Cluster policy and firm performance: a case study of the French optic/photonic industry

REFERENCES

• Aranguren, M. J., De La Maza, X., Parrilli, M. D., Vendrell-Herrero, F., & Wilson, J. R. (2014). Nested methodological approaches for cluster policy evaluation: An application to the Basque Country. Regional Studies, 48(9), 1547–1562. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.750423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. E., & Okubo, T. (2006). Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: Spatial selection and sorting. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 323–346. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbi020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. E., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2007). Entry and asymmetric lobbying: Why governments pick losers. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(5), 1064–1093. doi: 10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.5.1064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbesol, Y., & Briant, A. (2008). Économies d’agglomération et productivité des entreprises: Estimation sur données individuelles françaises. Economie et Statistique, 419(1), 31–54. doi: 10.3406/estat.2008.7726
   Google Scholar
• Beason, R., & Weinstein, D. E. (1996). Growth, economies of scale, and targeting in Japan (1955–1990). Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 286–295. doi: 10.2307/2109930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becchetti, L., De Panizza, A., & Oropallo, F. (2007). Role of industrial district externalities in export and value-added performance: Evidence from the population of Italian firms. Regional Studies, 41(5), 601–621. doi: 10.1080/00343400701281691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellégo, C., & Dortet Bernadet, V. (2014). L’impact de la participation aux pôles de compétitivité sur les PME et les ETI. Economie et Statistique, 471(1), 65–83. doi: 10.3406/estat.2014.10482
   Google Scholar
• Brossard, O., & Moussa, I. (2014). The French cluster policy put to the test with differences-in-differences estimates. Economics Bulletin, 34(1), 520–529.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, A., Dorsett, R., & Purdon, S. (2002). The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of active labour market policies (Working Paper No. 4). London: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camisón, C. (2004). Shared, competitive, and comparative advantages: A competence-based view of industrial-district competitiveness. Environment and Planning A, 36(12), 2227–2256. doi: 10.1068/a3759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., & Golovko, E. (2011). Innovation and internationalization through exports. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 56–75. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2010.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccone, A., & Hall, R. E. (1996). Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review, 86(1), 54–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingano, F., & Schivardi, F. (2004). Identifying the sources of local productivity growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(4), 720–744. doi: 10.1162/1542476041423322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combes, P. P., Duranton, G., Gobillon, L., Puga, D., & Roux, S. (2012). The productivity advantages of large cities: Distinguishing agglomeration from firm selection. Econometrica, 80(6), 2543–2594. doi: 10.3982/ECTA8442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corden, W. (1974). Trade policy and economic welfare. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, C., Martin, R., Overman, H., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). The effect of industrial policy on corporate performance: Evidence from panel data. Unpublished mimeo. Retrieved from http://personal.lse.ac.uk/criscuol/papers/criscuolo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crozet, M., Mayer, T., & Mucchielli, J.-L. (2004). How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(1), 27–54. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0462(03)00010-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vaan, M., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2013). Clustering and firm performance in project-based industries: The case of the global video game industry, 1972–2007. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(6), 965–991. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, M., Ketels, C., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2012). The determinants of national competitiveness (Working Paper No. w18249). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
   Google Scholar
• Devereux, M. P., Griffith, R., & Simpson, H. (2007). Firm location decisions, regional grants and agglomeration externalities. Journal of Public Economics, 91(3–4), 413–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, D., Mitze, T., Patuelli, R., & Reinkowski, J. (2013). Does cluster policy trigger R&D activity? Evidence from German biotech contests. European Planning Studies, 21(11), 1735–1759.
   Google Scholar
• Falck, O., Heblich, S., & Kipar, S. (2010). Industrial innovation: Direct evidence from a cluster-oriented policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(6), 574–582. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., & Olofsson, C. (2004). Science parks and the development of NTBFs – Location, survival and growth. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 5–17. doi: 10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011178.44095.cd
   Google Scholar
• Fontagné, L., Koenig, P., Mayneris, F., & Poncet, S. (2010). Clustering the winners: the French policy of competitiveness clusters (Working Papers No. 2010-18). Paris: Centre d’Études Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales (CEPII).
   Google Scholar
• Fontagné, L., Koenig, P., Mayneris, F., & Poncet, S. (2013). Cluster policies and firm selection: Evidence from France. Journal of Regional Science, 53(5), 897–922. doi: 10.1111/jors.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, C. K., Ries, J. C., & Swenson, D. L. (1999). Attracting foreign manufacturing: Investment promotion and agglomeration. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29(2), 197–218. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0462(98)00029-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training program. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654. doi: 10.2307/2971733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V. (2003). Marshall’s scale economies. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00505-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V., Kuncoro, A., & Turner, M. (1995). Industrial development in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 103(5), 1067–1090. doi: 10.1086/262013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V., Lee, T., & Lee, Y. J. (2001). Scale externalities in Korea. Journal of Urban Economics, 49(3), 479–504. doi: 10.1006/juec.2000.2202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, C., & Brown, J. (2006). Dynamics of clustering and performance in the UK opto-electronics industry. Regional Studies, 40(7), 707–725. doi: 10.1080/00343400600877862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, P. (2009). Agglomeration and the export decisions of French firms. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(3), 186–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, P., Mayneris, F., & Poncet, S. (2010). Local export spillovers in France. European Economic Review, 54(4), 622–641. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, A. O. (1990). Asymmetries in policy between exportables and import-competing goods (Working Paper No. w2904). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
   Google Scholar
• Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341. doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2011a). Public support to clusters: A firm level study of French ‘local productive systems’. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(2), 108–123. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2011b). Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France. Journal of Urban Economics, 69(2), 182–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011). R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: An empirical evaluation of the industrial cluster project in Japan. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 117–144. doi: 10.1007/s10961-009-9148-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037. doi: 10.1086/261420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2119–2171. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3
   Google Scholar
• Shefer, D. (1973). Localization economies in SMSA’s: A production function analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 55–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1973.tb00377.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissoko, A. (2011). R&D subsidies and firm-level productivity: Evidence from France (Working Paper). Louvain: Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
   Google Scholar
• Sveikauskas, L. (1975). The productivity of cities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89(3), 393–413. doi: 10.2307/1885259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linde, C. (2003). The demography of clusters—findings from the cluster meta-study. In J. Bröcker, D. Dohse, & R. Soltwedel (Eds.), Innovation clusters and interregional competition (pp. 130–149). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Viladecans-Marsal, E., & Arauzo-Carod, J.-M. (2012). Can a knowledge-based cluster be created? The case of the Barcelona 22@ district. Papers in Regional Science, 91(2), 377–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, K., & Nolan, A. (2014). Evaluation of industrial policy: Methodological issues and policy lessons (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 16). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar