The geography of duplicated inventions: evidence from patent citations

REFERENCES

• Alcácer, J., & Gittelman, M. (2006). Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 774–779. doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcácer, J., Gittelman, M., & Sampat, B. (2009). Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis. Research Policy, 38(2), 415–427. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905–917. doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atal, V., & Bar, T. (2010). Prior art: To search or not to search. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(5), 507–521. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessen, J., & Meurer, M. J. (2008). Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put innovators at risk. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bikard, M. (2012). Simultaneous discoveries as a research tool: Method and promise (SSRN Working Paper 2329605). Social Science Research Network (SSRN).
   Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi, A., Čenys, A., Chorafakis, G., Cooke, P., Foray, D., Giannitsis, A., & Harrison, M. (2009). The question of R&D specialisation: Perspectives and policy implications (No. JRC51665). Directorate Growth & Innovation and JRC-Seville, Joint Research Centre. Retrieved from https://observatorio.iti.upv.es/media/managed_files/2009/06/10/JRC51665.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannigan, A., & Wanner, R. A. (1983). Multiple discoveries in science: A test of the communication theory. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 8(2), 135–151. doi:10.2307/3340123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.975
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2005). Knowledge networks from patent data. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 613–643). Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(4), 439–468. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalini, C. (2012). Microgeography and the Direction of Inventive Activity (SSRN Working Paper 2126890). Social Science Research Network (SSRN).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1349–1367. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00068-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H. (1992). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Constant, E. W. (1978). On the diversity and co-evolution of technological multiples: Steam turbines and Pelton water wheels. Social Studies of Science, 8(2), 183–210. doi:10.1177/030631277800800202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, P., & Verspagen, B. (2008). Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents. Research Policy, 37(10), 1892–1908. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P., & Maskin, E. (1987). The simple economics of research portfolios. Economic Journal, 97(387), 581–595. doi:10.2307/2232925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denicolo, V., & Franzoni, L. A. (2003). The contract theory of patents. International Review of Law and Economics, 23(4), 365–380. doi:10.1016/j.irle.2003.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rassenfosse, G., Schoen, A., & Wastyn, A. (2014). Selection bias in innovation studies: A simple test. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 287–299. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkana, Y. (1971). The conservation of energy: A case of simultaneous discovery? Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences, 24, 31–60.
   Google Scholar
• Encaoua, D., & Ulph, D. (2005). Catching-up or Leapfrogging: The effects of competition on innovation and growth (Working Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., & Kogler, D. F. (2010). Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, 381–410. doi:10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01008-7
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, M. A. (2011). Duplication externalities in an endogenous growth model with physical capital, human capital, and R&D. Economic Modelling, 28(1–2), 181–187. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2010.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Merges, R., Samuelson, P., & Sichelman, T. (2009). High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system: Results of the 2008 Berkeley patent survey. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 24(4), 255–327.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. R., & Scotchmer, S. (1995). On the division of profit in sequential innovation. RAND Journal of Economics 26 (1): 20–33. doi:10.2307/2556033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guellec, D., Martinez, C., & Zuniga, P. (2012). Pre-emptive patenting: Securing market exclusion and freedom of operation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(1), 1–29. doi:10.1080/10438599.2010.536378
   Google Scholar
• Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2000). Applications, grants and the value of patent. Economics Letters, 69(1), 109–114. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00265-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2001). The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND Journal of Economics, 32, 101–128. doi:10.2307/2696400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. S. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, 90(2), 215–218. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.2.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. doi:10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. I. (1995). R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 759–784. doi: 10.1086/262002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. F. (2009). The burden of knowledge and the death of the Renaissance man: Is innovation getting harder? Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 283–317. doi:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00531.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. I., & Williams, J. C. (2000). Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 65–85. doi:10.1023/A:1009826304308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorde, T. M., & Teece, D. J. (1990). Innovation and cooperation: Implications for competition and antitrust. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3), 75–96. doi:10.1257/jep.4.3.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 752–782. doi:10.1257/0022051042177685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitch, E. W. (1977). The nature and function of the patent system. Journal of Law and Economics, 20(2), 265–290. doi:10.1086/466903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortum, S. (1993). Equilibrium R&D and the patent–R&D ratio: U.S. evidence. American Economic Review, 83(2), 450–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, D., & Easton, S. M. (1985). Multiple discovery: The pattern of scientific progress. Trowbridge: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, R. (2007). Strategic citation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(1), 320–333. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1961). Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 105(5), 470–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1979). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, J., & Bettels, B. (2001). Patent citation analysis. A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports. Scientometrics, 51(1), 185–201. doi:10.1023/A:1010577030871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, P. (2005). How do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century world’s fairs. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1214–1236. doi:10.1257/0002828054825501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, P. (2011). Do patents weaken the localization of innovations? Evidence from world’s fairs. Journal of Economic History, 71(2), 363–382. doi:10.1017/S0022050711001562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2015). Markets versus spillovers in outflows of university research. Research Policy, 44(1), 50–66. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, F., & O’Mahony, S. (2007). Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation: Implications for organization science. Organization Science, 18(6), 1006–1021. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niehans, J. (1995). Multiple discoveries in economic theory. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2(1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ogburn, W. F., & Thomas, D. (1922). Are inventions inevitable? A note on social evolution. Political Science Quarterly 37(1), 83–98. doi:10.2307/2142320
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, L. L. (2012). Do patents disclose useful information? Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 25(2), 545–607.
   Google Scholar
• Scotchmer, S. (1991). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 29–41. doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1979). Multiple discovery and invention: Zeitgeist, genius, or chance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(9), 1603–1616. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.9.1603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J., & Marx, M. (2013). Geographic constraints on knowledge spillovers: Political borders vs. spatial proximity. Management Science, 59(9), 2056–2078. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), 1199–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, D., & Roberts, P. W. (2010). Categorical coherence, classification volatility and examiner-added citations. Research Policy, 39(1), 89–102. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., & Fox-Kean, M. (2005). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. American Economic Review, 95(1), 450–460. doi:10.1257/0002828053828509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Graevenitz, G., Wagner, S., & Harhoff, D. (2013). Incidence and growth of patent thickets: The impact of technological opportunities and complexity. Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(3), 521–563. doi:10.1111/joie.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. P., Cohen, W. M., & Cho, C. (2007). Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research. Research Policy, 36(8), 1184–1203. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar