Smart Specialisation in sparsely populated areas: challenges, opportunities and new openings

REFERENCES

• Asheim, B. T., Moodysson, J., & Tödtling, F. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Towards state-of-the-art regional innovation system policies in Europe? European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1133–1139. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.573127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations ( Independent report prepared at the request of European Commissioner for Regional Policy, Danuta Hübner). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beise, M. (2004). Lead markets: Country-specific drivers of the global diffusion of innovations. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 997–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2013). Constructing regional advantage and Smart Specialization: Comparison of two European policy concepts (Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography No. 13.22). Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht (URU), Utrecht University. Retrieved from http://econ.geog.uu.nl/peeg/peeg.html
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44(2), 355–389. doi: 10.1111/grow.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in Smart Specialization strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24, 1393–1406. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, D., Gross, F., & Bachtler, J. (2012). Smart Specialisation and Cohesion Policy – A strategy for all regions? (IQ-Net Thematic Papers No. 30 (2)). Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde. Retrieved from http://www.eprc-strath.eu/public/dam/jcr:ca04731c-2d7b-490f-a51e-3e368b7ecfb6/ThematicPaper30%25282%2529Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2007). To construct regional advantage from innovation systems first build policy platforms. European Planning Studies, 15(2), 179–194. doi: 10.1080/09654310601078671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Rosa Pires, A., Pertoldi, M., Edwards, J., & Hegyi, F. B. (2014). Smart Specialisation and innovation in rural areas (JRC Technical Reports). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl Fitjar, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). Innovating in the periphery: Firms, values and innovation in southwest Norway. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 555–574. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.548467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., & Roto, J. (2012). Making the best of Europe’s sparsely populated areas – On making geographic specificity a driver for territorial development in Europe (Nordregio Working Paper No. 15). Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008). Green Paper on territorial cohesion: Turning territorial diversity into strength. COM(2008) 616 final. Brussels:European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON). (2012). Geographic specificities and development potentials in Europe (No. Final report). Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2015). Smart Specialisation – Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2011). Smart Specialisation. From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation (MTEI – Working Paper). Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Gianelle, C., Kyriakou, D., Cohen, C., & Przeor, M. (Eds.). (2016). Implementing Smart Specialisation Strategies. Luxembourg: DG JRC IPTS.
   Google Scholar
• Gløersen, E., Dubois, A., Copus, K., & Schürmann, C. (2006). Northern peripheral, sparsely populated regions in the European Union and in Norway (Nordregio Report No. 2). Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, N. (1992). Competition, trust, and reciprocity in the development of innovative regional milieux. Papers in Regional Science, 71(2), 95–105. doi: 10.1007/BF01434257
   Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V., Tura, T., & Melkas, H. (2011). Regional innovation platforms. In Cooke, P., Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Martin, R., Schwartz, D., & Tödtling, F. (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 556–572). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D. (2014). Designing and implementing a Smart Specialisation Strategy at regional level: Some open questions. Scienze Regionali, 107–126. doi: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001006
   Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D., & Guzzini, E. (2016). Relatedness and connectivity in technological domains: Missing links in S3 design and implementation. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1511–1526. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1170108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2014). Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis (Papers in Innovation Studies No. 17). Lund: Lund University, Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE). Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/lucirc/2014_017.html
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 93(5), 436–457. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinossian, N. (2018). Planning strategies and practices in non-core regions: A critical response. European Planning Studies, 26(2), 365–375. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1361606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komninos, N., Musyck, B., & Reid, A. I. (2014). Smart Specialisation Strategies in south Europe during crisis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 448–471. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-11-2013-0118
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015). Efforts to implement Smart Specialization in practice – Leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2079–2098. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakou, D., Palazuelos Martinez, M., Perianez-Forte, I., & Rainoldi, A. (2017). Governing Smart Specialisation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Landabaso, M. (2012). What public policies can and cannot do for regional development. In P. Cooke, M. D. Parrilli, & J. L. Curbelo (Eds.), Innovation, global challenge and territorial resilience (pp. 364–382). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013a). Redesigning and reforming European regional policy: The reasons, the logic, and the outcomes. International Regional Science Review, 36(3), 424–445. doi: 10.1177/0160017612463234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013b). Transforming European regional policy: A results-driven agenda and Smart Specialization. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29(2), 405–431. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grt021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2017). From smart growth to European spatial planning: A new paradigm for EU Cohesion Policy post-2020. European Planning Studies, 25(10), 1856–1875. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1337729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., Trippl, M., & Zukauskaite, E. (2015). Policy learning and Smart Specialization: Exploring strategies for regional industrial change (School of Planning and Geography Working Papers). Cardiff: Cardiff University. Retrieved from http://orca.cf.ac.uk/78211
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2013). The regional state in the era of Smart Specialisation. Ekonomiaz, 83(02), 103–126.
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuur, C., & Laestadius, S. (2010). Development in peripheral regions: Case studies in Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(3), 293–307. doi: 10.1177/0969776409352156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). Innovation driven growth in regions: The role of Smart Specialisation. Paris: OECD Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. E. (2014). ‘Old wine in new bottles’? Smart Specialisation in Wales. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 152–157. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2014.944209
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S., Curaj, A., Gheorghiu, R., Andreescu, L., & Wade, I. (2017). Advances in the theory and practice of Smart Specialization. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sörvik, J., & Midtkandal, I. (2017). Continuous priority setting – In the Norwegian VRI programme. In D. Kyriakou, M. Palazuelos Martinez, I. Perianez-Forte, & A. Rainoldi (Eds.), Governing Smart Specialisation (pp. 156–178). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teräs, J., Dubois, A., Sörvik, J., & Pertoldi, M. (2015). Implementing Smart Specialisation in sparsely populated areas ( JRC Technical Reports No. 10). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Teräs, J., & Mäenpää, A. (2016). Smart Specialisation implementation processes in the north lessons learned from two Finnish regions Jukka Teräs, Antti Mäenpää. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 4(2), 75–86.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Regionalization of Innovation Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2017). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5), 687–705. doi:10.1177/0309132517700982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unicreds. (2012). University partnerships for prosperity – How higher education can help build regional knowledge based economies in Europe (Final Report). Retrieved from http://www.unicreds.eu/latest-news/item/97-university-partnerships-for-prosperity-unicreds-final-report.html.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., Sörvik, J., & Midtkandal, I. (2014). Inter-regional collaboration in research and innovation strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3) ( JRC Technical Reports No. 06). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Valdaliso, J. M., Magro, E., Navarro, M., Aranguren, M. J., & Wilson, J. R. (2014). Path dependence in policies supporting Smart Specialisation Strategies: Insights from the Basque case. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 390–408. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-12-2013-0136
   Google Scholar
• Young, N. (2010). Globalization from the edge: A framework for understanding how small and medium-sized firms in the periphery ‘go global’. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(4), 838–855. doi: 10.1068/a42315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Plechero, M. (2017). Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography, 93(4), 325–345. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar