Cooperation linkages and technological capabilities development across firms

REFERENCES

• Abramovsky, L., & Simpson, H. (2011). Geographic proximity and firm–university innovation linkages: Evidence from Great Britain. Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 949–977. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425–455. doi:10.2307/2667105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, A. (2007). Innovation survey indicators: What impact on innovation policy? In Science technology and innovation indicators in a changing world: Responding to policy needs (pp. 49–64). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Badillo, E. R., & Moreno, R. (2014). Does absorptive capacity determine collaboration returns to innovation? A geographical dimension (IREA Working Paper No. 2014-28). Barcelona: University of Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Balconi, M., Lorenzi, V., Saviotti, P., & Zucchella, A. (2013). Cognitive distance in research collaborations (DEM Working Paper No. 51(09-13)). Pavia: University of Pavia.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms: Evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209–223. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bönte, W., & Keilbach, M. (2005). Concubinage or marriage? Informal and formal cooperations for innovation? International Journal of Industrial Organizations, 23(3–4), 279–302. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages and regional growth. Economic Geography, 85(3), 289–311. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2003). The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44(Spring), 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99(September), 569–596. doi:10.2307/2233763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. doi:10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., & Wischnevsky, J. D. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(4), 269–291. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2006.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., Shearmur, R., & Guillaume, R. (2014). Collaboration transferable and non-transferable knowledge, and innovation: A study of a cool climate wine industry (Canada). Growth and Change, 46(1), 16–37. doi:10.1111/grow.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duysters, G., & Lokshin, B. (2011). Determinants of alliance portfolio complexity and its effect on innovative performance of companies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 570–585. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00824.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatotchev, I., Piga, C., & Dyomina, N. (2003). Network positioning and R&D activity: A study of Italian groups. R&D Management, 33(1), 37–48. doi:10.1111/1467-9310.00280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. F., Revilla Diez, J., Snickars, F., & Varga, A. (2001). Metropolitan systems of innovation. Theory and evidence from three metropolitan regions in Europe. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Freel, M. S., & Harrison, R. T. (2006). Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector: Evidence from Northern Britain. Regional Studies, 40(4), 289–305. doi:10.1080/00343400600725095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, I. M. B., Clausen, T., Fontana, R., & Verspagen, B. (2011). Formal and informal external linkages and firms’ innovative strategies. A cross-country comparison. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(1), 91–119. doi: 10.1007/s00191-010-0188-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Green, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 883–895. doi:10.1162/0034653043125194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzini, E., & Iacobucci, D. (2014). The dark side of R&D collaborations (Working Paper No. 1405,c.MET-05). Interuniversity Center of Economics Applied to Industrial, Local Development and Globalization Policy, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Moffat, J. (2011). R&D, innovation and exporting (SERC Discussion Paper No. 73). London: LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. doi:10.2307/1912352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., Arundel, A., & Hollanders, H. (2010). How firms innovate: R&D, non R&D, and technology adoption (UNU-MERIT Working Paper No. 2010-027). Maastricht: United Nations University.
   Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S., Piva, M., Vivarelli, M., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2012). Technological capabilities and patterns of innovative cooperation of firm in the UK regions. Regional Studies, 46(10), 1283–1301. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.679259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R., & Allen, T. (1982). Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D projects. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, S., & Rosenberg, J. N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–305). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K. (2012). Keep searching and you’ll find what do we know about variety creation through firms’ search activities for innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(5), 1181–1220. doi:10.1093/icc/dts025
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., Masciarelli, F., & Prencipe, A. (2007). Regions matter: How regional characteristics affect external knowledge acquisition and innovation (DRUID Working Paper No. 07-20). Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy, Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. doi:10.1002/smj.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155. doi:10.1080/19416521003691287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowska, M. S. (2015). Capturing absorptive capacity: Concepts, determinants, measurement modes and role in open innovation. International Journal of Management and Economics, 45, 32–56. doi:10.1515/ijme-2015-0015
   Google Scholar
• Lhuillery, S., & Pfister, E. (2009). R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, 38(1), 45–57. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. (2013). The geography of innovation. In M. Fischer & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of regional science (pp. 375–389). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (1992). Learning by firms and incremental technical change. Economic Journal, 102, 845–859. doi:10.2307/2234581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (1997). Public policy and industrial dynamics: An evolutionary perspective. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 130–156). London: Cassel.
   Google Scholar
• Muscio, A., & Pozzali, A. B. (2013). The effects of cognitive distance in university–industry collaborations: Some evidence from Italian universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 486–508. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9262-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula, R., & Zanfei, A. (2003). The international dimension of innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 318–345). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems. A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6), 367–377. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). ISIC Rev. 3, Technology intensity definition. Classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, G., Piva, M., & Vivarelli, M. (2009). How do young innovative companies innovate? (IZA Discussion Paper No. 4301). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labour.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Luno, A., Wiklung, J., & Valle Cabrera, R. (2011). The dual nature of innovative activity: How entrepreneurial orientation influences innovation generation and adoption. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 555–571. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, C. C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 890–913. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piva, M., & Vivarelli, M. (2009). The role of skills as a major driver of corporate R&D. International Journal of Manpower, 30(8), 835–852. doi:10.1108/01437720911004452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponds, R., van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423–443. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, M. T. (2009). Structural change, specialization and regional labour market performance: Evidence for the UK. Applied Economics, 41(3), 275–293. doi:10.1080/00036840601007278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Mountains in a flat world: Why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(3), 371–388. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsn011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. (1990). Why firms do basic research (with their own money). Research Policy, 19(2), 165–174. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90046-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6), 751–766. doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.6.751.16026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287–306. doi:10.1002/smj.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Gonzalez, G., & Herrera, L. (2014). Effects of customer cooperation on knowledge generation activities and innovation results of firms. Business Research Quarterly, 17(4), 292–302. doi:10.1016/j.brq.2013.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1943). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Unwin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. (2015). Far from the madding crowd: Slow innovators, information value, and the geography of innovation. Growth and Change, 46(3), 424–442. doi:10.1111/grow.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2000). Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: Rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 73–102. doi:10.1080/146324400363536
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 81–112. doi:10.2307/2666980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Tunzelmann, N., & Wang, Q. (2003). An evolutionary view of dynamic capabilities. Economie Appliquee, 6, 33–64.
   Google Scholar
• Von Tunzelmann, N., & Wang, Q. (2007). Capabilities and production theory. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 18(2), 192–211. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2006.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Yayavaram, S., & Ahuja, G. (2008). Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 333–362. doi:10.2189/asqu.53.2.333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zidorn, W., & Wagner, M. (2012). Too much of a good thing: The role of alliance portfolio diversity for innovation output in the biotechnology industry (DRUID Working Paper No. 12-10). Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy, Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
   Google Scholar