Foreign-owned firms as agents of structural change in regions

REFERENCES

• Alcácer, J., & Chung, W. (2007). Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science, 53(5), 760–776. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, P. (1996). Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 155–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascani, A., & Iammarino, S. (2018). Multinational enterprises, service outsourcing and regional structural change. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(6), 1585–1611. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Békés, G., Kleinert, J., & Toubal, F. (2009). Spillovers from multinationals to heterogeneous domestic firms: Evidence from Hungary. World Economy, 32(10), 1408–1433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01179.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk, S., Mudambi, R., & McCann, P. (2010). Introduction: Place, space and organization: Economic geography and the multinational enterprise. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4), 485–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Balland, P.-A., & Kogler, D. F. (2015). Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in U.S. metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(1), 223–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Capone, G. (2015). Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework. Research Policy, 44(10), 1902–1914. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Capone, G. (2016). Relatedness and diversification in the European Union (EU-27) and European neighbourhood policy countries. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(4), 617–637. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15614729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., & Iammarino, S. (2000). Multinational corporations and the location of technological innovation in the UK regions. Regional Studies, 34(4), 317–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050078105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., & Iammarino, S. (2003). Multinational corporations and European regional systems of innovation. London: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986714
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., & Piscitello, L. (2005). Recent location of foreign-owned research and development activities by large multinational corporations in the European regions: The role of spillovers and externalities. Regional Studies, 39(1), 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., & Santangelo, G. D. (2002). The new geography of corporate research in information and communications technology (ICT). Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1), 163–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2720-0_17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2014). The emergence of new technology-based sectors in European regions: A proximity-based analysis of nanotechnology. Research Policy, 43(10), 1681–1696. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., Gagliardi, L., & Iammarino, S. (2015). Foreign Multinationals and domestic innovation: Intra-industry effects and firm heterogeneity. Research Policy, 44(3), 596–609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damijan, J., Kostevc, Č, & Rojec, M. (2018). Global supply chains at work in Central and Eastern European countries: Impact of foreign direct investment on export restructuring and productivity growth. Economic and Business Review, 20(2), 237–267.
   Google Scholar
• Delios, A., Xu, D., & Beamish, P. W. (2008). Within-country product diversification and foreign subsidiary performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 706–724. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2), 163–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-5931(99)00035-9
   Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. (2015). Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas. Regional Studies, 49(5), 752–766. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.806793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J., Verspagen, B., & von Tunzelmann, N. (Eds.). (1994). The dynamics of technology, trade and growth. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Farjoun, M. (1994). Beyond industry boundaries: Human expertise, diversification and resource-related industry groups. Organization Science, 5(2), 185–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 635–649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, L., & Muraközy, B. (2007). Does distance matter in spillover? Economics of Transition, 15(4), 781–805. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2007.00308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, C., Yan, Y., & Rigby, D. (2018). Regional industrial evolution in China. Papers in Regional Science, 97(2), 173–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A.-L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S., & McCann, P. (2013). Multinationals and economic geography, location, technology and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Inzelt, A. (2008). The inflow of highly skilled workers into Hungary: A by-product of FDI. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 422–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9053-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javorcik, B. S., Lo Turco, A., & Maggioni, D. (2018). New and improved: Does FDI boost production complexity in host countries? Economic Journal, 128(614), 2507–2537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. (2007). Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Science, 53(4), 616–631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S., & Simons, K. L. (2000). Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 997–1016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<997::aid-smj134>3.0.co;2-o
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler, D. F., Rigby, D. L., & Tucker, I. (2013). Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1374–1391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.755832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengyel, B., & Cadil, V. (2009). Innovation policy challenges in transition countries: Foreign business R&D in the Czech Republic and Hungary. Transition Studies Review, 16(1), 174–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-009-0046-5
   Google Scholar
• Lengyel, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Regional innovation systems in Hungary: The failing synergy at the national level. Regional Studies, 45(5), 677–693. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003614274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengyel, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The effects of FDI on innovation systems in Hungarian regions: Where is the synergy generated? Regional Statistics, 5(1), 3–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.15196/rs05101
   Google Scholar
• Lengyel, I., Vas, Z., Szakálné Kanó, I., & Lengyel, B. (2017). Spatial differences of reindustrialization in a post-socialist economy: Manufacturing in the Hungarian counties. European Planning Studies, 25(8), 1416–1434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1319467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Los, B., Timmer, M. P., & de Vries, G. J. (2015). How global are global value chains? A new approach to measure international fragmentation. Journal of Regional Science, 55(1), 66–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lux, G. (2017a). A külföldi működő tőke által vezérelt iparfejlődési modell és határai Közép-Európában. Tér és Társadalom, 31(1), 30–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.17649/tet.31.1.2801
   Google Scholar
• Lux, G. (2017b). Újraiparosodás Közép-Európában. Budapest–Pécs: Dialóg Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Narula, R., & Dunning, J. H. (2010). Multinational enterprises, development and globalization: Some clarifications and a research agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 38(3), 263–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2010.505684
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Hartog, M., Boschma, R., & Henning, M. (2018). Agents of structural change: The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification. Economic Geography, 94(1), 23–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1391691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., & Henning, M. (2013). Skill relatedness and firm diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 297–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670–702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887109990098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palich, L. E., Cardinal, L. B., & Miller, C. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2), 155–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200002)21:2<155::aid-smj82>3.0.co;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petralia, S., Balland, P.-A., & Morrison, A. (2017). Climbing the ladder of technological development. Research Policy, 46(5), 956–969. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouder, R., & St. John, C. H. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1192–1225. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/259168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, G., Li, L., & Rugman, A. M. (2013). Liability of country foreignness and liability of regional foreignness: Their effects on geographic diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(6), 635–647. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S. (2002). Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe: Determinants, organizers and alignments. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 87–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013152721632
   Google Scholar
• Resmini, L. (2007). Regional patterns of industry location in transition countries: Does economic integration with the European Union matter? Regional Studies, 41(6), 747–764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701281741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D. (2015). Technological relatedness and knowledge space: Entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1922–1937. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.854878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangelo, G. D., & Meyer, K. E. (2017). Internationalization as an evolutionary process. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9), 1114–1130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0119-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets, R. (2008). Collecting the pieces of the FDI knowledge spillovers puzzle. World Bank Research Observer, 23(2), 107–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkn003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a
   Google Scholar
• Wintjens, R. (2001). Regional economic effects of foreign companies. A research on the embeddedness of American and Japanese companies in Dutch regions  (Netherlands Geographical Studies No. 286). Utrecht: KNAG/University Utrecht. [in Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, J., Boschma, R., & Andersson, M. (2018). Industrial diversification in Europe: The differentiated role of relatedness. Economic Geography, 94(5), 514–549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1444989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar