Regional planning: an arena of interests, institutions and relations

REFERENCES

• Albrechts, L., Healey, P., & Kunzmann, K. R. (2003). Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alden, J. (2006). Regional planning: An idea whose time has come? International Planning Studies, 11(3–4), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470701203801
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, H., & Wachsmuth, D. (2020). Why does everyone think cities can save the planet? Urban Studies, 57(11), 2201–2221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020919081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M. (2016). How disruptive is the smart cities movement? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(3), 441–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516645965
   Google Scholar
• Eräranta, S., & Mladenović, M. N. (2020). Networked dynamics of knowledge integration in strategic spatial planning processes: A social network approach. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1739637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1963). Regional planning as a field of study. Journal of the American Planning Association, 29(3), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366308978061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J., & Weaver, C. (1979). Territory and function: The evolution of regional planning. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granqvist, K., Humer, A., & Mäntysalo, R. (2020). Tensions in city-regional spatial planning: The challenge of interpreting layered institutional rules. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1707791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundel, I. (2020). Contemporary regionalism and The Scandinavian 8 Million City: Spatial logics in contemporary region-building processes. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1826419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., Galland, D., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2020). Regional planning is dead: Long live planning regional futures. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1750580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humer, A., & Granqvist, K. (2020). The gradual city-ness and town-ness of public service locations: Towards spatially sensitive sector policies. Geoforum, 113, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaap, G., & Lewis, R. (2011). Regional planning for sustainability and hegemony of metropolitan regionalism. In E. Seltzer & A. Carbonell (Eds.), Regional planning in America: Practice and prospect (pp. 176–208). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Lingua, V., & Balz, V. (Eds.). (2019). Shaping regional futures. Designing and visioning in governance rescaling. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S., Monstadt, J., & Friendly, A. (2020). Rethinking the governance and planning of a new generation of greenbelts. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1747608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., & Fernandez-Maldonado, A. M. (2020). Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: Trends across Europe. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2010). Regions are social constructs, but who or what ‘constructs’ them? Agency in question. Environment and Planning A, 42(10), 2296–2301. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A., Harrison, J., & Jones, M. (2018). New consolidated regional geographies. In A. Paasi, J. Harrison, & M. Jones (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of regions and territories (pp. 1–22). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E., & Mattila, H. (2018). Integrating regional development and planning into ‘spatial planning’ in Finland: The untapped potential of the Kainuu experiment. Administrative Culture, 18(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.32994/ac.v18i2.166
   Google Scholar
• Schafran, A. (2014). Rethinking mega-regions: Sub-regional politics in a fragmented metropolis. Regional Studies, 48(4), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.834043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. (1999). European and North American contexts for cross-border regionalism. Regional Studies, 33(7), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950078657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smas, L., & Schmitt, P. (2020). Positioning regional planning across Europe. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1782879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2018). New institutionalism and planning theory. In M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, & V. Watson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of planning theory (pp. 250–263). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Z., Fitzgibbons, J., & Mitchell, C. L. (2020). Finding the future in policy discourse: An analysis of city resilience plans. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1760235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (2020). Transcending land–sea dichotomies through strategic spatial planning. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1766671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, K., & Jonas, A. E. G. (2004). Competitive city-regionalism as a politics of space: A critical reinterpretation of the new regionalism. Environment and Planning A, 36(12), 2119–2139. https://doi.org/10.1068/a36223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. M. (2002). The new regionalism: Key characteristics of an emerging movement. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar