Is there an optimal size for local governments? A spatial panel data model approach

REFERENCES

• Alesina, A., & Rosenthal, H. (1994). Partisans politics, divided governments, and the economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & Spolaore, E. (1997). On the number and size of nations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1027–1056. doi: 10.1162/003355300555411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & Spolaore, E. (2005). War, peace and the size of countries. Journal of Public Economics, 89(7), 1333–1354. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L., Amacher, R., & Tollison, R. (1974). The economic theory of clubs: A geometric exposition. Public Finance, 29(3–4), 386–391.
   Google Scholar
• Astworth, S., & Mesquita, E. B. (2006). Delivering the goods: Legislative particularism in different electoral and institutional settings. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 168–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastida, F., Guillamón, M., & Benito, B. (2013). Municipal spending in Spain: A spatial approach. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 139(2), 79–93. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G. (2011). Local services: Size, scale and governance. In IEB’s report on fiscal federalism. Barcelona: Institut d’Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, T. C., & Goodman, R. P. (1973). Private demand for public goods. American Economic Review, 63, 280–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, L., & Blume, T. (2007). The economic effects of local authority mergers: Empirical evidence for German city regions. Annals of Regional Science, 41, 689–713. doi: 10.1007/s00168-007-0118-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, P., & Rolland, G. (1997). The breakup of nations: A political economy analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1057–1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borcheding, T. E., & Deacon, R. T. (1972). The demand for the services of non-federal governments. American Economic Review, 62, 891–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borge, L. (2005). Strong politicians, small deficits: Evidence from Norwegian local governments. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 325–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, W., & Dolbear, F. T. (1967). The possibility of oversupply of local ‘public’ goods: A critical note. Journal of Political Economy, 75, 86–90. doi: 10.1086/259241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32, 1–14. doi: 10.2307/2552442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchfield, M., Overman, H., Puga, D., & Turner, M. (2006). Causes of sprawl: A portrait from space. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 587–633. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, J. I., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2003). Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 503–522. doi: 10.1068/b12847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, J. I., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2008). Does smart growth matter to public finance? Evidence from the United States. Urban Studies, 45(9), 1791–1823. doi: 10.1177/0042098008093379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudik, A., Mohaddes, K., Pesaran, M., H., & Raissi, M. (2017). Is there a debt-threshold effect on output growth? Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(1), 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva, D. F. C., Elhorst, J. P., & da Mota Silveira Neto, R. (2017). Urban and rural population growth in a spatial panel of municipalities. Regional Studies, 51(6), 894–908. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1144922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dafflon, B. (2012). Voluntary amalgamation of local governments: The Swiss debate in the European context. In Lago-Penas and Martinez-Vazquez (Eds.), The challenge of local government size. Theoretical perspectives, international experience and policy reform. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, T. A., & Pogue, T. F. (1994). Adjusting school aid formulas for the higher cost of educating disadvantaged students. National Tax Journal, 47, 89–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dur, R., & Staal, K. (2008). Local public good provision, municipal consolidation, and national transfers. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(2), 160–173. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. H. Y. (1990). Congestion function specification and the ‘publicness’ of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 27, 80–96. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(90)90026-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhorst, J. P. (2014). Spatial econometrics: From cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ertur, C., & Koch, W. (2007). Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: Theory and evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(6), 1033–1062. doi: 10.1002/jae.963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., & Scholz, J. (Eds.). (2010). Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action dilemmas. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., Madies, T., & Paty, S. (2008). Public spending interactions and local politics. Empirical evidence from French municipalities. Public Choice, 137, 57–80. doi: 10.1007/s11127-008-9312-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frere, Q., Leprince, M., & Paty, S. (2014). The impact of intermunicipal cooperation on local public spending. Urban Studies, 51(8), 1741–1760. doi: 10.1177/0042098013499080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Sánchez, I. M., Mordan, N., & Prado-Lorenzo, J. M. (2012). Effect of the political system on local financial condition: Empirical evidence for Spain’s largest municipalities. Public Budgeting and Finance, 32, 40–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2011.00986.x
   Google Scholar
• Goerlich, F. J., & Cantarino, I. (2010). Un índice de rugosidad del terreno a escala municipal a partir de modelos de elevación digital de acceso public (Documento de Trabajo No. 7/2010). Fundación BBVA.
   Google Scholar
• Goerlich, F. J., & Mas, M. (2008). Empirical evidence of population concentration in Spain, 1900–2001. Population-E, 63(4), 635–650. doi: 10.3917/pope.804.0635
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Antonio, M., Hortas-Rico, M., & Li, L. (2016). The causes of urban sprawl in Spanish urban areas: A spatial approach. Spatial Economic Analysis, 11(2), 219–247. doi: 10.1080/17421772.2016.1126674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, N., & Knight, B. (2009). A spatial merger estimator with an application to school district consolidation. Journal of Public Economics, 93(5–6), 752–765. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanes, N. (2015). Amalgamation impacts on local public expenditures in Sweden. Local Government Studies, 41(1), 63–77. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2013.869496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindriks, J., & Lockwood, B. (2005). Centralization and political accountability (CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5125).
   Google Scholar
• Hortas-Rico, M., & Salinas, P. (2014). Determinación de la escala mínima eficiente en la provisión de bienes públicos locales. Evidencia para los municipios españoles. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 66, 35–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hortas-Rico, M., & Solé-Ollé, A. (2010). Does urban sprawl increase the costs of providing local public services? Evidence from Spanish municipalities. Urban Studies, 47, 1513–1540. doi: 10.1177/0042098009353620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihlanfeldt, K., & Willardsen, K. (2018). Local public services costs and the geography of development: Evidence from Florida counties. Journal of Regional Science 58(1), 5–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, R. P., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1997). The political economy of federalism. In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice (pp. 73–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F. (1992). Population growth, density and the costs of providing public services. Urban Studies, 29, 273–295. doi: 10.1080/00420989220080321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F. (1994). Fiscal impacts of local population growth: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24, 661–686. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(94)90006-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F., & Yinger, J. (1989). America’s ailing cities: Fiscal health and the design of urban policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. F., & Yu, J. (2010). Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics, 154, 165–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P. (2014). Spatial econometric panel data model specification: A Bayesian approach. Spatial Statistics, 9, 122–145. doi: 10.1016/j.spasta.2014.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, A., & Uusitalo, R. (2013). The impact of municipal mergers on public expenditures in Finland. Public Finance and Management, 13(3), 148–166.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120–1149. doi: 10.1257/jel.37.3.1120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 349–373. doi: 10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1969). The principle of fiscal equivalence: The division of responsibilities among different levels of government. American Economic Review, 59, 479–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly, M. (1970). Optimality, ‘public’ goods, and local governments: A general theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 572–585. doi: 10.1086/259651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto, A. M., Zofio, J. L., & Alvarez, I. (2015). Cost economies, urban patterns and population density: The case of public infrastructure for basic utilities. Papers in Regional Science, 94(4), 795–816. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingewertz, Y. (2012). Do municipal amalgamations work? Evidence from municipalities in Israel. Journal of Urban Economics, 72, 240–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2012.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, V., & Gianmoena, L. (2018). Convergence in CO2 emissions: A spatial economic analysis with cross-country interactions. Energy Economics, 75, 222–238. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, V., Pascual, P., & Cabasés, F. (2017). What drives local government spending in Spain? A dynamic spatial panel approach. Spatial Economic Analysis, 12(2–3), 230–250. doi: 10.1080/17421772.2017.1282166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. D. (1989). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies. European Economic Review, 33(5), 903–933. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(89)90002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarimaa, T., & Tukiainen, J. (2010). Coalition formation and political decision-making: Evidence from Finnish municipal mergers (Government Institute for Economic Research Working Papers No. 19). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1926636; or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1926636
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralization as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3, 24–43. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/3.2.24
   Google Scholar
• Seabright, P. (1996). Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40, 61–89. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(95)00055-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack, E., & Bird, R. (2012). Merging municipalities: Is bigger better? In A. Moisio (Ed.), Rethinking local government: Essays on municipal reform ( VATT Publications No. 61:83-123). Helsinki: Government Institute for Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Solé-Ollé, A. (2006). Expenditure spillovers and fiscal interactions: Empirical evidence from local governments in Spain. Journal of Urban Economics, 59, 32–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2005.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solé-Ollé, A., & Bosch, N. (2005). On the relationship between authority size and the costs of providing local services: Lessons for the design of intergovernmental transfers in Spain. Public Finance Review, 33(3), 343–384. doi: 10.1177/1091142104272708
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, R. J. (2006). Local government consolidations: The impact of political transaction costs. Public Choice, 127, 75–95. doi: 10.1007/s11127-006-7106-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speir, C., & Stephenson, K. (2002). Does sprawl cost us all? Isolating the effects of housing patterns on public water and sewer costs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1), 56–70. doi: 10.1080/01944360208977191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, R., Kaiser, C., & Eythorsson, G. T. (2016). A comparative analysis of amalgamation reforms in selected European countries. In S. Kuhlmann & G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Local public sector reforms in times of crisis: National trajectories and international comparisons (pp. 23–42). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. (2018). Municipal amalgamations and their effects: A literature review. Regional Studies on Development, 22(1), 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tellier, G. (2006). Public expenditures in Canadian provinces: An empirical study of politico-economic interactions. Public Choice, 126(3–4), 367–385. doi: 10.1007/s11127-006-2455-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. doi: 10.1086/257839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkerink, B., & de Haan, J. (2001). Fragmented governments effect on fiscal policy: New evidence. Public Choice, 109(3), 221–242. doi: 10.1023/A:1013048518308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., & Lee, L. F. (2012). Convergence: A spatial dynamic panel data approach. Global Journal of Economics, 1(1), 1–36.
   Google Scholar