System-level agency and its many shades: path development in a multidimensional innovation system

REFERENCES

• Asheim, B., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bækkelund, N. G. (2021). Change agency and reproductive agency in the course of industrial path evolution. Regional Studies, 55(4), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1893291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2019). Place-based policy and politics. Renewal, 27, 84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2003). Toward a relational economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.2.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2014). Institutional change in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513507823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S. (2022). The role of powerful incumbent firms: Shaping regional industrial path development through change and maintenance agency. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 9, 390–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2022.2081597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2021). Towards a stage model of regional industrial path transformation. Industry and Innovation, 28(2), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1789452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2019). Smart specialization and institutional context: The role of institutional discovery, change and leapfrogging. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1791–1810. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1643826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2020). Mitigating human agency in regional development: The behavioural side of policy processes. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 7, 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1760732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2022a). A tale of sky and desert: Translation and imaginaries in transnational windows of institutional opportunity. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 128, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2022b). Retheorizing industrial–institutional coevolution: A multidimensional perspective. Regional Studies, 56(9), 1524–1537. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1949441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2022c). Revisiting path-as-process: Agency in a discontinuity-development model. European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2061309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Jacobson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., & Gong, H. (2022). Legitimation dynamics in industrial path development: New-to-the-world versus new-to-the-region industries. Regional Studies, 56(4), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global innovation systems – A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46(7), 1284–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The ‘macro’ and the ‘micro’ of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., & Květoň, V. (2022). Towards an integrated framework of agency in regional development: The case of old industrial regions. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2054976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., Květoň, V., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., & Trippl, M. (2020). The dark side of regional industrial path development: Towards a typology of trajectories of decline. European Planning Studies, 28(8), 1455–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1685466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness and regional branching. In H. Bathelt, M. Feldman, & D. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory: Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion, and innovation (pp. 64–81). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bosma, N., Hessels, J., Schutjens, V., Van Praag, M., & Verheul, I. (2012). Entrepreneurship and role models. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(2), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 130–156). Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Breul, M., Hulke, C., & Kalvelage, L. (2021). Path formation and reformation: Studying the variegated consequences of path creation for regional development. Economic Geography, 97(3), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2021.1922277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breul, M., & Pruß, F. (2022). Applying evolutionary economic geography beyond case studies in the global north: Regional diversification in Vietnam. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 43(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., & Vale, M. (2018). Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, N. M., & Jordhus-Lier, D. C. (2011). Constrained agency? Re-evaluating the geographies of labour. Progress in Human Geography, 35(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510366746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4–5), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–21). Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, J., & Döringer, S. (2022). The limits of change agency: Establishing a peripheral university campus in East Tyrol. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 37(4), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942221122100
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., & James, A. D. (2015). Understanding the emergence of new science and technology policies: Policy entrepreneurship, agenda setting and the development of the European framework programme. Research Policy, 44(6), 1252–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation approaches – Their emergence and characteristics. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 1–35). Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2006). Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, & D. C. Mowery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, F., Wentland, A., & Pfotenhauer, S. M. (2019). Testing future societies? Developing a framework for test beds and living labs as instruments of innovation governance. Research Policy, 48(9), 103826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fai, F., Tomlinson, P. R., & Branston, J. R. (2022). Actors, knowledge and path transformations in a declining cluster. European Urban and Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764221105765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangenheim, A. (2022). Regional preconditions to shape interpath relations across regions: Two cases from the Austrian food sector. European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2053661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangenheim, A., Trippl, M., & Chlebna, C. (2020). Beyond the single path view: Interpath dynamics in regional contexts. Economic Geography, 96(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2019.1685378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2016). The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems – An analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 103, 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2001). Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In R. Garud, & P. Karnøe (Eds.), Path dependence and creation (pp. 1–38). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010). Path dependency or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 760–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giustolisi, A., Benner, M., & Trippl, M. (2022). Smart specialisation strategies: Towards an outward-looking approach. European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2068950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, H., Binz, C., Hassink, R., & Trippl, M. (2022). Emerging industries: Institutions, legitimacy and system-level agency. Regional Studies, 56(4), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2033199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, H., & Hassink, R. (2019). Co-evolution in contemporary economic geography: Towards a theoretical framework. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1344–1355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1494824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., Isaksen, A., & Nielsen, H. (2022a). Advancing the treatment of human agency in the analysis of regional economic development: Illustrated with three Norwegian cases. Growth and Change, 53(1), 248–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., & Nielsen, H. (2022b). Temporality of agency in regional development. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211028884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., & Trippl, M. (2018). Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Rekers, J. V., & Sotarauta, M. (2021). Investigating agency: Methodological and empirical challenges. In M. Sotarauta, & A. Beer (Eds.), Handbook on city and regional leadership (pp. 302–323). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Sotarauta, M., Asheim, B,  … , & Stihl, L. (2022c). Agency and economic change in regions: Identifying routes to new path development using qualitative comparative analysis. Regional Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2053095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, C., & Benner, M. (2021). Situating innovation policy in Mediterranean Arab countries: A research agenda for context sensitivity. Research Policy, 50(7), 104273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall, & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, S. (1994). Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/202035
   Google Scholar
• Heiberg, J., Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2020). The geography of technology legitimation: How multiscalar institutional dynamics matter for path creation in emerging industries. Economic Geography, 96(5), 470–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1842189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, N. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, D. (2020). Institutional work in the maintenance of regional innovation policy instruments: Evidence from Wales. Regional Studies, 54(3), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1634251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindess, B. (1986). Actors and social relations. In M. L. Wardell, & S. P. Turner (Eds.), Sociological theory in transition (pp. 133–126). Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2019). The behavioural foundations of urban and regional development: Culture, psychology and agency. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(1), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Jakobsen, S. E. (2017). New path development between innovation systems and individual actors. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1268570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S., Njøs, R., & Normann, R. (2019). Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., Grillitsch, M., & Hansen, T. (2020). Agency and actors in regional industrial path development. A framework and longitudinal analysis. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 111, 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukk, P., Moors, E. H. M., & Hekkert, M. P. (2016). Institutional power play in innovation systems: The case of Herceptin®. Research Policy, 45(8), 1558–1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurikka, H., & Grillitsch, M. (2021). Resilience in the periphery: What an agency perspective can bring to the table. In R. Wink (Ed.), Economic resilience in regions and organisations (pp. 147–171). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kurikka, H., Kolehmainen, J., Sotarauta, M., Nielsen, H., & Nilsson, M. (2022). Regional opportunity spaces – Observations from Nordic regions. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2107630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), SAGE handbook of organization studies. 2nd edition (pp. 215–254). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–27). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. Ǻ. (1992). Introduction. In B. Ǻ. Lundvall (Ed.), National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp. 1–19). Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography, 95(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Actor-oriented analysis of innovation systems: Exploring micro–meso level linkages in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(4), 443–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802141429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2010). Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2007). Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 573–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele, A. (2013). Agency. In B. Kaldis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy and the social sciences (pp. 11–14). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J. (2022). Contextualizing agency in new path development: How system selectivity shapes regional reconfiguration capacity. Regional Studies, 56(4), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1854713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2019). Embracing the future: Path transformation and system reconfiguration for self-driving cars in west Sweden. European Planning Studies, 27(11), 2144–2162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1652570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiolik, J., Markard, J., Hekkert, M., & Furrer, B. (2020). Creating innovation systems: How resource constellations affect the strategies of system builders. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 153, 119209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 3–21). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T., & Njøs, R. (2022). Greening of regional industrial paths and the role of sectoral characteristics: A study of the maritime and petroleum sectors in an Arctic region. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211038412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R., Sjøtun, S. G., Jakobsen, S. E., & Fløysand, A. (2020). Expanding analyses of path creation: Interconnections between territory and technology. Economic Geography, 96(3), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1756768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, D. F., York, J. G., Dean, T. J., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: A tale of two theories. Journal of Management, 36(4), 974–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309360280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiner, C., & Benner, M. (2022). Cooperation bias in regional policy: Is competition neglected? Annals of Regional Science, 69(1), 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-022-01114-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekers, J. V., & Stihl, L. (2021). One crisis, one region, two municipalities: The geography of institutions and change agency in regional development paths. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 124, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. K. R., & Mazzucato, M. (2019). The evolution of mission-oriented policies: Exploring changing market creating policies in the US and European space sector. Research Policy, 48(4), 936–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rypestøl, J. O., Isaksen, A., Eriksen, E. L., Iakovleva, T., Sjøtun, S. G., & Njøs, R. (2021). Cluster development and regional industrial restructuring: Agency and asset modification. European Planning Studies, 29(12), 2320–2339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1937951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. L., & Sabel, C. (2008). Venture capital in the ‘periphery’: the new argonauts, global search, and local institution building. Economic Geography, 84(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.00001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz, E. (2009). Ethnographic immersion and the study of politics. In E. Schatz (Ed.), Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of politics (pp. 1–22). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, S., & Henn, S. (2018). The evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems and the critical role of migrants. A phase-model based on a study of IT startups in the greater Tel Aviv area. Cambridge journal of regions. Economy and Society, 11, 317–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/259271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2018). Smart specialization and place leadership: Dreaming about shared visions, falling into policy traps? Regional Studies, Regional Science, 5, 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1480902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Beer, A. (2021). Introduction to city and regional leadership. In M. Sotarauta, & A. Beer (Eds.), Handbook on city and regional leadership (pp. 2–18). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., Suvinen, N., Jolly, S., & Hansen, T. (2021). The many roles of change agency in the game of green path development in the north. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(2), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420944995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. (2016). Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1605–1622. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., & Hansen, G. H. (2018). Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography, 94(2), 188–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., Trippl, M., & Desch, V. (2022). New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges. European Planning Studies, 30(11), 2139–2156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1951177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2020). Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 111, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2018). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517700982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2022). Going beyond the line of sight: Institutional entrepreneurship and system agency in regional path creation. Regional Studies, 56(4), 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1980522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnke, P., Koschatzky, K., Dönitz, E., Zenker, A., Stahlecker, T., Som, O., Cuhls, K., & Güth, S. (2016). Opening up the innovation system framework towards new actors and institutions. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, 49, 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Plechero, M. (2017). Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography, 93(4), 325–345. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar