Technological diversity in Europe: empirical evidence from agri-food research projects

REFERENCES

• Aiginger, K., & Davies, S. (2004). Industrial specialization and geographic concentration: Two sides of the same coin? Not for the European Union. Journal of Applied Economics, 12, 231–248.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, E. (2012). Understanding long-term impacts of R&D funding: The EU Framework Programme. Research Evaluation, 21(5), 332–343. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvs025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, E., Clark, J., & Muscio, A. (2005). What the evaluation record tells us about European Union Framework Programme performance. Science and Public Policy, 32(5), 385–397. doi: 10.3152/147154305781779335
   Google Scholar
• Attaran, M., & Zwick, M. (1987). Entropy and other measures of industrial diversification. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 26, 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Banal-Estañol, A., Jofre-Bonet, M., & Lawson, C. (2015). The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK. Research Policy, 44, 1160–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolli, T., & Somogyi, F. (2011). Do competitively acquired funds induce universities to increase productivity? Research Policy, 40(1), 136–147. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1170–1182. doi: 10.1086/228631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85, 289–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi, L., & Peri, G. (2003). Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review, 47, 687–710. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00307-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Cassi, L., Malerba, F., & Vonotars, N. (2009). Networked research: European policy intervention in ICTs. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 21(7), 833–857. doi: 10.1080/09537320903182314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Cusmano, L. (2004). Unveiling the texture of a European research area: Emergence of oligarchic networks under EU Framework Programmes. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(8), 747–772. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2004.004992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32, 69–87. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelli, R., & Montobbio, F. (2016). European integration and knowledge flows across European regions. Regional Studies, 50(4), 709–727. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.931572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassi, L., Corrocher, N., Malerba, F., & Vonortas, N. (2008). The impact of EU-funded research networks on knowledge diffusion at the regional level. Research Evaluation, 17(4), 283–293. doi: 10.3152/095820208X364535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecere, G., & Corrocher, N. (2015). The intensity of interregional cooperation in information and communication technology projects: An empirical analysis of the Framework Programme. Regional Studies, 49(2), 204–218. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.759651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecere, G., & Ozman, M. (2014). Technological diversity and inventor networks. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23, 161–178. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2013.815473
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., Muscio, A., Simmonds, P., & Von Tunzelmann, N. (2004, May). Targeted review of added value provided by international R&D programmes. London: Office of Science and Technology (OST) International, Department of Trade and Industry ( DTI).
   Google Scholar
• Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38, 293–305. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013, August 7). Sixth FP7 monitoring report (Monitoring Report 2012). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016a). An analysis of the role and engagement of universities with regard to participation in the Framework Programmes, DG Research and Innovation (Study carried out by Ismeri Europa, Politecnico di Torino and IRCRES-CNR). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016b). An analysis of the role and impact of research performing organisations’ participation in the Framework Programmes, DG Research and Innovation. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016c). An analysis of the role and impact of industry participation in the Framework Programmes, DG Research and Innovation. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrenkrog, G., Polt, W., Rojo, J., Tubke, A., & Zinocker, K. (2002). RTD evaluation toolbox: Assessing the socio-economic impact of RTD policies (STRATA Project HPV 1 CT 1999-00005, IPTS Technical Report Series No. EUR 20382 EN). Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS).
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2011). Smart specialization: From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation (MTEI Working Paper 2011-001). Lausanne: École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., & Goenaga, X. (2013). The goals of smart specialisation (S3 Policy Brief Series No. 01/2013 – May, S3 Platform). Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies-Joint Research Centre (IPTS-JRC).
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41, 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambardella, A., Mariani, M., & Torrisi, S. (2009). How ‘provincial’ is your region? Openness and regional performance in Europe. Regional Studies, 43(7), 935–947. doi: 10.1080/00343400801932268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemba, K., & Kodama, F. (2001). Diversification dynamics of the Japanese industry. Research Policy, 30, 1165–1184. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00140-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L. (2001). Evolving frameworks for European collaboration in research and technology. Research Policy, 30, 891–903. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00163-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbekec, W., Duystersd, G., & Van den Oorda, A. (2008). Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37, 1717–1731. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granstrand, O. (1998). Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Research Policy, 27, 465–489. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00067-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granstrand, O., & Oskarsson, C. (1994). Technology diversification in ‘MUL-TECH’ corporations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41, 355–364. doi: 10.1109/17.364559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. (2002). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Larèdo, P. (1998). The networks promoted by the Framework Programme and the questions they raise about its formulation and implementation. Research Policy, 27, 589–598. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00055-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The Impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 673–702. doi: 10.1177/0306312705052359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, T. (2002). Technology and market orientation in company participation in the EU Framework Programme. Research Policy, 31(3), 437–455. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00118-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni, M. A. & Uberti, T. E. (2007). Inter-regional knowledge flows in Europe: An econometric analysis. In Frenken K. (Ed.), Applied evolutionary economics and economic geography (pp. 230–255). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, M. G., & Briz, J. (2000). Innovation in the Spanish food & drink industry. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 3, 155–176. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7508(00)00033-1
   Google Scholar
• Maurseth, P. B., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Knowledge spillovers in Europe: A patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104, 531–545. doi: 10.1111/1467-9442.00300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscio, A. (2006). The European added value of Framework Programmes: Evidence from the UK. Economia, Società e Istituzioni, 3, 381–412.
   Google Scholar
• Muscio, A. (2013). University–industry linkages: What are the determinants of distance in collaborations? Papers in Regional Science, 92(4), 715–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00442.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscio, A., Nardone, G., & Dottore, A. (2010). Understanding demand for innovation in the food industry. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(4), 35–48. doi: 10.1108/13683041011093749
   Google Scholar
• Muscio, A., Rivera Leon, L., & Reid, A. (2015). An empirical test of the regional innovation paradox: Can smart specialisation overcome the paradox in Central and Eastern Europe? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18(2), 153–171. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2015.1013545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paier, M., & Scherngell, T. (2011). Determinants of collaboration in European R&D networks: Empirical evidence from a discrete choice model. Industry and Innovation, 18(1), 89–104. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2010.528935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandza, K., Wilkins, T. A., & Alfoldi, E. A. (2011). Collaborative diversity in a nanotechnology innovation system: Evidence from the EU Framework Programme. Technovation, 31, 476–489. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 56–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quintana-Garcia, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2008). Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37, 492–507. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. (2009). Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations: Empirical evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme. Papers in Regional Science, 88, 531–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. (2011). Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: Evidence from the fifth EU Framework Programme. Annals of Regional Science, 46(2), 247–266. doi: 10.1007/s00168-009-0334-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Panne, G. (2004). Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 593–604. doi: 10.1007/s00191-004-0232-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rijnsoever, F. J., Van den Berg, J., Koch, J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015). Smart innovation policy: How network position and project composition affect the diversity of an emerging technology. Research Policy, 44, 1094–1107. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., & Von Tunzelmann, N. (2000). Complexity and the functions of the firm: Breadth and depth. Research Policy, 29, 805–818. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00106-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., Scherngell, T., & Lata, R. (2015). Embeddedness of European regions in European Union-funded research and development (R&D) networks: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1685–1705. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.873119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar