcilazo, E., & McCann, P. (2015). The effects of the global financial crisis on European regions and cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(5), 935–949. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbv032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., & Poelman, H. (2008). Remote rural regions: How proximity to a city influences the performance of rural regions (Regional Focus No. 1, 2008). EC-DG REGIO.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., & Poelman, H. (2011). Regional typologies: A compilation. European Union Regional Policy Paper No. 01/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., & Ruiz, V. (2010). Refinement of the OECD regional typology: Economic performance of remote rural regions. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/41/56/45511797.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J., & Swanstrom, T. (2001). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty first century. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Ederveen, S., Gorter, J., de Mooij, R., & Nahuis, R. (2002). Funds and games: The economics of European Cohesion Policy. CPB Special Publication No. 41.
   Google Scholar
• Ederveen, S., de Groot, H. L. F., & Nahuis, R. (2006). Fertile soil for Structural Funds? A panel data analysis of the conditional effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy. Kyklos, 59(1), 17–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposti, R., & Bussoletti, S. (2008). Impact of Objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European Union: A panel-data approach. Regional Studies, 42(2), 159–173. doi: 10.1080/00343400601142753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). Ex post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes 2000–2006 financed by the European Regional Development Fund in Objective 1 and 2 regions. Directorate General Regional Policy.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Monitoring and evaluation of European Cohesion Policy: European Social Fund. Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion DG.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Milà, T., & McGuire, T. (2001). Do interregional transfers improve the economic performance of poor regions? The case of Spain. International Tax and Public Finance, 8(3), 281–296. doi: 10.1023/A:1011264107134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, T., & Mohl, P. (2008). Which is the right dose of EU Cohesion Policy for economic growth? ZEW Discussion Paper No. 08-104. Mannheim: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW).
   Google Scholar
• Imbens, G., & Kalyanaraman, K. (2012). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 79(3), 933–959. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdr043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. A. (1997). Poverty and place: Ghettos, barrios, and the American city. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. A. (2003). Stunning progress, hidden problems: The dramatic decline of concentrated poverty in the 1990s, center on urban and metropolitan policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kasanko, M., Barredo, J. I., Lavalle, C., Mccormick, N., Demicheli, L., Sagris, V., & Brezger, A. (2006). Are European cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77, 111–130. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gallo, J., Dall’Erba, S., & Guillain, R. (2011). The local versus global dilemma of the effects of Structural Funds. Growth and Change, 42(4), 466–490. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2011.00564.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designsin economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. doi: 10.1257/jel.48.2.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrini, S. (1999). The evolution of income disparities among the regions of the European Union. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29, 257–281. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0462(98)00039-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. (1998). Can regional policies affect growth and geography in Europe? World Economy, 21, 757–774. doi: 10.1111/1467-9701.00162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2014). Smart specialisation in European regions: Issues of strategy, institutions and implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 409–427.
   Google Scholar
• Midelfart-Knarvik, K. H., & Overman, H. G. (2002). Delocation and European integration: Is structural spending justified? Economic Policy, 17, 321–359. doi: 10.1111/1468-0327.00091
   Google Scholar
• Mohl, P., & Hagen, T. (2010). Do EU Structural Funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(5), 353–365. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009a). Regions at a glance. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009b). How regions grow. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011a). Regions and innovation policy. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011b). Regional typology. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Percoco, M. (2005). The impact of Structural Funds on the Italian Mezzogiorno, 1994–1999. Région et Développement, 21, 141–153.
   Google Scholar
• Percoco, M. (2013). The impact of European Cohesion Policy on regional growth: How much do strategy and local economic structure matter? Mimeo. Milan: Università Bocconi.
   Google Scholar
• Puga, D. (2002). European regional policy in the light of recent location theories. Journal of Economic Geography, 2, 373–406. doi: 10.1093/jeg/2.4.373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puigcerver-Peñalver, M. (2007). The impact of Structural Funds policy on European regions’ growth. A theoretical and empirical approach. European Journal of Comparative Economics, 4(2), 179–208.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Fratesi, U. (2004). Between development and social policies: The impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 regions. Regional Studies, 38(1), 97–113. doi: 10.1080/00343400310001632226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996). Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review, 40, 1325–1352. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(95)00029-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar