Level with us, regional development is still ‘man shaped’: feminism, futurity and leadership

REFERENCES

• Amoore, L. (2020). Merely feminist: Politics, partiality, gender and geography. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520911570
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., de Ruyter, A., Hearne, D., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2022). Shocks, resilience and regional industry policy: Brexit and the automotive sector in two Midlands regions. Regional Studies. 10.1080/00343404.2022.2071421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beneria, L., Berik, G., & Floro, M. (2015). Gender, development and globalization (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, K. (2015). Women and economy: Complex inequality in a post-industrial landscape. Gender, Place & Culture, 22(9), 1287–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.958066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, E. (2012). The interruptive feminine: Aleatory time and feminist politics. In Gunkel, H., Nigianni, C., & Soderback, F. (Eds.), Undutiful daughters: New directions in feminist thought and practice (pp. 35–48). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Billing, C., McCann, P., Ortega-Argilés, R., & Sevinc, D. (2021). UK analysts’ and policy-makers’ perspectives on Brexit: Challenges, priorities and opportunities for subnational areas. Regional Studies, 55(9), 1571–1582. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1826039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bir, J., & Bruser, A. (2021). The imperative of a gender sensitive recovery. Social Europe, 12 May. https://socialeurope.eu/the-imperative-of-a-gender-sensitive-recovery
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., Liñares-Zegarra, J., & Wilson, J. O. S. (2019). The (potential) impact of Brexit on UK SMEs: Regional evidence and public policy implications. Regional Studies, 53(5), 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1597267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting, M. (2020). Labours of love: The crisis of care. Granta.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E. H. (1961). What is history? Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chidgey, R. (2012). The need for the New in feminist activist discourse: Notes toward a scene of anachronism. In H. Gunkel, C. Nigianni, & F. Soderback (Eds.), Undutiful daughters: New directions in feminist thought and practice (pp. 23–34). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Criado Perez, C. (2019). Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Chatto & Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Darke, J. (1996). The man-shaped city. In C. Booth, J. Darke, & S. Yeandle (Eds.), Changing places: Women’s lives in the city (pp. 88–99). Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. (2022). Levelling up the United Kingdom (CP 604). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1052706/Levelling_Up_WP_HRES.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deusdad, B., Javornik, J., Giralt, R. M., & Marban-Flores, R. (2017). Chapter 8: Care in the wake of the financial crisis: Gender implications in Spain and the United Kingdom. In F. Martinelli, A. Anttonen, & M. Matzke (Eds.), Social services disrupted: Changes, challenges and policy implications for Europe in times of austerity (pp. 176–200). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, C., & Rubery, J. (2018). Advancing gender equality through European employment policy: The impact of the UK’s EU membership and the risks of Brexit. Social Policy and Society, 17(2), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746417000458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falu, A., & Sassen, S. (2018). Women and the city: Reclaiming the streets to impose equal rights. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/women-and-the-city-reclaiming-the-streets-to-impose-equal-rights-88279
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett Society. (2020). Sex and power 2020. https://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=bdb30c2d-7b79-4b02-af09-72d0e25545b5
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, S. S., & Servon, L. J. (2005). Gender and planning: A reader. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foundational Economy Collective. (2018). Foundational economy. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foundational Economy Collective. (2020). What comes after the Pandemic? A ten-point platform for foundational renewal. https://foundationaleconomycom.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/what-comes-after-the-pandemic-fe-manifesto-005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garikipati, S., & Kambhampati, U. (2020). Leading the fight against the Pandemic: Does gender ‘really’ matter? https://www.reading.ac.uk/web/files/economics/emdp202013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibney, J., Liddle, J., & Shutt, J. (2021). Brexit disruption and transborder leadership in Europe. Regional Studies, 55(9), 1596–1608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1900556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J.-K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2013). Take back the economy: An ethical guide for transforming our communities. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M., & Pollard, J. (2018). Flourishing or floundering? Policing the boundaries of economic geography. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(7), 1541–1545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18810530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (2005). Time travels: Feminism, nature, power. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. M. (2019). A very personal crisis: Family fragilities and everyday conjunctures within lived experiences of austerity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44, 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2015). Introduction: New horizons in regional studies. Regional Studies, 49(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.980637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden, D. (1980). What would a non-sexist city be like? Speculations on housing, urban design, and human work. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(3: Suppl.: Women in the America City), S170–S187. https://doi.org/10.1086/495718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, M. (2019). Time should tell (more): Evolutionary economic geography and the challenge of history. Regional Studies, 53(4, 602–613. 10.1080/00343404.2018.1515481
   Google Scholar
• Herten-Crabb, A., & Davies, S. E. (2020). Why who needs a feminist economic agenda. The Lancet, 395(10229), 1018–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30110-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heslop, J., & Ormerod, E. (2020). The politics of crisis: Deconstructing the dominant narratives of the housing crisis. Antipode, 52(1), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, F. (2021). There is nothing for you here: Finding opportunity in the twenty-first century. HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, C., Hunt, S., & Piedalue, A. (2015). Violence, colonialism and space: Towards a decolonizing dialogue. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(2), 539–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR). (2017). Gender balance and power: Women’s representation in regional and local government in the UK and Germany. https://www.ippr.org/files/publications/pdf/gender-balance-of-power_May2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• James, A. (2017). Work–life advantage: Sustaining regional learning and innovation. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. (2007). Home truths about care-less competitiveness. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, L. (2020). Feminist city: Claiming space in a man-made world. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. (2006). Crisis (trans. M. W. Richter). Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(2), 357–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., & Derickson, K. D. (2013). From resilience to resourcefulness: A critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography, 37(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512454775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Kempton, L., O’Brien, P., Ormerod, E., Pike, A., & Tomaney, J. (2021). Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeavy, J., Fannin, M., & Larner, W. (2021). Feminism and futurity: Geographies of resistance, resilience and reworking. Progress in Human Geography, 45(6), 1558–1579. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211003327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G. (2014). Urban and regional horizons. Regional Studies, 48(4), 583–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.903717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdawi, A. (2021). Strong female lead: Lessons from women in power. Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2015). Towards a developmental turn in evolutionary economic geography?. Regional Studies, 49(5), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.899431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1995). Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of reproduction (2nd edn). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., Ortega-Argilés, R., Sevinc, D., & Cepeda-Zorrilla, M. (2021). Rebalancing UK regional and industrial policy post-Brexit and post-Covid-19: Lessons learned and priorities for the future. Regional Studies, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1922663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKittrick, K. (2011). On plantations, prisons, and a black sense of place. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(8), 947–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.624280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minto, R., & Parken, A. (2021). The European Union and regional gender equality agendas: Wales in the shadow of Brexit. Regional Studies, 55(9), 1550–1560. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1826422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholds, A., Gibney, J., Mabey, C., & Hart, D. (2017). Making sense of variety in place leadership: The case of England’s smart cities. Regional Studies, 51(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1232482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann, R. H., Garmann Johnsen, H. C., Knudsen, J. P., Vasstrom, M., & Garmann Johnsen, I. (2017). Emergence of regional leadership – A field approach. Regional Studies, 51(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1182146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (ONS). (2021). Gender pay gap in the UK, 2021. https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/bulletins/genderpaygapintheuk/2021
   Google Scholar
• Olufemi, L. (2021). Experiments in imagining otherwise. Hajar Press C.I.C.
   Google Scholar
• Perrons, D. (2011). Regional disparities and equalities: Towards a capabilities perspective? In A. Pike, A. Rodriguez-Pose, J. Tomaney (Eds.), (pp. 59–73). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2007). What kind of local and regional development and for whom? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1253–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701543355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, J. (2013). Gendering capital: Financial crisis, financialization and (an agenda for) economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 37(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512462270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. (2018). Who speaks for economic geography? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(7), 1525–1531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18804831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raagmaa, G., & Keerberg, A. (2017). Regional higher education institutions in regional leadership and development. Regional Studies, 51(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1215600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roitman, J. (2013). Anti-crisis. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, L., Zugasti Hervas, I., & De Diego Baciero, A. (2020). Feminise politics now! Toolkit created by municipalist movement. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. https://commonspolis.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Feminise-Politics-Now.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI). (2020). Women in planning. https://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/4325/women-and-planning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. (2022). Levelling up the United Kingdom (Command Paper No. 604). HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Alfred Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki, M., Enright, T., & Valverde, M. (2020). The gendered production of infrastructure. Progress in Human Geography, 44(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519828458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderback, F. (2012). Introduction: A politics of polyphony. In H. Gunkel, C. Nigianni, & F. Soderback (Eds.), Undutiful daughters: New directions in feminist thought and practice (pp. 3–12). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., Beer, A., & Gibney, J. (2017). Making sense of leadership in urban and regional development. Regional Studies, 51(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1267340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2021). What’s so new about new municipalism? Progress in Human Geography, 45(2), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520909480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J. (2013). Parochialism – A defence. Progress in Human Geography, 37(5), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512471235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J., & Pike, A. (2020). Levelling up? The Political Quarterly, 91(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J., & Pike, A. (2021). Levelling up: A progress report. Political Insight, 12(2), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/20419058211022935
   Google Scholar
• Truelove, Y., & Ruszczyk, H. A. (2021). Bodies as urban infrastructure: Gender, intimate infrastructures and slow infrastructural violence. Political Geography, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Women. (2020). The shadow pandemic: Domestic violence in the wake of COVID-19. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llNP__bW-o0
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (1989). The geography of women’s fear. Area, 21(4), 385–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G., & Waite, L. (2012). Negotiating difference through everyday encounters: The case of sexual orientation and religion and belief. Antipode, 44(2), 474–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00866.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walby, S. (2009). Globalization and inequalities: Complexity and contested maternities. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, M., Strauss, K., Parker, B., Orzeck, R., Derickson, K., & Bonds, A. (2017). Feminist political economy in geography: Why now, what is different, and what for? Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 79, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar