426
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effects of cluster policies on regional inventor networks: evidence from France

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1903-1918 | Received 10 Apr 2020, Published online: 22 Feb 2022

REFERENCES

  • Ahlfeldt, G. M., Roth, D., & Seidel, T. (2018). The regional effects of Germany’s national minimum wage. Economics Letters, 172, 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.08.032
  • Almendral, J. A., Oliveira, J. G., López, L., Mendes, J. F. F., & Sanjuán, M. A. (2007). The network of scientific collaborations within the European framework programme. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 384(2), 675–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.05.049
  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2015). Mastering ‘metrics’: The path from cause to effect. Princeton University Press.
  • Autant-Bernard, C., & LeSage, J. (2011). Quantifying knowledge spillovers using spatial econometric models. Journal of Regional Science, 51(3), 471–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00705.x
  • Balland, P. A., De Vaan, M., & Boschma, R. (2013). The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: The case of the global video game industry, 1987–2007. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(5), 741–765. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs023
  • Bellandi, M., & Caloffi, A. (2010). An analysis of regional policies promoting networks for innovation. European Planning Studies, 18(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903343534
  • Bellégo, C., & Dortet-Bernadet, V. (2014). L’impact de la participation aux pôles de compétitivité sur les PME et les ETI. Economie et Statistique, 471(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2014.10482
  • Bertamino, F., Bronzini, R., De Maggio, M., & Revelli, D. (2017). Regional policies for innovation: The case of technology districts in Italy. Regional Studies, 51(12), 1826–1839. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1255321
  • Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., & Strumsky, D. (2007). Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. Research Policy, 36(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.026
  • Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B. (2009). Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of Econometrics, 150(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.021
  • Breschi, S., & Lenzi, C. (2016). Co-invention networks and inventive productivity in US cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 92, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.12.003
  • Brossard, O., & Moussa, I. (2014). The French cluster policy Put to the test with differences-in-differences estimates. Economics Bulletin, 34(1), 520–529.
  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Harvard University Press.
  • Capello, R., & Faggian, A. (2005). Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes. Regional Studies, 39(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320851
  • Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169–1184. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344704
  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The Two faces of R & D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
  • Crespo, J., Suire, R., & Vicente, J. (2014). Lock-in or lock-out? How structural properties of knowledge networks affect regional resilience. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt006
  • Crespo, J., Suire, R., & Vicente, J. (2016). Network structural properties for cluster long-run dynamics: Evidence from collaborative R&D networks in the European mobile phone industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv032
  • Crespo, J., & Vicente, J. (2016). Proximity and distance in knowledge relationships: From micro to structural considerations based on territorial knowledge dynamics (TKDs). Regional Studies, 50(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.984671
  • Cunningham, P., & Ramlogan, R. (2016). The impact of innovation networks. In J. Edler, P. Cunningham, A. Gok, & P. Shapira (Eds.), Handbook of innovation policy impact (pp. 279–317). Edward Elgar.
  • Directorate General for Enterprise (DGE). (2017). Competitiveness clusters (Etudes et statistiques No. 67). DGE.
  • Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society, 24(3), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6
  • Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002
  • Erdyn, Technopolis & BearingPoint. (2012). L’évaluation des pôles de compétitivité (Technical Report). DGCIS Datar.
  • Etxabe, I., & Valdaliso, J. M. (2016). Measuring structural social capital in a cluster policy network: Insights from the Basque Country. European Planning Studies, 24(5), 884–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1117582
  • Everett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P. (1999). The centrality of groups and classes. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23(3), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1999.9990219
  • Falck, O., Heblich, S., & Kipar, S. (2010). Industrial innovation: Direct evidence from a cluster-oriented policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(6), 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.007
  • Falck, O., Koenen, J., & Lohse, T. (2019). Evaluating a place-based innovation policy: Evidence from the innovative regional growth cores program in East Germany. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 79, 103480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103480
  • Fleming, L., King, C., & Juda, A. I. (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18(6), 938–954. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0289
  • Fontagné, L., Koenig, P., Mayneris, Fl., & Poncet, S. (2013). Cluster policies and firm selection: Evidence from France. Journal of Regional Science, 53(5): 897–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12050
  • Gilsing, V. A., & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: An analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. European Management Review, 2(3), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500041
  • Giuliani, E., Matta, A., & Pietrobelli, C. (2016). Networks, Cluster Development Programs, and performance: The electronics cluster in Córdoba, Argentina. In R. Stucchi (Ed.), The impact evaluation of Cluster Development Programs: Methods and practices (pp. 117–150). Inter-American Development Bank.
  • Graf, H. (2011). Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovators. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(1), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beq001
  • Graf, H., & Broekel, T. (2020). A shot in the dark? Policy influence on cluster networks. Research Policy, 49(3), 103920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103920
  • Graf, H., & Henning, T. (2009). Public research in regional networks of innovators: A comparative study of four East German regions. Regional Studies, 43(10), 1349–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802251460
  • Hassine, H. B., & Mathieu, C. (2020). R&D crowding out or R&D leverage effects: An evaluation of the French cluster-oriented technology policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120025
  • He, S., MacNeill, S., & Wang, J. (2014). Assessing overall network structure in regional innovation policies: A case study of cluster policy in the West Midlands in the UK. European Planning Studies, 22(9), 1940–1959. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09654313.2013.812066
  • Kauffeld-Monz, M., & Fritsch, M. (2013). Who are the knowledge brokers in regional systems of innovation? A multi-actor network analysis. Regional Studies, 47(5), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003713365
  • Kogut, B., & Walker, G. (2001). The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088882
  • Kolak, M., & Anselin, L. (2020). A spatial perspective on the econometrics of program evaluation. International Regional Science Review, 43(1–2), 128–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017619869781
  • Lucena-Piquero, D., & Vicente, J. (2019). The visible hand of cluster policy makers: An analysis of Aerospace Valley (2006–2015) using a place-based network methodology. Research Policy, 48(3), 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.001
  • Mar, M., & Massard, N. (2021). Animate the cluster or subsidize collaborative R&D? A multiple overlapping treatments approach to assess the impact of the French cluster policy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(4), 845–867. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtab002
  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
  • Neal, Z. P. (2017). How small is it? Comparing indices of small worldliness. Network Science, 5(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2017.5
  • N’Ghauran, A., & Autant-Bernard, C. (2021). Assessing the collaboration and network additionality of innovation policies: A counterfactual approach to the French cluster policy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(6), 1403–1428. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtab017
  • Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011). Subsidy and networking: The effects of direct and indirect support programs of the cluster policy. Research Policy, 40(5), 714–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.011
  • Pike, A., Dawley, S., & Tomaney, J. (2010). Resilience, adaptation and adaptability. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsq001
  • Raub, W., & Weesie, J. (1990). Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 626–654. https://doi.org/10.1086/229574
  • Rothgang, M., Cantner, U., Dehio, J., Engel, D., Fertig, M., Graf, H., Hinzmann, S., Linshalm, E., Ploder, M., Scholz, A. M., & Töpfer, S. (2017). Cluster policy: Insights from the German leading edge cluster competition. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 3(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0064-1
  • Schilling, M. A., & Phelps, C. C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0624
  • Schmoch, U. (2008). Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons; Final report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO); Revised August 2011. WIPO.
  • Simmie, J., & Martin, R. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp029
  • Ter Wal, A. L. (2013). Cluster emergence and network evolution: A longitudinal analysis of the inventor network in Sophia-Antipolis. Regional Studies, 47(5), 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003614258
  • Ter Wal, A. L. (2014). The dynamics of the inventor network in German biotechnology: Geographic proximity versus triadic closure. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(3), 589–620. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs063
  • Ter Wal, A. L., & Boschma, R. (2009). Applying social network analysis in economic geography: Framing some key analytic issues. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0258-3
  • Töpfer, S., Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2019). Structural dynamics of innovation networks in German leading-edge clusters. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1816–1839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9642-4
  • Uyarra, E., & Ramlogan, R. (2016). The impact of cluster policy on innovation. In J. Edler, P. Cunningham, A. Gok, & P. Shapira (Eds.), Handbook of innovation policy impact (pp. 196–238). Edward Elgar.
  • Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504. https://doi.org/10.1086/432782
  • Van der Wouden, F., & Rigby, D. (2019). Co-inventor networks and knowledge production in specialized and diversified cities. Papers in Regional Science, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12432.
  • Wanzenböck, I., Neuländtner, M., & Scherngell, T. (2020). Impacts of EU funded R&D networks on the generation of key enabling technologies: Empirical evidence from a regional perspective. Papers in Regional Science, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12473.
  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. doi:10.1038/30918

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.