How the practice of clustering shapes cluster emergence

REFERENCES

• Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1994). Living in the global. In A. Amin, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argote, L., & Greve, H. (2007). A behavioral theory of the firm – 40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organization Science, 18(3), 337–349. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, A., & Lester, L. (2015). Institutional thickness and institutional effectiveness: Developing regional indices for policy and practice in Australia. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 205–228. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2015.1013150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthod, O., Grothe-Hammer, M., & Sydow, J. (2017). Network ethnography: A mixed-method approach for the study of practices in interorganizational settings. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 299–323. doi: 10.1177/1094428116633872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørkeng, K., Clegg, S., & Pitsis, T. (2009). Becoming (a) practice. Management Learning, 40, 145–159. doi: 10.1177/1350507608101226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Fornahl, D. (2011). Cluster evolution and a roadmap for future research. Regional Studies, 45(10), 1295–1298. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.633253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunerhjelm, P., & Feldman, M. (2008). Cluster genesis: Technology-based industrial development. Economic Geography, 84(2), 245–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, T., & Mühlig, A. (2013). Factors and mechanisms causing the emergence of local industrial clusters: A summary of 159 cases. Regional Studies, 47(4), 480–507. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.701730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T., Gambardella, A., & Saxenian, A. (2001). ‘Old economy’ inputs for ‘new economy’ outcomes: Cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 835–860. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.835
   Google Scholar
• Denis, J., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2007). Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60(1), 179–215. doi: 10.1177/0018726707075288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., & Braunerhjelm, P. (2006). The genesis of industrial clusters. Cluster Genesis: Technology-Based Industrial Development, 1, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., Francis, J., & Bercovitz, J. (2005). Creating a cluster while building a firm: Entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Regional Studies, 39, 129–141. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornahl, D., Henn, S., & Menzel, M. (eds.). (2010). Emerging clusters: Theoretical, empirical and political perspectives on the initial stage of cluster evolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Karnoe, P. (2013). Path dependence and creation. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotaratuta, M. (2018). Regional growth paths: From structure to agency and back ( Paper in Innovation Studies No. 2018/01). Lund: Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE), Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henn, S., & Bathelt, H. (2017). Cross-local knowledge fertilization, cluster emergence, and the generation of buzz. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(3), 449–466. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtx036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbert, P., Huxham, C., Sydow, J., & Lerch, F. (2010). Barriers to process learning: Authority and anomie in regional clusters. Management Learning, 41, 453–471. doi: 10.1177/1350507609355125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmen, A., & Fosse, J. K. (2017). Regional agency and constitution of new paths: A study of agency in early formation of new paths on the west coast of Norway. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 498–515. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1276159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S., Njøs, R., & Normann, R. (2019). Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 48–65. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P. (2008). Shaping strategy as a structuration process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 621–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., & Fenton, E. (2006). Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts. Long Range Planning, 39(6), 631–648. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2006.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., & Murphy, J. T. (2011). Theorizing practice in economic geography: Foundations, challenges, and possibilities. Progress in Human Geography, 35(3), 366–392. doi: 10.1177/0309132510375585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnøe, P., & Garud, R. (2012). Path creation: Co-creation of heterogeneous resources in the emergence of the Danish wind turbine cluster. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 733–752. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.667923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiese, M. (2010). Policy transfer and institutional learning: An evolutionary perspective on regional cluster policies in Germany. In D. Fornahl, S. Henn, & M. Peter Menzel (Eds.), Emerging clusters: Theoretical, empirical and political perspectives on the initial stage of cluster evolution (pp. 324–353). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, E., & Wójcik, D. (2017). Geographical linkages in the financial services industry: A dialogue with organizational studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 116–127. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1254768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. (2001). Regional learning between variation and convergence: The concept of ‘mixed land-use’ in regional spatial planning in The Netherlands. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24(1), 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710. doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography, 95(2), 113–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magro, E., & Wilson, J. (2013). Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy, 42, 1647–1656. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, M., & Fornahl, D. (2010). Cluster life cycles – Dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 205–238. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtp036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirabeau, L., Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2018). Bridging practice and process research to study transient manifestations of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 582–605. doi: 10.1002/smj.2732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nefke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice theory, work, and organization. An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouder, R., & St. John, C. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1192–1225. doi: 10.5465/amr.1996.9704071867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritvala, T., & Kleymann, B. (2012). Scientists as midwives to cluster emergence: An institutional work framework. Industry and Innovation, 19, 477–497. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2012.718875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosiello, A., & Orsenigo, L. (2008). A critical assessment of regional innovation policy in pharmaceutical biotechnology. European Planning Studies, 16, 337–357. doi: 10.1080/09654310801920599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J., & Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Returning to practice anew: A life-world perspective. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1349–1368. doi: 10.1177/0170840609349872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, Jr, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29. doi:10.1086/229967
   Google Scholar
• Staber, U., & Sautter, B. (2011). Who are we, and do we need to change? Cluster identity and life cycle. Regional Studies, 45, 1349–1361. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.490208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. (2016). Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1605–1622. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., Lerch, F., & Staber, U. (2010). Planning for path dependence? The case of a network in the Berlin–Brandenburg optics cluster. Economic Geography, 86, 173–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A., & Boschma, R. (2011). Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies, 45, 919–933. doi: 10.1080/00343400802662658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., Isaksen, A., & Sinozic, T. (2015). Perspectives on cluster evolution: Critical review and future research issues. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2028–2044. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.999450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Plechero, M. (2017). Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography, 93(4), 325–345. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar