Agency and economic change in regions: identifying routes to new path development using qualitative comparative analysis

REFERENCES

• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, 385–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3
   Google Scholar
• Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (1982). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. The British Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 455–483. https://doi.org/10.2307/589357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., & Norrie, A. (1998). Critical realism: Essential readings. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Advanced introduction to regional innovation systems. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bækkelund, N. G. (2021). Change agency and reproductive agency in the course of industrial path evolution. Regional Studies, 55(4), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1893291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., Bellandi, M., Caloffi, A., & de Propris, L. (2010). Place-renewing leadership: Trajectories of change for mature manufacturing regions in Europe. Policy Studies, 31(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442871003723408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, A., Barnes, T., & Horne, S. (2021). Place-based industrial strategy and economic trajectory: Advancing agency-based approaches. Regional Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1947485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1997). A realist theory of science. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., Žížalová, P., Rumpel, P., Skokan, K., & Chládek, P. (2013). Emerging regional innovation strategies in Central Europe: Institutions and regional leadership in generating strategic outcomes. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411428651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., & Van Praag, M. (2017). The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: A review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 61–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1216397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristow, G., & Healy, A. (2014). Regional resilience: An agency perspective. Regional Studies, 48(5), 923–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.854879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R. D. (2007). The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100020852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., & Vale, M. (2018). Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European union member states. Regional Studies, 48(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.770141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collinge, C., Gibney, J., & Mabey, C. (2011). Leadership and place. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, Policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., & Francis, J. L. (2006). Entrepreneurs as agents in the formation of industrial clusters. In B. T. Asheim, P. Cooke, & R. Martin (Eds.), Clusters and regional development: Critical reflections and explorations (pp. 115–136). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., Francis, J., & Bercovitz, J. (2005). Creating a cluster while building a firm: Entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Regional Studies, 39(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(6), 1248–1267. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 42(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K., & Uyarra, E. (2016). Four dangers in innovation policy studies – and how to avoid them. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). Effects of New business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38(8), 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., Obschonka, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2019). Historical roots of entrepreneurship-facilitating culture and innovation activity: An analysis for German regions. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1296–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1580357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2021). Is innovation (increasingly) concentrated in large cities? An international comparison. Research Policy, 50(6), 104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021). Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. AMR, 46, 778–799. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L., & Pagliarin, S. (2021). Social and causal complexity in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Strategies to account for emergence. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(4), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1799636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903389979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984/2007). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gorski, P. S. (2018). After positivism: Critical realism and historical sociology. In Critical realism, history, and philosophy in the social sciences (pp. 23–45). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-871920180000034002
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Asheim, B. (2018). Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions. European Planning Studies, 26(8), 1638–1662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1484892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., Isaksen, A., & Nielsen, H. (2022). Advancing the treatment of human agency in the analysis of regional economic development: Illustrated with three Norwegian cases. Growth and Change, 53, 248–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12583
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Martynovich, M., Fitjar, R. D., & Haus-Reve, S. (2021a). The black box of regional growth. Journal of Geographical Systems, 23(3), 425–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-020-00341-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? The Annals of Regional Science, 54(1), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Rekers, J. V., & Sotarauta, M. (2021b). Investigating agency: Methodological and empirical challenges. In M. Sotarauta, & A. Beer (Eds.), Handbook on city and regional leadership (pp. 302–323). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groff, R. (2017). Causal mechanisms and the philosophy of causation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiberg, J., Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2020). The geography of technology legitimation: How multiscalar institutional dynamics matter for path creation in emerging industries. Economic Geography, 96(5), 470–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1842189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidle, K., & Normann, R. H. (2013). Who can govern? Comparing network governance leadership in two Norwegian city regions. European Planning Studies, 21(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, J. R., Østergaard, C. R., & Olesen, T. R. (2017). Destruction and reallocation of skills following large company closures. Journal of Regional Science, 57(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S.-E., Njøs, R., & Normann, R. (2019). Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems. In M. Parrilli, R. Fitjar, & A. Rodríguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66–84). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, J., Lamberg, J.-A., & Pietinalho, L. (2012). The fall and the fragmentation of national clusters: Cluster evolution in the paper and pulp industry. Journal of Forest Economics, 18(3), 218–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2012.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Research Centre (JRC). (2020). Atlas of the human planet 2020 – Open geoinformationfor research, policy, and action. European Commission, JRC.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., Grillitsch, M., & Hansen, T. (2020). Agency and actors in regional industrial path development. A framework and longitudinal analysis. Geoforum, 111, 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn, M. (2015). Peripheralization: Theoretical concepts explaining socio-spatial inequalities. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A., Velde, M. V. D., & Kuijpers, M. (2020). Looking for causes of effects in cases: Evaluating intermunicipal collaboration in The Netherlands applying QCA. Journal Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 64(3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2019-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Rethinking path creation: A geographical Political economy approach. Economic Geography, 95(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (1999). The competitiveness of firms and regions: ‘ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649900600101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics: An introductory volume. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2000). Institutional approaches in economic geography. In T. Barnes, & M. Sheppard (Eds.), A companion to economic geography (pp. 77–94). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2014). On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P. (2020). Perceptions of regional inequality and the geography of discontent: Insights from the UK. Regional Studies, 54(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1619928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Morales, F. X., López-Navarro, M. Á., & Guia-Julve, J. (2002). The role of local institutions as intermediary agents in the industrial district. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(4), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977640200900403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). OECD regions and cities at a glance 2018. OECD Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Pagliarin, S., & Gerrits, L. (2020). Trajectory-based qualitative comparative analysis: Accounting for case-based time dynamics. Methodological Innovations, 13(3), 2059799120959170. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120959170
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S. (2002). Regional innovation systems in central and Eastern Europe: Determinants, organizers and alignments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013152721632
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (1998). The logic of qualitative comparative analysis. International Review of Social History, 43(S6), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000115111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In B. Rihoux, & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 87–122). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, R. (2019). Openness values and regional innovation: A set-analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(6), 1211–1232. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, R. (2021). Uncertainty, possibility, and causal power in QCA. Sociological Methods & Research, Online First, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211031268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutzou, T., & Elder-Vass, D. (2019). On assemblages and things: Fluidity, stability, causation stories, and formation stories. Sociological Theory, 37(4), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275119888250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A., & Sabel, C. (2008). Roepke lecture in economic geography venture capital in the “periphery”: The new argonauts, global search, and local institution building. Economic Geography, 84(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.00001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1984). Method in social science: A realist approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. (2012). Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation. Cities, 29, S9–S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Beer, A. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook on city and regional leadership. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Pulkkinen, R. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1066r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2(3), 191–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649500200301
   Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., & Pflitsch, G. (2020). Transition topology: Capturing institutional dynamics in regional development paths to sustainability. Research Policy, 49(7), 104006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2018). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517700982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., & Otto, A. (2009). How to turn the fate of old industrial areas: A comparison of cluster-based renewal processes in Styria and the Saarland. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(5), 1217–1233. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataraman, S. (2004). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, S., & Trell, E.-M. (2019). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in spatial planning research and related disciplines: A systematic literature review of applications. Journal of Planning Literature, 34(3), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219841490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar