Do EU regions benefit from Smart Specialisation principles?

REFERENCES

• Antonelli, C., Crespi, F., & Quatraro, F. (2020). Knowledge complexity and the mechanisms of knowledge generation and exploitation: The European evidence. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. (2014). North Denmark Region RIS3. An expert assessment on behalf of DG Regional and Urban Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Balland, P. A., & Boschma, R. (2019). Smart specialization: Beyond patents. European Commission, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Balland, P. A., & Boschma, R. (2021). Complementary inter-regional linkages and Smart Specialisation. An empirical study on European regions. Regional Studies, 55(6), 1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. (2019). Smart specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1252–1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P. A., & Rigby, D. (2017). The geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography, 93(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1205947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellemare, M., Masaki, T., & Pepinsky, T. (2017). Lagged explanatory variables and the estimation of causal effects. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 949–963. https://doi.org/10.1086/690946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2014). Constructing regional advantage and smart specialization. Comparison of two European policy concepts. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.3280/SCRE2014-001004
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as a driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Balland, P. A., & Kogler, D. (2015). Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(1), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Miguélez, E., Moreno, R., & Ocampo-Corrales, T. (2021). Technological breakthroughs in European regions: The role of related and unrelated combinations. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 21.18, Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1393–1406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortinovis, N., Xiao, J., Boschma, R., & van Oort, F. (2017). Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(6), 1179–1208. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Adda, D., Guzzini, E., Iacobucci, D., & Palloni, R. (2019). Is smart specialisation strategy coherent with regional innovative capabilities? Regional Studies, 53(7), 1004–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1523542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Adda, D., Iacobucci, D., & Palloni, R. (2020). Relatedness in the implementation of Smart Specialisation Strategy: A first empirical assessment. Papers in Regional Science, 99(3), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejermo, O. (2009). Regional innovation measured by patent data – Does quality matter? Industry and Innovation, 16(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710902764246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2019). Methodological manual on territorial typologies, 2018 edition. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2016). On the policy space of smart specialization strategies. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1428–1437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1176126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialization – The concept. Knowledge Economists Brief No. 9, June. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P., & Hall, B. (2011). Smart specialization: From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. MTEI Working Paper, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., Goddard, J., Beldarrain, X., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., Nauwelaers, C., Ortega-Argilés, R., & Mulatero, F. (2012). Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3).
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2021). Is innovation (increasingly) concentrated in large cities? An international comparison. Research Policy, 50(6), 104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelle, G., Guzzo, F., & Mieszkowski, K. (2020). Smart Specialisation: what gets lost in translation from concept to practice? Regional Studies, 54(1), 1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1607970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. (2003). Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering: Gaining Understanding through theory and scientific visualization. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., & Trippl, M. (2018). Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Preston, P. (1988). The carrier wave: New information technology and the geography of innovation 1846–2003. Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., Scherer, F., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., & Gong, H. (2019). Six critical questions about smart specialization. European Planning Studies, 27(10), 2049–2065. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., Gao, M., Kan, M. Y., & Wang, D. (2016). Birank: Towards ranking on bipartite graphs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Submission 2016, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2016.2611584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C., Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Deldago, M., Feldman, M., Frenken, K., Glaeser, E., He, C., Kogler, D., Morrison, A., Neffke, F., Rigby, D., Stern, S., Zheng, S., & Zhu, S. (2018). The principle of relatedness. In A. Morales, C. Gershenson, D. Braha, A. Minai, & Y. Bar-Yam (Eds.), Unifying themes in complex systems IX (pp. 451–457). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570–10575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D. (2014). Designing and implementing a smart specialisation strategy at regional level: Some open questions. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.3280/SCRE2014-001006
   Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D., & Guzzini, E. (2016). Relatedness and connectivity in technological domains: Missing links in S3 design and implementation. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1511–1526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1170108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler, D., Esslezbichler, J., & Rigby, D. (2017). The evolution of specialization in the EU15 knowledge space. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(2), 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler, D., Rigby, D., & Tucker, I. (2013). Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1374–1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.755832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler, D., & Whittle, A. (2018). The geography of knowledge creation: Technological relatedness and regional smart specialization strategies. In A. Paasi, J. Harrison, & M. Jones (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of regions and territories (pp. 153–168). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015). Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice – Leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2079–2098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gallo, J., & Paez, A. (2013). Using synthetic variables in instrumental variables estimation of spatial series models. Environment and Planning A, 45(9), 2227–2242. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrocu, E., Paci, R., Rigby, D., & Usai, S. (2020). Smart specialization strategy: Any relatedness between theory and practice? CRENOS Working Paper No. 2020_04. University of Cagliari.
   Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (1999). The competitiveness of firms and regions: ‘ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649900600102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2016). The early experience of smart specialization implementation in EU cohesion policy. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1407–1427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1166177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewes, L., & Broekel, T. (2020). Technological complexity and economic growth of regions. Research Policy, 104156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., Trippl, M., & Zukauskaite, E. (2015). Policy learning and smart specialization: Exploring strategies for regional industrial change. Smart specialization for regional innovation. Reflection Paper: Work Package 4. European Union, Seventh Framework Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409750132289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2015). Book review of Foray, D. Smart specialization: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Abingdon, Regional studies association. Regional Studies, 49(3), 480–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1007572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauwelaers, C., Magro, E., Aranguren, M., Navarro, M., Wilson, J., Trippl, M., Hansen, T., Grillitsch, M., Blazek, J., Morgan, K., & Healy, A. (2014). Underpinning effective strategy design. Smart specialization for regional innovation. Reflection Paper: Work Package 4. European Union, Seventh Framework Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F. (2009). Productive places: The influence of technological change and relatedness on agglomeration externalities [Doctoral dissertation]. School of Geography, Utrecht University. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/34317
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintar, N., & Scherngell, T. (2021). The complex nature of regional knowledge production: Evidence on European regions. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. (2018). Questioning the implementation of smart specialisation: Regional innovation policy and semi-autonomous regions. Environment and Planning C, 36(3), 530–547.
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S., Curaj, A., Gheorghiu, R., Andreescu, L., & Wade, I. (eds.). (2018). Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417717069
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, D. (2015). Technological relatedness and knowledge space: Entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1922–1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.854878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocchetta, S., Mina, A., Lee, C., & Kogler, D. (2021). Technological knowledge spaces and the resilience of European regions. Journal of Economic Geography, 22(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbab001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A., Di Cataldo, M., & Rainoldi, A. (2014). The role of government institutions for smart specialization and regional development. S3 Policy Brief Series No. 4/2014. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 673–706. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoalha, A. (2016). New indicators of smart specialization. A related diversification approach applied to European regions (TIK Working Papers on Innovation Studies No. 20161220). University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Santoalha, A. (2019a). Technological diversification and smart specialization: The role of cooperation. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1269–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1530753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoalha, A. (2019b). New indicators of related diversification applied to smart specialization in European regions. Spatial Economic Analysis, 14(4), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2019.1584328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U. (2008). Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons. Final report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation – WIPO.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, S. (1983). Network structure and minimum degree. Social Networks, 5(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(83)90028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Zukauskaite, E., & Healy, A. (2020). Shaping smart specialization: The role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions. Regional Studies, 54(10), 1328–1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unterlass, F., Reinstaller, A., Friesenbichler, K., Charos, A., Hranyai, K., Reschenhofer, P., & Weingartner, S. (2015). The relationship between export and technological specialization profiles across EU countries and regions and the identification of development potentials. Research Report. Vienna: Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO).
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., Marzocchi, C., & Sorvik, J. (2018). How outward looking is smart specialisation? Rationales, Drivers and Barriers. European Planning Studies, 26(12), 2344–2363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1529146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., & Frenken, K. (2018). The subsidiarity principle: Turning challenge-oriented innovation policy on its head. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 18.06. Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, A., & Kogler, D. (2020). Related to what? Reviewing the literature on technological relatedness: Where we are now and where can we go? Papers in Regional Science, 99(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle, A., Lengyel, B., & Kogler, D. (2020). Understanding regional branching-knowledge diversification via inventor collaboration networks. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography #20.06. Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar