6,745
Views
101
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Strategic agency and institutional change: investigating the role of universities in regional innovation systems (RISs)

, &
Pages 235-248 | Received 13 Feb 2015, Published online: 31 Oct 2016

REFERENCES

  • Aldrich, H. E. (2012). The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: A personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 41(7), 1240–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.013
  • Arbo, P., & Benneworth, P. (2007). Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: A literature review (OECD Education Working Paper No. 2007/09). Paris: OECD.
  • Arbo, P., & Eskelinen, H. (2003). The role of small, comprehensive universities in regional economic development: Experiences from two Nordic cases. Paper presented at the 43rd ERSA Congress, Jyväskylä, Finland, 27–30 August 2003.
  • Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
  • Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13, 653–676. doi:10.1177/1350508406067008
  • Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). 2 How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65–107. doi:10.1080/19416520903053598
  • Beer, A., & Clower, T. (2014). Mobilizing leadership in cities and regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/21681376.2013.869428
  • Benneworth, P. (2012). The relationship of regional engagement to universities’ core purposes: Reflections from engagement efforts with socially excluded communities. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development. A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 199–218). New York: Routledge.
  • Benneworth, P. S. (2004). In what sense ‘regional development?’: Entrepreneurship, underdevelopment and strong tradition in the periphery. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(6), 439–458. doi:10.1080/0898562042000249786
  • Benneworth, P. S. (2007). Seven samurai opening up the Ivory tower? The construction of Newcastle as an entrepreneurial university. European Planning Studies, 15(4), 487–509. doi:10.1080/09654310601133286
  • Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
  • Cai, Y., & Liu, C. (2015). The roles of universities in fostering knowledge-intensive clusters in Chinese regional innovation systems. Science and Public Policy, 42(1), 15–29. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scu018
  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York: Pergamon.
  • Cloete, N., Bailey, T., Pillay, P., Bunting, I., & Maassen, P. (2011). Universities and economic development in Africa. Cape Town: African Minds.
  • Collinge, C., Gibney, J., & Mabey, C. (2010). Leadership and place. Policy Studies, 31, 367–378. doi:10.1080/01442871003723242
  • Cooke, P. (2005). Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation. Research Policy, 34, 1128–1149. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.005
  • Cooke, P. (2011). Transition regions: Regional–national eco-innovation systems and strategies. Progress in Planning, 76(3), 105–146. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2011.08.002
  • Eckardt, F. ( Forthcoming 2017). The multidimensional role of global science spaces in attracting expats. Regional Studies, Regional Science.
  • Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation. Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Enders, J., & Boer, H. (2009). The mission impossible of the European university: Institutional confusion and institutional diversity. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, & P. Maassen (Eds.), European integration and the governance of higher education and research (pp. 159–178). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Feldman, M., & Desrochers, P. (2003). Research universities and local economic development: Lessons from the history of The Johns Hopkins University. Industry and Innovation, 10, 5–24. doi: 10.1080/1366271032000068078
  • Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28, 957–969. doi:10.1177/0170840607078958
  • Geertz, C. (1994). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In M. Martin, & C. C. McIntyre (Eds.), Readings in the philosophy of social science (pp. 213–231). New York: Basic.
  • Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75–99. doi:10.1093/jeg/3.1.75
  • Goddard J., & Vallance, P. (2013). The university and the city. London: Routledge.
  • Gornitzka, Å, Stensaker, B., Smeby, J.-C., & De Boer, H. (2004). Contract arrangements in the Nordic countries – Solving the efficiency/effectiveness dilemma? Higher Education in Europe, 29, 87–101. doi:10.1080/03797720410001673319
  • Greenwood, R., Sahlin-Andersson, K., Suddaby, R., & Oliver, C. (2012). Institutional theory in organization studies. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  • Gunasekara, C. (2006). Universities and associative regional governance: Australian evidence in non-core metropolitan regions. Regional Studies, 40(7), 727–741. doi: 10.1080/00343400600959355
  • Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hunter, J. (2012). Place matters: But does local leadership? Public Money and Management, 32, 95–102. doi:10.1080/09540962.2012.656001
  • Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2010). Different modes of innovation and the challenge of connecting universities and industry: Case studies of two regional industries in Norway. European Planning Studies, 18, 1993–2008. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2010.516523
  • Karlsen, J., & Larrea, M. (2012). Emergence of shared leadership. In M. Sotarauta, I. Horlings, & J. Liddle (Eds.), Leadership and change in sustainable regional development (pp. 212–233). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Karlsen, J., Larrea, M., Aranguren, M. J., & Wilson, J. R. (2012). Bridging the gap between academic research and regional development in the Basque country. European Journal of Education, 47(1), 122–138. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01512.x
  • Krücken, G. (2003). Learning the ‘new, new thing’: On the role of path dependency in university structures. Higher Education, 46, 315–39. doi:10.1023/a:1025344413682
  • Krücken, G., Kosmützky, A., & Torka, M. (2007). Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions. Bielefeld: Transaction.
  • Lagendijk, A. (2007). The accident of the region: A strategic relational perspective on the construction of the region’s significance. Regional Studies, 41(9), 1193–1208. doi:10.1080/00343400701675579
  • Lester, R., & Sotarauta, M. (Eds.). (2007). Innovation, universities and the competitiveness of regions. Helsinki: Tekes.
  • Livi, C., Crevosier, O., & Jeannerrat, H. (2014). From regional innovation to multi-local valuation milieux. The case of the Western Switzerland photovoltaic industry. In R. Rutten, P. Benneworth, D. Irawati, & F. Boekema (Eds.), The social dynamics of innovation networks (pp. 23–41). London: Routledge.
  • Lundvall, B. (2007). National innovation systems – Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. doi:10.1080/13662710601130863
  • Marginson, S. (2004). Competition and markets in higher education: A ‘glonacal’ analysis. Policy Futures in Education, 2, 175–244. doi:10.2304/pfie.2004.2.2.2
  • McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European union cohesion policy, regional policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.799769.
  • Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (2010). The changing dynamics of higher education middle management. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Mintzberg, H., & Rose, J. (2003). Strategic management upside down: Tracking strategies at McGill University from 1829 to 1980. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 20(4), 270–290. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00705.x
  • Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257–272. doi:10.1002/smj.4250060306
  • Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491–503. doi:10.1080/00343409750132289
  • Musselin, C. (2007). Are universities specific organisations? In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a Multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions (pp. 63–84). Bielefeld: Transaction.
  • Nedeva, M. (2007). New tricks and old dogs? The ‘third mission’ and the re-production of the university. In D. Epstein, R. Boden, R. Deem, F. Rizvi, & S. Wright (Eds.), Geographies of knowledge, geometries of power: Framing the future of higher education (pp. 85–105). London: Routledge.
  • Normann, R. (2013). Regional leadership: A systemic view. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(1), 23–38. doi:10.1007/s11213-012-9268-2
  • Oïnas, P., & Lagendijk, A. (2005). Towards understanding proximity, distance and diversity in economic interaction and local economic development. In A. Lagendijk & P. Oïnas (Eds.), Proximity, distance and diversity, issues on economic interaction and local development (pp. 307–331). London: Ashgate.
  • Olsen, J. P. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 25–54). Amsterdam: Springer.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007). Higher education and regions: Globally competitive, regionally engaged. Paris: OECD.
  • Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Pinheiro, R. (2012). University ambiguity and institutionalization: A tale of three regions. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 35–55). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Pinheiro, R., Benneworth, P., & Jones, G. A. (2012a). Understanding regions and the institutionalization of universities. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: An assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 11–32). London: Routledge.
  • Pinheiro, R., Benneworth, P., & Jones, G. A. (2012b). What next? Steps towards a recategorization of universities’ regional missions. In R. Pinheiro & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 241–55). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Pinheiro, R., & Stensaker, B. (2014). Designing the entrepreneurial university: The interpretation of a global idea. Public Organization Review, 14(4), 497–516. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0241-z
  • Powell, J., & Dayson, K. (2011). Engagement and the idea of the civic university. In P. Benneworth (Ed.), Universities engagement with socially excluded communities (pp. 143–162). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Powell, W., & Colyvas, J. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–98). London: Sage.
  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.748978.
  • Sayer, A. (2000). Realism in social science (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Selznick, P. (1984). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Sotarauta, M. (2005). Shared leadership and dynamic capabilities in regional development. In S. Halkier (Ed.), Regionalism contested: Institution, society and governance (pp. 53–72) (Urban and Regional Planning and Development Series). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Sotarauta, M. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(1), 96–112. doi:10.1068/c1066r
  • Sotarauta, M. (2014). Reflections on ‘mobilizing leadership in cities and regions’. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 28–31. doi:10.1080/21681376.2013.869431
  • Sotarauta, M., & Pulkkinen, R. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(1), 96–112. doi:10.1068/c1066r
  • Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. London: Guilford.
  • Storper, M. (2009). The economics of context, localisation and trade: Another great transformation? In G. Becattini, M. Bellandi, & L. Propris (Eds.), A handbook of industrial districts (pp. 141–157). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Tadaki, M., & Tremewan, C. (2013). Reimagining internationalization in higher education: International consortia as a transformative space? Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 367–387. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.773219
  • Vorley, T., & Nelles, J. (2012). Scaling entrepreneurial architecture: The challenge of managing regional technology transfer in Hamburg. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 181–98). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Watson, D., & Hall, L. (2015). Addressing the elephant in the room: Are universities committed to the third stream agenda. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 4(2), 48–76.