Distributive politics and spatial equity: the allocation of public investment in Chile

REFERENCES

• Alesina, A. (1989). Politics and business cycles in industrial democracies. Economic Policy, 4, 55–98. doi: 10.2307/1344464
   Google Scholar
• Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2006). Transparency, political polarization, and political budget cycles in OECD countries. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 530–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00200.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt, J. E., & Rose, S. (2006). Context-conditional political budget cycles. In C. Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics (pp. 845–867). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., & Snyder, J. M. (2006). Party control of state government and the distribution of public expenditures. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108, 547–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2006.00470.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297. doi: 10.2307/2297968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banful, A. B. (2011). Do formula-based intergovernmental transfer mechanisms eliminate politically motivated targeting? Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Development Economics, 96, 380–390. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M., & John, P. (2010). Government checking government: How performance measures expand distributive politics. Journal of Politics, 72, 545–558. doi: 10.1017/S002238160999082X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brollo, F., & Nannicini, T. (2012). Tying your enemy’s hands in close races: The politics of federal transfers in Brazil. American Political Science Review, 106, 742–761. doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadot, O., Röller, L., & Stephan, A. (2006). Contribution to productivity or pork barrel? The two faces of infrastructure investment. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1133–1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, E., & Murillo, M. V. (2012). When parties meet voters: Assessing political linkages through Partisan networks and distributive expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Political Studies, 46, 851–882. doi: 10.1177/0010414012463882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, A. (2001). Election goals and income redistribution: Recent evidence from Albania. European Economic Review, 45, 405–423. doi:10.1016/S00142921(00)00078-7 doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00078-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, A., & Solé-Ollé, A. (2005). The regional allocation of infrastructure investment: The role of equity, efficiency and political factors. European Economic Review, 49, 1165–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerda, R., & Vergara, R. (2007). Business cycle and political election outcomes: Evidence from the Chilean democracy. Public Choice, 132, 125–136. doi: 10.1007/s11127-006-9138-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-i-Font, J., Rodriguez-Oreggia, E., & Lunapla, D. (2003). Political competition and pork-barrel politics in the allocation of public investment in Mexico. Public Choice, 116, 185–204. doi: 10.1023/A:1024263208736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (1986). Electoral politics as a redistributive game. Journal of Politics, 48, 370–389. doi: 10.2307/2131098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denemark, D. (2000). Partisan pork barrel in parliamentary systems: Australian constituency-level grants. Journal of Politics, 62, 896–915. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, A., & Londregan, J. (1996). The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics. Journal of Politics, 58, 1132–1155. doi: 10.2307/2960152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drazen, A., & Eslava, M. (2010). Electoral manipulation via voter-friendly spending: Theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 92, 39–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2014). Social panorama of Latin America. Santiago de Chile: ECLAC.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., Madies, T., & Paty, S. (2008). Public spending interactions and local politics. Empirical evidence from French municipalities. Public Choice, 137, 57–80. doi: 10.1007/s11127-008-9312-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, M., & Min, B. (2013). Distributive politics around the world. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 73–99. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-052209-121553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkesworth, I., Melchor, O. H., & Robinson, M. (2012). Selected budgeting issues in Chile: Performance budgeting, medium-term budgeting, budget flexibility. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 12, F1–F39. doi: 10.1787/budget-12-5k44tpx5bl48
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, E. (2003). Intergovernmental grants as a tactical instrument: Empirical evidence from Swedish municipalities. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 883–915. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00148-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, P., & Ward, H. (2001). Political manipulation in a majoritarian democracy: Central government targeting of public funds to English subnational government, in space and across time. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3, 308–339. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00062
   Google Scholar
• Kemmerling, A., & Stephan, A. (2002). The contribution of local public infrastructure to private productivity and its political economy: Evidence from a panel of large German cities. Public Choice, 113, 403–424. doi: 10.1023/A:1020821624682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramon, E., & Posner, D. N. (2013). Who benefits from distributive politics? How the outcome one studies affects the answer one gets. Perspectives on Politics, 11, 461–474. doi: 10.1017/S1537592713001035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroth, V. E. (2014). Essays in political economy: Elections, public finance and service delivery in South Africa (Unpublished doctoral thesis). London: London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, H. Y. (2005). Targeting public spending in a new democracy: Evidence from South Korea. British Journal of Political Science, 35, 321–341. doi: 10.1017/S0007123405000177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessmann, C. (2012). Regional inequality and decentralization: An empirical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1363–1388. doi: 10.1068/a44267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindbeck, A., & Weibull, J. W. (1987). Balanced-budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition. Public Choice, 52, 273–297. doi: 10.1007/BF00116710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2015). Distributive politics and regional development: Assessing the territorial distribution of Turkey’s public investment. Journal of Development Studies, 51, 1518–1540. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2015.1028536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2008). National growth versus spatial equality? A cautionary note on the new ‘trade-off’ thinking in regional policy discourse. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 1, 3–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00003.x
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, K. S., & Smart, M. (2005). Regional grants as pork barrel politics (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1453). Munich: CESifo. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=710903
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). Revitalising Chile’s urban governance architecture. In OECD urban policy reviews: Chile (pp. 141–210). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Psycharis, Y., Zoi, M., & Iliopoulou, S. (2015). Decentralization and local government fiscal autonomy: Evidence from the Greek municipalities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34, 262–280. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15614153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. W. (1979). Regional and urban economics. London: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Ezcurra, R. (2009). Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 619–644. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Gill, N. (2005). On the ‘economic dividend’ of devolution. Regional Studies, 39, 405–420. doi: 10.1080/00343400500128390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., Psycharis, Y., & Tselios, V. (2016). Politics and investment: Examining the territorial allocation of public investment in Greece. Regional Studies, 50, 1097–1112. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1009027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 80, 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata (Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 103). Center for Global Development. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=982943
   Google Scholar
• Sakurai, S. N., & Menezes-Filho, N. (2011). Opportunistic and partisan election cycles in Brazil: New evidence at the municipal level. Public Choice, 148, 233–247. doi: 10.1007/s11127-010-9654-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solé-Ollé, A. (2013). Inter-regional redistribution through infrastructure investment: Tactical or programmatic? Public Choice, 156, 229–252. doi: 10.1007/s11127-011-9896-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., & Brusco, V. (2013). Between clients and citizens: Puzzles and concepts in the study of distributive politics. In S. C. Stokes, T. Dunning, M. Nazareno, & V. Brusco (Eds.), Brokers, voters, and clientelism: The puzzle of distributive politics (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarschys, D. (2003). Time horizons in budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2, 77–103. doi: 10.1787/budget-v2-art10-en
   Google Scholar
• Tavits, M. (2009). Geographically targeted spending: Exploring the electoral strategies of incumbent governments. European Political Science Review, 1, 103–123. doi: 10.1017/S1755773909000034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga, L. G., & Pinho, M. M. (2007). The political economy of intergovernmental grants: Evidence from a maturing democracy. Public Choice, 133, 457–477. doi: 10.1007/s11127-007-9208-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga, L. G., & Veiga, F. J. (2007). Political business cycles at the municipal level. Public Choice, 131, 45–64. doi: 10.1007/s11127-006-9104-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R., Shepsle, K. A., & Johnsen, C. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 642–664. doi: 10.1086/260997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willett, T., & Keil, M. (2004). Political business cycles. In C. Rowley, & F. Schneider (Eds.), The encyclopedia of public choice (pp. 736–740). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_152
   Google Scholar