791
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Academic excellence, local knowledge spillovers and innovation in Europe

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1058-1069 | Received 20 Nov 2017, Published online: 31 Jan 2019

REFERENCES

  • Abramovsky, L., Harrison, R., & Simpson, H. (2007). University research and the location of business R&D. Economic Journal, 117, C114–C141. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02038.x
  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2017). National systems of innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 997–1008. doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8
  • Adams, J. D. (2005). Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. In S. F. M. Breschi (Ed.), Clusters, networks and innovation (pp. 379–410). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Arimoto, A. (2011). Reaction to academic ranking: Knowledge production, faculty productivity from an international perspective (pp. 229–258). In J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings. London: Springer.
  • Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2017). Economic performance and the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship: A comment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1234–1235. doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9507-2
  • Barletta, F., Yoguel, G., Pereira, M., & Rodríguez, S. (2017). Exploring scientific productivity and transfer activities: Evidence from Argentinean ICT research groups. Research Policy, 46, 1361–1369. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.007
  • Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms: Evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33, 209–223. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003
  • Belderbos, E., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 1237–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.08.001
  • Bonaccorsi, A. (2014). Knowledge, diversity and performance in European higher education. A changing landscape. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Bonaccorsi, A. (2017). Addressing the disenchantment: Universities and regional development in peripheral regions. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 20, 293–320. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2016.1212711
  • Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo, M. G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2013). University specialization and new firm creation across industries. Small Business Economics, 41, 837–863. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9509-5
  • Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo, M. G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2014). The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms evidence from the Italian case. Small Business Economics, 43, 261–287. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9536-2
  • Bonaccorsi, A., Haddaway, H., Cicero, T., & Ul-Hassan, S. (2017). The solitude of stars. An analysis of the distributed excellence model of European universities. Journal of Informetrics, 11, 435–454. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.003
  • Broström, A. (2010). Working with distant researchers – Distance and content in university–industry interaction. Research Policy, 39, 1311–1320. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.002
  • Calcagnini, G., Favaretto, I., Giombini, G., Perugini, F., & Rombaldoni, R. (2016). The role of universities in the location of innovative start-ups. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 670–693. doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9396-9
  • Calderini, M., Franzoni, C., & Vezzulli, A. (2007). If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world. Research Policy, 36, 303–319. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.007
  • Calderini, M., Franzoni, C., & Vezzulli, A. (2009). The unequal benefits of academic patenting for science and engineering research. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56, 16–30. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2008.2009889
  • Chartier, O. (2007). Agri-food research in Europe. Overview of the agri-food research landscape in Europe (Final report of the EU Agri Mapping project). Brussels: European Commission.
  • De Fuentes, C., & Dutrénit, G. (2016). Geographic proximity and university–industry interaction: The case of Mexico. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 329–348. doi: 10.1007/s10961-014-9364-9
  • Duguet, E., & Lelarge, C. (2012). Does patenting increase the private incentives to innovate? A microeconometric analysis. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 107/108, 201–238. doi: 10.2307/23646577
  • European Commission. (2008). Commission recommendation on the management of intellectual property in knowledge transfer activities and code of practice for universities and other public research organisations. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Fini, R., Fu, K., Mathisen, M. T., Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2016). Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: A longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study. Small Business Economics, 48, 361–391. doi: 10.1007/s11187-016-9779-9
  • Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30, 297–312. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00115-8
  • Hong, W., & Su, Y. S. (2013). The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data. Research Policy, 42, 454–464. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.012
  • Karlsson, C., & Andersson, M. (2006). The location of industry R&D and the location of university R&D. How are they related? (Electronic Working Paper Series No. 38) Stockholm: Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies (CESIS).
  • Kleinknecht, A., & Reijnen, J. O. N. (1992). Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study. Research Policy, 21, 347–360. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(92)90033-Z
  • Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2011). Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies, 45, 507–523. doi: 10.1080/00343400903401618
  • Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Maietta, O. W. (2015). Determinants of university–firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry. Research Policy, 44, 1341–1359. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.006
  • Maietta, O. W., Barra, C., & Zotti, R. (2017). Innovation and university firm R&D collaboration in the European food and drink industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68, 749–780. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12208
  • Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90080-A
  • Mansfield, E., & Lee, J. Y. (1996). The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial support. Research Policy, 25, 1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00893-1
  • Monfardini, C., & Radice, R. (2008). Testing exogenity in the bivariate probit model: A Monte Carlo study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 271–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00486.x
  • Moscati, R., Regini, M., & Rostan, M. (2010). Torri d’avorio in frantumi? Bologna: Il Mulino.
  • Pavitt, K. (1984). Patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., … Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialization: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42, 423–442. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
  • Perotti, L. (2010). Università e sistema economico: Un rapporto difficile. Stato e Mercato, 89, 255–286.
  • Szücs, F. (2018). Research subsidies, industry–university cooperation and innovation. Research Policy, 47, 1256–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009
  • Tijssen, R. J., Visser, M. S., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2002). Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? Scientometrics, 54, 381–397. doi: 10.1023/A:1016082432660
  • Veugelers, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 26, 303–315. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00019-X
  • Wilde, J. (2000). Identification of multiple equation probit models with endogenous dummy regressors. Economics Letters, 69, 309–312. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00320-7

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.