Determining the effects of open innovation: the role of knowledge and geographical spillovers

REFERENCES

• Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455. doi: 10.2307/2667105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. M., & Hussinger, K. (2005). Export behavior and firm productivity in German manufacturing: A firm-level analysis. Review of World Economics, 141(2), 219–243. doi: 10.1007/s10290-005-0026-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Economics, 38, 361–379. doi: 10.2307/2098345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2713–2739. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80018-X
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 9(1), 30–42. doi: 10.1108/13598540410517566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, E. M., & Maier, G. (2009). Network central: Regional positioning for innovative advantage. Annals of Regional Science, 43, 615–644. doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0251-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Minondo, A., & Navarro, M. (2012). Related variety and regional growth in Spain. Papers in Regional Science, 91(2), 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001a). Localised knowledge spillovers vs. Innovative milieux: Knowledge ‘tacitness’ reconsidered. Papers in Regional Science, 80(3), 255–273. doi: 10.1007/PL00013627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001b). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.975
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32, 69–87. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2003). The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58. doi: 10.2307/41166175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. A., & Kim, G. M. (2003). Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: The supplier’s standpoint. Research Policy, 32(4), 587–603. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00047-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596. doi: 10.2307/2233763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39, 699–709. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt, R. (1997). Spillovers and innovative activities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(96)01023-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M. A., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2008). Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 677–690. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20(5), 499–514. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F. G., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimpe, C., & Kaiser, U. (2010). Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: The gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1483–1509. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00946.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harabi, N. (1997). Channels of R&D spillovers: An empirical investigation of Swiss firms. Technovation, 17(11), 627–635. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00064-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, F., & Rice, J. (2009). The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating open innovation outcomes: A study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 201–220. doi: 10.1142/S1363919609002261
   Google Scholar
• Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Olander, H., Blomqvist, K., & Panfilii, V. (2012). Orchestrating R&D networks: Absorptive capacity, network stability, and innovation appropriability. European Management Journal, 30, 552–563. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value ( NBER Working Paper No. 1815). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
   Google Scholar
• Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24, 185–205. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. doi: 10.1002/smj.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43, 867–878. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010). Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 224–236. doi: 10.1002/smj.807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability-based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315–1338. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00854.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mañez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., Sanchis, A., & Sanchis, J. A. (2009). The role of sunk costs in the decision to invest in R&D. Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4), 712–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00398.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2005). Spatial spillovers and innovation activity in european regions. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1793–1812. doi: 10.1068/a37341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (2005). A cognitive theory of the firm. European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 18(1), 29–60.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D., & Zook, C. (2002). Open-market innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(10), 80–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51–67. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammarra, A., & Biggiero, L. (2008). Heterogeneity and specificity of inter-firm knowledge flows in innovation networks. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 800–829. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00770.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segarra, A., & Arauzo, J. M. (2008). Sources of innovation and industry–university interaction: Evidence from spanish firms. Research Policy, 37(8), 1283–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2011). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 31(1), 10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Teirlinck, P., & Spithoven, A. (2008). The spatial organization of innovation: Open innovation, external knowledge relations and urban structure. Regional Studies, 42(5), 689–704. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triguero, A., & Córcoles, D. (2014). Understanding innovation: An analysis of persistence for Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 42(2), 340–352. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (1989). Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. In Industrial Dynamics (pp. 157–176). Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (1998). Economics of product development by users: The impact of ‘sticky’ local information. Management Science, 44(5), 629–644. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.44.5.629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, P. K., Lee, L., & Foo, M. D. (2008). Occupational choice: The influence of product vs. process innovation. Small Business Economics, 30(3), 267–281. doi: 10.1007/s11187-006-9044-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2005). Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(1), 39–54. doi: 10.1002/jae.770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar