REFERENCES
- Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3), 422–448. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2032
- Balland, P., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.883598
- Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
- Bilbao-Osorio, B., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2004). From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth and Change, 35(4), 434–455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00256.x
- Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
- Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2005). ‘Cross-firm’ inventors and social networks: Localized knowledge spillovers revisited. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 79/80, 189–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/20777575
- Brooker, D. (2013). From ‘wannabe’ Silicon Valley to global back office? Examining the socio-spatial consequence of technopole planning practices in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 54(1), 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12001
- Burger, M., & Meijers, E. (2016). Agglomerations and the rise of urban network externalities. Papers in Regional Science, 95(1), 5–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12223
- Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44(2), 355–389. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12012
- Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Caragliu, A. (2016). Static vs. dynamic agglomeration economies: Spatial context and structural evolution behind urban growth. Papers in Regional Science, 95(1), 133–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12182
- Cantos, P., Gumbau-Albert, M., & Maudos, J. (2005). Transport infrastructures, spillover effects and regional growth: Evidence of the Spanish case. Transport Reviews, 25(1), 25–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/014416410001676852
- Carrincazeaux, C., Lung, Y., & Vincente, J. (2008). The scientific trajectory of the French School of Proximity: Interaction- and institution-based approaches to regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 16(5), 617–628. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802049117
- Combes, P., Duranton, G., Gobillon, L., Puga, D., & Roux, S. (2012). The productivity advantages of large cities: Distinguishing agglomeration from firm selection. Econometrica, 80(6), 2543–2594. doi: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA8442
- Cooke, P. (2001). From technopoles to regional innovation systems: The evolution of localised technology development policy. Canadian Journal of Regional Science/Revue, 24(1), 21–40.
- Crevosier, O. (2014). Beyond territorial innovation models: The pertinence of the territorial approach. Regional Studies, 48(3), 551–561. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.602629
- Dahlander, L., & Frederiksen, L. (2012). The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organization Science, 23(4), 988–1007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0673
- Doloreux, D. (2003). Regional innovation systems in the periphery: The case of the Beauce in Québec (Canada). International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(1), 67–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000738
- Eder, J. (2018). Innovation in the periphery: A critical survey and research agenda. International Regional Science Review, 42(2), 119–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017618764279
- Fitjar, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). Innovating in the periphery: Firms, values and innovation in southwest Norway. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 555–574. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548467
- Fitjar, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2017). Nothing is in the air. Growth and Change, 48(1), 22–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12161
- Florida, R., Mellander, C., & Stolarick, K. (2008). Inside the black box of regional development – Human capital, the creative class and tolerance. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5), 615–649. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn023
- Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘national system of innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.
- Fujita, M., & Tabuchi, T. (1997). Regional growth in postwar Japan. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27(6), 643–679. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(96)02167-9
- Fukugawa, N. (2016). Knowledge creation and dissemination by Kosetsushi in sectoral innovation systems: Insights from patent data. Scientometrics, 109(3), 2303–2327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2124-x
- Garcia-López, M.-A., Hémet, C., & Viladecans-Marsal, E. (2017). How does transportation shape intrametropolitan growth? An answer from the Regional Express Rail. Journal of Regional Science, 57(5), 758–780. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12338
- Geldes, C., Felzensztein, C., Turkina, E., & Durand, A. (2015). How does proximity affect interfirm marketing cooperation? A study of an agribusiness cluster. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 263–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.034
- Glaeser, E., & Gottlieb, J. (2009). The wealth of cities: Agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 983–1028. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.4.983
- Glasmeier, A. (1988). The Japanese Technopolis programme: High-tech development strategy or industrial policy in disguise? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12(2), 268–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1988.tb00453.x
- Glückler, J. (2007). How controversial innovation succeeds in the periphery? A network perspective of BASF Argentina. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(5), 903–927. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu016
- Goetz, S., Han, Y., Findeis, J., & Brasier, K. (2010). U.S. commuting networks and economic growth: Measurement and implications for spatial policy. Growth and Change, 41, 276–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2010.00527.x
- Grabher, G. (2018). Marginality as strategy: Leveraging peripherality for creativity. Environment and Planning A, 50(8), 1785–1794. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18784021
- Grillitsch, M., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? Annals of Regional Science, 54(1), 299–321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8
- International Telecommunications Union (ITU). (2018). Percentage of individuals using the Internet. Statistics [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx
- Isaac, M., Erickson, B., Quashie-Sam, J., & Timmer, V. (2007). Transfer of knowledge on agroforestry management practices: The structure of farmer advice networks. Ecology and Society, 12(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267879?refreqid=excelsior%3A921874cd2cf18d21dacd1f23599863be&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02196-120232
- Jacobs, A. (2002). Integrated development planning, supportive public policies, and corporate commitment: A recipe for thriving major cities in Aichi, Japan. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(2), 175–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.00121
- Kaiser, U., Kongsted, H., & Ronde, T. (2011). Labour mobility, social network effects, and innovative activity ( IZA DP No. 5654). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA).
- Lagendijk, A., & Lorentzen, A. (2007). Proximity, knowledge and innovation in the peripheral regions. On the intersection between geographical and organizational proximity. European Planning Studies, 15, 457–466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310601133260
- Lundvall, B.-Å (Ed.). (1992). National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
- MacKinnon, D., Cumber, A., & Chapman, K. (2002). Learning, innovation and regional development: A critical appraisal of recent debates. Progress in Human Geography, 26, 293–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132502ph371ra
- Martinus, K. (2013). Creating a knowledge-based region through policy integration and joint governance: The case of Kobe City in Kansai, Japan. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 4(4), 300–317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2013.058520
- Martinus, K. (2016). Regional development in a resource production system: Long distance commuting, population growth and wealth redistribution in the WA goldfields. Geographical Research, 54(4), 420–432. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12173
- Martinus, K. (2018). Labor networks connecting peripheral economies to the national innovation system. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(3), 845–863. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1374163
- Martinus, K., & Sigler, T. (2017). Global city clusters: Theorizing spatial and non-spatial proximity in inter-urban firm networks. Regional Studies, 52(8), 1041–1052.
- Meijers, E., & Burger, M. (2017). Stretching the concept of ‘borrowed size’. Urban Studies, 54(1), 269–291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015597642
- Miguelez, E., & Moreno, R. (2013). Mobility, networks and innovation: The role of regions’ absorptive capacity. Growth and Change, 44(2), 321–354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12008
- Morichi, S. (2005). Long-term strategy for transport systems in Asian megacities. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 1–22.
- Motohashi, K. (2005). University–industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the national innovation system. Research Policy, 34(5), 583–594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.001
- Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000065442
- Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011). Subsidy and networking: The effects of direct and indirect support programs of the cluster policy. Research Policy, 40(5), 714–727. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.011
- Odagiri, H., & Goto, A. (1993). The Japanese system of innovation: Past, present and future. In R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems (pp. 76–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Okubo, T., & Tomiura, E. (2012). Industrial relocation policy, productivity and heterogeneous plants: Evidence from Japan. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(1–2), 230–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.09.004
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). OECD Patent Statistics Manual. Paris: OECD Publ.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014). OECD REGPAT database: EPO and PCT patent application at regional level (January 2014 edition). Paris: OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). Japan policy brief: Agriculture. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/policy-briefs/japan--assuring-long-term-health-of-food-and-agriculture-system.pdf
- Otsuka, A. (2017). Dynamics of agglomeration, accessibility, and total factor productivity: Evidence from Japanese regions. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(7), 611–627.
- Paasi, A., Harrison, J., & Jones, M. (2018). Handbook on the geographies of regions and Territories. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Pain, K. (2008). Examining ‘core–periphery’ relationship in a global city-region: The case of London and South-East England. Regional Studies, 42(8), 1161–1172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701808857
- Partridge, M., Ali, K., & Olfert, M. (2010). Rural-to-urban commuting: Three degrees of integration. Growth and Change, 41(2), 303–335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2010.00528.x
- Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2007). What kind of local and regional development and for whom? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1253–1269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701543355
- Power, D., & Lundmark, M. (2004). Working through knowledge pools: Labour market dynamics, the transference of knowledge and ideas, and industrial clusters. Urban Studies, 41(5–6), 1025–1044. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980410001675850
- PwC. (2017). The 2017 Global Innovation 1000 Study. Retrieved from https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/innovation1000
- Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701654186
- Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Wilkie, C. (2018). Innovating in less developed regions: What drives patenting in the lagging regions of Europe and North America (CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP13048). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3214567
- Shearmur, R. (2017). Urban bias in innovation studies. In H. Bathelt, P. Cohendet, S. Henn, & L. Simon (Eds.), The Elgar companion to innovation and knowledge creation: A multi-disciplinary approach (pp. 440–456). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Shearmur, R., Carrincazeaux, C., & Doloreux, D. (2016). Handbook on the geographies of innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Shearmur, R., & Doloreux, D. (2015). KIBS use and innovation: High-order services, geographic hierarchies and internet use in Quebec’s manufacturing sector. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1654–1671. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.870988
- Shearmur, R., & Doloreux, D. (2016). How open innovation processes vary between urban and remote environments: Slow innovators, market-sourced information and frequency of interaction. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 28(5–6), 337–357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1154984
- Simmie, J. (2003). Innovation and urban regions as national and international nodes for the transfer and sharing of knowledge. Regional Studies, 37(6/7), 607–620. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108714
- Singh, J. (2008). Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Research Policy, 37, 77–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.004
- Sobels, J., Curtis, A., & Lockie, S. (2001). The role of Landcare group networks in rural Australia: Exploring the contribution of social capital. Journal of Rural Studies, 17(3), 265–276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00003-1
- Stern, M., & Adams, A. (2010). Do rural residents really use the Internet to build social capital? An empirical investigation. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(9), 1389–1422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210361692
- Suorsa, K. (2007). Regionality, innovation policy and peripheral regions in Finland, Sweden and Norway. Fennia, 185(1), 15–29.
- Suzuki, J. (2017). To support R&D or linkages? Seeking a better policy mix for SME support (RIETI Discussion Paper Series 17-E-098).
- Tonts, M. (2005). Competitive sport and social capital in rural Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(2), 137–149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.03.001
- Vicente, J., Pria, Y., & Suire, R. (2007). Informational cascades versus network externalities in locational choice: Evidence of ‘ICT clusters’ formation and stability. Regional Studies, 41(2), 173–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601108424
- Wirth, P., Elis, V., Müller, B., & Yamamoto, K. (2016). Peripheralisation of small towns in Germany and Japan – Dealing with economic decline and population loss. Journal of Rural Studies, 47(A), 62–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.021
- Yasunaga, Y., Watanabe, M., & Korenaga, M. (2009). Application of technology roadmaps to governmental innovation policy for promoting technology convergence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 61–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.06.004