497
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Trade liberalization and firms’ productivity in Vietnam: the role of local business environment

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1681-1713 | Received 06 Sep 2021, Published online: 18 Jan 2023

REFERENCES

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (vol. 1, pp. 385–472). Elsevier.
  • Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 701–728. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/120.2.701
  • Agostino, M., Di Tommaso, M. R., Nifo, A., Rubini, L., & Trivieri, F. (2020). Institutional quality and firms’ productivity in European regions. Regional Studies, 54(9), 1275–1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1712689
  • Aiello, F., Pupo, V., & Ricotta, F. (2014). Explaining total factor productivity at firm level in Italy: Does location matter? Spatial Economic Analysis, 9(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2013.863428
  • Álvarez, I. C., Barbero, J., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Zofío, J. L. (2018). Does institutional quality matter for trade? Institutional conditions in a sectoral trade framework. World Development, 103, 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.010
  • Amiti, M., & Konings, J. (2007). Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1611–1638. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.5.1611
  • Anderson, J. E., & Marcouiller, D. (2002). Insecurity and the pattern of trade: An empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317411587
  • Aron, J. (2000). Growth and institutions: A review of the evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(1), 99–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.1.99
  • Atkin, D., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2020). How distortions alter the impacts of international trade in developing countries. Annual Review of Economics, 12(1), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-041554
  • Baccini, L., Impullitti, G., & Malesky, E. J. (2019). Globalization and state capitalism: Assessing Vietnam’s accession to the WTO. Journal of International Economics, 119, 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.02.004
  • Bai, J., Jayachandran, S., Malesky, E. J., & Olken, B. A. (2019). Firm growth and corruption: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. The Economic Journal, 129(618), 651–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12560
  • Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Martin, P., Ottaviano, G., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2003). Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press.
  • Baldwin, R. E., & Okubo, T. (2006). Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: Spatial selection and sorting. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi020
  • Bas, M., & Berthou, A. (2012). The decision to import capital goods in India: Firms’ financial factors matter. The World Bank Economic Review, 26(3), 486–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhs002
  • Bas, M., & Ledezma, I. (2010). Trade integration and within-plant productivity evolution in Chile. Review of World Economics, 146(1), 113–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-009-0041-2
  • Bas, M., & Strauss-Kahn, V. (2014). Does importing more inputs raise exports? Firm-level evidence from France. Review of World Economics, 150(2), 241–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-013-0175-0
  • Bas, M., & Strauss-Kahn, V. (2015). Input-trade liberalization, export prices and quality upgrading. Journal of International Economics, 95(2), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.005
  • Benhabib, J., & Spiegel, M. (2005). Human capital and technology diffusion. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (vol. 1, pp. 935–966). Elsevier.
  • Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003). Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1268–1290. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803769206296
  • Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (2004). Why some firms export. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323031111
  • Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2012). The empirics of firm heterogeneity and international trade. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), 283–313. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110928
  • Bernard, A. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2011). Multiproduct firms and trade liberalization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), 1271–1318. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr021
  • Berry, C. R., & Glaeser, E. L. (2005). The divergence of human capital levels across cities. Papers in Regional Science, 84(3), 407–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2005.00047.x
  • Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2010). Property rights and economic development. In D. Rodrik & M. Rosenzweig (Eds.), Handbooks in economics (pp. 4525–4595). Elsevier.
  • Bloom, N., Manova, K., Van Reenen, J., Sun, S. T., & Yu, Z. (2021). Trade and management. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 103(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00925
  • Bonfiglioli, A., Crinò, R., & Gancia, G. (2018). Betting on exports: Trade and endogenous heterogeneity. The Economic Journal, 128(609), 612–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12408
  • Brandt, L., van Biesebroeck, J., Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017). WTO accession and performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2784–2820. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20121266
  • Chakraborty, P. (2016). Judicial quality and regional firm performance: The case of Indian states. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44(4), 902–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.07.001
  • Chanda, A., & Dalgaard, C.-J. (2008). Dual economies and international total factor productivity differences: Channeling the impact from institutions, trade, and geography. Economica, 75(300), 629–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00673.x
  • Choi, J. J., Jiang, C., & Shenkar, O. (2015). The quality of local government and firm performance: The case of China’s provinces. Management and Organization Review, 11(4), 679–710. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2015.46
  • Cincera, M., & Galgau, O. (2005). Impact of market entry and exit on EU productivity and growth performance (Research Paper No. 222). Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission.
  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Dau, L. A. (2009). Structural reform and firm exports. Management International Review, 49(4), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-009-0005-8
  • Damijan, J. P., Konings, J., & Polanec, S. (2014). Import churning and export performance of multi-product firms. The World Economy, 37(11), 1483–1506. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12196
  • De Groot, H. L. F., Linders, G., Rietveld, P., & Subramanian, U. (2004). The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Kyklos, 57(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00245.x
  • De Loecker, J. (2007). Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics, 73(1), 69–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.03.003
  • De Loecker, J. (2011). Product differentiation, multiproduct firms, and estimating the impact of trade liberalization on productivity. Econometrica, 79(5), 1407–1451. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7617
  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Courts. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 453–517. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303321675437
  • Djankov, S., Porta, R. L., de Silanes, F. L., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399436
  • Doan, T. T. H., & Kiyota, K. (2014). Firm-level evidence on productivity differentials and turnover in Vietnamese manufacturing. Japanese Economic Review, 65, 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jere.12032
  • Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2001). Trade in capital goods. European Economic Review, 45(7), 1195–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00103-3
  • Eicher, T., Garcia-Penalosa, C., & Teksoz, U. (2006). How do institutions lead some countries to produce so much more output per worker than others? In T. Eicher & C. Garcia-Penalosa (Eds.), Institutions, development and economic growth (pp. 65–80). MIT Press.
  • Ericson, R., & Pakes, A. (1995). Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. The Review of Economic Studies, 62(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297841
  • Ethier, W. J. (1982). National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade. American Economic Review, 72, 389–405. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1831539
  • Fritsch, M., & Storey, D. J. (2014). Entrepreneurship in a regional context: Historical roots, recent developments and future challenges. Regional Studies, 48(6), 939–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.892574
  • Gabe, T. M. (2009). Knowledge and earnings. Journal of Regional Science, 49(3), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00603.x
  • Ganau, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2019). Do high-quality local institutions shape labour productivity in western European manufacturing firms? Papers in Regional Science, 98, 1633–1666. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12435
  • Garicano, L., Lelarge, C., & van Reenen, J. (2016). Firm size distortions and the productivity distribution: Evidence from France. American Economic Review, 106(11), 3439–3479. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130232
  • Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., Pavcnik, N., & Topalova, P. (2010). Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4), 1727–1767. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1727
  • Grazzi, M. (2012). Export and firm performance: Evidence on productivity and profitability of Italian companies. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 12(4), 413–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-011-0102-9
  • Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press.
  • Guariglia, A., Liu, X., & Song, L. (2011). Internal finance and growth: Microeconometric evidence on Chinese firms. Journal of Development Economics, 96(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.07.003
  • Halpern, L., Koren, M., & Szeidl, A. (2015). Imported inputs and productivity. American Economic Review, 105(12), 3660–3703. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150443
  • Hanousek, J., & Kochanova, A. (2016). Bribery environments and firm performance: Evidence from CEE countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 43, 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.02.002
  • Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1990). Capital structure and the informational role of debt. The Journal of Finance, 45(2), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb03693.x
  • Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. R. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. MIT Press.
  • Huang, C. H., & Yang, C. H. (2016). Ownership, trade, and productivity in Vietnam’s manufacturing firms. Asia–Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 23(3), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2016.1188449
  • International Trade Centre (ITC). (2016). Navigating non-tariff measures: Insights from a business survey in the European union. ITC & European Commission.
  • Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the revolution of industry. Econometrica, 50(3), 649–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912606
  • Kasahara, H., & Lapham, B. (2013). Productivity and the decision to import and export: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics, 89(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.08.005
  • Kasahara, H., & Rodrigue, J. (2008). Does the use of imported intermediates increase productivity? Plant-level evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.12.008
  • Kugler, M., & Verhoogen, E. (2012). Prices, plant size, and product quality. The Review of Economic Studies, 79(1), 307–339. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdr021
  • Lasagni, A., Nifo, A., & Vecchione, G. (2015). Firm productivity and institutional quality: Evidence from Italian industry. Journal of Regional Science, 55(5), 774–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12203
  • Le, M. D., Pieri, F., & Zaninotto, E. (2019). From central planning towards a market economy: The role of ownership and competition in Vietnamese firms’ productivity. Journal of Comparative Economics, 47(3), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2019.04.002
  • Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00246
  • Li-Puma, J. A., Newbert, S. L., & Doh, J. P. (2013). The effect of institutional quality on firm export performance in emerging economies: A contingency model of firm age and size. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 817–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9395-7
  • Lu, J., Xu, B., & Liu, X. (2009). The effects of corporate governance and institutional environments on export behaviour in emerging economies. Management International Review, 49(4), 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-009-0004-9
  • Makino, S., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2011). Historical ties and foreign direct investment: An exploratory study. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(4), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.53
  • Malesky, E., McCulloch, N., & Nguyen, D. N. (2015). The impact of governance and transparency on firm investment in Vietnam. Economics of Transition, 23(4), 677–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12068
  • Malesky, E. J. (2004). Entrepreneurs on the periphery: A study of private sector development beyond the high performing cities and provinces of Vietnam. World Bank & International Finance Corporation.
  • Markusen, J. R. (1989). Trade in producer services and in other specialized intermediate inputs. American Economic Review, 79, 85–95. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1804775
  • Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
  • Mukherjee, S. (2016). Financial leverage and total factor productivity growth: Firm-level evidence from India. In The 12th Annual Conference on Economic Growth and Development, 19-21 December 2016, Indian Statistical Institute. https://www.isid.ac.in/epu/acegd2016/papers/ShahanaMukherjee.pdf
  • Muûls, M., & Pisu, M. (2009). Imports and exports at the level of the firm: Evidence from Belgium. World Economy, 32(5), 692–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01172.x
  • Navas, A., Serti, F., & Tomasi, C. (2020). The role of the gravity forces on firms’ trade. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’économique, 53(3), 1059–1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12467
  • Newman, C., Rand, J., Tarp, F., & Nguyen, T. T. A. (2017). Exporting and productivity: Learning from Vietnam. Journal of African Economies, 26(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejw021
  • Nguyen, D. B. (2019). Entrepreneurial reinvestment: Local governance, ownership, and financing matter—Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(sup2), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12475
  • Nguyen, D. B. (2021). Regional informal institutions, local governance and gendered entrepreneurship. Regional Studies, 55(7), 1169–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1889489
  • Nguyen, D. B., Mickiewicz, T., & Du, J. (2018). Local governance and business performance in Vietnam: The transaction costs’ perspective. Regional Studies, 52(4), 542–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1341625
  • Nguyen, Q. H. (2017). Business reforms and total factor productivity in Vietnamese manufacturing. Journal of Asian Economics, 51, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.06.003
  • Nicoletti, G., Scarpetta, S., & Lane, P. R. (2003). Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence. Economic Policy, 18(36), 9–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00102
  • Nifo, A., & Vecchione, G. (2014). Do institutions play a role in skilled migration? The case of Italy. Regional Studies, 48(10), 1628–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.835799
  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
  • Nunn, N., & Trefler, D. (2014). Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantage. In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of international economics (vol. 4, pp. 263–315). Elsevier.
  • Okubo, T., Picard, P. M., & Thisse, J.-F. (2010). The spatial selection of heterogeneous firms. Journal of International Economics, 82(2), 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.07.003
  • Okubo, T., & Tomiura, E. (2012). Industrial relocation policy, productivity and heterogeneous plants: Evidence from Japan. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(1–2), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.09.004
  • Pavcnik, N. (2002). Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: Evidence from Chilean plants. The Review of Economic Studies, 69(1), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00205
  • Ramstetter, E. D., & Phan, M. N. (2013). Productivity, ownership, and producer concentration in transition: Further evidence from Vietnamese manufacturing. Journal of Asian Economics, 25, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2012.12.001
  • Rivera-Batiz, L. A., & Romer, P. M. (1991). Economic integration and endogenous growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937946
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A., & di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 673–706. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu023
  • Santarelli, E., & Tran, T. H. (2012). Growth of incumbent firms and entrepreneurship in Vietnam. Growth and Change, 43(4), 638–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2012.00601.x
  • Schor, A. (2004). Heterogeneous productivity response to tariff reduction: Evidence from Brazilian manufacturing firms. Journal of Development Economics, 75(2), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.06.003
  • Smeets, V., & Warzynski, F. (2013). Estimating productivity with multi-product firms, pricing heterogeneity and the role of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 90(2), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.01.003
  • Sobel, R. S. (2008). Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.004
  • Sobel, R. S. (2015). Economic freedom and entrepreneurship. In D. J. Boudreaux (Ed.), What America’s decline in economic freedom means for entrepreneurship and prosperity (pp. 37–66). The Fraser Institute.
  • Syverson, C. (2011). What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326–365. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.2.326
  • Topalova, P., & Khandelwal, A. (2011). Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 995–1009. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00095
  • Tran, T. B., Grafton, R. Q., & Kompas, T. (2009). Institutions matter: The case of Vietnam. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.05.012
  • Tran, T. H. (2019). Institutional quality and market selection in the transition to market economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 105890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.07.001
  • Vogel, A., & Wagner, J. (2010). Higher productivity in importing German manufacturing firms: Self-selection, learning from importing, or both? Review of World Economics, 145(4), 641–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-009-0031-4
  • Wei, W., & Tang, J. (2019). Ownership transformation, firm performance and manufacturing growth in China. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 27(2), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12190
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters, 104(3), 112–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.04.026

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.