1,153
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

On the persistence and complementarities of design and technological change: a regional perspective

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1289-1302 | Received 05 Nov 2020, Published online: 18 Oct 2022

REFERENCES

  • Abrigo, M. R. M., & Love, I. (2015). Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata: A package of programs (Working Paper). University of Hawaii.
  • Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., & Varga, A. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31(7), 1069–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6
  • Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press.
  • Andrews, D. W., & Lu, B. (2001). Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 101(1), 123–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00077-4
  • Apa, R., De Noni, I., Orsi, L., & Sedita, S. R. (2018). Knowledge space oddity: How to increase the intensity and relevance of the technological progress of European regions. Research Policy.
  • Archibugi, D., & Planta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4
  • Arelano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
  • Asheim, B. (2007). Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610701722846
  • Asheim, B., Coenen, L., & Vang, J. (2007). Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(5), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0648
  • Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2017). Introduction: Combinatorial knowledge bases, regional innovation, and development dynamics. Economic Geography, 93(5), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1380775
  • Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
  • Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In The Oxford Handbook of innovation.
  • Aspers, P. (2009). Using design for upgrading in the fashion industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp030
  • Block, J., Fisch, C., Ikeuchi, K., & Kato, M. (2021). Trademarks as an indicator of regional innovation: Evidence from Japanese prefectures. Regional Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1887843
  • Boix, R., Capone, F., De Propris, L., Lazzeretti, L., & Sanchez, D. (2016). Comparing creative industries in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(4), 935–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776414541135
  • Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
  • Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi022
  • Boschma, R., & Martin, R. (2010). Handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Edward Elgar.
  • Breschi, S. (2000). The geography of innovation: A cross-sector analysis. Regional Studies, 34(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050015069
  • Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(4), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp008
  • Camagni, R. (1991). Innovation networks. Spatial perspectives. Belhaven.
  • Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44(2), 355–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12012
  • Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44(2), 355–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12012
  • Capello, R. (2002). Spatial and sectoral characteristics of relational capital in innovation activity. European Planning Studies, 10(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120114481
  • Capello, R. (2017). Towards a new conceptualization of innovation in space: Territorial patterns of innovation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 976–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12556
  • Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2014). Spatial heterogeneity in knowledge, innovation, and economic growth nexus: Conceptual reflections and empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Science, 54(2), 186–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12074
  • Castaldi, C. (2018). To trademark or not to trademark: The case of the creative and cultural industries. Research Policy, 47(3), 606–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.006
  • Castaldi, C. (2020). All the great things you can do with trademark data: Taking stock and looking ahead. Strategic Organization, 18(3), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019847835
  • Castaldi, C., Frenken, K., & Los, B. (2015). Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies, 49(5), 767–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.940305
  • Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European union member states. Regional Studies, 48(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.770141
  • Cooke, P., & De Propris, L. (2011). A policy agenda for EU smart growth: The role of creative and cultural industries. Policy Studies, 32(4), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2011.571852
  • Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4–5), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
  • Corradini, C., Battisti, G., & Demirel, P. (2016). Serial innovators in the UK: Does size matter? Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu040
  • Corradini, C., & De Propris, L. (2017). Beyond local search: Bridging platforms and inter-sectoral technological integration. Research Policy, 46(1), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.017
  • Corradini, C., & D’Ippolito, B. (2022). Persistence and learning effects in design innovation: Evidence from panel data. Research Policy, 51(2), 104452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104452
  • Corradini, C., & De Propris, L. (2015). Technological diversification and new innovators in European regions: Evidence from patent data. Environment and Planning A, 47(10), 2170–2186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15599285
  • D’Ippolito, B. (2014). The importance of design for firms’ competitiveness: A review of the literature. Technovation, 34(11), 716–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.01.007
  • Dijkstra, L., Garcilazo, E., & McCann, P. (2013). The economic performance of European cities and city regions: Myths and realities. European Planning Studies, 21(3), 334–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.716245
  • Drivas, K. (2020). The role of technology and relatedness in regional trademark activity. Regional Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1808883
  • Eisenman, M. (2013). Understanding aesthetic innovation in the context of technological evolution. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0262
  • Fagerberg, J., & Godinho, M. M. (2005). Innovation and catching-up. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Handbook of innovation (pp. 514–542). Oxford University Press.
  • Filippetti, A., & D’Ippolito, B. (2017). Appropriability of design innovation across organisational boundaries: Exploring collaborative relationships between manufacturing firms and designers in Italy. Industry and Innovation, 24(6), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1263888
  • Filitz, R., Henkel, J., & Tether, B. S. (2015). Protecting aesthetic innovations? An exploration of the use of registered community designs. Research Policy, 44(6), 1192–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.004
  • Fritsch, M., Kudic, M., & Pyka, A. (2019). Evolution and co-evolution of regional innovation processes. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1235–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1627306
  • Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2001). Effects of reputational sanctions on the competitive imitation of design innovations. Organization Studies, 22(4), 563–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601224002
  • Geroski, P. A., Van Reenen, J., & Walters, C. F. (1997). How persistently do firms innovate? Research Policy, 26(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00903-1
  • Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.75
  • Gilchrist, S., & Himmelberg, C. P. (1995). Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36(3), 541–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(95)01223-0
  • Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.
  • Grillitsch, M., Martin, R., & Srholec, M. (2017). Knowledge base combinations and innovation performance in Swedish regions. Economic Geography, 93(5), 458–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1154442
  • Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50(4), 1029–1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775
  • Hassink, R., & Gong, H. (2019). Six critical questions about smart specialization. European Planning Studies, 27(10), 2049–2065. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898
  • Hirschman, E. C. (1982). Symbolism and technology as sources for the generation of innovations. Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 537–541.
  • Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., & Rosen, H. S. (1988). Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica, 56(6), 1371–1395. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913103
  • Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401
  • Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. A. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
  • Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I
  • Kogler, D. F., Essletzbichler, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2017). The evolution of specialization in the EU15 knowledge space. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(2), 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw024
  • Lazzeretti, L., Boix, R., & Capone, F. (2008). Do creative industries cluster? Mapping creative local production systems in Italy and Spain. Industry & Innovation, 15(5), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710802374161
  • Lee, K. (2019). The art of economic catch-up: Barriers, detours and leapfrogging in innovation systems. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, N., & Drever, E. (2013). The creative industries, creative occupations and innovation in London. European Planning Studies, 21(12), 1977–1997. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722969
  • Lee, N., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2014). Creativity, cities, and innovation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(5), 1139–1159. https://doi.org/10.1068/a46202
  • Love, I., & Zicchino, L. (2006). Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(2), 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.007
  • Malecki, E. J. (2010). Everywhere? The geography of knowledge. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00640.x
  • Martin, R., & Moodysson, J. (2011). Innovation in symbolic industries: The geography and organization of knowledge sourcing. European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1183–1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.573131
  • Martin, R., & Moodysson, J. (2013). Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411427326
  • Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
  • Miguelez, E., & Moreno, R. (2018). Relatedness, external linkages and regional innovation in Europe. Regional Studies, 52(5), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1360478
  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap.
  • Nickell, S. J. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911408
  • Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & Van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36(7), 1016–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003
  • Parent, O., & LeSage, J. P. (2012). Determinants of knowledge production and their effects on regional economic growth. Journal of Regional Science, 52(2), 256–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00732.x
  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Anchor.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 673–706. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu023
  • Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), 71–102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
  • Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. Cambridge University Press.
  • Sleuwaegen, L., & Boiardi, P. (2014). Creativity and regional innovation: Evidence from EU regions. Research Policy, 43(9), 1508–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.014
  • Soo, K. T. (2018). Innovation across cities. Journal of Regional Science, 58(2), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12352
  • Stoneman, P. (2010). Soft innovation: Economics, product aesthetics, and the creative industries. Oxford University Press.
  • Storper, M. (2018). Regional innovation transitions. In J. Glückler, R. Suddaby, & R. Lenz (Eds.), Knowledge and institutions. Knowledge and space (Vol. 13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_10
  • Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
  • Sunley, P., Pinch, S., Reimer, S., & Macmillen, J. (2008). Innovation in a creative production system: The case of design. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5), 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn028
  • Sutton, J. (1991). Sunk costs and market structure: Price competition, advertising, and the evolution of concentration. MIT Press.
  • Szerb, L., Acs, Z., Autio, E., Ortega-Argiles, R., & Komlosi, E. (2013). REDI: The regional entrepreneurship and development index – Measuring regional entrepreneurship (Final Report). European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, REGIO DG. doi: 10.2776/79241
  • Utterback, J., Vedin, B. A., Alvarez, E., Ekman, S., Walsh Sanderson, S., Tether, B., & Verganti, R. (2006). Design-inspired innovation and the design discourse. Design-Inspired Innovation, 154–186. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812774088_0006
  • Verganti, R. (2018). Overcrowded: Designing meaningful products in a world awash with ideas. Overcrowded: Designing Meaningful Products in a World Awash with Ideas, 48–48. 10.3280/PM2018-034012
  • Walsh, V. (1996). Design, innovation and the boundaries of the firm. Research Policy, 25(4), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00847-0
  • Yoshioka-Kobayashi, T., Fujimoto, T., & Akiike, A. (2018). The validity of industrial design registrations and design patents as a measurement of ‘good’ product design: A comparative empirical analysis. World Patent Information, 53, 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2018.04.001