REFERENCES
- Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9412190214
- Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Advanced introduction to regional innovation systems. Edward Elgar.
- Bailey, D., Pitelis, C., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2018). A place-based developmental regional industrial strategy for sustainable capture of co-created value. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(6), 1521–1542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey019
- Barbaroux, P. (2019). Innovation and legitimacy: The case of remotely piloted aircraft systems. In Barbaboux, P., Disruptive technology and defence innovation ecosystems (pp. 105–120). Wiley. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119644569.ch5.
- Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). 2 how actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903053598
- Beise, M. (2004). Lead markets: Country-specific drivers of the global diffusion of innovations. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 997–1018. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.003
- Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008a). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
- Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., & Sandén, B. A. (2008b). ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: Two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 575–592. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292768
- Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2014). Why space matters in technological innovation systems – Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy, 43(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002
- Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
- Boon, W. P. C., Moors, E. H. M., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2011). Demand articulation in emerging technologies: Intermediary user organisations as co-producers? Research Policy, 40(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.006
- Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 285–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002
- Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
- Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
- Boucher, P. (2015). Domesticating the drone: The demilitarisation of unmanned aircraft for civil markets. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(6), 1393–1412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9603-3
- Carvalho, L., & Vale, M. (2018). Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 275–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy009
- Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014
- Content, J., & Frenken, K. (2016). Related variety and economic development: A literature review. European Planning Studies, 24(12), 2097–2112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517
- Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., & Pike, A. (2015). Policy activism and regional path creation: The promotion of offshore wind in North East England and Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu036.
- Dewald, U., & Truffer, B. (2012). The local sources of market formation: Explaining regional growth differentials in German photovoltaic markets. European Planning Studies, 20(3), 397–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651803
- Eliasson, G. (2010). Advanced public procurement as industrial policy: The aircraft industry as a technical university. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Essletzbichler, J. (2009). Evolutionary economic geography, institutions, and political economy. Economic Geography, 85(2), 159–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01019.x
- Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
- Frenken, K. (2017). A complexity-theoretic perspective on innovation policy. Complexity Governance & Networks, 3(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20377/cgn-41
- Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296
- Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2001). Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In R. Garud, & P. Karnøe (Eds.), Path dependence and creation (pp. 1–40). Psychology Press.
- González-López, M. (2019). Understanding policy learning in regional innovation policies: Lessons from the Galician case. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1519780
- Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., & Trippl, M. (2018). Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy012
- Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
- Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
- Heiberg, J., Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2020). The geography of technology legitimation. How multi-scalar legitimation processes matter for path creation in emerging industries. Economic Geography, 96(5), 470–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1842189
- Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
- Isaksen, A. (2015). Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 585–600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu026
- Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S. E., Njøs, R., & Normann, R. (2019). Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 48–65.
- Jones, T. (2017). International commercial drone regulation and drone delivery services. RAND.
- MacKinnon, D. (2012). Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm–region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1), 227–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr009
- MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography, 95(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294
- MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Steen, M., Menzel, M.-P., Karlsen, A., Sommer, P., Hansen, G. H., & Normann, H. E. (2018). Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector. Progress in Planning, 130, 1–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001
- MacKinnon, D., Karlsen, A., Dawley, S., Steen, M., Afewerki, S., & Kenzhegaliyeva, A. (2021). Legitimation, institutions and regional path creation: A cross-national study of offshore wind. Regional Studies, 0, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861239
- Martin, H., Martin, R., & Zukauskaite, E. (2019). The multiple roles of demand in new regional industrial path development: A conceptual analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(8), 1741–1757. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19863438
- Ministerio de Fomento. (2018). Plan estrategico para el desarrollo del sector civil de los drones en España 2018–2021. Gobierno de España.
- Morgan, K., & Marques, P. (2019). The public animateur: Mission-led innovation and the “smart state” in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz002
- Neffke, F., Hartog, M., Boschma, R., & Henning, M. (2018). Agents of structural change: The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification. Economic Geography, 94(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1391691
- Njøs, R., Sjøtun, S. G., Jakobsen, S.-E., & Fløysand, A. (2020). Expanding analyses of path creation: Interconnections between territory and technology. Economic Geography, 96(3), 266–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1756768
- Ridder, H.-G. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business Research, 10(2), 281–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z
- Sánchez-Carreira, M. d. C., Peñate-Valentín, M. C., & Varela-Vázquez, P. (2019). Public procurement of innovation and regional development in peripheral areas. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 119–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1528142
- Simmie, J. (2012). Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 753–772. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667924
- Steen, M., & Hansen, G. H. (2018). Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography, 94(2), 188–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953
- Storper, M., & Walker, R. (1989). The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology, and industrial growth. Basil Blackwell.
- Tanner, A. (2014). Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography, 90(4), 403–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12055
- Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2020). Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 111, 189–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
- Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2018). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5), 687–705. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517700982
- Uyarra, E., Flanagan, K., Magro, E., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2017). Anchoring the innovation impacts of public procurement to place: The role of conversations. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(5), 828–884. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417694620
- Uyarra, E., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Flanagan, K., & Magro, E. (2020). Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation. Research Policy, 49(1), 103844. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103844
- Vale, M., & Carvalho, L. (2013). Knowledge networks and processes of anchoring in Portuguese biotechnology. Regional Studies, 47(7), 1018–1033. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.644237
- Xunta de Galicia. (2014). Smart Specialisation Strategy in Galicia 2014–2020. Xunta de Galicia: Consellería de Economía e Industria, Santiago de Compostela.
- Xunta de Galicia. (2017). Oportunidades Industria 4.0 en Galicia. Diagnóstico Sectorial: Aeronáutico. Santiago de Compostela.
- Yap, X.-S., & Truffer, B. (2019). Shaping selection environments for industrial catch-up and sustainability transitions: A systemic perspective on endogenizing windows of opportunity. Research Policy, 48(4), 1030–1047. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.002
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research. SAGE.
- Zhu, S., He, C., & Zhou, Y. (2017). How to jump further and catch up? Path-breaking in an uneven industry space. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(3), 521–545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw047.