Diversifying in green technologies in European regions: does political support matter?

REFERENCES

• Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Hanley, D., & Kerr, W. (2016). Transition to clean technology. Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 52–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/684511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. (2019). Smart Specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1252–1268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, N., & Consoli, D. (2019). Regional diversification and green employment in US metropolitan areas. Research Policy, 48(3), 693–705. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, N., Ghisetti, C., Gilli, M., Marin, G., & Nicolli, F. (2016). A survey of the literature on environmental innovation based on main path analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(3), 596–623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, N., Marzucchi, A., & Rizzo, U. (2020). Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones? Research Policy, 49(2), article 103901. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, N., Perruchas, F., & Consoli, D. (2018). Specialization, diversification and environmental technology-life cycle (Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography No. 18.38). Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2014). Why space matters in technological innovation systems – Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy, 43(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Capone, G. (2015). Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework. Research Policy, 44(10), 1902–1914. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., D’Amato, A., & Mazzanti, M. (2015). Adoption of waste-reducing technology in manufacturing: Regional factors and policy issues. Resource and Energy Economics, 39, 53–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrión-Flores, C., & Innes, R. (2010). Environmental innovation and environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., & Truffer, B. (2012). Places and spaces of sustainability transitions: Geographical contributions to an emerging research and policy field. European Planning Studies, 20(3), 367–374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A., & Quatraro, F. (2019). Green start-ups and local knowledge spillovers from clean and dirty technologies. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 773–792. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9934-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2010). Regional innovation systems: Development opportunities from the ‘green turn’. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 831–844. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.511156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2012). Transversality and transition: Green innovation and new regional path creation. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 817–834. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradini, C. (2019). Location determinants of green technological entry: Evidence from European regions. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 845–858. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9938-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Martini, C., & Pennacchio, L. (2015). Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector. Research Policy, 44(3), 577–595. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini, V., Crespi, F., & Palma, A. (2017). Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies. Research Policy, 46(4), 799–819. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR). (2016). Local and regional government in Europe – Structures and competences. CEMR.
   Google Scholar
• Dandoy, R., & Schakel, A. H. (Eds.). (2013). Regional and national elections in Western Europe. Territoriality of the vote in thirteen countries. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre, A., Martin, R., & Mohnen, M. (2017). Knowledge spillovers from clean and dirty technologies (Working Paper). Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics (LSE).
   Google Scholar
• Dewald, U., & Truffer, B. (2012). The local sources of market formation: Explaining regional growth differentials in German photovoltaic markets. European Planning Studies, 20(3), 397–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facchini, F., Gaeta, G., & Michallet, B. (2017). Who cares about the environment? An empirical analysis of the evolution of political parties’ environmental concern in European countries (1970–2008). Land Use Policy, 64, 200–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farstad, F. M. (2018). What explains variation in parties’ climate change salience? Party Politics, 24(6), 698–707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817693473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornahl, D., Hassink, R., Klaerding, C., Mossig, I., & Schröder, H. (2012). From the old path of shipbuilding onto the new path of offshore wind energy? The case of northern Germany. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 835–855. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K. (2016). A complexity-theoretic perspective on innovation policy (ISU Working Paper No. 16.01). Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Fusillo, F. (2019). Are green inventions really more complex? Evidence from European patents (Working Paper). Turin.
   Google Scholar
• Ghisetti, C., & Quatraro, F. (2013). Beyond inducement in climate change: Does environmental performance spur environmental technologies? A regional analysis of cross-sectoral differences. Ecological Economics, 96, 99–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghisetti, C., & Quatraro, F. (2017). Green technologies and environmental productivity: A cross-sectoral analysis of direct and indirect effects in Italian regions. Ecological Economics, 132, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giudici, G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2019). The creation of cleantech startups at the local level: The role of knowledge availability and environmental awareness. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 815–830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9936-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Hansen, T. (2018). Green industrial path development in different types of regions (Papers in Innovation Studies No. 2018/11 ). Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 92–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R., & Klinger, B. (2007). The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparative advantage (Working Paper No. 146). Center for International Development, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C., Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Delgado, M., Feldman, M., Frenken, K., Glaeser, E., He, C., Kogler, D., Morrison, A., Neffke, F., Rigby, D., Stern, S., Zheng, S., & Zhu, S. (2018). The principle of relatedness. In Springer Proceedings in Complexity, 451–457. Paper originally presented at the International Conference on Complex Systems (ICCS), 22–27 July 2018, Cambridge, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jaber, J. O., Odeh, S. D., & Probert, S. D. (2003). Integrated PV and gas-turbine system for satisfying peak-demands. Applied Energy, 76(4), 305–319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(03)00010-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnøe, P., & Garud, R. (2012). Path creation: Co-creation of heterogeneous resources in the emergence of the Danish wind turbine cluster. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 733–752. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., Rogge, K. S., & Howlett, M. (2019). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Research Policy, 48, article 103832. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler, D. F., Rigby, D. L., & Tucker, I. (2013). Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1374–1391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.755832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanjouw, J. O., & Mody, A. (1996). Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy, 25(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00853-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Maux, B., Rocaboy, Y., & Goodspeed, T. (2011). Political fragmentation, party ideology and public expenditures. Public Choice, 147(1–2), 43–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9603-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinaweaver, J., & Thomson, R. (2016). Greener governments: Partisan ideologies, executive institutions, and environmental policies. Environmental Politics, 25(4), 633–660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1144271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, M. B., Markardb, J., & Andersen, A. D. (2018). Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU’s energy policy mix. Research Policy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, S., Dawley, A. P., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography, 95(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makitie, T., Andersen, A., Hanson, J., Normann, H., & Thune, T. (2018). Established sectors expediting clean technology industries? The Norwegian oil and gas sector’s influence on offshore wind power. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 813–823. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manifesto Project Dataset. (2016). Codebook (Version 2016b from December 15). Manifesto Project Dataset.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Zarzosoa, I., Bengochea-Morancho, A., & Morales-Lagec, R. (2019). Does environmental policy stringency foster innovation and productivity in OECD countries? Energy Policy, 134, article 110982. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matti, C., Consoli, D., & Uyarra, E. (2017). Multilevel policy mixes and industry emergence. The case of wind energy in Spain. Environment and Planning C, 35(4), 661–683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16663933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montresor, S., & Quatraro, F. (2019). Green technologies and Smart Specialisation strategies: A European patent-based analysis of the intertwining of technological relatedness and key enabling-technologies. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1648784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. T. (2015). Human geography and socio-technical transition studies: Promising intersections. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 73–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). Climate change mitigation: Policies and progress. OECD Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). Patent search strategies for the identification of selected environment-related technologies (ENV-TECH). OECD Environment Directorate. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/environment/consumption-innovation/ENV-tech%20search%20strategies,%20version%20for%20OECDstat%20(2016).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orsatti, G., Quatraro, F., & Pezzoni, M. (2020). The antecedents of green technologies: The role of team-level recombinant capabilities. Research Policy, 49(3), article 103919. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, F. L., Alshamsi, A., Hartmann, D., Boschma, R., & Hidalgo, C. (2018). Shooting low or high: Do countries benefit from entering unrelated activities? (Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography No. 18.07). Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Quatraro, F., & Scandura, A. (2019). Academic inventors and the antecedents of green technologies. A regional analysis of Italian patent data. Ecological Economics, 156, 247–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation – Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Requate, T. (2005). Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments – A survey. Ecological Economics, 54(2–3), 175–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D. (2015). Technological relatedness and knowledge space: Entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1922–1937. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.854878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620–1163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schakel, A. H. (2013). Congruence between regional and national elections. Comparative Political Studies, 46(5), 631–662. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011424112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Kanger, L. (2018). Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality. Research Policy, 47(6), 1045–1059. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2007). Caution! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39(4), 763–770. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a39310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterlacchini, A. (2019). Trends and determinants of energy innovations: Patents, environmental policies and oil prices. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 23, 49–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1565410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. (2014). Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography, 90(4), 403–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. (2016). The emergence of new technology-based industries: The case of fuel cells and its technological relatedness to regional knowledge bases. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(3), 611–635. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berge, M., & Weterings, A. (2014). Relatedness in eco-technological development in European regions (Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography No. 14.13). Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berge, M., Weterings, A., & Alkemade, F. (2019). Do existing regional specialisations stimulate or hinder diversification into cleantech? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesseling, J. (2015). Strategies of incumbent car manufacturers in sustainability transitions (Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University Repository.
   Google Scholar
• Zeppini, P., & van den Bergh, J. C. (2011). Competing recombinant technologies for environmental innovation: Extending Arthur’s model of lock-in. Industry and Innovation, 18(3), 317–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.561031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar