Distance-based agglomeration externalities and neighbouring firms’ characteristics

REFERENCES

• Alcácer, J., & Chung, W. (2007). Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science, 53, 760–776. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcácer, J., & Chung, W. (2014). Location strategies for agglomeration economies. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1749–1761. doi: 10.1002/smj.2186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45, 905–917. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amrhein, C. (1995). Searching for the elusive aggregation effect: Evidence from statistical simulations. Environment and Planning A, 27, 105–119. doi: 10.1068/a270105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbia, G. (1989). Spatial data configuration in statistical analysis of regional economic and related problems. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Arbia, G. (2001). Modelling the geography of economic activities on a continuous space. Papers in Regional Science, 80, 411–424. doi: 10.1007/PL00013646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbia, G., & Espa, G. (1996). Statistica economica territoriale. Padua: CEDAM.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. R., Beckstead, D., Brown, W. M., & Rigby, D. L. (2008). Agglomeration and the geography of localization economies in Canada. Regional Studies, 42, 117–132. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, C., & Schiffauerova, A. (2009). Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy, 38, 318–337. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy (pp. 37–51). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies (ILO).
   Google Scholar
• Briant, A., Combes, P.-P., & Lafourcade, M. (2010). Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? Journal of Urban Economics, 67, 287–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, M. J., Van Oort, F. G., & Van der Knaap, B. (2010). A treatise on the scale-dependence of agglomeration externalities and the MAUP. Scienze Regionali, 9, 19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., Fracasso, A., & Vittucci Marzetti, G. (2015). Spatial agglomeration and productivity in Italy: A panel smooth transition regression approach. Papers in Regional Science, 94, S39–S67. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., Iacobucci, D., & Ganau, R. (2016). Do geographic concentration and vertically related variety foster firm productivity? Micro-evidence from Italy. Growth and Change, 47, 197–217. doi: 10.1111/grow.12112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., & Leoncini, R. (1999). Externalities and long-term local industrial development. Some empirical evidence from Italy. Revue d’Économie Industrielle, 90, 25–39. doi: 10.3406/rei.1999.1762
   Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., & Lupi, C. (2010). Does spatial proximity matter? Micro-evidence from Italy. In N. De Liso, & R. Leoncini (Eds.), Internationalization, technological change and the theory of the firm (pp. 163–186). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cingano, F., & Schivardi, F. (2004). Identifying the sources of local productivity growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 720–742. doi: 10.1162/1542476041423322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P., & Rosenbloom, J. (1990). Marshallian factor market externalities and the dynamics of industrial localization. Journal of Urban Economics, 28, 349–370. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(90)90033-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lucio, J. J., Herce, J. A., & Goilcolea, A. (2002). The effects of externalities on productivity growth in Spanish industry. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32, 241–258. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0462(01)00081-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deltas, G., De Silva, D., & McComb, R. P. (2015). Industrial agglomeration and spatial persistence of employment in software publishing (Working Paper No. 85393182). Lancaster: Management School, Department of Economics, Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., & Overman, H. G. (2005). Testing for localization using micro-geographic data. Review of Economic Studies, 72, 1077–1106. doi: 10.1111/0034-6527.00362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2004). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In J. V. Henderson & J.-F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics, Vol. 4 (pp. 2064–2117). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, M., Schimke, A., Brenner, T., & Luxen, D. (2014). Firm growth and the spatial impact of geolocated external factors. Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbücher fuer Nationalökonomie und Statistik), 234, 234–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, M., Scholl, T., Brenner, T., Luxen, D., & Raschke, F. (2015). Industry-specific firm growth and agglomeration. Regional Studies, 49, 1822–1839. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.861059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, R. H. (2011). Localized spillovers and knowledge flows: How does proximity influence the performance of plants? Economic Geography, 87, 127–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, G., & Maltese, E. (2015). Agglomeration externalities and the productivity of Italian firms. Growth and Change, 46, 354–378. doi: 10.1111/grow.12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriele, R., Giuliani, D., Corsino, M., & Espa, G. (2013). Reassessing the spatial determinants of the growth of Italian SMEs (Discussion Paper No. 2013/06). Trento: Department of Economics and Management (DEM), University of Trento.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Schleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126–1152. doi: 10.1086/261856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161. doi: 10.2307/1912352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, V. J. (2003). Marshall’s scale economies. Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 1–28. doi: 10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00505-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, V. J., Kuncoro, A., & Turner, M. (1995). Industrial development in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 1067–1090. doi: 10.1086/262013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mameli, F., Faggian, A., & McCann, P. (2014). Estimation of local employment growth: Do sectoral aggregation and industry definition matter? Regional Studies, 48, 1813–1828. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.756578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcon, E., Lang, G., Traissac, S., & Puech, F. (2012). dbmss: Distance-based measures of spatial structures. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dbmss/
   Google Scholar
• Marcon, E., & Puech, F. (2010). Measures of the geographic concentration of industries: Improving distance-based methods. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 745–762. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrocu, E., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2013). Productivity growth in the old and new Europe: The role of agglomeration externalities. Journal of Regional Science, 53, 418–442. doi: 10.1111/jors.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2011). Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France. Journal of Urban Economics, 69, 182–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (1999). Critical survey. The new ‘geographical turn’ in economics: Some critical reflections. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 65–91. doi: 10.1093/cje/23.1.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munari, F., Sobrero, M., & Malipiero, A. (2012). Absorptive capacity and localized spillovers: Focal firms as technological gatekeepers in industrial districts. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21, 429–462. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtr053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. (2002). On the units of geographical economics. Geoforum, 33, 153–164. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(01)00034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2008). Agglomeration economies, spatial dependence and local industry growth. Revue d’Économie Industrielle, 123, 87–109. doi: 10.4000/rei.3917
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, J. E. (1993). Does history matter only when it matters little? The case of city–industry location. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 843–867. doi: 10.2307/2118410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley, B. D. (1977). Modelling spatial patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 39, 172–212.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037. doi: 10.1086/261420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2003). Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 377–393. doi: 10.1162/003465303765299882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2008). The attenuation of human capital spillovers. Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 373–389. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2008.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, T., & Brenner, T. (2016). Detecting spatial clustering using a firm-level cluster index. Regional Studies, 50, 1054–1068. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.958456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, M. J., & Flyer, F. (2000). Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1175–1193. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200012)21:12<1175::AID-SMJ139>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, O., & Audia, P. G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 424–462. doi: 10.1086/316962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oort, F. G. (2007). Spatial and sectoral composition effects of agglomeration economies in the Netherlands. Papers in Regional Science, 86, 5–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2006.00088.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oort, F. G., Burger, M. J., Knoben, J., & Raspe, O. (2012). Multilevel approaches and the firm-agglomeration ambiguity in economic growth studies. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26, 468–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00723.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. C. (2015). Geography of knowledge sourcing, search breadth and depth patterns, and innovative performance: A firm heterogeneity perspective. Environment and Planning A, 47, 744–761. doi: 10.1068/a140024p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, D., & Amrhein, C. G. (1996). Research on the MAUP: Old wine in a new bottle or real breakthrough? Geographical Systems, 3, 73–76.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters, 104, 112–114. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar