Co-producing city-regional intelligence: strategies of intermediation, tactics of unsettling

REFERENCES

• Anderson, P. M. L., Brown-Luthango, M., Cartwright, A., Farouk, I., & Smit, W. (2013). Brokering communities of knowledge and practice: Reflections on the African Centre for Cities’ CityLab programme. Cities, 32, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, L., Jones, P., Denoon-Stevens, S. P., & Lorena, M. (2020). Negotiating polyvocal strategies: Re-reading de Certeau through the lens of urban planning in South Africa. Urban Studies, 57(12), 2440–2455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019875423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Miura, S. (2019). Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance? Public Administration, 98(1), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, H., & Brunner, R. (2020). Nurturing the buffer zone: Conducting collaborative action research in contemporary contexts. Qualitative Research, 22(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120965373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Luthango, M. (2013). Community–university engagement: The Philippi CityLab in Cape Town and the challenge of collaboration across boundaries. Higher Education, 65(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9546-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, I. (2000a). Michel de Certeau: Cultural theorist. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, I. (2000b). Tactics and strategies. In I. Buchanan (Ed.), Michel de Certeau: Cultural theorist (pp. 86–108). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Marvin, S., Voytenko Palgan, Y., McCormick, K., Breitfuss-Loidl, M., Mai, L., Von Wirth, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418787222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, A., Parnell, S., Oelofse, G., & Ward, S. (Eds.). (2012). Climate change at the city scale: Impacts, mitigation and adaptation in Cape Town. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Cirolia, L. R., Görgens, T., Van Donk, M., Smit, W., & Drimie, S. (Eds.). (2016). Upgrading informal settlements in South Africa: A partnership-based approach. University of Cape Town Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, A., Segar, J., & Checkland, K. (2016). The devolution project in Greater Manchester: Introduction to the special issue. Representation, 51(4), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2016.1165496
   Google Scholar
• Cossetta, A., & Palumbo, M. (2014). The co-production of social innovation: The case of Living Lab. In R. Dameri & C. Rosenthal-Sabroux (Eds.), Smart city (pp. 221–235). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Culwick, C., Washbourne, C.-L., Anderson, P. M. L., Cartwright, A., Patel, Z., & Smit, W. (2019). CityLab reflections and evolutions: Nurturing knowledge and learning for urban sustainability through co-production experimentation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dant, T. (2003). Critical social theory: Culture, society and critique. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Brooks, E. (2020). City-regional imaginaries and politics of rescaling. Regional Studies, 55(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1762856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, B., Te Molder, H., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2021). Understanding science-in-the-making by letting scientific instruments speak: From semiotics to post-phenomenology. Social Studies of Science, 51(3), 392–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720981600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Translated by S. F. Rendell [1980]. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deas, I., Haughton, G., & Ward, K. (2020). Scalar post politics, inclusive growth and inclusive economies: Challenging the Greater Manchester agglomeration model. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 14(1), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaa022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2014). Writing and/as analysis or performing the world. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 569–584). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Derudder, B., & van Meeteren, M. (2019). Engaging with ‘urban science’. Urban Geography, 40(4), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1585138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, A., Acuto, A., & Washbourne, C. (2021). Urban observatories: A comparative review. Connected cities Lab. University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, T., & Farrelly, L. (2019). Urban rooms: Where people get to design their city’s future. The Conversation, January 18. theconversation.com
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, T., Montgomery, J., Horton-Baker, N., & Farrelly, L. (2018). Using urban foresight techniques in city visioning: Lessons from the Reading 2050 vision. Local Economy, 33(8), 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094218800677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dublin Dashboard. (2021). About the dashboard. https://www.dublindashboard.ie
   Google Scholar
• Duminy, J., & Parnell, S. (2020). City science: A chaotic concept–and an enduring imperative. Planning Theory and Practice, 21(4), 648–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1802155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C., Perry, B., & Richardson, L. (2020). Co-producing research with users and communities. In E. Loeffler, & T. Bovaird (Eds.) (pp. 669–692). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., & Richardson, L. (Eds.). (2015). Designing public policy for co-production: Theory, practice and change. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2016). Trials and tribulations: Problematizing the city through/as urban experimentation. Geography Compass, 10(10), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3), 363–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614563742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinders, M., Wood, M., & Cunningham, M. (2016). The politics of co-production. Evidence & 18 Policy, 12(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426415X14412037949967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Jain, S., & Tuertscher, P. (2008). Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organization Studies, 29(3), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauteng City Region Observatory (GCRO). (2021). https://www.gcro.ac.za/
   Google Scholar
• Glasgow City Region Intelligence Hub (GCRIH). (2021). http://www.glasgowcityregion.co.uk/IntelligenceHub
   Google Scholar
• Greater Manchester Savers. (2020). Our story so far. Report. https://communitysavers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/GMS-STORYSOFAR-LOW-RES.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Habermehl, V., & Perry, B. (2021). The risk of austerity co-production in city-regional governance in England. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(3), 555–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Deas, I., Hincks, S., & Ward, K. (2016). Mythic Manchester: Devo Manc, the Northern Powerhouse and rebalancing the English economy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9(2), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsw004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemström, K., Simon, D., Palmer, H., Perry, B., & Polk, M. (2021). Transdisciplinary knowledge co-production: A practical guide. Practical Action.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, R. (2010). Regional competitive intelligence: Benchmarking and policy-making. Regional Studies, 44(5), 639–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802331312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge. The co-production of science and social order. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joubert, L., & Mistra Urban Futures Realising Just Cities Team (2021). Realising just cities. Mistra Urban Futures and African Centre for Cities.
   Google Scholar
• Karuri-Sebina, G. (2019). Urban Africa’s futures: Perspectives and implications for agenda 2063. Foresight, 22(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-07-2019-0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karuri-Sebina, G., Haegeman, K.-H., & Ratanawaraha, A. (2016). Urban futures: Anticipating a world of cities. Foresight, 18(5), 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-07-2016-0037
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A., & van Heur, B. (2014). Urban laboratories: Experiments in reworking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(2), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, H. (2019). Power in the city: A walk through Manchester’s electric past. Carbon Coop blog.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction into actor–network theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, D., & Zundel, M. (2016). Recovering the divide: A review of strategy and tactics in business and management. International Journal of Management Reviewers, 19(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, S., Jones, A., Ward, J., Christie, I., Druckman, A., & Lyon, F. (2017). A critical review of the role of indicators in implementing the sustainable development goals. In L. F. W (Ed.), Handbook of sustainability science (pp. 41–56). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P., Connolly, J., Novy, J., Olivo, I., Potter, C., & Steil, C. (2011). Searching for the just city. Debates in urban theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (2003). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 37(6–7), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, T., & Perry, B. (2017). Cities and the knowledge economy: Promise, politics and possibilities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• May, T., & Perry, B. (2018). Reflexivity: The essential guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• May, T., & Perry, B. (2022). Social research: issues, methods and process (5th Edn). Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Miszczak, S. M., & Patel, Z. (2018). The role of engaged scholarship and co-production to address urban challenges: A case study of the Cape Town knowledge transfer programme. South African Geographical Journal, 100(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2017.1409649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state – Co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T., Horne, R., & Doyon, A. (2019). Housing industry transitions: An urban living Lab in Melbourne, Australia. Urban Policy and Research, 38(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2020.1730786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesti, G. (2018). Co-production for innovation: The urban living lab experience. Policy and Society, 37(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1374692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijman, J., & Wei, Y. D. (2020). Urban inequalities in the 21st century economy. Applied Geography, 117, 102188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an Age of uncertainty. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, H., & Walasek, H. (Eds.). (2016). Co-production in action: Towards realising just cities. Mistra Urban Futures.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Y., Tian, Y., Liu, X., Gu, D., & Hua, G. (2016). Urban big data and the development of city intelligence. Engineering, 2(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, Z., Greyling, S., Parnell, S., & Pirie, G. (2015). Co-producing urban knowledge: Experimenting with alternatives to ‘best practice’ for Cape Town, South Africa. International Development Planning Review, 37(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2015.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, B., & Atherton, M. (2017). Beyond critique: The value of co-production in realising just cities? Local Environment, 22(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1297389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, B., Diprose, K., King, S., Habermehl, V., Hine, I., May, T., Russell, B., Simpson, V., Spring, C., Taylor Buck, N., Bellinson, R., McVicar-Payling, A., & Patient, J. (2019a). Realising just cities: An overview of activity 2016–2019. Seventy-Seven Creations.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, B., Diprose, K., Taylor Buck, N., & Simon, D. (2021). Localizing the SDGs in England: Challenges and value propositions for local government. Front. Sustain. Cities, 3, 746337. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.746337
   Google Scholar
• Perry, B., Durose, C., & Richardson, L. & Action Research Collective (2019b). How can we govern differently? The promise and practice of co-production. Creative Concern.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, B., Patel, Z., Noren Bretzer, Y., & Polk, M. (2018). Organising for co-production: Local interaction platforms for urban sustainability. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, B., & Russell, R. (2020). Participatory cities from the ‘outside in’: The value of comparative learning. In D. Simon, H. Palmer, & J. Riise (Eds.), Comparative co-production (pp. 133–155). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pieterse, E. (2013). City/university interplays amidst complexity. Territiorio, 66(66), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2013-066005
   Google Scholar
• Pillay, U. (2004). Are globally competitive ‘city regions’ developing in South Africa? Formulaic aspirations or new imaginations? Urban Forum, 15(4), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-004-0013-5
   Google Scholar
• Polk, M. (2015). Co-producing knowledge for sustainable cities: Joining forces for change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ravetz, J. (2020). Deeper city: Collective intelligence and the pathways from smart to wise. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, D., & Whitehead, S. (2021). A method for making the everyday visible: Photovoice and everyday politics. In K. Hemström, D. Simon, H. Palmer, B. Perry, & M. Polk (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge co-production: A practical guide (pp. 141–146). Practical Action.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, D., Palmer, H., & Riise, J. (2020). Comparative urban research from theory to practice: Co-production for sustainability. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, D., Palmer, H., Riise, J., Smit, W., & Valencia, S. (2018). The challenges of transdisciplinary knowledge production: From unilocal to comparative research. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818787177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, W., de Lannoy, A., Dover, R. V. H., Lambert, E. V., Levitt, N., & Watson, V. (2014). ‘Good houses make good people’: Making knowledge about health & environment in Cape Town. In B. Cooper, & R. Morrell (Eds.), Africa-centred knowledges: Crossing fields and worlds (pp. 142–162). James Currey.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, W., Lawhon, M., & Patel, Z. (2015). Co-producing knowledge for whom, and to what end? Reflections from the African centre for cities in Cape Town. In M. Polk (Ed.), Co-producing knowledge for sustainable cities: Joining forces for change (pp. 47–69). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, K., & van Bueren, E. (2017). Urban living labs: A living lab way of working. Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Tacoli, C. (ed.). (2006). The Earthscan reader in rural–urban linkages. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Toomer McAlpine, A., & Perry, B. (2021). Closing the co-productive cycle: Creative documentation for multi-vocal representation. In K. Hemström, D. Simon, H. Palmer, B. Perry, & M. Polk (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge co-production: A practical guide (pp. 159–163). Practical Action.
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, P., Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Kempton, L. (2020). Building collaborative platforms for urban innovations: Newcastle City futures as a quadruple helix intermediary. European Urban and Regional Studies, 27(4), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420905630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite, D., Maclennan, D., & O’Sullivan, T. (2013). Emerging city policies: Devolution, deals and disorder. Local Economy, 28(7–8), 770–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094213500122
   Google Scholar
• Washbourne, C.-L., Culwick, C., Acuto, M., Blackstock, J., & Moore, R. (2019). Mobilising knowledge for urban governance: The case of the Gauteng city-region observatory. Urban Research and Practice, 14(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2019.1651899
   Google Scholar
• Ziervogel, G., Waddell, J., Smit, W., & Taylor, A. (2016). Flooding in Cape Town’s informal settlements: Barriers to collaborative urban risk governance. South African Geographical Journal, 98(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2014.924867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar