Creating planning visions for fragmented post-socialist city-regions

REFERENCES

• Ache, P. (2000). Vision and creativity—challenge for city regions. Futures, 32(5), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00085-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., Healey, P., & Kunzmann, K. (2003). Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. APA Journal, 69(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976301
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames gateway. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(3), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2010). Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(5), 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1068/c09163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Graham, S. (1997). The ordinary city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1997.00411.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, H. (2019). Can the EU stop Eastern Europe’s illiberal turn? Critical Review, 31(3–4), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2019.1647956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., & Koski, P. (2010). Exploring quadruple helix: Outlining user-oriented innovation models (Työraportteja 85/2010 Working Papers). University of Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binek, J., Opravil, Z., Chmelar, R., & Svobodova, H. (2016). Cooperation and mutual relationships of cities and their hinterlands with regard to the operation of EU integrated development instruments. Quaestiones Geographicae, 35(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouzarovski, S., Sýkora, L., & Matoušek, R. (2017). Locked-in post-socialism. Rolling path dependencies in Liberec’s district heating system. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(4/5), 624–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2016.1250224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe, 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 447–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969229042000282864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buček, J. (2016). Urban development policy challenges in East–Central Europe: Governance, city regions and financialisation. Quaestiones Geographicae, 35(2), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0012
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, R., & Meijers, E. (2016). Contrasts between first-tier and second-tier cities in Europe: A functional perspective. European Planning Studies, 24(5), 996–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1120708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, A., & Campbell, A. (2006). Into the mainstream: Local democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Local Government Studies, 5, 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930600896129
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C., & Le Galès, P. (2012). Cities as national champions? Journal of European Public Policy, 19(3), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.640795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M., & Piskorek, K. (2018). The development of strategic spatial planning in central and Eastern Europe: Between path dependence, European influence, and domestic politics. Planning Perspectives, 33(4), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2018.1513373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deas, I., & Lord, A. (2006). From a new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The emergence of non-standard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganisation of the state. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1847–1877. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600838143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demazière, C. (2020). The multiple agencies of metropolitan institutions: Is there convergence? In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 41–58). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, T., Montgomery, J., Horton-Baker, N., & Farrelly, L. (2018). Using urban foresight techniques in city visioning: Lessons from the reading 2050 vision. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 33(8), 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094218800677
   Google Scholar
• Eames, M. A., Marvin, B., Hodson, M. B., Dixon, T., Guthrie, P. S., & Lannon, S. (2014). Briefing: Re-engineering the city 2020–2050. Urban foresight and transition management. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning, 167(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.11.00032
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2010). Beyond Lisbon: Soft European spatial planning. DISP, 182(3), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2010.10557098
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2016). Territorial governance challenging government. In P. Schmitt & L. Van Well (Eds.), Territorial governance across Europe (pp. 36–47). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Güell, J. M., & Lopez, J. (2016). Cities futures. A critical assessment of how future studies are applied to cities. Foresight (Los Angeles), 18(5), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-06-2015-0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, M., & Borkowska-Waszak, S. (2018). Integrated territorial investments and new governance models in Poland. European Structural & Investment Funds Journal, 6(1), 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Fürst, D. (2005). Metropolitan governance in Germany. In H. Heinelt & D. Kübler (Eds.), Metropolitan governance. Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place (pp. 151–168). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gaffikin, F., & Sterrett, K. (2006). New visions for old cities: The role of visioning in planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 7(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350600673070
   Google Scholar
• Galland, D., & Harrison, J. (2020). Conceptualising metropolitan regions: How institutions, policies, spatial imaginaries and planning are influencing metropolitan development. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 1–21). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Galland, D., Harrison, J., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2020). What is metropolitan planning and governance for? In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 237–256). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, M., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2016). City futures and the civic university. Newcastle University.
   Google Scholar
• Granqvist, K., Humer, A., & Mäntysalo, R. (2021). Tensions in city-regional spatial planning: The challenge of interpreting layered institutional rules. Regional Studies, 55(5), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1707791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2008). Stating the production of scales: Centrally orchestrated regionalism, regionally orchestrated centralism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 922–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00815.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2010). Networks of connectivity, territorial fragmentation, uneven development: The new politics of city-regionalism. Political Geography, 29(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., Galland, D., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2021). Regional planning is dead: Long live planning regional futures. Regional Studies, 55(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1750580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., & Growe, A. (2014). From places to flows? Planning for the new ‘regional world’ in Germany. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412441191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirt, S. (2007). Suburbanizing Sofia: Characteristics of post-socialist peri-urban change. Urban Geography, 28(8), 755–780. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.28.8.755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth, T. M. (2016). From municipalisation to centralism: Changes to local public service delivery in Hungary. In H. Wollmann, I. Koprić, & G. Marcou (Eds.), Public and social services in Europe (pp. 185–200). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hrelja, R. (2015). Integrating transport and land-use planning? How steering cultures in local authorities affect implementation of integrated public transport and land-use planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulst, R., & van Montfort, A. (2012). Institutional features of inter-municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076711403026
   Google Scholar
• Hytönen, J., Mäntysalo, R., Peltonen, L., Kanninen, V., Niemi, P., & Simanainen, M. (2016). Defensive routines in land use policy steering in Finnish urban regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413490424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwaniec, D., & Wiek, A. (2014). Advancing sustainability visioning practice in planning: The general plan update in Phoenix, Arizona. Planning Practice and Research, 29(5), 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2014.977004
   Google Scholar
• Janas, K., & Jarczewski, W. (Eds.). (2017). Zarządzanie i współpraca w miejskich obszarach funkcjonalnych (Raport o stanie polskich miast). Obserwatorium Polityki Miejskiej IRM.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, A., & Ward, K. (2007). Introduction to a debate on city-regions: New geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00711.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, T. (2016). Administrative division of Poland – 25 years of experience during the systemic transformation. EchoGéo, 35. https://doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.14514
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, T. (2018). Soft planning for soft spaces. Concept of Poznań metropolitan area development – A case study. Miscellanea Geographica, 22(4), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, T., & Ryder, A. (2015). Top-down and bottom-up metropolitan integration in Poland. In J. Buček & A. Ryder (Eds.), Governance in transition (pp. 19–39). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, P. (2008). Varieties of city regionalism and the quest for political cooperation: A comparative perspective. Urban Research and Practice, 1(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535060802169799
   Google Scholar
• Keil, R., & Hamel, P. (Eds.). (2015). Suburban governance a global view. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S., & Zaman, A. (2018). Future cities: Conceptualizing the future based on a critical examination of existing notions of cities. Cities, 72, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, W., Benson, V., Anderson, J., & Herr, P. (1993). Vision of things to come. Planning, 59(5), 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kociuba, D. (2018). Implementation of integrated territorial investments in Poland – Rationale, results, and recommendations. Quaestiones Geographicae, 37(4), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostelecký, T., Illner, M., & Vobecká, J. (2007). Metropolitan governance in the Czech Republic. In J.-P. Collin & M. Robertson (Eds.), Governing metropolises: Profiles of issues and experiments on four continents (pp. 235–258). Presses de l’Université Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, Z., Farkas, Z. J., Egedy, T., Kondor, A. C., Szabó, B., Lennert, J., Baka, D., & Kohán, B. (2019). Urban sprawl and land conversion in post–socialist cities: The case of metropolitan Budapest. Cities, 92, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krukowska, J., & Lackowska, M. (2017). Metropolitan colours of Europeanization: Institutionalisation of integrated territorial investment structures in the context of past cooperation in metropolitan regions. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0447-y
   Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, C. (2001). Metropolitan government reform in Europe: Trends and challenges. Revue Suisse de Sciences Politiques, 7(3), 136–141.
   Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, C., & Weir, M. (2010). Building metropolitan institutions. In K. Mossberger, S. Clarke, & P. John (Eds.), Urban politics (pp. 624–641). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2013). Citizens in the city-regions: Political orientations across municipal borders. Urban Affairs Review, 49(2), 282–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087412457549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingua, V., & Balz, V. (Eds.). (2020). Shaping regional futures – Designing and visioning in governance rescaling. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lityński, P., & Hołuj, A. (2021). Macroeconomic perspective on urban sprawl: A multidimensional approach in Poland. Land, 10(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, B. (2018). From decentralization to re-centralization: Tendencies of regional policy and inequalities in Central and Eastern Europe. Administrative Culture, 18(2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.32994/ac.v18i2.162
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, C., van der Zwet, A., & Borkowska-Waszak, S. (2021). Rescaling urban development policy in the EU: The impact of integrated place-based approaches in Cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 55(6), 1154–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1891215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikuła, Ł. (2015). Theories of metropolitan government and the post-socialist experience: The case of Poznań metropolitan area. In J. Buček & A. Ryder (Eds.), Governance in transition (pp. 91–107). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mikuła, Ł. (2020). Metropolitan planning and governance in the new urban agenda: A post-socialist perspective in Central and Eastern Europe. In C. Silva & A. Trono (Eds.), Local governance in the new urban agenda (pp. 111–134). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mikuła, Ł, & Kaczmarek, T. (2017). Metropolitan integration in Poland: The case of Poznań metropolis. International Planning Studies, 22(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2016.1256191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Nelles, J. (2018). Discovering American regionalism. An introduction to regional intergovernmental organizations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore-Cherry, N., & Tomaney, J. (2019). Spatial planning, metropolitan governance and territorial politics in Europe: Dublin as a case of metro-phobia? European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418783832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V. (2007). The emergence of the spatial planning approach in England. Planning Practice and Research, 22(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701455934
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., & Fernandez-Maldonado, A. M. (2020). Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: Trends across Europe. Regional Studies, 55(5), 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuissl, H., & Rink, D. (2005). The ‘production’ of urban sprawl in eastern Germany as a phenomenon of post-socialist transformation. Cities, 22(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1972). Metropolitan reform: Propositions derived from two traditions. Social Science Quarterly, 53, 474–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, T. (2001). From concentration to deconcentration – Migration patterns in the postsocialist city. Cities, 18(6), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00032-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouředníček, M. (2007). Differential suburban development in the Prague urban region. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 89(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00243.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2010). Regions are social constructs, but who or what ‘constructs’ them? Agency in question. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(10), 2296–2301. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pálné Kovács, I., Bodor, A., Finta, I., Grünhut, Z., Kacziba, P., & Zongor, G. (2016). Farewell to decentralisation: The Hungarian story and its general implications. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 16(4), 789–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N., & Wood, A. (2011). The new post-suburban politics? Urban Studies, 48(12), 2591–2610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011411944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E. (2018). Diminishing borders and conflating spaces: A storyline to promote soft planning scales. European Planning Studies, 26(5), 1008–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1430750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2008). The rise of the ‘city-region’ concept and its development policy implications. European Planning Studies, 16(8), 1025–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802315567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salet, W., & Savini, F. (2015). The political governance of urban peripheries. Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy, 33(3), 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15594052
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W., Vermeulen, R., Savini, F., Dembski, S., Thierstein, A., Nears, P., Vink, B., Healey, P., Stein, U., Schultz, H., Salet, W., Vermeulen, R., Savini, F., & Dembski, S. (2015). Planning for the new European metropolis: Functions, politics, and symbols. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(2), 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1021574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F., Majoor, S., & Salet, W. (2015). Urban peripheries: Reflecting on politics and projects in Amsterdam, Milan, and Paris. Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy, 33(3), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1068/c13132
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. (2001). Globalization and the rise of city-regions. European Planning Studies, 9(7), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120079788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37(6–7), 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108697a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, R., & Michela, J. (2006). Can vision motivate planning action? Planning, Practice & Research, 21(2), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450600944715
   Google Scholar
• Shipley, R., & Newkirk, R. (1998). Visioning, did anybody see where it came from? Journal of Planning Literature, 12(4), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229801200402
   Google Scholar
• Shipley, R., & Newkirk, R. (1999). Vision and visioning in planning: What do these terms really mean? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(4), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260573
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C. N. (2007). Reinventing local and metropolitan government. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 954–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00780_4.x
   Google Scholar
• Smas, L., & Schmitt, P. (2021). Positioning regional planning across Europe. Regional Studies, 55(5), 778–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1782879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanilov, K. (Ed.). (2007). The post-socialist city: Urban form and space transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after socialism. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stanilov, K., & Sýkora, L. (2014). Managing suburbanization in postsocialist Europe. In K. Stanilov & L. Sýkora (Eds.), Confronting suburbanization: Urban decentralization in postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 296–320). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. (2013). Keys to the city: How economics, institutions, social interaction, and politics shape development. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, M., & Mumford, M. (2005). The origins of vision: Effects of reflection, models, and analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sześciło, D. (2019). Is there a room for local and regional self-government in the illiberal democracy? Struggle over recentralization attempts in Poland. Studia Iuridica, 79, 166–179. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.1893
   Google Scholar
• Szpilko, D. (2020). Foresight as a tool for the planning and implementation of visions for smart city development. Energies, 13(7), 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Green Book of the Poznań Agglomeration. (2009). Centrum Badań Metropolitalnych UAM. https://docplayer.pl/6446855-Zielona-aglomeracji-ksiega-poznanskiej-poznan-maj-2010.html
   Google Scholar
• Tomàs, M. (2020). Metropolitan revolution or metropolitan evolution? The (dis)continuities in metropolitan institutional reforms. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 25–39). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Zwet, A., & Bachtler, J. (2018). New implementation mechanisms for integrated development strategies in ESIF. EStIF, 1, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• van Straalen, F. M., & Witte, P. A. (2018). Entangled in scales: Multilevel governance challenges for regional planning strategies. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 5(1), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1455533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Waart, P., Mulder, I., & de Bont, C. (2016). A participatory approach for envisioning a smart city. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite, D., & Bristow, G. (2019). Spaces of city-regionalism: Conceptualising pluralism in policy-making. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(4), 689–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418791824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, N., & Hamm, G. (2010). Community visioning programs: Processes and outcomes. Community Development, 41(2), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575331003610005
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. (2010, January 21–22). Soft spatial planning – What, why and how? Paper presented at soft spatial planning – Territorial governance in a borderless Europe, Workshop at HafenCity University Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Wolański, M. (2018). Ewaluacja systemu realizacji instrumentu ZIT (Raport końcowy). https://www.ewaluacja.gov.pl/media/62252/RK_ewaluacja_ZIT_na_strone.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerbauer, K., & Paasi, A. (2019). Hard work with soft spaces (and vice versa): Problematizing the transforming planning spaces. European Planning Studies, 28(4), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1653827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, K. (2017). Re-scaling of metropolitan governance in Germany. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-017-0480-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, K. (2020). What is at stake for metropolitan regions and their governance institutions? In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 59–74). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, K., & Feiertag, P. (2018). Return of the metro-model? Governance and planning in metropolitan regions under change – An international comparison of France, Italy and Germany. Papers. Regió Metropolitana de Barcelona, 61(1), 16–26.
   Google Scholar