Administrative capacity or quality of political governance? EU Cohesion Policy in the new Europe, 2007–13

REFERENCES

• Addison, H. J. (2009). Is administrative capacity a useful concept? Review of the application, meaning and observation of administrative capacity in political science literature (LSE Working Paper). Retrieved from http://personal.lse.ac.uk/addisonh/Papers/AC_Concept.pdf 
   Google Scholar
• Alexandru, V., Iorga, E., Kovachev, P., & Konstantinov, D. (2013). Transparency and effectiveness of use of Structural Funds in Romania and Bulgaria: Learning by mistakes. Bucharest: Institute for Public Policy & Green Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D. (2000). Cohesion and the Structural Funds. In H. Wallace & W. Wallace (Eds.), Policy making in the European Union (pp. 243–265). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, I., Andreou, G., Atanasova, G., & Tomsic, D. (2011). Europeanization and multi-level governance in south-east Europe: The domestic impact of EU Cohesion Policy and pre-accession aid. Journal of European Public Policy, 18, 122–141. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.520884 doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.520884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Downes, R., & Gorzelak, G. (2000). Transition, cohesion and regional policy in Central and Eastern Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., & McMaster, I. (2008). EU Cohesion Policy and the role of the regions: Investigating the influence of Structural Funds in the new member states. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 398–427. doi:10.1068/c0662 doi: 10.1068/c0662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., & Mendez, C. (2007). Who governs EU Cohesion Policy? Deconstructing the reforms of the Structural Funds. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45, 535–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00724.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., & Oraže, H. (2013). From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative performance and capacity in Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies, 22, 1–23. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., & De Propris, L. (2004). A bridge too PHARE? EU Pre-accession aid and capacity building in the candidate countries. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 42, 77–98. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00477.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations (Report prepared at the request of the European Union Commissioner for Regional Policy – Danuta Hubner, Brussels, Belgium).
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52, 134–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batterbury, S. C. (2002). Evaluating policy implementation: The European Union’s small and medium sized enterprise policies in Galicia and Sardinia. Regional Studies, 36, 861–876. doi: 10.1080/0034340022000012306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baun, M., & Marek, D. (2008). EU Cohesion Policy after enlargement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2008). EU suspends funding for Bulgaria (July 23, 2008). Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7520736.stm
   Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk, M., & Eijffinger, S. (2005). The effectiveness of structural policy in the European Union: An empirical analysis for the EU-15 in 1995–2001. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 43, 37–51. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9886.2005.00545.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, S., & Petrova, V. (2013). National subversion of supranational goals: ‘Pork-barrel’ politics and EU regional aid. Europe–Asia Studies, 65, 1599–1620. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.833014 doi: 10.1080/09668136.2013.833014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeckhout, S., et al. (2002). Key indicators for candidate countries to effectively manage the Structural Funds. Rotterdam: Netherlands Economic Institute (NEI).
   Google Scholar
• Boijmans, P. (2013). The secrets of a successful administration for Cohesion Policy. Paper presented at the RSA European Conference, Tampere, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Boldrin, M., & Canova, F. (2001). Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: Reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy, 16, 206–253. doi: 10.1111/1468-0327.00074
   Google Scholar
• Bouvet, F., & Dall’Erba, S. (2010). European regional Structural Funds: How large is the influence of politics on the allocation process? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48, 501–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02062.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cace, C., Nicolaescu, V., Cace, S., & Iova, C. (2010). Capacity of PHARE and Structural Funds absorption: Pre-accession versus post-accession. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 28, 78–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union member states. Regional Studies, 48, 68–90. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.770141 doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.770141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Ministers of Bulgaria. (2013). Strategic report of the Republic of Bulgaria for 2012 on the implementation of Structural and Cohesion Funds. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/how/stages-step-by-step/strategic-report/
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2006). Regulation No. 1083/2006 – Laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the cohesion. Official Journal of the EU L210/25.
   Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M. (2012). Shallow or deep Europeanisation? The uneven impact of EU Cohesion Policy on the regional and local authorities in Poland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 730–745. doi:10.1068/c1164r doi: 10.1068/c1164r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellmuth, L., & Stoffel, M. F. (2012). Distributive politics and intergovernmental transfers: The local allocation of European Union Structural Funds. European Union Politics, 13, 413–433. doi:10.1177/1465116512440511 doi: 10.1177/1465116512440511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A. L. (2010). The new member states of the EU in the aftermath of enlargement: Do new European rules remain empty shells? Journal of European Public Policy, 17, 137–148. doi:10.1080/13501760903464929 doi: 10.1080/13501760903464929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A., & Toshkov, D. (2007). The dynamics of domestic coordination of EU policy in the new member states: Impossible to lock in? West European Politics, 30, 961–986. doi:10.1080/01402380701617381 doi: 10.1080/01402380701617381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimulescu, V., Pop, R., & Doroftei, M. (2013). Risks of corruption and the management of EU funds in Romania. Romanian Journal of Political Science, 13, 101–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobre, A. (2010). Europeanization and new patterns of multi-level governance in Romania. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10, 59–70. doi:10.1080/14683851003606838 doi: 10.1080/14683851003606838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotti, N.F. (2013). The unbearable instability of Structural Funds' distribution. European Planning Studies, 21, 596–614. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722956
   Google Scholar
• Ederveen, S., Groot, H. L., & Nahuis, R. (2006). Fertile soil for Structural Funds? A panel data analysis of the conditional effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy. Kyklos, 59, 17–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2006). Preparing for extended decentralisation of the PHARE and ISPA programmes. Commission Services Working Document.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Investment for jobs and growth. Promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities: Sixth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Brussels: DG Regional and Urban Policy.
   Google Scholar
• European Institute for Public Administration (EIPA). (2008). Managing Structural Funds: A step-by-step practical handbook. Maastricht: EIPA.
   Google Scholar
• European Policies Research Centre (EPRC). (2009). Ex-post evaluation of EU Cohesion Policy programmes 2000–2006 co-financed by the ERDF (Work Package No. 11: Management and Implementation Systems for Cohesion Policy. Final Report to the European Commission). Glasgow: EPRC.
   Google Scholar
• Fazekas, M., Chvalkovska, J., Skuhrovec, J., Tóth, I. J., & King, L. P. (2013). Are EU funds a corruption risk? The impact of EU funds on grand corruption in Central and Eastern Europe (Working Paper Series No. CRCB-WP/2013:03). Budapest: Corruption Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, M. (2013). The achievements of Cohesion Policy: Evidence and methodological challenges from an EU10 Perspective (GRINCOH Working Article WP8, Task 1).
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, M., & McMaster, I. (2013). Cohesion Policy and the evolution of regional policy in Central and Eastern Europe. Europe–Asia Studies, 65, 1502–1528. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.832969 doi: 10.1080/09668136.2013.832969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgescu, G. (2008). Determinants of increasing EU funds absorption capacity in Romania. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 2, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Romania. (2010). National strategic report on the implementation of the Structural and Cohesion Funds. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/how/stages-step-by-step/strategic-report/
   Google Scholar
• Government of Romania. (2013). National strategic report 2012 on the implementation of Structural and Cohesion Funds. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/how/stages-step-by-step/strategic-report/
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, T. (2014). Money, margins and the motors of politics: The EU and the development of party politics in Central and Eastern Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52, 71–87. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hille, P., & Knill, C. (2006). ‘It’s the bureaucracy, stupid’: The implementation of the Acquis Communautaire in EU candidate countries, 1999–2003. European Union Politics, 7, 531–552. doi:10.1177/1465116506069442 doi: 10.1177/1465116506069442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Keating, M. (1994). The politics of European Union regional policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 1, 367–393. doi:10.1080/13501769408406965 doi: 10.1080/13501769408406965
   Google Scholar
• Horvat, A. (2005). Why does nobody care about the absorption? Some aspects regarding administrative absorption capacity for the EU Structural Funds in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia before accession. Vienna: Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (WIFO).
   Google Scholar
• Horvat, A., & Maier, G. (2004). Regional development, absorption problems and the EU Structural Funds. Paper presented at ERSA, Osttirol.
   Google Scholar
• Hristova, D. (2013). Programming EU funds in Bulgaria: Challenges, opportunities and the role of civil society. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 5, 22–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., Gwendolyn, S., & Gordon, C. (2004). Conditionality and compliance in the EU’s eastward enlargement: Regional policy and the reform of sub-national government. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 42, 523–551. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00517.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodological and analytical issues (Working Paper No. 5430). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmerling, A., & Bodenstein, T. (2006). Partisan politics in regional redistribution: Do parties affect the distribution of EU Structural Funds across regions? European Union Politics, 7, 373–392. doi:10.1177/1465116506066264 doi: 10.1177/1465116506066264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG Romania, GEA S&C, Pluriconsult. (2010). A formative evaluation of structural instruments in Romania (Final Report prepared for Ministry of Public Finance).
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, R. (2005). Cohesion Policy in the European Union: The building of Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• METIS. (2014). Co-financing salaries, bonuses, top-ups from Structural Funds during the 2007–2013 period (Final report prepared for the European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Milio, S. (2007). Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from Structural Funds implementation in southern Italy. Regional Studies, 41, 429–442. doi:10.1080/00343400601120213 doi: 10.1080/00343400601120213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milio, S. (2008). How political stability shapes administrative performance: The Italian case. West European Politics, 31, 915–936. doi:10.1080/01402380802234581 doi: 10.1080/01402380802234581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molle, W. (2007). European Cohesion Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MWH. (2007). Supporting enlargement – What does evaluation show? Ex-post evaluation of PHARE support allocated between 1999–2001 (Consolidated summary report prepared for DG Enlargement).
   Google Scholar
• Oprescu, G., Constantin, D. L., Ilie, F., & Pîslaru, D. (2004). Analiza capacităţii de absorbţie a fondurilor comunitare în românia [Analysis of absorption capacity of community funds in Romania]. Bucharest: European Institute of Romania (IER).
   Google Scholar
• Paliova, I., & Lybek, T. (2014). Bulgaria’s EU funds absorption: Maximizing the potential! (WP/14/21). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund (IMF).
   Google Scholar
• PwC and ECORYS. (2013). Identifying and reducing corruption in public procurement in the EU (Report prepared for the European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47, 1034–1047. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.748978 doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Garcilazo, E. (2015). Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies, 49, 1274–1290. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933 doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21, 165–190. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherpereel, J. A. (2010). EU Cohesion Policy and the Europeanization of Central and East European regions. Regional and Federal Studies, 20, 45–62. doi: 10.1080/13597560903174899
   Google Scholar
• Smyrl, M. E. (1997). Does European community regional policy empower the regions? Governance, 10, 287–309. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.431997043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumpikova, M., Pavel, J., & Klazar, S. (2003). EU funds: Absorption capacity and effectiveness of their use, with focus on regional level in the Czech Republic. Paper presented at the 12th NISPAcee Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. (2014). Absorption of regional funds: A comparative analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52, 371–387. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsachevsky, V. (2012). Five years of Bulgaria’s membership into the European Union – The slow absorption of EU funds slackens Bulgaria’s Europeanisation. Turku: Pan-European Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Verheijen, T. (Ed.). (1999). Civil service systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Verheijen, T. (2007). Administrative capacity in the new EU member states: The limits of innovation? Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman, G., & Georgescu, G. (2009). Structural Fund absorption: A new challenge for Romania? Journal for Economic Forecasting, 6, 136–154.
   Google Scholar